Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Critical Examination of Islam
  3. Quranic Divinity
  4. Is the Koran all from Allah?

Is the Koran all from Allah?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Quranic Divinity
26 Posts 13 Posters 845 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    smmirza
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Peace,
    You know I have been wondering that for a while too! It seems to me it is narrated by a group who refer themselves as 'We'. But then there are some parts where God speaks himself and it becomes 'I'. I find the story about Khidhr especially interesting when he talks to Moses about what he had done. Because he uses 'We' instead of himself. I dunno I guess I am rambling here. Some people say the 'I' denotes an intensive form when God is becoming personal.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • WakasW Offline
      WakasW Offline
      Wakas
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Does God Exist?
      An answer using The Quran and probability http//www.quran434.com/Does-God-Exist.pdf

      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Does God Exist?
        An answer using The Quran and probability http//www.quran434.com/Does-God-Exist.pdf

        Be aware that the method you used is defeated easily by the anthropic principle.

        Actually, the probability for God to exist is either 1 or 0 depending on the definition of God. With a correct definition of God, it is 1, this fact is inescapable

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • WakasW Offline
          WakasW Offline
          Wakas
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Be aware that the method you used is defeated easily by the anthropic principle.

          Can you elaborate?

          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Can you elaborate?

            I'm sure you're aware of the typical argument about creationism, people say "for life to exist, 1 in 1000000000000000 chance, for life to evolve into us, 1 in 10^1000 chance". Yet if you flip the lenses you see this through, chances of life to exist in a universe with our physics = 100%, that is to say that because we are here to observe it, the chances MUST be 100%.

            Another way to look at it, what are the odds for anything to happen? For example with a dice, you may say "1 in 6" for any side. But you can also say, with a bit less rigour, that the "chance" is 1 in 2 - it either happens or it doesn't In this case, the 1 in 6 probability is actually irrelevant and the 1 in 2 is what matters though this is counterintuitive. It's hard to explain this thing so early in the morn, if I try explaining any further I will merely cloud your mind but a bit of reading around will work wonders

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • WakasW Offline
              WakasW Offline
              Wakas
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Yes, but I am not referring to the probability of creation, I am referring to the probability of a human authoring such a book. To boot, in our 'closed system' called earth, within the experience of what we know. Of course, one could argue that the probability of this is actually high if we imagine in our vast universe many human-inhabited planets exist and we just happen to live in the one where the 1 in 10 thousand billion billion human did it. Fair enough.

              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                JewishDude
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Ahhhh the old if you can't convince them confuse them argument. And better yet confuse them with heavy maths that they probably don't know. So they feel not only confused but stupid and inferior.

                Putting on professor jacket (yes I have one)
                As a person who does have the title "Tenured Associate Professor of Statistics" with a PhD in Statistics I do know a bit about probability. I do not claim to know everything about probability but I teach it at a university and have published many research articles in it.....

                What are you talking about??? using probability to PROVE something has to be true?!?! Probability is the language of uncertainty not the language of certainty. If you are certain then from a maths perspective you are deterministic. If you are uncertain you are "stochastic" or "probabilistic". You use probability to tell people YOU ARE UNCERTAIN. Rare events happen all the time. Ever read in the newspaper or hear on the news that someone won the lottery? The odds of winning the big prize in the Powerball lottery is around 1 in 53,000,000 (which is really small). But several people win this lottery every year. Sometimes every week.

                Here is my point. Don't use probability to confuse people. You can't use probability to PROVE that something is true or something is not true. You can only use it to understand how uncertain you are about that something.

                My apologies to anyone. I felt the need to protect my discipline.

                Taking off my professor jacket

                Religion and faith are not about confusing other people. When you read the Quran does it seem as though it is authentic to you? If not then you are uncertain. Being uncertain is ok. Being uncertain is probably advantageous as it requires us to seek out Allah. It requires us to get to know him/her and to strive for certainty. Don't look for certainty in probabilities because you won't find it there. Look for certainty in your hearts, in a newborn's eyes, in the laughter of a friend. That is where you will find your certainty. There is where you will see Allah shine through to you. Be open to finding Allah and you will see his/her works. Once you see Allah's works you will be able to answer the question that is the title of this thread. Once you see Allah's works you will push your certainty to 1.

                Just my thoughts.

                Jewish Dude
                peace Salam, Shalom, Peace peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  noble
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Thanks @JewishDude,

                  I taught Maths and IT,and my weakness is actually Probability and Statistics, that is why I usually refused to lecture it to seniors ;D

                  There are some distinctions you made which I directly relate to...

                  My certainty for the existence of God (Allah) are through the events in my life...

                  In fact most times I use these events as feedback for guidance, and if I am doing the right thing... (it is very surprising the "answers" I get
                  even for the most trivial of matters)...

                  An important and vital breakthrough for me was my asking the question "if the hadith and traditions of the prophet Mohamed were what Allah expected of me
                  or being guided by the Quran alone, and that I be given a Sign" - one night, I had a dream of searching on google about hadith and quran,
                  so I did what my dream told me, and I stumbled on this site, that was in 2003...

