Number of wives?
-
Very gooooooooood at twisting God's words to fulfil your sex-maniac desires.
The verses that you showed were not this verse.
You lost your argument against Mazhar then you bring another verse that uses singular noun to support and suit your evil sexist mysogynist unjust desires. LOLsalaam Yuliana
This is a very bad thing to say. I do not think that you realize or have realized the implications of what you have said. I think that you should immediately apologize to brother Israfeel. Do not generalize nor personalize! Continue your arguments constructively!
salaam
-
Salamun alaikum,
Not exception but command. For exceptions command verbs are not used. For advice, mood of verb is jussive; for discretion mood of verb is subjunctive.
Polygamy as a Custom of having many spouses for pleasure is not allowed in the Grand Qur'aan
Salamun alaikum,
Try to find out what is a "legal exception/exemption".
General Rule Exception
Forbidden to eat -> Can eat flesh of swine
flesh of swine (Emergency)
(2173) (2173)Cannot kill -> Can kill
a person (War)
(22.39)One wife -> Multiple wives
(3350) (orphans)
(43)and so on..
If fear of unjust to wives, Allah command for one wife, i.e. the reinstatement of the general rule in (3350), and even in the situation for the benefit of an orphan. One wife.
Peace brother.
-
Salaam Israfeel,
I didn't say that you were wrong about the verse 334.
But you used the verse to say that the verses (that contain the word women) you showed to Mazhar also talked to singular man.
The Pure Quran talks about having multiple wives (polygamy) as being normal
Permitted to you, on the night of the fasts, is the approach to your wives (2187)
But do not associate with your wives while ye are in retreat in the mosques (2187)
Your wives are as a tilth unto you (2223)
For those who take an oath for abstention from their wives, a waiting for four months is ordained (2226)
In what your wives leave, your share is a half (412)
And those who pray, "Our Lord! Grant unto us wives and offspring who will be the comfort of our eyes (2574)
**Why would Islam discourage polygamy when Muslims are taught by the Quran to pray for wives (plural)??
Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers (334)
Enter ye the Garden, ye and your wives, in (beauty and) rejoicing. (4370)
Erroneous way of reading texts. The pronoun for men is plural whereby the following word "wives" is plural. It denotes respective wife--respective wives if a man has married others to fulfill the obligation imposed upon him.
You gave the verses that talked about WIVES. Then Mazhar responded to you that the verses talking about WIVES also used the plural PRONOUN (see what pronoun is, i.e. I, You, He, She, It, They, We) of man.
Then you responded to Mazhar only by using the verse 334 that uses singular NOUN of man to prove that a man is normal for having multiple wives.
You hope that I would be banned?
Why don't you yourself read your own posts that may make people hate Islam?
Because of people like you, Ali Sina and his buddies keep laughing at Islam.You want me to get banned?
This forum is dedicated to God and study His scripture. This forum is a Qur'an-alone forum.
You are angry with my words now?Why don't you re-read Mahar's response to your posts of verses that you higlighted in red the word wives?
Instead of wishing me to get banned, why don't you yourself read your posts that ridicule your own religion Islam and the Qur'an?
You breach rule no 2.
I also have the right to report your posts that ridicule the Qur'an.I apologize for the 'insults' but why don't you yourself understand why I used the words? But it is true that you try your best to twist God's words to suit polygamy-without-exception?
Anyway I was saying about your desires. Not yourself! Why are you even angry when I said such things? Why don't you look at countries like Afghanistan (some parts), Yemen, Mali, Saudi Arabia where women are treated like garbage because of male-dominated ideology?
Regards,
Yuliana -
Permitted to you, on the night of the fasts, is the approach to your wives (2187)
But do not associate with your wives while ye are in retreat in the mosques (2187)
Your wives are as a tilth unto you(2223)
For thosewho take an oath for abstention from their wives, a waiting for four months is ordained (2226)
Wait, Isn't it even logical to use "their wife"?In what your wives leave, your share is a half (412)
And those who pray, "Our Lord! Grant unto us wives and offspring who will be the comfort of our eyes (2574)
Wait, it is not logical to use "unto us wife" right?Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom yedivorce by Zihar your mothers (334)
Anyway, the phrase "Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body" has pwned and disproved your view on polygamy(polygamy-without-exception). -
salaam Yuliana
This is a very bad thing to say. I do not think that you realize or have realized the implications of what you have said. I think that you should immediately apologize to brother Israfeel. Do not generalize nor personalize! Continue your arguments constructively!
salaam
I know that you support Israfeel's views.
