Beating Women
-
Peace Ahmed,
Do you really think everyone here is stupid and cannot read Arabic ? The scan that I posted clearly shows that "idraba" has the same meaning as "idraba 3anha". From this it is crystal clear that "idrabuhunna" would be the same as "idrabu 3anhunna". Everyone can see how you are blatantly lying about what the scan is showing. You have exposed your deceptive tactics yourself.
Sister Boost, this is clear proof that all Ahmed cares is about his ego and not the truth. He would rather tell you lies than the truth, just so he can promote his lengthy "debates", his fallacious interpretations and his own agenda based on his desires and deception.
4523 Have you seen the one who took his ego as his god, and God led him astray, despite his knowledge, and He sealed his hearing and his heart, and He made a veil on his eyes? Who then can guide him after God? Will you not remember?
-
Peace Ahmed,
Do you really think everyone here is stupid and cannot read Arabic ?
Leave stupidity away, i didn't say that, it is you who is saying that, on the other hand yes it seems you dont know how to read arabic
The scan that I posted clearly shows that "idraba" has the same meaning as "idraba 3anha".
The scan you posted clearly exposes your ignornace
You need another word in addition to the word Idraba to get the meaning you want, that word is An, and it is separate word, that word is not Huna, look at your scan and you will see it, on the other hand I challenge you to prove me wrong however we need another fluent Arabic speaker to give the final blow to you
it seems you got mixed up between the Damir Huna and the word An, but that is your problem not a language problem
From this it is crystal clear that "idrabuhunna" would be the same as "idrabu 3anhunna".
a clear cut case of ignorance
Idrabahuna is totally different meaning to Idrab Anhuna
Idrabuhuna is two words, Idrab and Huna
Idrab Anhuna is three words, Idrab and An and Huna
your ignorance is beyond belief
just be a good a believer and cocede, this is what your lex dectionary says not me
You need another word "An" to make the word Idrab means to separate from
As I told ya bro, game is over
I challenge the whole world to prove me wrong
Everyone can see how you are blatantly lying about what the scan is showing. You have exposed your deceptive tactics yourself.
dismissed
Sister Boost, this is clear proof that all Ahmed cares is about his ego and not the truth. He would rather tell you lies than the truth, just so he can promote his lengthy "debates", his fallacious interpretations and his own agenda based on his desires and deception.
This is the last time you defame me brother, you are committing a huge sin indeed
-
Peace Ahmed,
Don't worry, you have defamed yourself. I will quote your posts here so you cannot edit your posts later and wiggle out of this.
I thank Allah brother Tanveer, you just shot yourself in the foot, this is planned by Allah to help sister Boost not to go astray
See, what you posted from the lex dictionary, clearly exposes your ignorance, sorry to tell you that, now if you are a sincere Muslim looking to learn about your religion, then I expect you to concede after knowing the following
Firstly, the image you posted was saved to my web site as a compelling evidence against you and will be used from now on against those who promote this flaw
Look again Tanveer and you will see that the dictionary NEVER LISTED the word ?IDRABUHUNA? which should look like this in Arabic? ?, that is 2 wordsIdraba & Huna, ? ? & ? ?
On the other hand your dictionary lists something else ?IDRAB ANHUNA?, i.e. in Arabic ? ?, i.e. ?Stay away from them?. see bro that is three words Idraba, An, & Huna, ? ?, ? ? & ? ?
What you totally missed the word An ? ?, and that is needed to make the meaning separate FROM, i.e. An = From, please look in your dictionary again
Please bro I have no time to waste on this subject any more
Game is over
Salam
Leave stupidity away, i didn't say that, it is you who is saying that, on the other hand yes it seems you dont know how to read arabic
The scan you posted clearly exposes your ignornace
You need another word in addition to the word Idraba to get the meaning you want, that word is An, and it is separate word, that word is not Huna, look at your scan and you will see it, on the other hand I challenge you to prove me wrong however we need another fluent Arabic speaker to give the final blow to you
it seems you got mixed up between the Damir Huna and the word An, but that is your problem not a language problem
a clear cut case of ignorance
Idrabahuna is totally different meaning to Idrab Anhuna
Idrabuhuna is two words, Idrab and Huna
Idrab Anhuna is three words, Idrab and An and Huna
your ignorance is beyond belief
just be a good a believer and cocede, this is what your lex dectionary says not me
You need another word "An" to make the word Idrab means to separate from
As I told ya bro, game is over
I challenge the whole world to prove me wrong
dismissed
This is the last time you defame me brother, you are committing a huge sin indeed
and this was my post containing the scan
Peace sis Boost,
There is no confusion, insha Allah.
