Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. :: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

:: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
123 Posts 18 Posters 3.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mmkhan
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    Dear, what is wrong with you, you do not let even simple things enter your mind and keep circling around what thoughts have veiled your intellect about a certain issue like pronouns here.

    Every book, including Qur'aan is a spoken word of a speaker. It was His choice how he selected relative pronouns or personal pronouns. For that you need to know minimum emphasis aspect, rhetoric.

    In 3331 are solely and exclusively the honourable wives of the Elevated Messenger of Allah the Exalted.

    I think you always forget that AlQuraan is a guidance for MANKIND, not only for scholars or the ones having good command on language. How is it a guidance for the naas? All aayaats are set on patterns and designs for lay man to compare and understand the usage of different aayaats.

    It is not a choice simply to fill the Book, but it has been purposely set in that pattern to show you something and guide you, etc.

    Now, if 3331 is about Messenger's wives, then why again 3332 used "yaa nisaa alnabiyyi" when it is already in context as per your understanding? There is surely a reason for such usage. When you make your mind blank , inshaAllah, you will see what I am trying to say.

    May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
    mmKhan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #57

      I think you always forget that AlQuraan is a guidance for MANKIND, not only for scholars or the ones having good command on language. How is it a guidance for the naas? All aayaats are set on patterns and designs for lay man to compare and understand the usage of different aayaats.

      It is not a choice simply to fill the Book, but it has been purposely set in that pattern to show you something and guide you, etc.

      Now, if 3331 is about Messenger's wives, then why again 3332 used "yaa nisaa alnabiyyi" when it is already in context as per your understanding? There is surely a reason for such usage. When you make your mind blank , inshaAllah, you will see what I am trying to say.

      May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
      mmKhan

      Dear, the day you understand how the text of Arabic of Qur'aan flows, where the discourse ends, and where a new discourse starts not to be linked with the earlier statements, you might know the beauty of Ayah 3232 starting with a fresh call seeking attention of them and then breaking the news about their status and position amongst the woman folk of all times.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Maha
        wrote on last edited by
        #58

        Did you try to explain me your point? NO!
        Did you try to give me an example? NO!
        Did you try to show me an aayat to explain your point? NO!
        Then what you were doing? You know exactly what you were doing already.

        Anyways, as per my understanding

        Mazher always try to convince mmKhan without bringing forward any proof. He always do that to me.

        As per the above sentence, "Mazher" is Subject and "mmKhan" is Object. And "He" is subject pronoun and "me" is object pronoun.

        Am I correct sir? If not, please correct me and then put forward your point. If I am right, then what is your point?

        May Allah increase us in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
        mmKhan

        Just want to thank you for giving me a lot of food for thought. I never really considered this issue before reading your post, but i will now definately check your references up and make up my mind, because you have discussed some very important things. It really seems like either that it wasnt muhammed who came with the quran as per the traditional islamic belief, and/or muhammed is a title and not a name.

        And please dont limit yourself due to Mazhars (sunni) agenda. Please keep posting about the issue.

        Peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #59

          Just want to thank you for giving me a lot of food for thought.

          Kindly share that food with us so that we could also benefit intake

          (1)
          (2)..., if more
          (3)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Maha
            wrote on last edited by
            #60

            Kindly share that food with us so that we could also benefit intake

            (1)
            (2)..., if more
            (3)

            Read my whole post, and you will see that I explained it further. I dont have time enough to repeat myself.

            Peace

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #61

              We have experience of many members who kept posting meaningless talks or clapping but never to substantiate. And then went away. Obviously rubbish cant be substantiated.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Maha
                wrote on last edited by
                #62

                We have experience of many members who kept posting meaningless talks or clapping but never to substantiate. And then went away. Obviously rubbish cant be substantiated.

                Frankly Mazhar, I find it VERY difficult to understand what you are talking about. And I just never get your point. And I know that others here also find it difficult to understand you as well. In any case, I was waiting for brother mmkhan to share more of his thoughts. If you could kindly stop posting, you would save everyones time.

                Peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #63

                  I know self adopted stupidity is deep rooted in all cells of the brain. But there is no harm trying.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Offline
                    G Offline
                    GODsubmitter
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #64

                    "His Qaum" denotes none else but Bani Israel. And the entire discourse is about reminding the Bani Israel of their past history.