You should read Israfeel's posts that make Islam look bad.
-
Peace.
And DO NOT APPROACH unlawful sexual intercourse
Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way.
(<a href="http//quran.com/17/32">1732</a>"Do not approach" adultery means deeper than the words "Do not commit" adultery. "Do not approach" means do not approach whatever that can leads to adultery. The difference between lawful and unlawful sexual intercourse is marriage; ie. lawful or unlawful marriage.
Therefore this will bring us to a new question, what is unlawful marriage according to the Qur'an?
Sura (3350) describes what is unlawful to the Believers; ie. unlawful marriage.
(3350) = Unlawful marriage
= Unlawful sexual intercourse
= Adultery
= "DO NOT APPROACH" -
I know that you support Israfeel's views.
You should read Israfeel's posts that make Islam look bad.
Dear Yuliana
It has nothing to do with any view I support. I even support some of your views. I was referring to the personal name calling. Do you disagree with what I said in the previous post?
Regards
-
Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers (334)
Two sentences are independent clauses; these are compounded by a conjunction waw. Independent since the verb is repeated.
The first sentence needs a careful parsing. "Two hearts" is not there; instead it is a prepositional phrase with Min "something emanating from two hearts" and then is adjectival description for the dual noun by a prepositional phrase coupled with possessive phrase. The object of verb is elided.
The discourse is about not accepting the word of the Non-Believers and Muna'fi'qeen Imposter believers.
Now one has to research as to what is the relationship of uttering a word-expression with the heart and chest.
When next wives are mentioned the pronoun for men is again plural.
-
Salamun alaikum,
Try to find out what is a "legal exception/exemption".
General Rule Exception
Forbidden to eat -> Can eat flesh of swine
flesh of swine (Emergency)
(2173) (2173)Cannot kill -> Can kill
a person (War)
(22.39)One wife -> Multiple wives
(3350) (orphans)
(43)and so on..
If fear of unjust to wives, Allah command for one wife, i.e. the reinstatement of the general rule in (3350), and even in the situation for the benefit of an orphan. One wife.
Peace brother.
I am differing only to remain precise. In legal parlance, a command verb places obligation upon the subject. He has to do it.
Law provides saving clauses for meeting exigencies of situation or instances of impracticability in obeying the prescribed provision of law.
-
Two sentences are independent clauses; these are compounded by a conjunction waw. Independent since the verb is repeated.
The first sentence needs a careful parsing. "Two hearts" is not there; instead it is a prepositional phrase with Min "something emanating from two hearts" and then is adjectival description for the dual noun by a prepositional phrase coupled with possessive phrase. The object of verb is elided.
The discourse is about not accepting the word of the Non-Believers and Muna'fi'qeen Imposter believers.
Now one has to research as to what is the relationship of uttering a word-expression with the heart and chest.
When next wives are mentioned the pronoun for men is again plural.
Peace,
To quote Israfeel
"Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers (334)
The word 'man' (Rajul) is singular in this Ayah. That destroys your argument."
To translate Mazhar's English into English "any man" 33/4 denotes "all men" (plural)
God bless
peace
-
Peace,
To quote Israfeel
"Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers (334)
The word 'man' (Rajul) is singular in this Ayah. That destroys your argument."
To translate Mazhar's English into English "any man" 33/4 denotes "all men" (plural) )
God bless
peace
Are you that poor in English too?
-
Peace Mazhar,
Did I understand you correctly yes/no?
Two sentences are independent clauses; these are compounded by a conjunction waw. Independent since the verb is repeated.
The first sentence needs a careful parsing. "Two hearts" is not there; instead it is a prepositional phrase with Min "something emanating from two hearts" and then is adjectival description for the dual noun by a prepositional phrase coupled with possessive phrase. The object of verb is elided.
The discourse is about not accepting the word of the Non-Believers and Muna'fi'qeen Imposter believers.
Now one has to research as to what is the relationship of uttering a word-expression with the heart and chest.
When next wives are mentioned the pronoun for men is again plural.
God bless
peace
-
Nice to see the same old Hawky! How you doin' me old mucker! Long time dude! Way too long! jedi
-
Number of wives?
This thread has got to number 531 posts! That is more than Soloman had as wives and concubines added together according to a certain source. By "certain source" I do not mean it is certain!!!And here is me having a complicated life with just one? And Yes,she will also say the same.
And to think there will be "72" waiting for you up there? According to another source.
