Physics proving the god
-
Peace "Abdun Nur",
Salaam jonny,
the so called 'law' of thermodynamics are derived from the stream engine, rules that were created to make it easier to understand stream power, in reality if applied to the universe at large the direct reverse of these so called laws becomes apparent, but then the general population would begin to understand reality and that would remove the elite very quickly. I agree with Tesla, he was correct as has been proved experimentally, not abstractly as Einstein.
JK- Einstein's theory of relativity has been proven via real experiments over and over too. So have the laws of conservation of energy. There's not a single system found by the scientists that violates this principle. If you say there is bring it out. Show us.
Tesla wrote in the New York Herald Tribune "Condensation of the primary substance is going on continuously, this being in a measure proved, for I have established by experiments which admit of no doubt that the sun and other celestial bodies steadily increase in mass and energy and ultimately must explode, reverting to the primary substance."
JK- Did he also mention where that increase in mass comes from? If he says from the vacuum then we need evidence that this is the case. In that case this very claim of Tesla has not been shown experimentally.
"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality." (Radio Power Will Revolutionize the World- in Modern Mechanics and Inventions (July 1934))
JK- No mathematics is good in it's own right and experiments in their. Hence science never claims to prove anything, a claim which is reserved for mathematics based on results which must follow logically to be consistent with definition ofthe underlying axioms. In the real world mathetaical formulas ARE APPLIED onto reality but no one mathewtical function can describe any part of reality with 100% accuracy. Like in some cases we use exponential decay but that is the overall statistic. It could be slightly biased here or there since we never know which single atom at which point would decay first only the average and hence this exp function is a good enough to satisfy all our practical needs.
"I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view." (New York Herald Tribune (11 September 1932))
Einsteins relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists." (New York Times (11 July 1935), p. 23, c.
JK- Can you tell me simply without quate mining, what exactly is wrong with relativity when experiments have demonstrated their accuracy for all practical purposes so far? As i said there is no ultimate mathematical model for anything in the universe, let alone the universe. GOD Bless!
-
Salaam jonny,
almost nothing has been proved in conventional physics, it's at best a pseudo-science, but more accurately a directed and intentional fraud, I realise you will refuse to accept any evidence that rejects the conventional establishment views, just like some still think 911 was Muslim terrorist plane hijackers, a person that subjugated could never be expected to come to a rational conclusion based on evidence.
Here is a 2 minute video that breaks the law of conservation of energy, which is a ridiculous concept to begin with, but if you can explain this, I expect you'll say the tests were wrong, which is the standard answer of the indoctrinated, anyway enjoy.
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBzGJLKrnFM&feature=player_embedded
-
Peace "Abdun Nur",
Salaam jonny,
almost nothing has been proved in conventional physics,
JK- I made it clear tnat NOTHING is ever PROVEN in science. All we have is evidence to back claims up and conventional physics has been verys good at that for all practical purposes.
it's at best a pseudo-science, but more accurately a directed and intentional fraud, I realise you will refuse to accept any evidence that rejects the conventional establishment views, just like some still think 911 was Muslim terrorist plane hijackers, a person that subjugated could never be expected to come to a rational conclusion based on evidence.
Here is a 2 minute video that breaks the law of conservation of energy, which is a ridiculous concept to begin with, but if you can explain this, I expect you'll say the tests were wrong, which is the standard answer of the indoctrinated, anyway enjoy.
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBzGJLKrnFM&feature=player_embedded
JK- Have you tested this device and made sure it works like it is being claimed? Nobody has yet been able to demonstrate that any of these oveunity devices actually work under controlled condition. They always turn out to be frauds and the fraudsters run away with peoples money. BUT IM willing to give it the benefit of the doubt. If you have enough money or know someone or have a group who can pay for it together, get such a device and actually test it out. See if the energy you get out is actually more than you put in without any part of the system collapsing over time. GOD Bless!
-
Salaam jonny,
many things are proven in science, however not the things that stand against physical reality, the theories that are describing a process that does not act according to the description, the universe demonstrates an open energy exchange, it doesn't matter that conventional physics says that is impossible, it is still a reality.
As I said you would not believe the tests done on the device in the example, because the establishment you worship has refuted through its intentional perversion and corruption of truth it being possible, so you conclude it must be wrong, without investigation. Over unity systems have cropped up again and again over the past century, I just found a simple example to demonstrate you're deep indoctrination and subjugation to sovereign authority, it is not important if I have personally investigated this device, many devices have demonstrated the same over unity attribute, even universities have done so, in the 90's a university developed a water splitter that produced 8000% over unity, fully tested and established by many many others, even reproduced by other universities, why is this not transforming physics, because physics in its conventional and widely publicised understandings, is complete and utter bull shit. But of course these university professors, who are based in chemistry, one of the few areas that the bankers cannot corrupt, because its a physical science, are confused, is that right, yes, you would need to test there device yourself, have you found a physicist, they would not be so fast to refute a magnet endlessly produces energy, a good physicist would just look at his shoes, a bad one would make up a lie.
I have begun making a system but I have run out of money, I was working on a water splitter to run house boiler, with the idea of freeing people from the enslavement of the corporations, but no one is willing to help, and I'm not very well off.
