Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Wife beating in islam? The Quran strikes back

Wife beating in islam? The Quran strikes back

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
301 Posts 43 Posters 19.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WakasW Offline
    WakasW Offline
    Wakas
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    Update

    Dr Shabbir (author of QXP) has opted to modify his translation according to the findings of Quran434.com

    I also provided a summary on the above thread, which I will post here also

    I would like to provide a short summary for those who may not wish to read the entire work (even though I strongly recommend they do)

    1. idriboo/DRB was shown not to mean "beat" anywhere in The Quran
    2. no Classical Arabic Dictionary references 434 at all nor gives DRB=beat in a comparable example, i.e. with a direct object with no prepositions, no what/where/how
    3. when The Quran uses DRB to mean a physical hit/strike it ALWAYS uses the preposition "bi" (with/by)
    4. The understanding of "beat/strike" causes internal contradictions within The Quran, and this is also probably why no commentator, past or present, uses The Quran itself to justify this view.
    5. "beat" causes discrepancies between Traditional commentators, Traditional Ahadith and Classical Arabic dictionaries
    6. the earliest Classical Arabic dictionary (Kitab Al Ayn) does not state DRB=beat as a meaning, and only indirectly does it have DRB=strike with sword.

    The understanding of DRB in 434 as "cite / indicate / put/show forth them" (to the authority) is the ONLY understanding that provides perfect internal coherence in The Quran. It is the ONLY understanding

    1. that provides a sequential link from 434 to 435
    2. to provide identical solutions between men & women in 434 and 4128
    3. that fits and perfectly explains 581-4
    4. that fits the divorce procedure of The Quran and related compensation
    5. that explains the reasoning behind the context of wealth/inheritance/giving/kindness etc.
    6. is consistent with the use of DRB with a direct object with no prepositions, in which it always means "put/show forth"
    7. that 100% matches the use of DRB when used with a person as the object, e.g. 273, 4357.

    All praise is due to Allah.

    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • WakasW Offline
      WakasW Offline
      Wakas
      wrote on last edited by
      #62

      peace all,

      I have finished the formatting for the book version
      www.quran434.com/wife-beating-islam-quran434.doc (Word doc, right click, save as)

      If people have time to proofread it for any errors or even feedback, let me know.

      Proposed book cover shown below. Feel free to give feedback, or even create others.

      http//www.quran434.com/Quran434-book-cover.jpg

      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #63

        peace all,

        I have finished the formatting for the book version
        www.quran434.com/wife-beating-islam-quran434.doc (Word doc, right click, save as)

        If people have time to proofread it for any errors or even feedback, let me know.

        Proposed book cover shown below. Feel free to give feedback, or even create others.

        http//www.quran434.com/Quran434-book-cover.jpg

        Arabic text of all Ayat where words relating to this Root are used can be seen side by side here

        Root

        Words from this Root in the Grand Qur'aan

        a) Total occurrences 58

        b) No of constructions 28

        The basic perception, meanings and signification of this Root has been made evident at the very first occasion of its use in the Grand Qur'aan and later by using it in this context for 31 times out of 58 occurrences

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Offline
          L Offline
          Leyna
          wrote on last edited by
          #64

          Peace, Wakas

          Proposed book cover shown below. Feel free to give feedback, or even create others.

          It doesn't look professional. The layout isn't very balanced, and the image is too aggressive and sort of contradicts the message. Plus, you are using two images that have a very different illustrative style.

          I'll be happy to help you with the design. Usually, I don't work for free, but this is for a very good cause. ) Maybe we can do a bit of brainstorming in this thread?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Offline
            WakasW Offline
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #65

            Peace Leyna,

            I'm happy to consider alternatives.

            That was one I just made myself, and I'm no graphics artist! ;D

            The way I saw the image was opening The Quran, i.e. reading/studying it, it actually knocks out the "wife beating in islam" argument, hence the picture. I was going for irony, a play on words and imagery etc.

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Offline
              L Offline
              Leyna
              wrote on last edited by
              #66

              I'm happy to consider alternatives.

              Let me think of some ideas, and I'll get back to you.

              That was one I just made myself, and I'm no graphics artist! ;D

              Well, yes, obviously.

