Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Science / History / Prophecy
  3. Science
  4. Jets from quasars travel faster than the speed of light?

Jets from quasars travel faster than the speed of light?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Science
12 Posts 4 Posters 172 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    MUNZIR_ALI
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I read an old book (published in 2004) which says jets from quasars travel faster than the speed of light. Is this true?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      Rev_John
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I read an old book (published in 2004) which says jets from quasars travel faster than the speed of light. Is this true?

      That is interesting. What book is that?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        san
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I read an old book (published in 2004) which says jets from quasars travel faster than the speed of light. Is this true?

        That's old? but never mind that... Science, pseudo-science, sci-fi? Author? Title?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Offline
          R Offline
          Rajah
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Hello all...apparently to this gentleman the equation E=mc2was not peer reviewed.
          http//www.brojon.org/frontpage/EINSTEIN-WENT-WRONG.html
          good weekend...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            san
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Hello all...apparently to this gentleman the equation E=mc2was not peer reviewed.
            http//www.brojon.org/frontpage/EINSTEIN-WENT-WRONG.html
            good weekend...

            I don't actually understand this stuff (forgotten most of what learned in school about it) but i remember some young lad, mad and frustrated came telling us that Einstein's E=mc2 was wrong or something.

            It may be relative, but the only thing interesting from that link you gave above was this http//www.brojon.org/images/articles/einstein1/Wristwatch.jpg

            yeah

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              MUNZIR_ALI
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              That is interesting. What book is that?

              Discover science almanac
              http//ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51PPN468XHL.BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA240_SH20_OU01.jpg

              It looks just like the above book.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Offline
                R Offline
                Rev_John
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I don't actually understand this stuff (forgotten most of what learned in school about it) but i remember some young lad, mad and frustrated came telling us that Einstein's E=mc2 was wrong or something.

                It may be relative, but the only thing interesting from that link you gave above was this http//www.brojon.org/images/articles/einstein1/Wristwatch.jpg

                yeah

                Well actually he was wrong about a couple of things

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  MUNZIR_ALI
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  That's old? but never mind that... Science, pseudo-science, sci-fi? Author? Title?

                  Its not updated so the some of the information contained in it might be false.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Rev_John
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Its not updated so the some of the information contained in it might be false.

                    Well it is now believed that the jets travel at a fraction under the speed of light

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      san
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Well actually he was wrong about a couple of things

                      hmm

                      laugh giveup before you even explain it! So don't bother...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rev_John
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        hmm

                        laugh giveup before you even explain it! So don't bother...

                        laugh laugh laugh laugh

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          MUNZIR_ALI
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Well it is now believed that the jets travel at a fraction under the speed of light

                          Quasars are amazing. One quasar has an absolute magnitude of -33.

                          Amazing!!! yay wow

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Users