Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Is Zina related to sex ?

Is Zina related to sex ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
85 Posts 14 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hawk99
    wrote on last edited by
    #55

    Salam god1quran1
    6012 O prophet, if the believing females come to make allegiance to you that they will not set up anything besides God, nor steal, nor commit adultery, nor kill their children, nor fabricate any falsehood (bohtan) between thair hands and their feets, nor disobey you in any matter which is righteous, then you shall accept their allegiance, and ask God to forgive them. God is Forgiver, Merciful.
    Peace

    Peace All,

    How do you, "fabricate any falsehood (bohtan) between thair hands and their feets"

    hmm

    God Bless

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Offline
      G Offline
      god1quran1
      wrote on last edited by
      #56

      Now i still have a open question for zina=aduletery theory
      Why ZANI cannot marry atheits according to 243 brickwall
      I am interested to read mazhar opinion on this point.

      I am going to respond to the rest of your post later but thought I should address the above right now.

      When you bring forth a new theory it is your responsibility to not only prove it but also to apply the same rules and logical consistency that you are applying to the theory/understanding that your understanding will replace.

      With what I have written above in mind, I will pose the same question back to you. Assuming zani does mean "defamer", why can't a defamer (Zani) not marry an athiest? Why can they only marry a zania or a polythiest?

      So I am really not sure where you are going with this?? How does this question help to decide Zani means someone who defames?

      the other question is
      if accusing a women (mohasanat) to commit adultery without proofs worth 80 leashes how much worth accusing her to have killed someone without proof ? confused

      You cannot use omission in support of your argument. Quran cannot list each and every rule or law that we must follow. We need to focus on what is mentioned and use our intellect to apply our understanding to other issues.
      You need to use material that is in the Quran in support of your arguments rather that speculating on what if scenarios. Quran does not talk about what should be the punishment if someone accuses an honorable man of rape for example. Should we then use this omission to conclude a zani is someone who defames?

      Kindly be consistent in your arguments and please make sure those arguments don't weaken your own theories/understanding.

      thanks.

      Peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #57

        For my education, can you kindly tell me how I can identify a relational word.

        thanks.

        A relational word is the one that needs two entities to completely portray the signification infolded in that word. Like, Rabb is a relational word. If there is no slave / allegiant / subject the word Rabb is but redundant. Similarly Abd - slave - servant is relational; there have to be two entities-persons to render this word a relaity.

        Zina is a well known and fully recognized word in Arabic lexicons and natives are a living evidence who use this word for specific signification. Non natives cannot say that it means this or that.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          mmkhan
          wrote on last edited by
          #58

          You certainly have a point but in 242 it also says "fa-ij'lid kulla widin min'hum mi-ata jaldatin" or flog each one of them 100 lashes which leads me to believe zani and the zania performed the same immoral act of zina together and not individually on separate occasions in different locations. "kulla widin" is for example used in 1231 which suggests all the participants were present together when the incident happened or for example in 411-12 where the context is to give each one from the same will

          538 does not have these words and imo can be understood to mean that the male thief and female thief do not have to commit the crime together.

          Does that make sense? )

          Salaam bro,

          Yes, that make sense to me... But at the moment I have to be -X
          I need more time to study on this. InshaAllah, I will get back to you on this if I find something different, otherwise there is no reason for me to reject what you said ) MashaAllah!

          May Allah increase our knowledge and guide us on His path pr
          mmKhan

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #59

            Now i still have a open question for zina=aduletery theory
            Why ZANI cannot marry atheits according to 243
            I am interested to read mazhar opinion on this point.

            The Man held guilty of consented illicit sexual intercourse shall not henceforth enter into the contract of Nikah matrimonial bondage except with a woman-convict of illicit sexual intercourse or a idol-worshipping woman.
            And no one except a convict-man of illicit sexual intercourse or idol-worshipper shall marry certain woman held guilty of consented illicit sexual intercourse.
            And this marriage entering into Nikah with the man or the woman convicted of illicit sexual intercourse is prohibited for the Believers.