Help!!! I do not want to go up there.
GOD bless you all.
Peace. -
Scary people have actually answered anything else instead of "Yes 1".
Be well
Qarael Amenuel -
Unbelievable!!!!
Hard to believe people, the same people are still arguing about the same topic for almost TEN YEARS!
This argument was done when the Quran was revealed.....
sheesh, wow
-
The case of leaving more than one widow in the ayas about inheritance is not considered. ?Any explanation? ?And what to do in case of more than one widow?
peace, math is simple like multiple sons
e.g. two spouses (non sisters), two sons412 so if be for you offspring so to them the eight
1/8 two spouses (1/16 each)
7/8 two sons (7/16 each)Unbelievable!!!!
Hard to believe people, the same people are still arguing about the same topic for almost TEN YEARS!
This argument was done when the Quran was revealed.....
sheesh, wow
peace, explain "in context" this part?
423 ... and that thou cohabit ye of between the sisters two except what hence befell indeed the god be forgiver of merciful of 424 wal-muhsanatu/and those who fortify (do not have sex outside marriage) from the womenfolk except ma/what malakat/control aymanukum/right hands yours
-
Salamun alaikum,
Try to find out what is a "legal exception/exemption".
General Rule Exception
Forbidden to eat -> Can eat flesh of swine
flesh of swine (Emergency)
(2173) (2173)Cannot kill -> Can kill
a person (War)
(22.39)One wife -> Multiple wives
(3350) (orphans)
(43)and so on..
Terrible comparison. Eating pork and killing a person/existence is "haram"/inviolable/forbidden - and one can only do these in certain conditions. Marrying more than one wife is nowhere stated as being inviolable/forbidden. In fact it is talked about as something that happens, e.g. 423.
Also, the exception in 3350 that does not apply to al mu'mineen is if a mu'minatan woman gave herself to the prophet - by forfeiting the dowry - the prophet may marry her without a dowry, if he so wishes. That is all. Notice that only "mu'minatan woman who gives herself to the prophet" - i.e. without a dowry - has a "wa" and the other categories of people do not. Then right after that it says that this is not for al mu'mineen.
The exception that prevents polygamy is given directly in 43, namely if you men have reason to fear that you might not be able to treat them with equal fairness, then one or "ma malakat aymanakum."
It is also stated in Sura (4129)
"..you will never be able to be equal between wives, even if you should strive.." (4129)
Basically it means it will never be just to marry more than one and it is against Islam, UNLESS it can bring justice to the orphan and wives (lesser). It will bring more justice if they are able to benefit the orphan and at the same time, are able to be equal between their wives. It is only in this situation Allah made it lawful to marry more than one woman.
Peace.
Common distortion, short-sightedness and twisting of the almighty god's words to appease certain "shayateen" - rebellious desires and people - in this case feminists. It is noteworthy that those who argue about plural forms used to somehow discredit polygamy (earlier in this thread) do not step in here. Let us read in context
4128 If one woman has experienced from her one husband ill-treatment/uprising or desertion, then it is not undignified for the two to reconcile between themselves; and reconciliation is better. (Greed is ever-present in human consciousness. If you do good and are prudent, then the god is expert over what you do.)
Clearly this is about being unfair to a wife, not about discouraging polygamy!
4129 (You (male plural) will not be able to be fair regarding the women even if you make every effort.) So do not sway (male plural) too greatly and leave her as one hanging in a void. If you reconcile and are prudent... god is forgiver, mercy-giver.
People fail to realize that asides are used in the reading. The clause "you (male plural) will not be able to be fair regarding the women even if you make every effort" is an aside and a fact given by the god, while "so do not sway too greatly and leave her as one hanging in a void. If you reconcile and are prudent... god is forgiver, mercy-giver." is a continuation of the problem and reconciliation in 4128. "Do not sway" is in male plural form, showing that this - as are all commandments regarding relations between men and women - is addressed to men in general when dealing with one/each wife.
Together, in context and understood properly, it reads as follows (with main clauses bolded for clarity)
If one woman has experienced from her husband ill-treatment/uprising or desertion, then it is not undignified for the two to reconcile between themselves; and reconciliation is better. (Greed is ever-present in human consciousness. If you do good and are prudent, then the god is expert over what you do. You men will not be able to be fair regarding the women even if you make every effort.) So do not sway too greatly and leave her as one hanging in a void. If you reconcile and are prudent... god is forgiver, mercy-giver.