Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Early islamic inscription provides/confirms (sunni caliph) umar's year of death

Early islamic inscription provides/confirms (sunni caliph) umar's year of death

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
11 Posts 5 Posters 120 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    Pseudo
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    According to tradition and other historical accounts, a Persian soldier assassin stabbed Umar in public as the caliph was leading prayers in a mosque. Zuhayr, who may have witnessed the violent crime, recorded that Umar died in "four and twenty," which means 644 A.D.

    This is useful information more so interested in how they wrote, used words/meanings etc., especially numbers seems at times written backwards; small number first then larger one as in quran.

    2234? 4 months and 10 (14 months)

    1825 300 years and add 9 (not sure about this one)

    I take it then
    50 years and 1000 = 1050 years
    50 years and 900 = 950 years

    2914 And We had sent Noah to his nation, so he stayed in them 1000 years illa 50

    Since illa is used above renders it in reverse

    ?so he stayed in them 1000 years no more than 50 (i.e. millennium less/illa 50)

    Similar to,
    7431 And We did not make the fire's owners only/no more than angels (illa mala-ikata)

    To give another example it is currently 530 pm and to say that I stayed 5 minutes

    530 illa 5

    Hope that makes sense.

    Peace

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      farida
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Salaam

      Very interesting observation.
      It could help solve No 19 issue too
      I don't know how to transfer pictures see this link for origional inscription

      http//my.algeria.com/forums/religion-religion/24279-first-islamic-inscription-may-solve-quran-question.html

      Also
      http//dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/11/18/islamic-inscription.html
      peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        Roshan
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Peace

        I do not understand what this adds. Who is to say that people wrote differently in formal writings and informal writings. Of course we know that today's Arabic does not contain such marks. We also know that the earlier versions of the Quran do not contain such marks, but that these were introduced later as Muslims moved away from Islam towards Sunnism/Shiaism aided by their newly found holy books of Bukari et al.

        So not only is there no direct proof of what you say, but there would have had to be two different movements (marks --> no marks --> marks).

        Although, perhaps your main point was to do with Umar rather than the marks.

        However, one point I raised a long time ago was whether there were words which had different meanings without the marks and with them. Can anyone give any examples?

        Roshan

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Samia
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          This is useful information more so interested in how they wrote, used words/meanings etc., especially numbers seems at times written backwards; small number first then larger one as in quran.

          2234? 4 months and 10 (14 months)

          1825 300 years and add 9 (not sure about this one)

          I take it then
          50 years and 1000 = 1050 years
          50 years and 900 = 950 years

          2914 And We had sent Noah to his nation, so he stayed in them 1000 years illa 50

          Since illa is used above renders it in reverse

          ?so he stayed in them 1000 years no more than 50 (i.e. millennium less/illa 50)

          Similar to,
          7431 And We did not make the fire's owners only/no more than angels (illa mala-ikata)

          To give another example it is currently 530 pm and to say that I stayed 5 minutes

          530 illa 5

          Hope that makes sense.

          Peace

          This is still the Arabic as written and said today! The inscription embedded in farida's post says "sanat arba3 wa 3ishreen" which is "the year 24" (not 44 as reported in the main post), which -again- is literally "four and twenty"...the way arabs still say the numbers!!

          We still say it's one o'clock "illa" 3ashra it's ten to one.
          My question how did they know that this dates to 1300 years ago? Has it undergone any accepted archeological examination?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            thegod
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            samia-This is still the Arabic as written and said today! The inscription embedded in farida's post says "sanat arba3 wa 3ishreen" which is "the year 24" (not 44 as reported in the main post), which -again- is literally "four and twenty"...the way arabs still say the numbers!!

            It doesn't say "44" in the main post, it says "four and twenty," which is in terms of "after hijra". In terms of "after christ" it is 644.

            ma'a salaam.

            God bless all.

            al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Offline
              T Offline
              thegod
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Pseudo-1825 300 years and add 9 (not sure about this one)

              Yes, this does not appear to be a standard usage.

              Quraan, 1825 can represent either

              1. the conjectural nature of proposed figures.

              2. the traditional view that 300 is the length of stay in terms of solar years, & increasing it by 9 gives the number of lunar years.

              Other explanations welcome.

              Given the quraanic account & the accuracy of the claim (300 solar years ~ 309 lunar years), I, as of now, go with the traditional interpretation.

              ma'a salaam.

              God bless all.

              al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Offline
                T Offline
                thegod
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                This inscription is important for several reasons

                1. Aspersions have been cast on the veracity of the quraanic text & it has been played with under the pretext of lack of alphabet-identification (bbkt-tykh being an example). This inscription, which predates earliest hijazi manuscripts of quraan, is more proof against the acceptability of such manipulation.