            Please read with 2221
            And you people should not marry the idol-worshipping women unless they heartily accept the belief.
            And indeed a believing house-maid is better for marriage than an idol-worshipping woman notwithstanding how much she astounded you people.
            And nor you people should cause the wedding/associate in matrimonial bondage the believing women with idol-worshipping men unless they heartily accept the belief.
            And indeed a believing house-servant is better than an idol-worshipping man notwithstanding how much he astounded you people.
            They the idol-worshippers are the people who invite others towards Hell-Fire.
            And Allah the Exalted calls towards Paradise and to seek the forgiveness with His permission.
            And He the Exalted succinctly explains His Aa'ya'at verbal passages
            so that they might conveniently and reflexively save it in memory, recall to narrate and get admonition.

            Now the remaining point is about non mention of "atheist" in both these Ayahs. Dictionary defines an atheist as a person who does not believe in Allah or deities. Is he not an idol worshipper? Is there no object that he worships? What difference you find between a Mushrik and an atheist?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              noshirk
              wrote on last edited by
              #60

              With what I have written above in mind, I will pose the same question back to you. Assuming zani does mean "defamer", why can't a defamer (Zani) not marry an athiest? Why can they only marry a zania or a polythiest?

              Shirk=defaming Allah
              Zina=defaming humans

              Mochrik and Zani are same people who love lies and defaming.
              A truthfull don't marie liers. Liers of all types marry themselves

              We need to focus on what is mentioned and use our intellect to apply our understanding to other issues.

              hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail

              and after , what is your response to penality applied to defamers for murder ?
              Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                noshirk
                wrote on last edited by
                #61

                What difference you find between a Mushrik and an atheist?

                Atheists says God don't exists, Quran is bullshit.
                Mochrik Says Allah Akbar and Quran is Sacred but , after that, Muchrik mix words of Allah with other words. Muchrik associate others legislators in deen of Allah than Allah. Mochrik go to teachers other than the only Rabb (educator) of islam and believe their words.

                Peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #62

                  Atheists says God don't exists, Quran is bullshit.
                  Mochrik Says Allah Akbar and Quran is Sacred but , after that, Muchrik mix words of Allah with other words. Muchrik associate others legislators in deen of Allah than Allah. Mochrik go to teachers other than the only Rabb (educator) of islam and believe their words.

                  Peace

                  Atheists are not interested in commenting about Qur'aan, Allah and the Messengers.

                  No Mushrik says Qur'aan is sacred.

                  Mushrik is he who adores or worships objects - deities termed as miscellaneous gods apart Allah the Exalted.

                  Atheist adopts his own thoughts, desires etc as worshiping entity.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #63

                    @Mazhar, look likes you're expert in Quranic teology.

                    Can I ask you, what's the meaning of "musyrikeen" in 2221 according to Quran alone?

                    Is Trinitian Christian is one of the musyrikeen?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #64

                      @Mazhar, look likes you're expert in Quranic teology.

                      Can I ask you, what's the meaning of "musyrikeen" in 2221 according to Quran alone?

                      Is Trinitian Christian is one of the musyrikeen?

                      2221 has nothing to do with Christians. We should never think and call them or equate them with Mushrikeen. Allah the Exalted does not say so, who are we to name them like this.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        noshirk
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #65

                        2221 has nothing to do with Christians. We should never think and call them or equate them with Mushrikeen. Allah the Exalted does not say so, who are we to name them like this.

                        12106 And most of them will not believe in God except while MUSHRIKEENS

                        4012 This is because when God alone was mentioned, you rejected, but when partners were set up with Him (IN YUSHRIK BIHI), you believed. Therefore, the judgment is for God, the Most High, the Great.

                        KOFR is rejection. MUSHRIK reject god when he is whorshipped alone and accept him when mixed with others.

                        so SHIRK is a kind of KOFR since acceptance of Allah is conditionned.

                        in fact ALLAH=LIE equation has two readings
                        Atheist reading ALLAH is a lie. There is no ALLAH.
                        SHIRK reading We whorship lies. We Whorship ALLAH only if we can redecorate (nozayyinou) all what he said with what we want.

                        Now we can respond to the "follow desires argument" of mazhar with a quranic verse

                        4716 And some of them listen to you, until when they go out from you, they say to those who have been given the knowledge ?What did he say?? Those are the ones whom God has sealed their hearts, and they followed their desires.

                        Not following Allah ar searching other sources as "the given knowledge" is following desires.
                        if Fact, we know from verse 37 that only Allah understand all quran
                        A mushrik is a "following desires" also since he can choose his "islamic doctrine" by choosing the "given knowledge" he wants other than Allah.

