Quran and Hadiths books, what is the difference ?
-
Greetings and Peace, all group
@SearchingGod I just love your "serious" website. I trust that its agenda reflects your own. You could have just said so.
BBC is pretty credible and easy to understand, so it is the first link. The article is titled "Tashkent's hidden Islamic relic."
Excerpt
" To prevent disputes about which verses should be considered divinely inspired, Othman had this definitive version compiled. It was completed in the year 651, only 19 years after Muhammad's death."
http//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4581684.stm
This link is to a peer reviewed article entitled "Forgotten witness evidence for the early codification of the Qur'an" from the Journal Of The American Oriental Society.
http//findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go2081/is_n1_v118/ai_n28706795/?tag=content;col1
This link is to an old peer reviewed article entitled "THE TRANSMISSION OF THE KUR'AN" from the Journal of the Manchester Egyptian & Oriental Society . Relevant pages are 25-47.
http//archive.org/details/manchesterorie00mancuoft
The following website has been very useful for finding references
http//www.egyptologyforum.org/EEFDigijournals.html
I don't see further conversation as being productive. Enjoy whatever fruits your theories yield. No parting shots--just bye.
ALLAH knows best.
peace
~Abdul-Hadi
-
Greetings and Peace, all group
@SearchingGod I just love your "serious" website. I trust that its agenda reflects your own. You could have just said so.
BBC is pretty credible and easy to understand, so it is the first link. The article is titled "Tashkent's hidden Islamic relic."
Excerpt
" To prevent disputes about which verses should be considered divinely inspired, Othman had this definitive version compiled. It was completed in the year 651, only 19 years after Muhammad's death."
http//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4581684.stm
This link is to a peer reviewed article entitled "Forgotten witness evidence for the early codification of the Qur'an" from the Journal Of The American Oriental Society.
http//findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go2081/is_n1_v118/ai_n28706795/?tag=content;col1
This link is to an old peer reviewed article entitled "THE TRANSMISSION OF THE KUR'AN" from the Journal of the Manchester Egyptian & Oriental Society . Relevant pages are 25-47.
http//archive.org/details/manchesterorie00mancuoft
The following website has been very useful for finding references
http//www.egyptologyforum.org/EEFDigijournals.html
I don't see further conversation as being productive. Enjoy whatever fruits your theories yield. No parting shots--just bye.
ALLAH knows best.
peace
~Abdul-Hadi
The Quran held the Jews and Christians responsibility for the scriptures "bayn aydeehim" meaning that they have possession of. We are only responsible for the scriptures we have possession of and nothing else. We are not responsible of how these scriptures came down to us and was passed down. Scriptures were designed to speak for themselves and we are only to deal with what we have been exposed of. God in the end choses what information is passed down to future generations and what is not.
-
Here we are ! Finally you wrote what was in your mind from the beginning.
It makes no difference to you if Quran is altered.
Unfortunately, you are going against .
giveup
Many people believed in the Quran when it first was revealed long before many of its verses were revealed and died without having much knowledge of the rest of the Quran. Many died in Mecca and the early days in Medina. Plus the magicians believed in Moses long before they came across any of the scriptures that bears Moses's name. So scriptures are biut one sign of God and not the only sign.
Faith is something God controls and not humans. God talked about the sun and moon as signs, and the day and night as signs. A blind person may never see those signs but it does not mean he can't believe in God. Faith is not based on what the eyes can see or what the ears hear.