Inheritance according to Qur?an
-
peace Nun,
Thanks for the example, but can you clarify what it proves? I'm not sure I follow.
Thanks.
Peace Wakas, try these examples and restrict nisa to only adult women...
1 son age 10; wife
1 ? 1/8 wife (fixed 412) = 7/8 son (variable/unstated)
1 son age 10; wife; 3 daughters ages 2, 14, 19
1 ? 1/8 wife (fixed 412) = 7/8 children (variable 411) 21 ratio male to female1 brother age 10; mother
1 ? 1/6 mother (fixed 411) = 5/6 brother (variable)
1 sister age 2; mother
1 ? 1/2 sister (fixed 4176) = 1/2 mother (variable) no son/brotherWhy not all inherit as with only son/s or mixed or sibling/s above?
3 daughters ages 2, 14, 19; wife -- need 411 cannot restrict based on age/nisa.
1 ? 2/3 (3 daughters, 2/9 each) = 1/3 wifeAbove are orphan cases and we know their shares are allocated kept safe until maturity (46).
Thus need to use context in translating ri-j--l-a and ni-s--a not always auto insert "men and women? ?
4176 ... and if they were a-kh-wa-t brothers/siblings (at least one male present any age) ri-j--l-a wa-ni-s--a so to the masculine/male gender like share the two (feminine)
ps. notice that in some sentences it says "MAA Taraka" and some not and some have "MIMAA Taraka" have to figure this out. (to what is this ma-taraka and mimaa-tarakaa reffering to? To the whole what is left OR what is left after some get their share?)
pps. I now also believe that thulathaa is 2/3 or maybe (1/3 + 1/3). A brother showed me 2047 where RASULAA is indeed used for 2 people.Salaam Bender, use context carefully read every word and best avoid translations do your own.
411 ... fa-la-hu-n so to them third for m-a not/what/who (use context) ta-ra-ka left
411 ... the sixth mim-m- of/from what ta-ra-ka left412 half m- what ta-ra-ka left spouses yours
412 the fourth mi-m- of what ta-ra-k-na they left412 the fourth mi-m- of what ta-ra-k-tu-m you left
412 the eight mim-m- of what ta-ra-k-tu-m you left4176 and to person sister so to her half m-a what ta-ra-ka left
4176 so if were two (feminine) fa-la-hu-m- (dual pronoun) so to them the third for (dual noun; 1/3 + 1/3) mim-m- of what ta-ra-ka left -
Quote from mirjamnur on July 06, 2012, 025842 AM
when she leaves husband and 2 daughters and 1 son
husband 1/4
parents 1/6
daughters and son 7/12 =28/48
daugther 1= 7/48
daughter 2=7/48
son 14/48411 directs you The God in your children to the male like share the two (feminine)
411 and for their parents to each one from them the sixth from what left if is to person walad/son
412 so if is for them walad/son so for you the fourth1/4 or 3/12 husband
1/3 or 4/12 parents = 1/6 mother + 1/6 father
......... 5/12 children = 5/24 son + 5/24 daughters (5/48 x 2 daughters); if children mixed 21 ratio male to femaleNoon
Are the priorities or sequence not changed in this case?It begins directs you The God in your children.
The share allocated to is not alterable.
-
Noon
Are the priorities or sequence not changed in this case?It begins directs you The God in your children.
The share allocated to is not alterable.
Peace Mazhar,
When ratio is given (21 male to female) it?s not solvable unless amount is first known.
Unless they are alone i.e. they get the whole or 1, priority is allocate fixed shares first.411 to the male like share the two (feminine)
4176 so to the male like share the two (feminine)1 daughter, 1 son, father
1 ? 1/6 father (fixed) = 5/6 children 21 ratio (10/18 son + 5/18 daughter)This is one proof father cannot inherit with siblings; kalalah is fatherless
1 sister, 1 brother, father (unsolvable)
1 = father (variable) + siblings 21 ratio male to female
1 = y + 2x + x
1 = y + 3x (no solution without negative numbers (-2=y, 1=x))Some suggest kalalah from Iklil ?crown that surrounds head? ? no head of household?
-
1 daughter, 1 son, father
1 ? 1/6 father (fixed) = 5/6 children 21 ratio (10/18 son + 5/18 daughter)Noon, please do consider this
1 daughter, 1 son will get 2/3, their share cannot be reduced or left to be settled by remainder.