                  Since then, now I am certain Allah has guided me to what I need as He wishes, not only did it increase me in Faith, but I started looking and digging deeper into the past
                  of the other associated faiths in the Torah and the Gospel...

                  Furthermore, I took the question of my origins seriously, as my genealogical trees on the arabic side bring me back to Ali and Fatima through Hassan,
                  and I do also have a Jewish side from the Aures on the side of a Grandmother...

                  So there is some fascinating research for me to do now...
                  I also wish to do a DNA genome collection to find out more scientifically about my origins...

                  Peace be with you

                  Nabil

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    loxbox13
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Is the Koran all from all Allah or is some of it from Gabriel, Mohammad, Jinn and so on? For instance is it claimed that every word in the Koran is directly what Allah told Gabriel to say to Mohammad verbatim?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Offline
                      C Offline
                      captainneckbeard
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Ahhhh the old if you can't convince them confuse them argument. And better yet confuse them with heavy maths that they probably don't know. So they feel not only confused but stupid and inferior.

                      Putting on professor jacket (yes I have one)
                      As a person who does have the title "Tenured Associate Professor of Statistics" with a PhD in Statistics I do know a bit about probability. I do not claim to know everything about probability but I teach it at a university and have published many research articles in it.....

                      What are you talking about??? using probability to PROVE something has to be true?!?! Probability is the language of uncertainty not the language of certainty. If you are certain then from a maths perspective you are deterministic. If you are uncertain you are "stochastic" or "probabilistic". You use probability to tell people YOU ARE UNCERTAIN. Rare events happen all the time. Ever read in the newspaper or hear on the news that someone won the lottery? The odds of winning the big prize in the Powerball lottery is around 1 in 53,000,000 (which is really small). But several people win this lottery every year. Sometimes every week.

                      Here is my point. Don't use probability to confuse people. You can't use probability to PROVE that something is true or something is not true. You can only use it to understand how uncertain you are about that something.

                      My apologies to anyone. I felt the need to protect my discipline.

                      Taking off my professor jacket

                      Religion and faith are not about confusing other people. When you read the Quran does it seem as though it is authentic to you? If not then you are uncertain. Being uncertain is ok. Being uncertain is probably advantageous as it requires us to seek out Allah. It requires us to get to know him/her and to strive for certainty. Don't look for certainty in probabilities because you won't find it there. Look for certainty in your hearts, in a newborn's eyes, in the laughter of a friend. That is where you will find your certainty. There is where you will see Allah shine through to you. Be open to finding Allah and you will see his/her works. Once you see Allah's works you will be able to answer the question that is the title of this thread. Once you see Allah's works you will push your certainty to 1.

                      Just my thoughts.

                      Jewish Dude
                      peace Salam, Shalom, Peace peace

                      I like this post very much! I have not taken classes in statistics in many years, so it is really not something I'm strong in; however, describing probability as the language of uncertainty really clicked with me. Thanks for the insight! bravo

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rana
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Ahhhh the old if you can't convince them confuse them argument. And better yet confuse them with heavy maths that they probably don't know. So they feel not only confused but stupid and inferior.

                        Putting on professor jacket (yes I have one)
                        As a person who does have the title "Tenured Associate Professor of Statistics" with a PhD in Statistics I do know a bit about probability. I do not claim to know everything about probability but I teach it at a university and have published many research articles in it.....

                        Oh no. Stats makes me want to crawl into a hole and hide! Well good on you for tackling it. )

                        The probability of an event is a measure of the likelihood that the event will occur. Statisticians have agreed on the following rules and conventions.
                        (from http//stattrek.com/Help/Glossary.aspx)

                        It doesn't mention that "you can only use it to understand how uncertain you are". Can you please explain?

                        peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • WakasW Offline
                          WakasW Offline
                          Wakas
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          peace JD,

                          Ahhhh the old if you can't convince them confuse them argument. And better yet confuse them with heavy maths that they probably don't know. So they feel not only confused but stupid and inferior.

                          Putting on professor jacket (yes I have one)
                          As a person who does have the title "Tenured Associate Professor of Statistics" with a PhD in Statistics I do know a bit about probability. I do not claim to know everything about probability but I teach it at a university and have published many research articles in it.....

                          I think the above comment is quite patronising to the lay reader. As statistics and probability are not that difficult to understand. In fact, I cite the following example in the PDF

                          Lets say ?1 in 2? people of the general population are male, and ?1 in 4? males are
                          brown eyed. Now, in order to find the probability of finding a male with brown eyes
                          within the general population, all you do, is multiply both probabilities as follows 1/2 *
                          1/4 = 1/8 (which equates to a ?1 in 8? chance of finding a brown eyed male in the
                          general population).
                          Mathematicians prefer to state the probability value as a decimal, in this case that would
                          be ?0.125? (1/. It is also well established that probability values closer to the value of
                          one are more likely to occur than those furthest from one. If a value of one is obtained,
                          this means that it is a certainty, if a value of zero is obtained this means it is impossible.