                2. It reinforces the fact that arabic had evolved pretty well by the time of the prophet.

                3. Putting question marks over the existence of historical personalities of muhammad's time has been a favorite exercise with a section of skeptics. The attestation in favor of umar is significant.

                4. In the name of countering bias some skeptics have favored non-arab material over arab material as the main source of arab history, irrespective of it's authenticity. The remarkable accuracy of this inscription lends further credibility to arab records.

                ma'a salaam.

                God bless all.

                al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Pseudo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Here is the standard time line; seldom a need to lie about dates...

                  622 CE Hijira - Muhammad and followers flee to Medina.
                  Islamic calendar (AH, Anno Hegirae) begins.
                  624 CE Muslims successfully attack Meccan caravans at Badr.
                  625 Muslims are defeated by Meccans at Uhud.
                  630 Muslims capture Mecca. Ka'ba is cleansed, pilgrimage rites are Islamicized, tribes of Arabia vow allegiance to Muhammad
                  632 Death of Muhammad. Abu Bakr chosen as caliph.
                  632-33 Wars of ridda (apostasy) restore allegiance to Islam
                  633 Muslim conquests (Futuhat) begin.
                  633-42 Muslim armies take the Fertile Crescent (Egypt, Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia), North African coast, parts of Persian and Byzantine Empires
                  c. 650 Caliph Uthman has the Qur'an written down.
                  656 Uthman is murdered; Ali becomes fourth caliph.

                  632 + 24 = 656

                  Perhaps that is what the person meant by 4 and 20.

                  Peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Offline
                    T Offline
                    thegod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    There is no mention of umar (or of abu bakr's death) in that standard timelime. What are the standard dates for their deaths?

                    622 Heraclius launches counteroffensive vs. Persia
                    MUHAMMAD and ABU BAKR flee Mecca for Medina ("Hegira&quot
                    622-26 Campaigns of Heraclius
                    Avar-Persian Siege of Constantinople
                    627 Battle of Nineveh Destruction of Persian army
                    628 Fall of Ctesiphon; Overthrow of Chosroes II
                    Heraclius imposes peace on Persia
                    630 Heraclius and True Cross received in Jerusalem
                    Muhammad received in Mecca Unification of Arabia
                    632 Publication of Monenergian Doctrine
                    Death of Muhammad. Abu Bakr elected Caliph (632-34)
                    634 UMAR I elected Caliph (634-644)
                    636 Battle of Yarmuk Arab Conquest of Syria
                    637 Battle of Qadisiya Collapse of Sassanid Persian Empire
                    637-42 Arab Conquest of Iraq, Armenia, and Iran
                    638 Fall of Jerusalem to the Arabs
                    Publication of ECTHESIS Proclamation of Monothelete Doctrine
                    641 Death of Heraclius and Succession Difficulties
                    Surrender of Alexandria and Egypt to Arabs
                    Accession of CONSTANS II (641-66
                    642 Arab Conquest of Cyrenaica and Tripolitania
                    644 Assassination of Umar I. UTHMAN elected Caliph (644-656). MUAWIYA commences construction of Arab fleet
                    645-46 Byzantine reoccupation of Alexandria
                    648 Publication of TYPUS
                    649 Pope Martin I condemns Monothelete doctrine
                    Muawiya conquers Cyprus Arabic naval offensive against Byzantium
                    653 Arrest and Deposition of Pope Martin I
                    654 Arabic Sack of Rhodes
                    655 Battle of Attaleia ("Battle of the Masts&quot Defeat of Imperial Navy and Flight of Constans II
                    656 Mutiny at Fustat (Cairo) and Murder of Caliph Uthman
                    Election of ALI as Caliph (656-661)
                    Outbreak of Islamic Civil War Muawiya and Constans II sign a truce
                    Battle of the Camel Ali crushes Bedouin army of Kufa and arrests Aisha
                    657 Kharijites ("those who go out&quot secede from Shi'ite Cause
                    661 Murder of Ali by Kharijites

                    umar is believed to have died on the last day of 23 ah & buried on the first day of 24 ah.

                    632 + 24 = 656

                    Perhaps that is what the person meant by 4 and 20.

                    Dates are recorded in terms of after hijra & not after muhammad.

                    ma'a salaam.

                    God bless all.

                    al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      thegod
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      thegod - umar is believed to have died on the last day of 23 ah & buried on the first day of 24 ah.

                      umar is believed to have died on the last night of 23 ah.

                      Then, according to arabic system, he died in 24 ah. So the date is spot-on.

                      ma'a salaam.

                      God bless all.

                      al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Users