Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Can we pray for our christian friends?

Can we pray for our christian friends?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
89 Posts 20 Posters 3.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hoppean
    wrote on last edited by
    #77

    yes , and it's also a sectarian spirit to call those who maintain salat and give zaakat "Mohammadans" and "mushreeks" while calling themselves "monoteists" instead muslims and befriending those who reject Quran.

    Islam in all its manifestations absolutely rejects the Quran. Have you ever studied their doctors and theologians? What they teach necessarily implies a rejection of the Quran, it doesn't matter what they otherwise claim. In fact the Jewish Rabbi who rejects the Quran openly, probably without knowing anything about it, is more honest, in that he does not claim that the Quran supports his false religion. According to your reasoning, as long as a roman catholic says he believes in the Quran, then nothing he teaches or does can put him outside of revealed truth. The post Quranic religion called Islam is shirk because it rejects the word of God as its final authority, and therefore gives the glory, that belongs to God alone, to their demons, which they camouflage as traditions.

    As far as salah and zakaah go, well you simply beg the question. Why is their religious practice definitional? Ironically their doctors teach that you CANNOT do salah and zaakah without their satanic traditions, as the word of God is wholly impotent to provide the "necessary details". Yet here you are defending the teachings of these people, as if they were of God! In their satanic religion you are NOT a "muslim" precisely because you faithfully accept the word of God as sufficient, and yet you cite their "salah" and their "zaakah" as proof of their orthodoxy!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      silverquin
      wrote on last edited by
      #78

      @Hamzamutlu

      1. When someone rejecting Quran it's his/her own business with Allah, not ours D Unless that person harm us, now thats become our 'business'. When that person dont harm us do we have to hate them? Read these, only a few examples written in Quran
        -Wealth and buildings are the beauty of this life. But the good deeds that remain behind are better with your Lord for a reward, and better for hope. (1846)
        -Kind words and forgiveness is far better than a charity that is followed by harm. God is Rich, Compassionate. (2263)
      2. Who said that ? Salat and Zakat are mentioned in Quran as part of our duties as Muslims.
      3. Muslim should abide only God.. not some imam/fellow person.. Even Rasulullah was sent by Allah only to deliver Allah's message.. not to create his own law. Because a Muslim is a Monoteist,
      • Say, I warn you only through the Revelation. But the deaf can hear nothing when they are warned (2145)
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        Jafar
        wrote on last edited by
        #79

        yes , and it's also a sectarian spirit to call those who maintain salat and give zaakat "Mohammadans" and "mushreeks" while calling themselves "monoteists" instead muslims and befriending those who reject Quran.

        I don't see it as 'sectarians' to call anyone anything.... (e.g. Americans, Africans, Asians, Mohammedans, Christians, Buddhist, Wahhabis, Suffis, Sallafis, Catholics, Saudis, Atheists, Footballers, Actors, Actress, Socialists, Nationalists, Zionists, Tourists, Capitalists.. and so on and so forth)

        As long as they don't incite hatred towards those who they regards as "NOT US" but "THEM"..

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fabrinoo
          wrote on last edited by
          #80

          Now I really feel Like praying to God so that he would guide her in life but am not sure what would Quran say to that. I know that you are not supose to pray for polytheists and Catholics do have their saint thing that they are big on.

          So, yeah can we pray for Catholics and other Christians, also can we pray for atheists who have helped us in life? Pray to God to guide them to himself.

          Dear Brother

          You are justifiably in confusion because most of the Muslims including those who have strong conviction that "Quran" is an only source for the knowledge of Deen e Islam. obviously it is very difficult to break the shackles around our necks by the traditions and sometime we perceive un-intentionally according to the traditions ( Islamic History, Biography of Prophet and Hadith). Therefore a misconception prevail among Muslims.