It is not meaningless that the like of share of two daugthers be apportioned for a male. The division is based beginning with daughters not a son or sons. Two third will be share of progenies. Rest is to be divided to the secondary relatives after progenies which is either solely daughters or includes a daughter. This cannot be compromised otherwise everything else would be against Qur'aan and priorities settled by Allah the Exalted.
Please note that when Progeny comprises only of daughters, they are prioritized about the share in the inheritance and other relatives are at secondary place to receive what is left over.
But in the case of single son, it is not the son who is prioritized but other near-ones. The son will get the left over.When there is solitary son, it is he who is to be given the remainder after the share of others. Please make calculations in that way also. Perhaps you made it 7/12 and 5/12. When they have to receive the remainder left afther 2/3 going to progenies, their percentages will proportionately be reduced.
Please note that equivalence between two females and male need NOT be decimal correct. "Mislo" does not mean hundred percent alike, it also shows that things are to taken in a very broader sense. Therefore, we need not act like Diophantus, Hero of Alexandria, or al-Khw?rizm? to understand the injunctions given in the Qur'aan about division and distribution of inheritance. -
Noon, please do consider this
1 daughter, 1 son will get 2/3, their share cannot be reduced or left to be settled by remainder.
Mazhar,
Please distribute according to Qur'an and which part of verse 411 is being used?
1 daughter 1 son = ?
3 daughters 1 son = ?parents 1/3 fixed (1/6 each 411)
husband 1/4 fixed 412Total = 7/12 (parents + husband) + remainder 5/12 = 1
-
parents 1/3 fixed (1/6 each 411)
husband 1/4 fixed 412Total = 7/12 (parents + husband) + remainder 5/12 = 1
Yes this is the case when the deceased has only one son. Here the son is not prioritized but parents. Similarly in 412 the share for husband/wife is prioritized when there is only one son.
Man died 1/6 + 1/6 +1/8=11/24-1=13/24 for son
Woman died 1/6+1/6+1/4=7/12-1=5/12 for son.Since equation of gender is share of two daughters shall be given to one son, whenever there is a daughter the distribution will be started with daughter not parents. Since the share of two or more daughters is two third, this will not be disturbed and shall be the first to be set aside for the entire progeny which may comprise daugther son, daughters son, daughter sons. Initially it is told that the injunction is for the progenies not parents or husband/wife. They are secondary beneficiaries.
All situations are conditional with apodosis clauses. -
Yes this is the case when the deceased has only one son. Here the son is not prioritized but parents. Similarly in 412 the share for husband/wife is prioritized when there is only one son.
Man died 1/6 + 1/6 +1/8=11/24-1=13/24 for son
Woman died 1/6+1/6+1/4=7/12-1=5/12 for son.This leaves nothing for daughters and we know they inherit?
Now try example 3 daughters, 2 sons, parents, husband?
whenever there is a daughter the distribution will be started with daughter not parents.
Obviously without son/s only daughter/s 1 - daughter/s = parent/s and/or spouse (variable)
It can never be fixed amounts on all entities which lead to contradiction -- shortfall/surplus.
This whole priority business one has to start first with the known then allocated remainder to unknown.
1 son, mother 1 - 1/6 mother (fixed/known) = 5/6 son (variable/unknown)
1 son, husband 1 - 1/4 husband (fixed/known) = 3/4 son (variable/unknown)
1 son, 1 daughter, mother, father, husband 1 - 1/6 m - 1/6 f - 1/4 h = 5/12 children (variable/unknown) 21 ratio male to female1 daughter, mother 1 - 1/2 daughter (fixed/known) = 1/2 mother (variable/unknown)
1 daughter, wife 1 - 1/2 daughter (fixed/known) = 1/2 wife (variable/unknown) -
Yes this is the case when the deceased has only one son. Here the son is not prioritized but parents. Similarly in 412 the share for husband/wife is prioritized when there is only one son.
Man died 1/6 + 1/6 +1/8=11/24-1=13/24 for son
Woman died 1/6+1/6+1/4=7/12-1=5/12 for son.This leaves nothing for daughters and we know they inherit?
Yes, because there is no daugter in this situation. The inheritance divisions is described by ground realities not hypothetical propositions.
