Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. You Have Been Warned

You Have Been Warned

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
322 Posts 25 Posters 10.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #180

    Peace Samia

    Just to let you know that "Khashia" has nothing to do with "Ikhtasha", it is just a case of similar letters and I know this confuses many new Arabic commers, what you should know that the word "Ikhtasha", is the "Masddar" "The root" itself and it is one of those 5 letters roots, like "Igtmaa", "Iktafa", "Izdahara

    The Alif and Ta in Ikhtasha CAN NOT BE DROPPED to determine the "Masddar"

    Peace Ahmed
    Just to let you know that ikhtasha and khashia are two verbs derived form one root. iktasha is a verb of the pattern "ifta3a" known as form 8, khashia is form 1. It is definitely not a masddar.
    Also, a 5-letters-root does not exist. All the examples you gave are for verbs of the pattern (, jama3a, kafa, zahara being their (form 1) verbs.

    I think sister you need Anwar for that one

    I can assure you that 4 and 5 root Masdar exist, it is called Kalimat Jamida

    But i will leave it at this until Anwar tell us what he thinks regarding the 5 letters root

    Salam

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      jonny_k
      wrote on last edited by
      #181

      Peace bro "AB",

      JK- I know GOD always warns before giving punishment. But the qs i asked is why does GOD make mention of hell and it's features at all? He could have just said that those who disbelieved would face severe punishment. Now you get my point? GOD Bless!

      Peace bro

      come on bro, i don't expect these sort of questions from a believer, however here is my answer mate

      He described the hell in details to us because He chose to do so

      Salam

      JK- Bro i believe to everything GOD has a reason. Theres nothing just in vain. GOD even says this in the Quran that nothing did He create in vain. Everything has to have a reason and one of the more reasobale reasons i see for the punishment of hell is also to motivate people. Ofcourse the reward also plays a very significant part in this. The BOTH DO. GOD Bless!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #182

        Peace bro "AB",

        Peace mate

        JK- Bro i believe to everything GOD has a reason.

        Of course, but let me ask you these two questions

        1. Do you believe that He told us all His reasons regarding all His plans?
        2. Do you believe that He SHOULD tell us all His reasons regarding all His plans?

        Theres nothing just in vain.

        Of course again, no believer will say this about Allah creation

        GOD even says this in the Quran that nothing did He create in vain.

        That is why believers will stand firm to that statement, because it was said by Him.

        Everything has to have a reason and one of the more reasobale reasons i see for the punishment of hell is also to motivate people.

        that is what you see bro however you are confusing the common sense in here

        FEAR DOES NOT MOTIVATE, it actually does the opposite however the task required will be done by force

        It would have been easy on Allah to create us without freewill and we just worship Him day and night like all others creatures "sun, earth, etc etc..), would you have prefered that life bro?, no reward no punishment?

        Now instead of that, He created a new law, that law is simply, He ecreated us ONLY to worship Him but we will have a freewill to make our decisions, then He told us that anyone who will meet Him kafir, will be doomed regardless of the deeds. this is no motivation whatsoever this is a law as a result of a given freewill.

        Now, He motivated us regarding all other sins, and He said He may forgive them all if you are not a kafir, see how there is a reward in here?, He told us if you repenet from the bad deeds and do not insist on it then it will be replaced with good deeds, again, can you see the motivation in here? there is a reward of course, and for the good deeds, He told us the reward for it will be multiplied if we are believers, again a reward and a motivation

        With Hell bro, there is no reward, if you are a kafir, you will be doomed, THIS IS A THREAT NOT A MOTIVATION

        Again people need to escape that satanic feel good religion attitude because it does not work with Islam

        Ofcourse the reward also plays a very significant part in this. The BOTH DO. GOD Bless!

        I believe only the rewards like Allah forgivness and His paradise will play all the part in motivation

        Salam

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          noble
          wrote on last edited by
          #183

          Peace Bro Ahmed.
          I am impressed by your memory of all the occurences of the word Yakhsha.
          I believe the meaning depends on the context. Do not forget there are other words for fear in other languages too, how about "being scared", or "being anxious", "terrorised"..., and each produce a different shade of meaning
          Again Allah never used Khawf Allah.
          In some examples you cited, khashiata means giving more importance to, giving more importance to a creature or a thing than to Allah.
          By the way I do not really care about translations of Quran. I agree Kashia includes fear, but not always. In the case of Khashiati Allah in Arabic, for me it means not only fear, also giving importance to and showing respect.
          The Quran also warns us from taking things out of their context....

          And as always Allah knows best

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #184

            Peace Bro Ahmed.
            I am impressed by your memory of all the occurences of the word Yakhsha.
            I believe the meaning depends on the context. Do not forget there are other words for fear in other languages too, how about "being scared", or "being anxious", "terrorised"..., and each produce a different shade of meaning
            Again Allah never used Khawf Allah.
            In some examples you cited, khashiata means giving more importance to, giving more importance to a creature or a thing than to Allah.
            By the way I do not really care about translations of Quran. I agree Kashia includes fear, but not always. In the case of Khashiati Allah in Arabic, for me it means not only fear, also giving importance to and showing respect.
            The Quran also warns us from taking things out of their context....