Following is the scan from Lane Lexicon showing that BOTH "idraba" and "idraba 3anha" can mean the same, i.e. turned away from, avoided, shunned, left it
http//i82.photobucket.com/albums/j265/tanveermd/Idraba.jpg
Please see where it says "as also idraba idraba 3anha". This clearly shows that it is POSSIBLE for "idraba" to have the meaning of "turned away from, avoided, shunned, left it".
God tells us in al-qur'aan to follow the best meaning, and it is very easy to see what the best meaning of "idriboohunna" is according to the context of 434 and 4128, out of the various possible meanings.
3918 The ones who listen to what is being said, and then follow the best of it. These are the ones whom God has guided, and these are the ones who possess intelligence.
3955 And follow the best of what has been sent down to you from your Lord, before the retribution comes to you suddenly when you least expect it.
Peace
Now everyone can see how you defamed yourself !!
-
Yeh you right, LOL
I'm putting this on my web site right now so the world see how I defamed myself
this is my last comment to you regarding any subject
Salam
-
Peace all,
Everyone can see how Ahmed deceptively did not tell others that the scan clearly shows "as also idraba idraba 3anha" showing that BOTH have the same meaning.
-
Hello All
The scan is talking about totally something else, it is talking about the word Idrab along with another word with it to mean Separate FROM, that word is An
do I need to say more?
it is in the bloody scan, all the Arabic examples in the scan have the word An and that is not Huna
as I said I challenge anyone but Tanveer to prove me wrong
Salam
-
Peace all,
I am going to save this post too, so Ahmed cannot wiggle out of it later on by editing it. Keep digging your own hole !!
Hello All
The scan is talking about totally something else, it is talking about the word Idrab along with another word with it to mean Separate FROM, that word is An
do I need to say more?
it is in the bloody scan, all the Arabic examples in the scan have the word An and that is not Huna
as I said I challenge anyone but Tanveer to prove me wrong
Salam
-
Hello All
Allah has given us a clear example in the Quran regarding the use of the word Idrab along with the word An to mean ?To turn away?, let?s have a look
Shall We then turn away the Message from you and repel (you), for that ye are a people transgressing beyond bounds?
(5)
-> See, ? ?, ?Afanadrab Ankum?, ?Turn Away from?
I.e. we need the word ?An?, ? ? along with the word ?Daraba?, ? ? for the two words to conclusively means ?To turn away?
On the other hand if you drop the word ?An?, ? ? then play with the meaning of the word Daraba on its own, is nothing but a clear cut case of following conjectures and the following verse maybe triggered then
Wert thou to follow the common run of those on earth, they will lead thee away from the way of Allah. They follow nothing but conjecture they do nothing but lie?
(116)
-> See, ? They follow nothing but conjecture they do nothing but lie?
My final say is this
If verse 434 to mean ?Turn away from them?, then it should not be looking like this
??, ?Wa Idrabuhuna?, ?And beat them?
Rather be looking like this
? ?, ?Wa Idrabu Anhuna?, ?And turn away from them?
I rest my case forever
Salam
-
Peace all,
As everyone can see from Lane Lexicon that "idraba" and "idraba 3anha" can have the same meaning so "idraba" can be used instead of "idraba 3anha" for the same meaning.
-
Lol
i guess one should engage in a discussion about the meaning of "khalidoun" or "forever" with ahmed. Might be interesting !
Peace all,
lkHi elke
not interested
-
Peace all
I suspect enough days have passed for our emotions and egos to settle down. I didn't intend for my questioning to lead to attacks like this... and it kind of bothers me that my questions led to ugliness like that.
Anyways, i think bro Ahmed is right. We need an outside person who can understand classical arabic to judge. I only know bro Ahmed who has that kind of knowledge - so if anyone knows of anyone else on this forum that does not have any biased opinion (hard to find i know lol) who can only explain the arabic, that would be great.
But if we can't i think we can still do it on our own using bro Tanveer's uploaded definition. To me, and i may be wrong, it seems like the definition is saying edrab or edrab 3anhunna = separate from. But i don't understand all the abreviations and initials in between and the symbols and such so i may be off. It could be referring to present OR past form of daraba + 3anhunna = separate from.