-
Yes, because there is no daugter in this situation. The inheritance divisions is described by ground realities not hypothetical propositions.
OK rewind, I want to understand; please distribute
3 daughters, 1 son, parents, husband?
3 daughters, 2 sons, parents, husband? -
OK rewind, I want to understand; please distribute
3 daughters, 1 son, parents, husband?
3 daughters, 2 sons, parents, husband?Perhaps now I have been able to convey what I think.
3 dauthers + 1 son=2/3 leaving behind 1/3 for other survivors father, mother, husband/wife as thecase maybe. Two third has five shares since one son will get like share of two daughters. Simplest form of distribution.
3 D + 2 sons =same 2/3 ....................of 2/3 are seven shares 3 + 2 + 2=7 shares.
The remaining is for living parents and husband/wife. It can be sub divided by restricting to percentages set in case of solitary son. Pl use your mathematical knowledge to get those.
-
Perhaps now I have been able to convey what I think.
3 dauthers + 1 son=2/3 leaving behind 1/3 for other survivors father, mother, husband/wife as thecase maybe. Two third has five shares since one son will get like share of two daughters. Simplest form of distribution.
3 D + 2 sons =same 2/3 ....................of 2/3 are seven shares 3 + 2 + 2=7 shares.
The remaining is for living parents and husband/wife. It can be sub divided by restricting to percentages set in case of solitary son. Pl use your mathematical knowledge to get those.
Mazhar -- Qur'an specifically states 1/6 each parent (1/3) and 1/4 to husband?
411 ... and for their parents to each one from them the sixth
412... so if kna is for them walad/son so for you the fourthShould be thus
3 daughters, 1 son, parents, husband
1 - 1/6 mother - 1/6 father - 1/4 husband = 5/12 children 21 ratio male to female3 daughters, 2 sons, parents, husband
1 - 1/6 mother - 1/6 father - 1/4 husband = 5/12 children 21 ratio male to female -
Mazhar -- Qur'an specifically states 1/6 each parent (1/3) and 1/4 to husband?
Yes, but only in case the prescribed condition is met or exists. It becomes null and void if condition does not exist. It is simple law that any thing subject to a certain thing will take effect only when firstly condition is met.
In case-subject to the condition--if the deceased has solitary son in his progeny----
-
Yes, but only in case the prescribed condition is met or exists. It becomes null and void if condition does not exist. It is simple law that any thing subject to a certain thing will take effect only when firstly condition is met.
In case-subject to the condition--if the deceased has solitary son in his progeny----
Yes the condition is "IF son" which is true regardless 1 son or 10 sons! Not about solitary.
Ask anyone who has 1 son or 10 sons simple question -- do you have male child Yes or No?
If you give all mixed children 2/3 -- how to distribute the 1/3 to parents and husband?
Likewise with solitary son condition try to distribute
10 sons, husband?
10 sons, parents?
10 sons, parents, husband?With that logic all above are undefined; so what to do -- distribute evenly?
-
Yes the condition is "IF son" which is true regardless 1 son or 10 sons! Not about solitary.
In Arabic no such thing exists that one son can be considered as ten sons also. Wherever there is more than one it is specified. Once the equation is given two daughters or more, and two daughter share is to be given to a son, that takes care of entire progency and need not be repeated for two sone or more sons.
In case of one daughter the rule is specifically given, she gets half. Similarly rule in case of solitary son is given who gets remainder which is also slightly above the half of inheritance. One can calculate the proportion of other relatives from 1/3 left by the progenies by applying the formula given for one son instead of making them equal. If 5/12 goes to solitary son the others get 7/12. In case of a single daughter getting 6/12 you can calculate what will be proportioned reduction in individual shares which was once 7/12 collectively, if it is not be equally distributed amongst them.
-
In Arabic no such thing exists that one son can be considered as ten sons also. Wherever there is more than one it is specified.
It's basic logic in any language...
IF is to person male child, YES or NO?
IF is to person child/born, YES or NO?Once the equation is given two daughters or more, and two daughter share is to be given to a son, that takes care of entire progency and need not be repeated for two sone or more sons.
