Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Does 5:33 applies to those insulting Allah and His Messenger?

Does 5:33 applies to those insulting Allah and His Messenger?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
13 Posts 6 Posters 15 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    (Please remember that wife of Firaoun was a believer and one of his minister was a believer. So Firaoun knew what islam of Abraham says and probably knew the law in 5-33)

    Yes, in his episode no one used Muslim before him, but he proclaimed that he is a Muslim while about to drown.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Salaam

      Concerning the attitude towards who insult prophet
      Concerning 5-33 which is one of the more difficult verses i faced.
      i looked for the expression "min khilaf" and found this
      The other three occurences are relative two Firaoun.
      So, first of all, we have to be careful not be a firaoun when we use this verse.

      Firaoun Changed the "Or" to an "And".
      (Please remember that wife of Firaoun was a believer and one of his minister was a believer. So Firaoun knew what islam of Abraham says and probably knew the law in 5-33)

      the context of 5-33 is "The recompense of those who fight (haraba) God and His messenger".
      Haraba is doing war. Insulting is not war. Fighting muslims for other reason than God and his message is not fighting God and his messenger

      Firaoun used this verse against his magicians for what they have said and for their belief and not in context of war and physical danger.

      Peace

      Thanks for the explanation. I often point out that the Bible also gave a commmandment much like this one during the time of Moses (commanded to fight anyone that would not let the Israelites pass peacefully through an area). Of course, they all say "We don't live by that part of the Bible anymore."

      Peace,

      Amina

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Those wishing to punish others for insulting the blessed Messenger often quote the following from the Qur'an in support of their actions.

        533 It is but a just recompense for those who make war on God and His apostle, and endeavour to spread corruption on earth, that they are being slain in great' numbers, or crucified in great numbers, or have, in l' result of their perverseness, their hands and feet cut off in great numbers, or are being banished from the earth such is their ignominy in this world. But in the life to come awesome suffering awaits them-
        .........................................

        This contrasts with numerous verses advising the Messenger to deal with those insulting him with dignified patience.

        How best should 533 be interpreted and for what situations it came into effect or comes into effect?

        Thanks in advance

        Without caring for the original Arabic words of the text of Qur'aan, translation yields nothing but distortions. Verbs are Passive and in subjunctive mood. And that two different types of people are mentioned.

        The only appropriate Penal Code for those;
        who wage war against Allah the Exalted and His Messenger ;
        and those who keep attempting to create disturbance-panic-chaos in the society;
        is that they might be fought back-killed in the war or prosecuted to capital punishment.
        Or their feet and their hands are chained in the state oppositely linked;
        or they might be exiled from the country-land.
        The disgrace is for them in the worldly life.
        And a great punishment is in wait-prepared for them in the Hereafter.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          noshirk
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Without caring for the original Arabic words of the text of Qur'aan, translation yields nothing but distortions. Verbs are Passive and in subjunctive mood. And that two different types of people are mentioned.

          The only appropriate Penal Code for those;
          who wage war against Allah the Exalted and His Messenger ;
          and those who keep attempting to create disturbance-panic-chaos in the society;
          is that they might be fought back-killed in the war or prosecuted to capital punishment.
          Or their feet and their hands are chained in the state oppositely linked;
          or they might be exiled from the country-land.
          The disgrace is for them in the worldly life.
          And a great punishment is in wait-prepared for them in the Hereafter.

          Salaam Mazhar
          i noticed that you traduced youqtaou by chained and yoslabou by prosecuted to capital punished.
          i am interested in seeing your arguments

          Peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mirjamnur
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Salam noshirk

            Salaam

            Concerning the attitude towards who insult prophet
            Concerning 5-33 which is one of the more difficult verses i faced.
            i looked for the expression "min khilaf" and found this
            The other three occurences are relative two Firaoun.
            So, first of all, we have to be careful not be a firaoun when we use this verse.

            Firaoun Changed the "Or" to an "And".
            (Please remember that wife of Firaoun was a believer and one of his minister was a believer. So Firaoun knew what islam of Abraham says and probably knew the law in 5-33)

            the context of 5-33 is "The recompense of those who fight (haraba) God and His messenger".
            Haraba is doing war. Insulting is not war. Fighting muslims for other reason than God and his message is not fighting God and his messenger

            Firaoun used this verse against his magicians for what they have said and for their belief and not in context of war and physical danger.

            Peace

            thank you for your explanation! The first time that I am aware, that Pharaoh could have known the law! And because he saw himself as a god, he threatened the people with that exact punishment (and even more), for the active war against God, was exactly what he was doing, and he's accused the magician, when they not longer obey him... Thank you! You help me a lot.
            Salam )

            Mazhar i like your deep knowledge in arabic- just explain it in a easy way that also i (not good english and arabic) can follow. thanks! )
            Salam )

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              huruf
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              5.33 does not establish a legal punishment for anybody, it is stateing that whagt may await those who do such things is that they may end up being killed, crucified or their extremities cut. It doesn't order anybody or dictate anybody to do so or say that it would be right to do so for anybody. As far as I can judge is the equivalent of the evangelical

              Thos who kill will the sword will die by the sword. Or thos who do wrong end up wronged.

              It doesn't impose any particular behaviour on believers, except of course not to do those things mentionned at the beginning of the aya.

              Salaam

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                5.33 does not establish a legal punishment for anybody, it is stateing that whagt may await those who do such things is that they may end up being killed, crucified or their extremities cut. It doesn't order anybody or dictate anybody to do so or say that it would be right to do so for anybody. As far as I can judge is the equivalent of the evangelical

                Thos who kill will the sword will die by the sword. Or thos who do wrong end up wronged.

                It doesn't impose any particular behaviour on believers, except of course not to do those things mentionned at the beginning of the aya.

                Salaam

                Peace Huruf,

                Where did you get the term "legal" from? I didn't see it implied or written anywhere.

                -Amina

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Salaam Mazhar
                  i noticed that you traduced youqtaou by chained and yoslabou by prosecuted to capital punished.
                  i am interested in seeing your arguments

                  Peace

                  Salamun alika,

                  One are those who imposed war on Believing society, they are to be fought back; some might get killed while there could be others who need to be tried for war crime---

                  who wage war against Allah the Exalted and His Messenger ;

                  is that they might be fought back-killed in the war

                  Verbs are subjunctive---not necessarily it needs be done. Enemy can be killed in the war but outside war field no one can be killed without a fair court trial,

                  Second category is not invaders or outsiders, they are within the society who create panic and chaos in the society.

                  or prosecuted to capital punishment; if it is not executed they might be sentenced to imprisonment with their feet and their hands chained in the state oppositely linked;
                  It is a common scene in our-Pakistan jails where terrorists and dangerous prisoners are chained like this.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Offline
                    H Offline
                    huruf
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Peace Huruf,

                    Where did you get the term "legal" from? I didn't see it implied or written anywhere.

                    -Amina

                    Exactly. It is not stating a punishment that the community, the believers, or whoever should apply, it is stating what may happen to those people, what they earn with their behaviour.

                    Salaam

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Oh...okay.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        noshirk
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Exactly. It is not stating a punishment that the community, the believers, or whoever should apply, it is stating what may happen to those people, what they earn with their behaviour.

                        Salaam

                        oh...okay
                        For me too.

                        i thank also Mazhar for his response.
                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Users