                    I agree

                    The whole Qur'an is but the reminder for the Bani Israel and followers of Jesus, and it doesn't bring anything new which is not already in the Torah! Present Islam is but an invention of men as a new innovation, same as Christianity.
                    Jesus was the most perfect Jew, same as Moses who is the greatest prophet of them all.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Offline
                      G Offline
                      GODsubmitter
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #65

                      So, could we keep up the subject gentlemen , and do try to answer the question

                      Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!!

                      (do try to answer without old or new hadiths),

                      thank you

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #66

                        The whole Qur'an is but the reminder for the Bani Israel

                        Only to admonish them that they are going to be the worst of the creatures. Condemned and cursed for ever. They were cursed also by Dawood alahisalam and Easa alahissalam.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          Bender
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #67

                          Only to admonish them that they are going to be the worst of the creatures. Condemned and cursed for ever. They were cursed also by Dawood alahisalam and Easa alahissalam.

                          Salaam,

                          hypno

                          From where did you got this wrong understanding?
                          Can you please give us some verses to support your understanding?
                          Please don't quote 578 nope

                          And who are Bani Israel according you?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Maha
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #68

                            I agree

                            The whole Qur'an is but the reminder for the Bani Israel and followers of Jesus, and it doesn't bring anything new which is not already in the Torah! Present Islam is but an invention of men as a new innovation, same as Christianity.
                            Jesus was the most perfect Jew, same as Moses who is the greatest prophet of them all.

                            That may seems to mean that Quran was written shortly after Jesus death .

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Maha
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #69

                              Only to admonish them that they are going to be the worst of the creatures. Condemned and cursed for ever. They were cursed also by Dawood alahisalam and Easa alahissalam.

                              Lol. rotfl David and Jesus were both from Bani Israel so it's hard to believe that They cursed themselves . Please use your brain.

                              Peace .

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #70

                                Lol. rotfl David and Jesus were both from Bani Israel so it's hard to believe that They cursed themselves . Please use your brain.

                                Peace .

                                The job of the jokers is to laugh and make people laugh mostly thru stupid things.

                                Ease alahissalam did not belong to Bani Israel. He is not from that Qaum-nation. He was son of Syeda Maryam.

                                Dawud alahissalam was the Messenger to Bani Israel. He also cursed those of his nation Bani Israel who did not believe.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 3 Offline
                                  3 Offline
                                  357
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #71

                                  So, could we keep up the subject gentlemen , and do try to answer the question

                                  Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!!

                                  (do try to answer without old or new hadiths),

                                  thank you

                                  Try this...........if you have time.

                                  http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9600004.msg239942#msg239942

                                  peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    GODsubmitter
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #72

                                    Thank you so much brother @357!

                                    It is utterly interesting and informative!

                                    Thank you for the links and threads, don't know how would I be able to find them otherwise.

                                    peace

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • WakasW Offline
                                      WakasW Offline
                                      Wakas
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #73

                                      Just read the first post. The evidence presented is very poor in my view.

                                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #74

                                        Just read the first post. The evidence presented is very poor in my view.

                                        Salaam,

                                        I was wondering who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab, but could not find any answer from AlQuraan till now. But Allah has shown me something just now, lets take a look at it.

                                        6940
                                        6940 Indeed, it is surely a speech of a noble Messenger.

                                        8119
                                        8119 Indeed, it is surely a speech of a noble Messenger.

                                        Who is this Rasoolin Kareem ?

                                        Some say, he is Jibraeel - There is no evidence from AlQuraan that Jibraeel is a Rasoolin Kareem.

                                        Some say, he is Muhammed - There is no evidence from AlQuraan that Muhammed is a Rasoolin Kareem.

                                        No other choice left. But no body ever think, whom Allah called a Rasoolin Kareem. Can you guess? Try!! OK! Please check 4417

                                        4417
                                        4417 And We had already tried before them the people of Pharaoh, and there came to them a noble messenger.

                                        A Noble Messenger is with "M", that is not Muhammed, not Me either but that is Musa. This is only messenger called Rasoolin Kareem in AlQuraan.

                                        One word suffices to prove how erroneous is the premises of thread.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          mmkhan
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #75

                                          One word suffices to prove how erroneous is the premises of thread.

                                          How ? Will you please explain?

                                          And what does means as per your understanding?

                                          May Allah guide us to His path pr
                                          mmKhan

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users