It's interesting to note that traditional interpretation also uses daraba = to hit. Now i know many of you will say "yes because they have an agenda to stay in control and power struggles and bla bla bla". True, but just follow my logic to the end... If that were the case, why would they cite a hadith stating that the beating is just symbolic of saying "i'm not happy with you these days" and you only use a toothbrush to do that. To me, it seems as though they too had an issue with the verse's meaning and tried to water it down in order to please people. That would mean they aren't trying to bank in on some sort of power struggle, and in reality, they had some heartburn with this verse and wanted to find a way around it. So if they did have heartburn with the verse, don't you think they would have investigated the meaning of the words? And had they found meanings that would be easier to swallow, don't you think they would have used them instead of making a huge circle with hadith and toothbrushes? This leads me to believe that there is one definition for that given phrase and they had issues with it so they found a hadith to make it easier for people to follow it.
That's just a side note. Has nothing to do with the definition - which i think now we all agree is the root of the issue. So we still need to either (1) find an objective person who is highly knowledgable in classical arabic, or (2) figure out what all the abreviations and initials and symbols mean in between the definition posted by bro Tanveer.
-
Hello Sister
Please don'tbet mixed up with the odd way this confusing dictionary is put down, indeed it is hard to read and you can't make a complete sentence out of it is just pure listing after each other and next to each other
now where it says that Adraba AN = Adraba, it is actually a common use in Arabic, this is also the same common use in english
let me explain what that confusing dictionary meant
the word Adraba (please note the A at the start), means to go on a strike,
for example Adraba An Al Taam, means go on a strike FROM food
Adraba An Al Amal, means go on a strike FROM work,
but you can briefly say it Adraba, i.e. go on a strike, however somewhere within the context of the sentence an explanation must be given to what exactly will be striken FROM, is it from food, or is it from work, or is from medicine etc etc, if you say someone went on a strike period, it will be very vague and meaningless, unless you say Bus drivers went on a strike and we can understand that it is a strike from work, same with teachers when they strike
now that thing called Adraba, "A strike" can not apply between a husband and wife logically, and in addition to that I explained with Arabic example that it should be "Adribu Anhuna" and not "Idrabuhuna", if you don't believe me still then this should clear it for you but please find someone who speaks arabic to tranlsate it for you and you will see clearly what i'm talking about
this is a link for the most popular Arabic dictionaries with the search result for the word Daraba, please have a look and you will see that even one dictioanry used the verse I used to explain the words Darab An
http//lexicons.ajeeb.com/idrisidic_1.asp?Sub=%d6%d1%c8
Salam
-
Peace all,
It's interesting to note that traditional interpretation also uses daraba = to hit. Now i know many of you will say "yes because they have an agenda to stay in control and power struggles and bla bla bla". True, but just follow my logic to the end... If that were the case, why would they cite a hadith stating that the beating is just symbolic of saying "i'm not happy with you these days" and you only use a toothbrush to do that. To me, it seems as though they too had an issue with the verse's meaning and tried to water it down in order to please people. That would mean they aren't trying to bank in on some sort of power struggle, and in reality, they had some heartburn with this verse and wanted to find a way around it. So if they did have heartburn with the verse, don't you think they would have investigated the meaning of the words? And had they found meanings that would be easier to swallow, don't you think they would have used them instead of making a huge circle with hadith and toothbrushes? This leads me to believe that there is one definition for that given phrase and they had issues with it so they found a hadith to make it easier for people to follow it.
This is an age-old malady of the sectarians. They first mistranslate the qur'aan and then they invent/fabricate/conjecture false "hadeeth" and falsely attribute them to the Prophet to "explain" their mistranslations. This is not the only place in al-qur'aan they have done that, but in numerous other places too. If people stop doing this, Iblis will be out of job >
As everyone can clearly see from the scan posted from Lane Lexicon that "idrab" and "idra 3anha" can have the same meaning. Please note where it says AS ALSO "IDRAB" "IDRAB 3ANHA". There is no confusion about it. The "AS ALSO" and "" make that crystal clear.
As everyone can also see that BOTH can mean "avoided, shunned, left". You don't have to put a "from" there, e.g. avoid her, shun her, leave her. Now who are we being told to avoid/shun/leave in 434 ? Its "hunna" or them. Thus "idribuhunna" and "idribu 3anhunna" will have the same meaning. Even Ahmed agrees to that
but you can briefly say it Adraba, i.e. go on a strike, however somewhere within the context of the sentence an explanation must be given to what exactly will be striken FROM, is it from food, or is it from work, or is from medicine etc etc,
Who is them ? the wives who commit nushooz. Within the context of 434, this information is clearly given. Thus everyone can see exactly who 434 is telling us to avoid, shun, leave i.e. "idribuhunna" or avoid them, shun them, leave them (the wives committing nushooz). Thus the meaning would not be "strike from them" but "avoid them, shun them, leave them".
