Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. 5:82 Nasara, who are they?

5:82 Nasara, who are they?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
26 Posts 11 Posters 265 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anoushirvan
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Peace free-minders,

    We can read this

    2113 And the Jews say "The Nassaras have no basis," and the Nassaras say "The Jews have no basis," while they are both reciting the Book! Similarly, those who do not know have said the same thing. God will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection in what they dispute.

    Nassaras are obviously not Christians, nor a Nazarenes (Jews that accept Jesus as Messiah) in the historical sense.
    Jews, Christians, and Nazarenes share the Old Testament. They only disagree in its interpretation when it comes to the status of Jesus.

    Old Testament is a too big collection of books for the Quran to assert that Jews say about Christian that they stand on nothing and reciprocally.

    So really, Jews and Nassaras thought that they didn't share anything in common, not even OT.

    Likewise, having discussed with Christians they don't understand why Quran says they took Mary as god as in
    5116 And God will say "O Jesus, son of Mary, did you tell the people to take you and your mother as gods other than God?" He said "Glory to you, I cannot say what I have no right of. If I had said it then You know it, You know what is in my self while I do not know what is in Your self. You are the Knower of the unseen."

    They never said that.

    To understand properly who were the Nassaras, we have to properly understand who was Issa ben Mariam. It is hadiths that say he is Jesus.
    But look, arab Christians never speak of Jesus as Issa (3issa). They speak of it as Yassou3a. One is not another word for it. God does not roll His tongue.

    And by the way, did you never notice that while Quran speaks of Romans (in Surah 30), it never speaks explicitely of Persians ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Man_of_Faith
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      As far as I have researched on the word nasar I get it to baptism, the kind of thinking John the Baptist was into.

      I track the root's origin to Saad-Ra-(Ra) and Sad-Waw-Ra. It can refer to resolution or (make a) preparation. It seems to mean that you take action in order to reform yourself. It is similar to the "slogan" of John the Baptist "Repent, the Kingdom is at hand". John meant that you should wake up and do something about your own situation, cleanse yourself. The water baptism was probably symbolic to symbolize a fresh start.

      And this means Nasara does not translate Christianity because the baptism that John came with was hence already in place when Jesus came.

      In comparison Nasara and Yahood (Jew) were two sects that emerged about 2000 years ago.

      The only comparable group that remains today to refer to Nasarene are a minority group who follow the teachings of John the Baptist in the Middle-East and whom are generally considered to be Gnostic.

      The belief in Nasara ("baptism&quot is that you abstain hard from this world very similar to Buddhism because the world is "evil" and leads into temptation innately.

      Modern Christianity does no have a lot to do with nasarenes except that Jesus followed that branch of tradition, e.g. when he came for baptism to John at the water.

      The word Jew means that a person has recognized the truth and this recognition will lead to "Heaven". This stance is what Jesus verbally counters in many of his sayings when he talks about taking action for your salvation.

      Be well
      Amenuel

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Man_of_Faith
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        But look, arab Christians never speak of Jesus as Issa (3issa). They speak of it as Yassou3a. One is not another word for it. God does not roll His tongue.

        is pronounced Yesoua, it is just the wannabe interpreters from past times who did not master Arabic very well and could not put the sequence together into a spoken phrase.

        The Arabic you think people master is not the real Arabic.

        The only person with a similar name as Jesus (Yesoua) was Yiseiua who interestingly prophesied a lot about the future and of whom still have active prophecies that have not yet come true.

        Be well
        Amenuel

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          Anoushirvan
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Peace Man of Faith

          is pronounced Yesoua, it is just the wannabe interpreters from past times who did not master Arabic very well and could not put the sequence together into a spoken phrase.

          The problem is that the word begins with a 'ayn which is a consonant in arabic, not a vowel. It does not make sense for a native Arabic speaker to pronounce Ya, although western people often cannot pronounce it.

          In hebrew, the closest word is Esau, same consonant 'ayn at the beginning, but different ending vowel. This can be explained by passage to Aramaic language.
          Transformation of vowel is easy to explain linguistically but transformation of consonant is harder to explain properly.

          So really, Issa in Quran is actually Esau. Esau was never meant to be the stupid brother of Israel, and son of Isaac. He was the true Messiah, rejected by Children of Israel.

          (By the way, rabbis call christianism Essav...).

          The Arabic you think people master is not the real Arabic.

          The only person with a similar name as Jesus (Yesoua) was Yiseiua who interestingly prophesied a lot about the future and of whom still have active prophecies that have not yet come true.

          It is really Yesou3a or Yeshou3a, with a consonant 'ayn at the end, like Yeshou3a bin Nun.

          I wonder if the inversion of consonants 'ayn and sin in hebrew in Esau name wasn't done on purpose, so as to be sure to erase all Esau story.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Man_of_Faith
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Yes, it begins with an ayn, but the second letter is Ye and in proper pronunciation it becomes from Eysua which when spoken sounds more like Yesua. It begins Eyy or Ay as different from Yesaiua . It has become linguistically made into Jesus in other tongues as that is how it may sound.

            Those interpreters of Quran missed an important factor and that is must be clearly pronounced. Furthermore they did not pay attention to the origin of the language and is a special Ae (?) sound so and together would produce a sound like Aeysua.

            is not Esau, it is not supported by the letters. The name would be spelled with Arabic letters (Esow), these are the originally used letters from the past to write his name also in Hebrew/Aramaic. If you make Esau of you gravely mispronounce the word, no better than how the creators of Islam misinterpreted it.

            And I apologize for not offering an explanation on how is Yesua (Eysua) to begin with.

            There are multiple prophets not mentioned in Quran, but also prophets that the creators of Islam left out when deciphering their fabrication of an interpretation such as (Yesaya) who indeed is mentioned in it.

            Be well
            Amenuel

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Man_of_Faith
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              And while people today speak of eternal punishment in Hell, Yesaya spoke that "one faces the consequences of their deeds in entirety". In other words it means that there are no more consequences than what their misdeeds are worth. The requital is proportionate.

              As to what Jesus (Eysua) and John in Baptism taught the realm (Heaven) is at hand and there is no need of waiting, i.e. resurrection. What is required is taking proper action and cleanse yourself from within. Cleanse yourself out from this world.

              Be well
              Amenuel

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Users