            And as always Allah knows best

            Thank you bro

            I hope you concede after reading the following verse that The Quran said we should "Nakhaf Allah"

            And remember your Lord within yourself humbly and fearing and in a voice not loud in the morning and the evening and be not of the heedless ones.

            (205)

            -> See bro , "And remember your Lord within yourself humbly and fearing "

            So fearing Allah was an order using the word "Khafa"

            Salam

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              noble
              wrote on last edited by
              #185

              Peace Bro
              Thank you
              That settles our little dispute
              Best Salam
              Noble

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                noble
                wrote on last edited by
                #186

                Peace
                Again Bro Ahmed
                And Allah was right to say that we humans are the most argumentative creatures, certainly I am... ;D
                Salam

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #187

                  Peace
                  Again Bro Ahmed
                  And Allah was right to say that we humans are the most argumentative creatures, certainly I am... ;D
                  Salam

                  Peace bro

                  I was one as well bro, but I'm glad I manged to take my ego away and leave it to Allah words to explaint itself

                  people think I'm argumantative, but the fact of the matter is verse 1736 say "Don't argue if you lack knowledge" and that is exactly what I try hard to do, the message of 1736 is very positive indeed because it allows you to argue if you have the knowledge

                  Take care bro

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    noble
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #188

                    Peace Bro Ahmed
                    I love arguing, but I do not have the energy to keep it up even when I am correct...
                    You too take care...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #189

                      Peace Bro Ahmed
                      I love arguing, but I do not have the energy to keep it up even when I am correct...
                      You too take care...

                      Peace bro

                      Did you notice that "Khifa" was on the same wazn as "Khashia"?

                      cheers

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        noble
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #190

                        Peace
                        Bro Ahmed
                        Yes it has the same emphasis. However the injunction or order was for the Prophet. I know Allah said He was the ultimate example for us, but I believe that it is very hard for the average believer to have the same faith as the Prophet himself...
                        Also are there other occurences of the word Khifa that is linked directly as an order to the Muslims, not the Prophet in isolation...
                        I told you I love arguing, but will probably not keep it up with you )
                        Salam

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jonny_k
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #191

                          Peace bro "AB",

                          With Hell bro, there is no reward, if you are a kafir, you will be doomed, THIS IS A THREAT NOT A MOTIVATION

                          JK- I get a feeling that you might be thinking that i deny it being a threat. If thts the case then know tht i dont. I considered it BOTH a threat and a motivation. GOD Bless!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Offline
                            N Offline
                            noble
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #192

                            Peace
                            This is becoming a philosophy thread lol

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              noble
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #193

                              Brother Ahmed
                              Please tell me what you think of the content in this link (a discussion about the Uncreatedness of the Quran)
                              http//www.livingislam.org/uncrq_e.html

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                arnoldyasin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #194

                                Peace AB

                                This is what I see as a proper translation to 74/30-31 by Piktchal

                                "Over it Nineteen

                                AND We have not made/appointed/set the wardens of the fire others than angels; and We have NOT made/appointed/set their number BUT a fitna for those who disbelieve(d); that those who have been given the book may attain certainty AND those who believe may increase in faith; AND those who have been given the book and the believers may not doubt, and that those in whose hearts is a disease and the unbelievers may say What does Allah mean by this mathal? Thus does Allah make err whom He pleases, and He guides whom He pleases, and none knows the hosts of your Lord but He Himself; and this is naught but a reminder to the mortals."

                                Fitna also means 'to research the purity of gold' and also 'to throw it in the fire to purify it from unpurities'. And 'malikah' i wouldn't translate as 'angels' but as 'ones in control' which is a closer translation of 'malikah', angel is a given title, not a translation, so here for me it refers to the Laws which are in control of the purity of the Quran. And kafr i would translate as someone who buries the truth for his 'self'.

                                "And We have not made/appointed/set the wardens of the fire others than the Laws that control ; and We have not made/appointed/set their number but 1) a purifying act (fitna) for those who bury the truth for themselves(kafr); 2)that those who have been given the book may attain certainty and 3)those who believe may increase in faith; and 4)those who have been given the book and the believers may not doubt, and 5)that those in whose hearts is a disease and the ones who bury the truth for themselves may say What does Allah mean by this mathal? Thus does Allah make err whom He wills, and He guides whom He wills, and none knows the forces of your Sustainer but He Himself; and this is naught but a reminder to the mortals."

                                For me, the fire doesn't refer only to something in the Next Life. Fire refers to something that consumes and doesn't feed you. Like an illusion only consumes as you cannot base it on reality, so you have to feed yourself to keep it alive, instead of it feeding you and keeping you alive.

                                For example Idolatry is called an illusion in 3130, and in 2257 it is said that people who commit idolatry are in the fire.

                                1. That is so for God is the Reality(Haq), and what they invoke other than Him is illusion. Indeed God is all-high and supreme.

                                2. God is the friend of those who believe, and leads them out of darkness into light; but the patrons of the ones who bury the truth for themselves(kafaruu) is everything that is served next to God/idols(taghhout) who lead them from light into darkness. They are the residents of Fire, and will abide therein.