          I understand that your question is actual not for Dua but for (Prayer, (you wish that the person who helped you in every manner must be rewarded by Allah Subhanna) The word Al-Dua'a ( you called prayer) is defined as under

          Definition
          Da?a also spelled as ?Dua? meaning ?to call someone?. Therefore, ?ad- da?a? means ?the forefinger which is used as a sign to call someone?. ?ad dayiah? denotes ? the cry of the horses in a battle?. Hu?a minni dawatar rajul convey ?he is at distance where a man?s voice can reach him; he is at a calling distance. (Taj) ?Ibn- e- Faaris? said its basic meanings are ?to incline someone towards oneself eloquently by speech or conversation?. Dayahu alal ameer, means he took him to ameer (leader); in this context ?dayi ?is not only one who calls but also someone who persuade you to someone else (for example to an ideology); or call someone.

          iddia?oo,(yad- da-oon) means ?to wish or desire? (Taj ul Urus); ?to call on someone, repeatedly?.(672 Tadau alaih, means ?they gathered against him?. tada?a alaihal aduwu min kulli jaa?nib, means ?the enemy attacked him from all sides?. tadaa?atilhaitaan means ?walls fall down one by one?.
          ( Taj ul Urus) Da?autuhu zaida, means I named him Zaid ad dayee-o means adopted son ? (taj) plural is ad-ia-oo 334 ad daayiah means the milk that is left behind in the teats of the animals so that the left over milk may obtain with its help, at the time of, milking the animal again; (taj) by the reason - cause.
          Such things, which entice and excite emotions of human called, ad dawa-ee (Muheet) (these meanings should be kept in mind because they throw light on the meaning of the word dua ? Call? ). Wad-oo shohada?akum 223, means ?call those who will help you?. in Surah Kahaf, nadao and da?a have been used as synonym;
          1852. In Surah Airaaf, 7.193, AAalaykum adaAAawtumoohum am antum mitoon(a) has been used as antonym; which means to be quiet as such da?a would mean to call. In Surah Baqarra, verse # 261, fa(o)dAAu lan rabbaka means Call upon your ?Rubb? for us.

          Al-dAAua call- request - applies for.

          An excerpt from Lughat ul Quran by Mr.GA.Pervaiz

          if you need further information about this,please go to http//rmakhtar.logspot.com

          Peace!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Offline
            H Offline
            hamzamutlu
            wrote on last edited by
            #81

            salam bigmo, all
            plz read 4171 more carefully

            4171 O people of the scripture, do not transgress the limits of YOUR religion, and do not say about GOD except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was a messenger of GOD, and His word that He had sent to Mary, and a revelation from Him. Therefore, you shall believe in GOD and His messengers. You shall not say, "Trinity."............

            Whose religion is the religion told in 4171, the limits of which are transgressed. christians' or jews' religion ?

            Basically anyone who are students any of the scriptures (the Torah, the Injeel and the Quran) are more or less people of the book so in fact sunnies and shites are people of the book as well.

            So accordingly prophet Mohammad and sahaba were also people of the book. D so are we all. If everybody is people of the book then what's the use of using the term "people of the book" ? D

            HOWEVER the term ?people of the book? as used in the Quran generally specifies only two groups , the Jews and the Christians because of the CONTEXT of the verses.

            Why "generally" ? have you seen exceptions ? is there any single verse in which the term "people of the book" is used for muslims ? D

            peace all

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Maha
              wrote on last edited by
              #82

              Bigmo

              People of the book are the Jews and not Christians. The Rabbis to this day will tell you they rejected Jesus because he claimed to be god. However the real reason why they rejected him is the same reason Sunnis and Shias reject

              Brother as I can see hhe quranic word for jew are simply 'hood' and when talking about jews only the quran stats 'jews'. But 'people of the book' as the word itself describes, are more than a group of people, its 'people who have a book'. The verse you just quoted regarding jews, what you forget is that it was during the time of moses when they had and still have torah hence they were/are included 'people of the book'. So the verse you just quoted, just confirms that jews are included in the people of the book and I believe muslims as well, since they really have hundreds of book which they follow

              Hamzamultlu

              So accordingly prophet Mohammad and sahaba were also people of the book. so are we all. If everybody is people of the book then what's the use of using the term "people of the book" ?