-
Peace "Abdun Nur",
Salaam jonny,
many things are proven in science, however not the things that stand against physical reality,
JK- Can you tell me anything that is "proven" in science?
the theories that are describing a process that does not act according to the description, the universe demonstrates an open energy exchange, it doesn't matter that conventional physics says that is impossible, it is still a reality.
JK- At the quantum level we do observe particles coming in and going out but the overall statistics or their doing such plays out on the macro level so that we don't get an infinite amount of energy just out of nothing. Some have claimed we can get this energy from the vacuum BUT NEVER has such a device been demonstrated. But as I said im open to see it.
As I said you would not believe the tests done on the device in the example, because the establishment you worship has refuted through its intentional perversion and corruption of truth it being possible, so you conclude it must be wrong, without investigation.
JK- Forget the establishment. 1st tell me Have YOU tested the device?
Over unity systems have cropped up again and again over the past century, I just found a simple example to demonstrate you're deep indoctrination and subjugation to sovereign authority, it is not important if I have personally investigated this device, many devices have demonstrated the same over unity attribute, even universities have done so, in the 90's a university developed a water splitter that produced 8000% over unity, fully tested and established by many many others, even reproduced by other universities, why is this not transforming physics, because physics in its conventional and widely publicised understandings, is complete and utter bull shit.
JK- SHOW ME. Where has this been done. I need to see this. For the time being give me a rough explanation of how that device worked. Did the water get used up i.e. was the energy taken from the H2O atoms by collapsing them?
But of course these university professors, who are based in chemistry, one of the few areas that the bankers cannot corrupt, because its a physical science, are confused, is that right, yes, you would need to test there device yourself, have you found a physicist, they would not be so fast to refute a magnet endlessly produces energy, a good physicist would just look at his shoes, a bad one would make up a lie.
JK- By producing energy we mean work that can be brought onto the macro sphere. AT the quantum level i already agreed that particles come and ago in and out of our dimesion but never has it been shown that we could use an infinite no of them at any point in spoace and use them to peform work on the macro level. BUT like i said if this has been done i want to see it.
I have begun making a system but I have run out of money, I was working on a water splitter to run house boiler, with the idea of freeing people from the enslavement of the corporations, but no one is willing to help, and I'm not very well off.
JK- Please give me a rogh outline where the energy comes from. Does it come from the water molecules which then collapse and the heat from their collapsing is then used to cause motion? GOD Bless!
-
Peace again "abdun nur",
Also if this (http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBzGJLKrnFM&feature=player_embedded) were possible we shoudlnt require any electricity at all to run it after the initial spark COZ if there is always 70% or 1.7X timesd more out than in, you can say start with X KJ electrical energy, convert it to mechnical energy plus 70%= 1.7X kJ mechnical energy out, then use 0.7X kJ of that energy for useful work as desired and the X kJ for driving an electric generator again producing X KJ of electrical energy which is lead back to the initial input of the machine and so on. So no more electrical input required from any external force and you should get more and more energy forever. GOD Bless!
-
Salaam jonny,
Tesla created over unity systems a hundred years ago, but if the sovereigns worshipped by the masses had allowed those very masses to use the abundance of Allah, they would have no long be any sovereigns still operating in the modern world, this is also the reason they buy and sell the abundance of the earth as if they owned it, because Muslim haven't got the brains Allah imbued an ant with, and clear guidance presented simply and clearly within the Qur'an confuses and mystifies them, to the extent they blindly follow sovereign jinn wherever they are led, they join in with the usury and the hoarding of Allahs property, buying and selling stolen goods as if it was acceptable.
Science proves many things, because many things are fundamental, it's these fundamentals that conventional physics rejects and attempts to cover in a blanket of deceit. If you reject the establishment as telling the truth and begin to look at the evidence of experimentation, a new picture of reality begins to emerge, a richer, deeper and simpler understanding, the main reason people do not understand physics is is makes no sense, they have turned it into gibberish intentionally, this scares people away from investigation at any level, beyond superficial acceptance of scientific dogma. The media reiterate lies endlessly, 'energy cannot be created nor destroyed', for science, 'Einstein is a genius' for a jewish superiority, a man who was wrong on everything here stated, and will be shown as so in the end; 'only two certainties in life death and taxes', both these ideas are lies, you cannot die in the conventional sense and taxation is a modern invention for the majority of the peoples of the earth, and as Islam demands all taxation must be refused and rejected Muslims must be at the forefront of that refusal, establishing common law as the true foundation of Islam, refusing sovereigns, corporations, legislations, taxations, usury and establishing reason, education as the corner stone of community.
-
Peace "Abdun Nur",
Salaam jonny,
Tesla created over unity systems a hundred years ago, but if the sovereigns worshipped by the masses had allowed those very masses to use the abundance of Allah, they would have no long be any sovereigns still operating in the modern world, this is also the reason they buy and sell the abundance of the earth as if they owned it, because Muslim haven't got the brains Allah imbued an ant with, and clear guidance presented simply and clearly within the Qur'an confuses and mystifies them, to the extent they blindly follow sovereign jinn wherever they are led, they join in with the usury and the hoarding of Allahs property, buying and selling stolen goods as if it was acceptable.