              No offense meant, btw.! I tend to be pretty direct, and criticizing other peoples' drafts is part of my job. -*

              The way I saw the image was opening The Quran, i.e. reading/studying it, it actually knocks out the "wife beating in islam" argument, hence the picture. I was going for irony, a play on words and imagery etc.

              Yes, I understand your train of thought regarding the choice of pictures. Still, I believe the glove / boxing hand carries particular connotations that could be problematic.

              Maybe it doesn't even need an image at all ? just a simple, catchy looking cover?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #67

                Yes, I dont mind there not being an image as such.

                Take your time, then DaRaBa what you have.

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Leyna
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #68

                  Maybe just some sort of typographic collage with the Arabic, highlighting the "daraba" or something like that? hmm

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • WakasW Offline
                    WakasW Offline
                    Wakas
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #69

                    Sounds like it has potential.

                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      loxbox13
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #70

                      peace all,

                      I have finished the formatting for the book version
                      www.quran434.com/wife-beating-islam-quran434.doc (Word doc, right click, save as)

                      If people have time to proofread it for any errors or even feedback, let me know.

                      Proposed book cover shown below. Feel free to give feedback, or even create others.

                      http//www.quran434.com/Quran434-book-cover.jpg

                      Good work brother, I appreciate it

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #71

                        Yes, I understand your train of thought regarding the choice of pictures. Still, I believe the glove / boxing hand carries particular connotations that could be problematic.

                        Also because those who advocate its meanings as "beating" they add such explanations and reservations which almost means "flowery beating".

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • H Offline
                          H Offline
                          huruf
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #72

                          I like that play of words with the Qur'an strikes back. The graphic may be misleading in the sense that it confirms what is negted with wordes, even if it is not done with that purpose. I think it defeats the thrust of the words. An image suggesting the opposite would be more congruent.

                          Salaam

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • WakasW Offline
                            WakasW Offline
                            Wakas
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #73

                            peace all,

                            I was needing some feedback on something. I was thinking of not including "about the author" pages in the book. Mainly because to me who authors are is irrelevant to the validity of the content, but some have found it helpful to understand how the work came about. Any thoughts?

                            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • WakasW Offline
                              WakasW Offline
                              Wakas
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #74

                              A new cover was designed for the book

                              http//img692.imageshack.us/img692/1208/greennewfinal.jpg

                              Thoughts?

                              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • W Offline
                                W Offline
                                wildguest1956
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #75

                                The understanding of DRB in 434 as "cite / indicate / put/show forth them" (to the authority) is the ONLY understanding that provides perfect internal coherence in The Quran.

                                Why not translating it by "move away" / "depart" / "leave" ?
                                http//gender-az.org/index_en.shtml?id_doc=457
                                In Lane, you can find the confirmation this translation is possible.

                                Peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • WakasW Offline
                                  WakasW Offline
                                  Wakas
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #76

                                  peace JM,

                                  That is what I used to think but the information is now overwhelming for the conclusions of www.Quran434.com

                                  I recommend reading it.

                                  All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • WakasW Offline
                                    WakasW Offline
                                    Wakas
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #77

                                    peace All,

                                    I have some great news. )

                                    I received the proof copy of the book and approved it, so it will be available for online purchase in most countries within a few weeks.

                                    I am planning to distribute some copies for free and/or at a nominal price. If anyone would like a copy, personal message me your name and address for shipping.

                                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • WakasW Offline
                                      WakasW Offline
                                      Wakas
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #78

                                      peace All,

                                      The book is now available to buy worldwide
                                      http//www.amazon.com/Wife-Beating-Islam-Quran-Strikes/dp/1461028256/

                                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        siki
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #79

                                        Fantastic

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mazhar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #80

                                          That is why the verse says "if you fear nushuz..." instead of for example, "if you find nushuz...". In other words, nushuz is unlikely to mean something in the husband's presence or obvious/blatant in his presence as 434 says "if you fear", so it is reasonable to assume it refers to something not done in the husband's presence. This could be related to the earlier use of "...guardians to the unseen...". If we take these factors into account, it suggests unseen "disloyalty/infidelity/ill-conduct/rebellion" in some way.

                                          Peace Wakas,

                                          The mood of the verb does not support this contention.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users