-
Peace all,
Interesting that this debate is still going on...
I thought the use of
Darabthroughout the Quran was very clear that the natural state of the word was not beat, but I guess old ideas die hard.The scan by Tanveer was also very clear of its acknowledged dual use until today.
Arabic is a language (like many others) that does not have one use for a word, but rather it is the context that determines the meaning.
For example, throughout this discussion I did not see one person raise any object that the word
wais being understood and implemented as then rather than using its natural state of and (i.e. if we stuck to the one meaning approach for words then we would say that the 3 steps listed in verse 434 are all to be done at the same time since God used the wordwarather than the wordthuma). However, everyone accepts that thewahere signifies a state (haal) and is not therefore viewed as its natural state of being (harf atff).Therefore, if you have accepted the meaning of
wabased on the context, then why deny the similar approach to the worddarabbased on its context also?Finally, sister Boost asked why the people before could not see this understanding of the verse...My answer is as follows
`And we place shields over their hearts, that they should not understand it, and a deafness in their ears. And if you mention your Lord in the Quran alone, they run away turning their backs in aversion. (1746)
God`s words are only understood with His permission, irrsepective of the skills in the language that the reader may posses.
-
To me, and i may be wrong, it seems like the definition is saying edrab or edrab 3anhunna = separate from. But i don't understand all the abreviations and initials in between and the symbols and such so i may be off. It could be referring to present OR past form of daraba + 3anhunna = separate from.
Hello sister
btw that daraba + 3anhunna is not the same as darabahuna
they thefirst is 3 words and the second is 2 words
also Idrabuhuna does not exist in the scan provided by Tanveer
Salam
-
For example, throughout this discussion I did not see one person raise any object that the word
wais being understood and implemented as then rather than using its natural state of and (i.e. if we stuck to the one meaning approach for words then we would say that the 3 steps listed in verse 434 are all to be done at the same time since God used the wordwarather than the wordthuma). However, everyone accepts that thewahere signifies a state (haal) and is not therefore viewed as its natural state of being (harf atff).Therefore, if you have accepted the meaning of
wabased on the context, then why deny the similar approach to the worddarabbased on its context also?Hello
actually if you read 434 and 435 again , you will see clearly that they are 4 options not 3 and as you can see that the fourth option listed in 435 and it starts with a waw, therefore according to your understanding the four option must happen together which include option 4 which is Hakam from his family and Hakam from her family, i.e. it is now almost heading for divorce
therefore what you are suggesting does not make sense
Salam
-
I have written an article on verse 434 of the Qur'an, a verse which has commonly been misinterpreted to justify violence against women. I have created a website to publish this article www.quranverse434.com
-
salaam aqua,
Your article suffers from multiple problems as highlighted here
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9599954.msg347142#msg347142"withdraw/turn away / go away from them"
Requires the tashkeel of present day Arabic Quran to be incorrect
This alleged usage in 434 occurs in 435 with the preposition "Aan", thus making Quran seems inconsistent IF it did mean that in 434
No identical example of this DRB usage in Quran
No explanation of how the authority are notified
It is unclear to what extent one separates, how they can do so without being unjust etc
No supporting marital example in Quran
My view Impractical result when inserted into 4128-130 and somehow requires iAAradan to be a positive thing and potentially makes Drb/3rD similar"cite them" www.Quran434.com
Works perfectly with the tashkeel in the present day Arabic Quran
Several identical examples of this DRB usage in Quran, including when humans are the direct object as in 434
Explains how the authority is notified by 435, and provides perfect logical/sequential coherence
DRB use is clear and simple to implement practically
581-4 provides perfect coherence in terms of marital example
When inserted into 4128-130 provides a complementary practical and coherent solutionIn fact there were more issues in your article. If you begin your own thread for your article I'd be happy to highlight them for you to respond to.
Interestingly, in your work you do not reference www.Quran434.com where you clearly got a lot of information from.
-
salaam aqua,
Your article suffers from multiple problems as highlighted here
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9599954.msg347142#msg347142In fact there were more issues in your article. If you begin your own thread for your article I'd be happy to highlight them for you to respond to.
Interestingly, in your work you do not reference www.Quran434.com where you clearly got a lot of information from.
Wow, you posted the same post in a lot of threads.