              What is all this sudden talk about muhammad and sahaba? you sound like a real sunni o

              Why "generally" ? have you seen exceptions ? is there any single verse in which the term "people of the book" is used for muslims ?

              Muslims can both be from among 'the people of the book' and they can also be people who are not among 'people of the book'

              And there are, certainly, among the people of the Scripture, those who believe in God and in that which has been revealed to you, and in that which has been revealed to them, humbling themselves before God. They do not sell the Verses of God for a little price, for them is a reward with their Lord. Surely, God is Swift in account. '(3199

              Not all of them are alike; a party of the people of the Scripture stand for the right, they recite the Verses of God during the hours of the night, prostrating themselves in prayer. They believe in God and the Last Day; they enjoin Al-Ma'r?f and forbid Al-Munkar ; and they hasten in (all) good works; and they are among the righteous. And whatever good they do, nothing will be rejected of them; for God knows well those who are Al-Muttaq?n .(3113-115)

              Verily! Those who believe and those who are Jews and Christians, and Sabians, whoever believes in God and the Last Day and do righteous good deeds shall have their reward with their Lord, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve . (quran 262)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Offline
                K Offline
                KDC501
                wrote on last edited by
                #83

                So accordingly prophet Mohammad and sahaba were also people of the book. so are we all. If everybody is people of the book then what's the use of using the term "people of the book" ?

                Why "generally" ? have you seen exceptions ? is there any single verse in which the term "people of the book" is used for muslims ?

                peace all

                The people of the book is used to describe people who have scripture that is from God.

                Hence the term ?the people of the BOOK? . Like the Torah and the Injeel, The Quran is also a BOOK!

                So basically any person who studies the scripture are people of the book. This includes , sunnis, shites, Jews, Christians etc.

                HOWEVER the term ?the people of the book? by context in the Quran is only used to describe the Jews and the Christians. Because they were used as EXAMPLES of people who had scripture from BEFORE.

                Ok look at it this way. If the Quran wasn?t the last scripture we today would have been categorized in a new scripture with the Jews and the Christians as ?people of the book? since we study the Quran. The Quran is a book,a scripture just like the Injeel and the Torah.

                Peace,

                Kevin

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Offline
                  H Offline
                  hamzamutlu
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #84

                  The people of the book is used to describe people who have scripture that is from God.

                  You can use the term ?the people of the book? as you wish..no problem. The matter is for which particular people the term is used by ALLAH in Quran ? And surely each of such terms in Quran must correspond to particular people since otherwise Quran's message would be ambiguous, wouldn't it ? And as you also admit, the term ?the people of the book? by context in the Quran is only used to describe the Jews and the Christians.

                  If the Quran wasn?t the last scripture we today would have been categorized in a new scripture with the Jews and the Christians as ?people of the book? since we study the Quran.

                  If the Quran wasn?t the last scripture then ALLAH would have choosen the terms He used in Quran accordingly.

                  peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Maha
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #85

                    You can use the term ?the people of the book? as you wish..no problem. The matter is for which particular people the term is used by ALLAH in Quran ? And surely each of such terms in Quran must correspond to particular people since otherwise Quran's message would be ambiguous, wouldn't it ? And as you also admit, the term ?the people of the book? by context in the Quran is only used to describe the Jews and the Christians.

                    If the Quran wasn?t the last scripture then ALLAH would have choosen the terms He used in Quran accordingly.

                    peace

                    People of the book in the quran is desribed for anyone with a book, and christians and jews had books so they are included. But you see, muslims also have a book called quran right? So they are also among people of the book. So when the prophet got these message he would be thinking about the people who had a book, mostly known as jews and christians but since Quran is timeless the 'people of the book' also means muslims today since they also have a book.

