Quran- Samarqand manuscript vs Current Hafs version

[herbman]

Salam all, Peace to everyone,

Has anyone here tried to decode old Quran manuscript, to confirm or refute our present copy of Al Quran.
I am saying that cause some people are "modifying" "original" text arguing first Quran came without diactrical signs (points on letters).

For example

951
Waaltteeni waalzzaytooni
By the Fig and the Olive,

952
Watoori seeneena
And the Mount of Sinai,

953
Wahatha albaladi alameeni
And this City of security

They change balad by YALAD arguing that it fits better in the context!!!!!

Here is a link which proclaim some differences between older versions of Quran and current one Samarkand manuscript

http//www.answering-islam.org/PQ/A1.htm#AppendA

ps personnaly I think God has protected His book as He claims in the Holy scripture, and Quran was first memorised (not written).

Peace

[herbman]

For easy reading, the begining of the chapter is here

CHAPTER IX SAMARQAND VS. 1924 EDITION - ?THE SAME??

http//www.answering-islam.org/PQ/ch9a-index.html#ch9

[herbman]

for example is there any diffrence between

and

[Cushan]

I don't know enough about arabic to know how serious it is. But if at all true, it definitely goes against the idea that not a single letter in variance exists between manuscripts.

[Tareq]

for example is there any diffrence between

and

"" in the end of "" and "" in the end of "" are the same. Both are ""(Alef).

[sarah2505]

... if at all true, it definitely goes against the idea that not a single letter in variance exists between manuscripts.

exactly