In case of one daughter the rule is specifically given, she gets half. Similarly rule in case of solitary son is given who gets remainder which is also slightly above the half of inheritance. One can calculate the proportion of other relatives from 1/3 left by the progenies by applying the formula given for one son instead of making them equal. If 5/12 goes to solitary son the others get 7/12. In case of a single daughter getting 6/12 you can calculate what will be proportioned reduction in individual shares which was once 7/12 collectively, if it is not be equally distributed amongst them.
What do you mean "one can calculate the proportion of other relatives from 1/3 left"?
It is clearly stated parents get 1/3 (1/6 each), husband gets 1/4 -- where you get 1/3?
Perhaps think, work all combinations instead of adding things which don't make sense!
son/s, daughter/s distribute 21 ratio male to female
mother/father, son/s 1/6 5/6
mother/father, 1 daughter 1/2 1/2 no son, mother/father variable
mother/father, 2 daughters 1/3 2/3 (2 daughters variable) all share equally
mother/father, 3 daughters 1/3 2/3mother, father 1/3 2/3
mother, brother/s 1/6 5/6mother/father, husband 1/2 1/2
mother/father, wife 3/4 1/4father, sibling/s 1 0 not kalala has father
husband/wife, sibling/s 1 0 not kalala has spousehusband/wife, 1 daughter 1/2 1/2 not childless; no son; husband/wife variable
husband/wife, 2 daughters 1/3 2/3
husband/wife, 3 daughters 1/3 2/3husband, son/s 1/4 3/4
mother, father, husband 1/4 1/4 1/2
mother, father, wife 3/8 3/8 1/4mother, father, 1 daughter 1/4 1/4 1/2
mother, father, 2 daughters 1/4 1/4 1/2
mother, father, 3 daughters 1/6 1/6 2/3mother, father, son/s 1/6 1/6 2/3
mother, husband/wife, 1 daughters 1/4 1/4 1/2
mother, husband/wife, 2 daughters 1/4 1/4 1/2
mother, husband/wife, 3 daughters 1/6 1/6 2/3mother, husband, son/s 1/6 1/4 7/12
mother, wife, son/s 1/6 1/8 17/24father, husband/wife, 1 daughter 1/4 1/4 1/2
father, husband/wife, 2 daughters 1/4 1/4 1/2
father, husband/wife, 3 daughters 1/6 1/6 2/3father, husband, son/s 1/6 1/4 7/12
father, wife, son/s 1/6 1/8 17/24father, daughter/s, son/s 1/6 5/6 children 21 ratio
husband, daughter/s, son/s 1/4 3/4 children 21 ratiomother, father, husband/wife, 1 daughter 1/6 1/6 1/6 1/2
mother, father, husband/wife, 2 daughters 1/5 1/5 1/5 2/5
mother, father, husband/wife, 3 daughters 1/9 1/9 1/9 2/3mother, father, husband, son/s 1/6 1/6 1/4 5/12
mother, father, wife, son/s 1/6 1/6 1/8 13/24mother, husband, daughter/s, son/s 1/6 1/4 7/12 children 21 ratio
mother, wife, daughter/s, son/s 1/6 1/8 17/24 children 21 ratiofather, husband, daughter/s, son/s 1/6 1/4 7/12 children 21 ratio
father, wife, daughter/s, son/s 1/6 1/8 17/24 children 21 ratiomother, father, husband, daughter/s, son/s 1/6 1/6 1/4 5/12 children 21 ratio
mother, father, wife, daughter/s, son/s 1/6 1/6 1/8 13/24 children 21 ratiomother, father, daughter/s, son/s 1/6 1/6 2/3 children 21 ratio
411 kalala fatherless spouseless no son (sibling/s variable)
mother, 1 daughter, sister/s 1/4 1/2 1/4
mother, 1 daughter, brother/s 1/6 1/2 1/3
mother, 1 daughter, sister/s, brother/s 1/6 1/2 1/3 siblings share equallymother, 2 daughters, sister/s 1/4 1/2, 1/4 each 1/4 1/4
mother, 2 daughters, brother/s 1/6 5/6 daughters siblings share equally
mother, 2 daughters, sister/s, brother/s 1/6 5/6 daughters siblings share equallymother, 3 daughters, sister/s 1/6 2/3 1/6
mother, 3 daughters, brother/s 1/6 2/3 1/6
mother, 3 daughters, sister/s, brother/s 1/6 2/3 1/3 siblings share equally1 daughter, sister/s 1/2 1/2
1 daughter, brother/s 1/2 1/2
1 daughter, sister/s, brother/s 1/2 1/2 siblings share equally2 daughters, sister/s daughters siblings share equally