                    So muslims are also 'people of the book'

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H Offline
                      H Offline
                      hamzamutlu
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #86

                      But you see, muslims also have a book called quran right? So they are also among people of the book.

                      I wonder when muslims exactly became the people of the book .. I mean after completion of revelation of Quran or after having %50 of it or maybe right after the revelation of the first verse.

                      So when the prophet got these message he would be thinking about the people who had a book, mostly known as jews and christians

                      Yes yes.. very probably he thought so since he was probably not as clever as you D

                      (sorry for the joke, but I couldn't find a better answer D)

                      peace

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Offline
                        K Offline
                        KDC501
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #87

                        You can use the term ?the people of the book? as you wish..no problem. The matter is for which particular people the term is used by ALLAH in Quran ? And surely each of such terms in Quran must correspond to particular people since otherwise Quran's message would be ambiguous, wouldn't it ? And as you also admit, the term ?the people of the book? by context in the Quran is only used to describe the Jews and the Christians.

                        If the Quran wasn?t the last scripture then ALLAH would have choosen the terms He used in Quran accordingly.

                        peace

                        I don't disagree with you brother that the term people of the book was used to describe the Jews and the Christians. What I do disagree with is that you say that the definition of the term means the Jews and the Christians. This is not the case.

                        Sura 4153
                        4153 The people of the book ask you to bring down to them a book from the heavens. They had asked Moses for even more than that, for they said, "Let us see God plainly!", so the lightning bolt took them for their wickedness. Then they took the calf after the proof had come to them, and We pardoned them for this; We gave Moses a clear authority.

                        Here we see that the people of the book was used to describe the Jews ALONE....

                        In Sura 4171
                        4171 O people of the book, do not overstep in your system, nor say about God except the truth. Jesus the son of Mary was no more than God's messenger and the fulfillment of His word to Mary, and an inspiration from Him. So acknowledge God and His messengers, and do not say, "Trinity." Cease, for it is better for you. God is only One god, be He glorified that He should have a son! To Him is all that is in the heavens and what is in the earth. God is enough as a caretaker.

                        We see that the term is used to describe the Christians alone...


                        In other verses the term is unclear regarding which group in particular....but most would agree that it generally describes the Jews and the Christians.

                        986 Those who rejected from the people of the book and those who set up partners are in the fires of hell abiding therein, those are the worst of creation

                        375 Among the people of the book are those whom if you entrust him with a large amount he gives it back to you, and there are those whom if you entrust with one gold coin he will not return it to you unless you are standing over him. That is because they said, "We have no obligation towards the Gentiles." They say about God lies while knowing.

                        5911 Have you noted those who are hypocrites, they say to their companions in denial among the people of the book "If you are driven out we will go out with you, and we will never obey anyone who opposes you. If anyone fights you, we will support you." God bears witness that they are liars.

                        We see the term people of the Book. But which people is God talking about?? The Jews or the Christians??? Or both?

                        Basically what I'm trying to show you is that if the term meant only Jews and the Christians why would the term be used with the Jews alone and the Christians alone? Jews and Christians are not the same. It's like jelly and peanut butter. So basically the proper definition of the term is "people who posses scripture" and not "Jews and Christians"

                        The term "People of the Book" is SUBJECTED TO CONTEXT! That is why you see it being used differently in the Quran. Sometimes it can mean the Jews alone, sometimes the Christians, sometimes both. The proper definition of the term means 'people who posses scripture'. Not Jews and Christians since this is a vague definition and it will depend on the context of its use in the Quran. Look at 4153 , 4171 and 5911.

                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Maha
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #88

                          I don't disagree with you brother that the term people of the book was used to describe the Jews and the Christians. What I do disagree with is that you say that the definition of the term means the Jews and the Christians. This is not the case.

                          Sura 4153
                          4153 The people of the book ask you to bring down to them a book from the heavens. They had asked Moses for even more than that, for they said, "Let us see God plainly!", so the lightning bolt took them for their wickedness. Then they took the calf after the proof had come to them, and We pardoned them for this; We gave Moses a clear authority.