JK- To be honest the cocnept of infinite energy even seemed problematic for me in view with GOD creating the universe in all the thing sin it. Coz if we can derive infinite energy from any pt in the vacuum, whats the whole fossil fuel GOD made in the earth for, what's the sun for with it's vast energy and the stars and so many other palces in the universe that have so much energy if we can just tap into the vacuum and get it? Could you offer me a good explanation for that?
Science proves many things, because many things are fundamental, it's these fundamentals that conventional physics rejects and attempts to cover in a blanket of deceit.
JK- CAn you give me example of some of these fundamentals and how they are proven?
If you reject the establishment as telling the truth and begin to look at the evidence of experimentation, a new picture of reality begins to emerge,
JK- But experimentation showed things like Einstein's general and special relativity to be true so far with no exceptions.
a richer, deeper and simpler understanding, the main reason people do not understand physics is is makes no sense, they have turned it into gibberish intentionally, this scares people away from investigation at any level, beyond superficial acceptance of scientific dogma. The media reiterate lies endlessly, 'energy cannot be created nor destroyed',
JK- Lets first define this. When you say energy can be destroyed, you probably mean that it disappears from our human observation, right? Coz in the absolute sense it doesnt make sense to say energy vanishes. it has to go somewhere like say into another dimension. If you agree on that , then I'll say that although this happens on the quantum level, I have not yet seen any reason to accept this can happen at the macro level too. ALSO it would make even less sense in relation to GOD, coz then why did GOD create a universe with laws and the things in it all follow laws and are stable, if everything is open?
for science, 'Einstein is a genius' for a jewish superiority, a man who was wrong on everything here stated, and will be shown as so in the end;
JK- So your saying relativity is wrong too?
'only two certainties in life death and taxes', both these ideas are lies, you cannot die in the conventional sense and taxation is a modern invention for the majority of the peoples of the earth, and as Islam demands all taxation must be refused and rejected Muslims must be at the forefront of that refusal, establishing common law as the true foundation of Islam, refusing sovereigns, corporations, legislations, taxations, usury and establishing reason, education as the corner stone of community.
JK- I agree with you on the tax issues. In the modern world of mass production taxation doesnt make any sense. Taxes were there to cut people's spending power so that the government could pay to establish public services WIHOUT causing inflation. HOWEVER in todays world even if demand increases, supply would also increase drastically. Thus the government could be given permission to print money and in the name of the people give it to the people whod be working for the general public plus even give every single indivdual arnd Eur 1000 or so tht everyones basic needs be fulfilled and they wld work happily to gain more luxury. That wld be a much better system and their wont be any inflation. The warnings of tht this wld cause inflation is wht i see as the actual fraud. Also just cause the middle class wld have 40% more money, all public service agents receiving eruql sums as before too, STILL the former wldnt start buying more vital stuff than they actually need. At best theyd buy a bigger car but as i said car companies are always happy to increase their supply should demand go uo coz of so much competition so there wont be any inflation. GOD Bless!
-
Peace "Abdun Nur",
Salaam,
it seems you want me to teach you physics, which is a bit too much for a thread on a forum, why don't you prove Einstein is correct and then I'll tell you why its not true.
JK- I've been watching many videos on free energy. Most of them make no sense and are obviously fakes but some actually made some sense i.e. the possible extraction of vacuum energy(zero point energy) by a German Physicist Prof. Dr. Claus W. Turtur. However he's been heavily criticized on a conference where the rest of the physicists say that what he showed is merely the Biefeld-Brown effect. Furthermore the effect he shows with his magnetic rotor is very small so I can't say anything yet. Listened to his lecture in German yesterday here where he also tries to refute some of the criticism levelled against him
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2I3EJyYcfc
I've written him an email and am waiting for a reply. Might visit him sometime and check the device for myself.
I've also heard claims equating ZPE with Dark Energy which physicists accept is there. However it's extraction for useful work here on earth is not caimed to be possible so far.
Another thing which makes more sense is this
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcCLIwlbhLcBUT even if this is true it doesn't mean Einstein was completely wrong JUST LIKE Newton wasn't enitirely wrong either since the latter still applies for all practical purposes in classical mechanics with perfectly satisfying results for everyday use here on earth. MOREOVER the above concept of free energy does not violate conservation of energy BECAUSE the energy DOES COME FROM SOMEWHERE AFTERALL i.e. THE VACUUM.
GOD Bless! -
Salaam jonny,
"The earlier concept of a universe made up of physical particles interacting according to fixed laws is no longer tenable. It is implicit in present findings that action rather than matter is basic. . . This is good news, for it is no longer appropriate to think of the universe as a gradually subsiding agitation of billiard balls. The universe, far from being a desert of inert particles, is a theatre of increasingly complex organization, a stage for development in which man has a definite place, without any upper limit to his evolution."
--Arthur M. Young - The Reflexive UniverseThis paragraph sums up exactly my views of particles, therefore Einstein is wrong, as was Newton before him, while Tesla, Faraday and Maxwell are correct.