                          Are you implying the above is too confusing for people?

                          IF that were true, then I think pondering upon whether God exists or not or trying to understand The Quran will be the least of their problems.

                          What are you talking about??? using probability to PROVE something has to be true?!?! Probability is the language of uncertainty not the language of certainty. If you are certain then from a maths perspective you are deterministic. If you are uncertain you are "stochastic" or "probabilistic". You use probability to tell people YOU ARE UNCERTAIN. Rare events happen all the time. Ever read in the newspaper or hear on the news that someone won the lottery? The odds of winning the big prize in the Powerball lottery is around 1 in 53,000,000 (which is really small). But several people win this lottery every year. Sometimes every week.

                          Here is my point. Don't use probability to confuse people. You can't use probability to PROVE that something is true or something is not true. You can only use it to understand how uncertain you are about that something.

                          You may have some education in statistics, but it is clear you either did not read the article or if you did you did not understand it. Here are some nice quotes, taken directly from the article

                          First of all, I would like to point out that no-one can prove or disprove that
                          God exists, 100% beyond doubt, because this is impossible to do either way.

                          If you believe that this is possible, then you could just as easily believe that The Quran is
                          man made. However, if you believe that this occurrence would be very rare (because the
                          odds are far too low) then, you should also consider that The Quran may in fact be the
                          word of God

                          I do not talk about certainty in the article.

                          If you wish to comment on something, it is recommended to actually read it before commenting on it.

                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Rana
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Wakas I can't be sure (it was a little unclear since JewishDude didn't mention anyone in the post) but he might have been referring to another commenter who spoke numerically in his/her post? But, like I said...not really sure. (and no stats to back up my idea )

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              JewishDude
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Sorry to offend anyone.

                              My comment is about the fact that people often confuse people in order to convince them. And then say if you don't understand then you aren't worthy of the knowledge. Think about the people who guard the hadith against interpretation. They say Itijihad is closed and you need to be an expert in order to understand it. That makes people feel inferior or plain stupid.

                              My personal opinion about mathematics/statistics is it allows me to see the patterns in the world that Allah created. There is a funny saying

                              Some use statistics like a drunkard uses a lamp post, he uses it for support instead of illumination. I think the same way about the Quran. People use it to support their position instead of using it for illumination.

                              Again if I offended any one I humbly ask for your forgiveness.

                              JewishDude
                              peace Shalom, Salam, Peace peace

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                savage_carrot
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                My personal opinion about mathematics/statistics is it allows me to see the patterns in the world that Allah created. There is a funny saying

                                Some use statistics like a drunkard uses a lamp post, he uses it for support instead of illumination. I think the same way about the Quran. People use it to support their position instead of using it for illumination.

                                Sweet quote, makes sense.

                                Are you implying the above is too confusing for people?

                                IF that were true, then I think pondering upon whether God exists or not or trying to understand The Quran will be the least of their problems.

                                I found it sexist personally and take offense to the rest of your statement P

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • WakasW Offline
                                  WakasW Offline
                                  Wakas
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  I take offence to your spelling of offence.

                                  All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    savage_carrot
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    Pedantic as always ;D

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Rana
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      Omg you guys! lol. At least you are funny on this thread so you gave me a giggle this morning.
                                      peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        huruf
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        I have the impression that statistics has its uses in things that occur in great numbers, but for a specific thing, there are no statistics. You may draw statististics about how much formal or even informal education believers or non believers have, how many children, any amount of data you care to take into consideration, but to say, fulan such and such is he or she a believer or not, there are no statistics. To say there is a God by this definition, you cannot say by statistics. And then the definitions... How can we define what we cannot fathom or grasp?

                                        It is a matter of existence or non existence, if something exists then what really exists we may call God, or we may call it something else, but the point is The thing we re calling. If we conceive of existence without meaning... that for instance, I cannot grasp. For me everything has meaning, so how can I grasp or interact we something that has no meaning, included myself. If something has meaning and it exists, and everything that exists exists, and is coherent and has meaning, call it by whatever you want, but it is only ONE, everything is ONE, and there a MIND that is ONE. Otherwise we would be chaos and we couldn't possibly be here pinching words.

                                        And that is not a matter of probabilities, that is a fact.

                                        Salaam

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          siki
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          Getting back to the topic,

                                          In my opinion Quran is too trivial a thing to be compiled by Allah himself. I think HIS planning division must have floated the idea and Got it approved. HIS R&D cell, probably chalked a broad outline and then let the Owners/controllers for earthly affairs finish the job.

                                          Once complete and approved, it must have been passed on to the messenger in charge (Gabriel) of inspectorate team, to be taken along in their next annual visit. They brought it down on one of the Shahar ur Ramadhan night some 14 centuries ago and handed it over to the last layer of controllers for deliverance across the border.

                                          siki

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users