Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Swine or all rotten food?

Swine or all rotten food?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
3 Posts 2 Posters 49 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    nsws1988
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Why is it that the meat of swine is prohibited but not the meat of rats or even the innocent looking shrimp.

    Using Project Root list, I took a look at the meanings of both Kha-Nun-Zay and Kha-Nun-Zay-Ra...

    Kha-Nun-Zay = stinking / maggoty / altered in odour (e.g. flesh-meat, date, walnut), pride, self-magnification.

    LL, V2, p 451, 452

    Kha-Nun-Zay-Ra = swine/pig.

    khinzir n.m. 2173, 53, 560, 6145, 16115

    LL, V2, p 452 (it says see Kh-Zay-Ra 367, 36

    Looking up the verses where Kha-Nun-Zay-Ra occurs (except 560), I found that the meaning of Kha-Nun-Zay can easily replace the 'swine/ pig' definition, which alters the prohibition to include all stinking/ maggoty foods.

    BUT, there must be some difference between Kha-Nun-Zay and Kha-Nun-Zay-Ra.

    Any views or help appreciated.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • WakasW Offline
      WakasW Offline
      Wakas
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      The search function reveals this topic was discussed significantly, about 70 pages, e.g.

      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=10385.0
      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=10514.0
      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=10610.0
      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=8584.0
      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=14318.0

      The basic conclusion was IF you ignore the form the word is in and Quranic grammar, then yes, you can interpret it the way you imply. Such a view would be baseless conjecture however.

      According to qur'aanic grammar, in the phrases "lahma khinzeerin" or "lahma alkhinzeeri", "khinzeer" CANNOT be an adjective but can only be a noun. This has been discussed numerous times on this forum in the past. Please use the search feature for the relevant threads.

      A short explanation is as follows

      For "khinzeer" to be an adjective the phrase has to have "AL" before both words or if "AL" is not before both words then both words have to have the same ending of "an" or "un".

      For example

      "lahmun khinzeerun" or "al-lahma al-khinzeer".

      The phrases in al-qur'aan are as follows

      "lahma khinzeerin" (6145), and "lahma/lahmu alkhinzeeri" (2173, 53, 16115).

      Thus "khinzeer" in those phrases CANNOT be an adjective, and can only mean "pig".

      As a side note, please be careful on how you use PRL, e.g. see the guide on its homepage

      Which root meaning is correct?
      http//www.studyquran.co.uk/Qwrmic.htm

      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        nsws1988
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I already used the search function but couldn't find much. Probably should have used different search terms.

        Thanks for the info

        As a side note, please be careful on how you use PRL, e.g. see the guide on its homepage

        Which root meaning is correct?
        http//www.studyquran.co.uk/Qwrmic.htm

        Of course, which is why I want to discuss the meanings with others

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Users