2 daughters, brother/s daughters siblings share equally
2 daughters, sister/s, brother/s daughters siblings share equally3 daughters, sister/s 2/3, 2/9 each 1/3
3 daughters, brother/s 2/3, 2/9 each 1/3
3 daughters, sister/s, brother/s 2/3 1/3 siblings share equally412 kalala fatherless spouseless has son (sibling/s fixed 1/6 or 1/3)
son/s, sister 5/6 1/6
son/s, brother 5/6 1/6
son/s, sisters 5/6 1/3
son/s, brothers5/6 1/3
son/s, sister/s, brother/s 2/3 1/3 siblings share equallydaughter/s, son/s, sister 5/6 children 21 ratio 1/6
daughter/s, son/s, brother 5/6 children 21 ratio 1/6
daughter/s, son/s, sisters 2/3 children 21 ratio 1/3
daughter/s, son/s, brothers2/3 children 21 ratio 1/3
daughter/s, son/s, sister/s, brother/s 2/3 children 21 ratio 1/3 siblings share equallymother, son/s, sister 1/6 2/3 1/6
mother, son/s, brother 1/6 2/3 1/6
mother, son/s, sisters 1/6 1/2 1/3
mother, son/s, brothers1/6 1/2 1/3
mother, son/s, sister/s, brother/s 1/6 1/2 1/3 siblings share equallymother, daughter/s, son/s, sister 1/6 2/3 children 21 ratio 1/6
mother, daughter/s, son/s, brother 1/6 2/3 children 21 ratio 1/6
mother, daughter/s, son/s, sisters 1/6 1/2 children 21 ratio 1/3
mother, daughter/s, son/s, brothers1/6 1/2 children 21 ratio 1/3
mother, daughter/s, son/s, sister/s, brother/s 1/6 1/2 children 21 ratio 1/3 siblings share equally4176 kalala fatherless spouseless no child/born
sister/s, brother/s 21 ratio male to femalemother, sister/s, brother/s 1/6 5/6 siblings 21 ratio
mother, 1 sister 1/2 1/2
mother, 2 sisters 1/3 2/3
mother, 3 sisters 1/4 3/4 unstated/variable distribute equally -
It's basic logic in any language...
IF is male child, YES or NO?
IF is child/born, YES or NO?I corrected myself because of you when you drew attention to masculine verb Kana that waladun meands a son not a child.
Waladun is masculine, its broken plural is grammatically feminine.
-
Yes only when the deceased had a son. Not otherwise. The situation is altogether different when he left dauther or daughters.
Mazhar -- the cases were below; once again please distribute according to Qur'an?
3 daughters, 1 son, parents, husband
1 - 1/6 mother - 1/6 father - 1/4 husband = 5/12 children 21 ratio male to female3 daughters, 2 sons, parents, husband
1 - 1/6 mother - 1/6 father - 1/4 husband = 5/12 children 21 ratio male to female3 daughters, 1 son
1 = children 21 ratio male to female3 daughters, 2 sons
1 = children 21 ratio male to female -
Mazhar -- the cases were below; once again please distribute according to Qur'an?
3 daughters, 1 son, parents, husband
1 - 1/6 mother - 1/6 father - 1/4 husband = 5/12 children 21 ratio male to femaleMother and father you have prioritized. It means that the inheritance instructions are with regard to parent.
But in Qur'aan the discourse starts
means all daugthers, means all sons, means combination of daugthers and sons. Subject of discourse is progenies not father and mother. They are residue beneficaries in case of progenies-dual or plural. But are prioritized in case of a son or in the absence of a son.
-
Mother and father you have prioritized. It means that the inheritance instructions are with regard to parent.
But in Qur'aan the discourse starts
means all daugthers, means all sons, means combination of daugthers and sons. Subject of discourse is progenies not father and mother. They are residue beneficaries in case of progenies-dual or plural. But are prioritized in case of a son or in the absence of a son.
Will you please distribute according to Qur'an and cite which part of which verse?
3 daughters, 1 son, parents, husband
3 daughters, 2 sons, parents, husband
3 daughters, 1 son
3 daughters, 2 sons