Good link about misconceptions
-
the author uses the Quran as proof
according to his understanding but you must verify it for your own self.
He says thatan example is already provided by Mazhar Sahib.
That last point is debatable... Tongue
You made my tight dhoti got lose D rotfl
He's one of the moderators and a wonderful person mashallah.
yeah but bit arrogant, calling others "illogical" most of the times.
-
This forum is not exactly for personal attacks, though honestly personal opinions like yours neither matter nor really have any significant effect. Plus by you blantantly attacking someones character like that does indicate why he would choose to call you something like that in the first place.
If you have issues with someone try not to make a big deal out of it in front of everyone, specially on an unrelated thread. Sheds a very bad light on yourself.
-
peace Mazhar,
The problem with your interpretation is your own insertions, and that you seem to regard the common Arabic word "muslim" as a proper title/name, when this is not the case. This has been discussed at length in this forum.
See http//misconceptions-about-islam.com/muslim-or-hell.htm
Although, having said that, technically one should be muslim (small "m" to gain "paradise". -
@wakas thanks bravo
Also, I'll post how I came to be a member here and how your link I posted got me in big trouble with family and friends &
@all the comedians ignore
@Raaajah and Mazhar Yes, I realize the understanding of certain verses of the Quran are subject to one's interpretation, however, pretty good work by Wakas none the less.
@ Raaajah I learned the hard way; a loose dhoti...never a good thing -[
-
rraza
If you have issues with someone try not to make a big deal out of it in front of everyone, specially on an unrelated thread. Sheds a very bad light on yourself.
Who cares? about your opinion on any one.
That's what I felt about him and said it honestly, what you felt you said it, don't try to create a storm in cup of tea as you usually do. -
tightdhoti
@Raaajah and Mazhar Yes, I realize the understanding of certain verses of the Quran are subject to one's interpretation, however, pretty good work by Wakas none the less.
@ Raaajah I learned the hard way; a loose dhoti...never a good thing
Yes Wakas has done some good work no doubt, I have often praised him in this forum, but nonetheless he is a human.
I respect your achievement, loose dhoti was just a joke on lighter side.
-
@Raaajah and Mazhar Yes, I realize the understanding of certain verses of the Quran are subject to one's interpretation, however, pretty good work by Wakas none the less.
No statement of Qur'aan is subject to one's interpretation. The Qur'aan's statement is only that which is conveyed by its own sentences. Every statement that needs elaboration from another angle has been so elaborated by the Qur'aan itself. Since Qur'aan is not merely a narrative book but is a speech/address, which necessitates elisions, for eloquent speech point of view, it has also elisions in a statement. However, the same are instantly detectable by a person who was not the addressee of the speech at the given point in time. Not to allow any reader of later time-line, to infer at his own and insert those elided elements in the speech, the same has been stated elsewhere in some indirect speech.
Therefore, even nothing is to be inferred, except which is mentioned therein point blank.
-
peace Mazhar,
The problem with your interpretation is your own insertions, and that you seem to regard the common Arabic word "muslim" as a proper title/name, when this is not the case. This has been discussed at length in this forum.
See http//misconceptions-about-islam.com/muslim-or-hell.htm
Although, having said that, technically one should be muslim (small "m" to gain "paradise".Peace Wakas,
There is no insertion in 1502. What is in parentheses can also be put outside in the striaght translation. What is stated therein is the desire which will be stated and repeated quite often only in the Hereafter. The other word in Parentheses is Grand Qur'aan which is mentioned immediately before this Ayah, which is denied by people about whom the information is given in this Ayah.
However I am happay about a little tilt "Although.......".