                                So the 'wardens of the fire are the Laws(ones in control=malikah)' refers to the borders between truth and falsehood, between reality and illusion. Between a true verse or word and even letter of the Quran and a fake one.

                                Peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #195

                                  The 'battle-ground' as you put it was started for a very simple reason You take every opportunity to malign or belittle AQ. And you know what? I will continue to question every thing you say so that not a single one of your defecations go unquestioned. Lets hope rule 2 makes a comeback.

                                  Your admittance to politicise this forum and to create a battle ground will not work, no matter how hard you try, with or without me, because you are not the Al-Qaeda style member-made deity nor the prophet of this forum, where people will simply succumb and submit to your hostilities. Take that stance somewhere else or keep it confined to your home.

                                  You can give my criticisms whatever names you like, such as defecations, urinations and quran-bashings, that too won't work, simply because you yourself do exactly that, i.e. the practice of analyzing, classifying, interpreting, or evaluating the literacy of Quranic injunctions, a deplorable state of confusion to "defecate/urinate (criticise)" on just about every word, verse and/or paragraph in the Quran in the broader sense of dicussions, including your mocking and mimicking of your "Allah".

                                  DanishYour question 1, deviates from subject matter, which is "fearing Allah" as claimed? If you need definitions of words, then check dictionaries.

                                  Lol. How am I deviating from the subject matter. You said 'DanishFearing an "Allah" is historically correct but realistically, scientifically and logically incorrect.'

                                  So the subject matter is still 'fear of allah' and why its 'realistically and logically' incorrect.

                                  The dictionaries do not contain a usage which agrees with your comments.Now kindly tell me what you mean

                                  mquran's 3-in-1 question 1. Why is it 'realistically' incorrect? Please define 'realistically' and your evidence that this definition is wholly objective. The definition of 'realistically' and its evidence, along with other definitions of 'historically', 'logically' and 'scientifically' can be found in dictionaries.

                                  I shall only explain what I wrote and that is "Fearing an "Allah" is historically correct but realistically, scientifically and logically incorrect." I am not here to give definitions to words you pick and choose but to explain my statement and in accordance to the following

                                  My approach towards certain verses mentioned above in relations to 7431 and others comes from analysing historical significance. It has nothing to do with "afterlife" or code-19. If I bring my thoughts into this, I'm sure I'll be bashed out by some belligerents unecessarily and become a battle ground. What say you? Do I get a green light?

                                  Moderators, I invoke rule 2. This person should be made to answer for his critique.

                                  Started crying again, eh. You can shed tears all you want all over the forum and I will respond only once you start behaving and get back into serious discussion. Here's a reminder

                                  mquranThat's all Im asking for here responsible, amicable discussion.

                                  This is not found in your ?dictionary?. Just dream on. As can be seen that this discussion itself is getting detoriated; thanks to "defecations/urinations" of mquran.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    mquran
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #196

                                    Danishmquran's 3-in-1 question 1. Why is it 'realistically' incorrect? Please define 'realistically' and your evidence that this definition is wholly objective. The definition of 'realistically' and its evidence, along with other definitions of 'historically', 'logically' and 'scientifically' can be found in dictionaries.

                                    I shall only explain what I wrote and that is "Fearing an "Allah" is historically correct but realistically, scientifically and logically incorrect."

                                    Ok, let me switch modes to 'kindergarten' and ask again

                                    Danish Fearing an Allah is REALISTICALLY, LOGICALLY, AND SCIENTIFICALLY incorrect.

                                    Mquran Why is it INCORRECT ? What constitutes 'correct' ? Please show me a 'correct' answer and by what measure this is correct ?

                                    Do you understand what 'why' means ? This means that, by the definitions in the dictionary, there's a reason that you said 'fearing an Allah is incorrect'. WHAT are those reasons?

                                    Kindly remember rule 2 please. This isn't some kuffar forum for you to play with.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #197

                                      This isn't some kuffar forum for you to play with.

                                      If it isn't a kuffar forum, then it is certainly not meant for a "prophet of doom"; a bigoted and pychopathic ayatollah (mquran) whose clone can be witnessed here http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBplylx55Zc&mode=related&search=mullah

                                      You want a battle field by such insurgencies, there you have it. Unless you stop infiltrated remarks to begin/end every discussion or criticism put forth and your kindergarten switching modes, I shall only respond to your "fair play" of beating the drums.

                                      A psychiatrist is much needed on your behalf at this time before any further discussion commences.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        phoenix1
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #198

                                        peace

                                        the above two posts are a great example of how it all starts.
                                        If you're asking a question, why not just ask the question instead of topping it with insults?
                                        and if someone asks you a question (yes you Danish), it's polite to answer it instead of throwing more insults.
                                        grow up!
                                        peace

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          mquran
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #199

                                          Phoenix, this isn't the first time I'm addressing him. Danish's tactic is pretending to delay answering on the pretext that he's busy. However, he's not too busy to answer other threads or to do continue his disparagement of AQ. I suggest you grow up and wise up to this, no offense.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users