                          Here we see that the people of the book was used to describe the Jews ALONE....

                          In Sura 4171
                          4171 O people of the book, do not overstep in your system, nor say about God except the truth. Jesus the son of Mary was no more than God's messenger and the fulfillment of His word to Mary, and an inspiration from Him. So acknowledge God and His messengers, and do not say, "Trinity." Cease, for it is better for you. God is only One god, be He glorified that He should have a son! To Him is all that is in the heavens and what is in the earth. God is enough as a caretaker.

                          We see that the term is used to describe the Christians alone...


                          In other verses the term is unclear regarding which group in particular....but most would agree that it generally describes the Jews and the Christians.

                          986 Those who rejected from the people of the book and those who set up partners are in the fires of hell abiding therein, those are the worst of creation

                          375 Among the people of the book are those whom if you entrust him with a large amount he gives it back to you, and there are those whom if you entrust with one gold coin he will not return it to you unless you are standing over him. That is because they said, "We have no obligation towards the Gentiles." They say about God lies while knowing.

                          5911 Have you noted those who are hypocrites, they say to their companions in denial among the people of the book "If you are driven out we will go out with you, and we will never obey anyone who opposes you. If anyone fights you, we will support you." God bears witness that they are liars.

                          We see the term people of the Book. But which people is God talking about?? The Jews or the Christians??? Or both?

                          Basically what I'm trying to show you is that if the term meant only Jews and the Christians why would the term be used with the Jews alone and the Christians alone? Jews and Christians are not the same. It's like jelly and peanut butter. So basically the proper definition of the term is "people who posses scripture" and not "Jews and Christians"

                          The term "People of the Book" is SUBJECTED TO CONTEXT! That is why you see it being used differently in the Quran. Sometimes it can mean the Jews alone, sometimes the Christians, sometimes both. The proper definition of the term means 'people who posses scripture'. Not Jews and Christians since this is a vague definition and it will depend on the context of its use in the Quran. Look at 4153 , 4171 and 5911.

                          Peace

                          The beauty of the quran is that its perfectly timeless. I find in many context references to todays muslims as well in 'people of the book' just look at following verses

                          1. Some followers of the scripture say, "Believe in what was sent down
                            to the believers in the morning, and reject it in the evening;
                            maybe someday they will revert ..... Say, "The true guidance is GOD's guidance." If they claim that they
                            have the same guidance, or argue with you about your Lord, say, "All grace is in GOD's hand; He bestows it upon whomever He wills."
                            GOD is Bounteous, Omniscient

                          Quite different from what bukhari teaches.

                          Do not argue with the people of the scripture (Jews, Christians, and Muslims) except in the nicest possible manner- unless they transgress-and say,"We believe in what was revealed to us and in what was revealed to you, and our god and your god is one and the same; to Him we are submitters." (Surah ankaboot 46, Rashad Khalifah translation)

                          Here God tells us how we should talk to the sunnites and shiites...

                          Peace

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Offline
                            B Offline
                            Bigmo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #89

                            salam bigmo, all
                            plz read 4171 more carefully

                            4171 O people of the scripture, do not transgress the limits of YOUR religion, and do not say about GOD except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was a messenger of GOD, and His word that He had sent to Mary, and a revelation from Him. Therefore, you shall believe in GOD and His messengers. You shall not say, "Trinity."............

                            Whose religion is the religion told in 4171, the limits of which are transgressed. christians' or jews' religion ?

                            So accordingly prophet Mohammad and sahaba were also people of the book. D so are we all. If everybody is people of the book then what's the use of using the term "people of the book" ? D

                            Why "generally" ? have you seen exceptions ? is there any single verse in which the term "people of the book" is used for muslims ? D

                            peace all

                            I think a good thing to do is to look at all the instances in the Koran that uses "ahlul kitaab" and see what its refering to. I am busy now so somebody has to do the search.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Users