                        1035 Say ?Are there any of those whom you set up as partners (SHOURAKAIIKOM) who can guide to the truth?? Say ?God guides to the truth. Is He who guides to the truth more worthy of being followed, or he who does not guide except after he is guided? What is wrong with you, how do you judge??

                        1035 explains why we have not to follow whose who have been given knowledge. That's shirk

                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #66

                          2221 has nothing to do with Christians. We should never think and call them or equate them with Mushrikeen. Allah the Exalted does not say so, who are we to name them like this.

                          Originally what I probleming is about marriage in 55, which says we can marry "ahl kitab".Allah already condemn them in various verses.

                          I know the kafaru/kufr divided into 2 in the Quran,first Kurf Alkitab (Christian,Jews) and Kufr musyrek (non believe/set equals to Allah).

                          Now the Trinitian Christ believe Allah has Son, Allah has 3 existence.Is that mean Tritinty teaching nearly enter musryikeen state?

                          Then what criterion of Ahl Kitab,who we can married to, based on 55?

                          Sorry for mislead the actual theme of this topic.

                          KOFR is rejection. MUSHRIK reject god when he is whorshipped alone and accept him when mixed with others.
                          so SHIRK is a kind of KOFR since acceptance of Allah is conditionned.
                          SHIRK reading We whorship lies. We Whorship ALLAH only if we can redecorate (nozayyinou) all what he said with what we want.
                          A mushrik is a "following desires" also since he can choose his "islamic doctrine" by choosing the "given knowledge" he wants other than Allah.

                          So what is a actual meaning of mushirk, according to you @noshirk

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #67

                            Originally what I probleming is about marriage in 55, which says we can marry "ahl kitab".Allah already condemn them in various verses.

                            I know the kafaru/kufr divided into 2 in the Quran,first Kurf Alkitab (Christian,Jews) and Kufr musyrek (non believe/set equals to Allah).

                            Now the Trinitian Christ believe Allah has Son, Allah has 3 existence.Is that mean Tritinty teaching nearly enter musryikeen state?

                            Then what criterion of Ahl Kitab,who we can married to, based on 55?

                            The point mentioned in the quoted Ayah is rather serious than their assertion about trinity. They are also not called Mushrik.

                            The identity of People of Book is different from Mushrikeen though both refused to accept Qur'aan.

                            Let us not equate them.
                            Allah the Exalted knows everything. Despite having given this information marriage with the independent women of is permitted.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              noshirk
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #68

                              So what is a actual meaning of mushirk, according to you @noshirk

                              Shirk is , while believeing in God as ALLAh and believing in Quran

                              • Taking as educators (RABB) in deen other than ALLAH ( as a prophet , priest, ..). That is relying on other than God and his own mind to understand quran.
                              • mixing quran with others words not coming from allah and saying that they are as if they were from God or inspired from him

                              problem is much more complicated for believers in God who didn't received Quran.
                              Really i cannot write my understanding on this because it is too complex for this thread and we have first to understand what is Quran in Deen islam (remember that abraham, moses and so on were muslims).

                              22 That is the Book in which there is no doubt, a guidance for the righteous.
                              23 Those who believe in the unseen, and hold the SALAT, and from Our provisions to them they spend.
                              24 And those who believe ??? in what was sent down to you, and what was sent down before you, and regarding the Hereafter they are certain.
                              25 These are the ones guided by their Lord, and these are the successful ones.

                              First page of quran (after fatiha) is of great importance.

                              Peace

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Offline
                                P Offline
                                pixelrow
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #69

                                Shirk is , while believeing in God as ALLAh and believing in Quran

                                • Taking as educators (RABB) in deen other than ALLAH ( as a prophet , priest, ..). That is relying on other than God and his own mind to understand quran.
                                • mixing quran with others words not coming from allah and saying that they are as if they were from God or inspired from him

                                problem is much more complicated for believers in God who didn't received Quran.
                                Really i cannot write my understanding on this because it is too complex for this thread and we have first to understand what is Quran in Deen islam (remember that abraham, moses and so on were muslims).

                                22 That is the Book in which there is no doubt, a guidance for the righteous.
                                23 Those who believe in the unseen, and hold the SALAT, and from Our provisions to them they spend.
                                24 And those who believe ??? in what was sent down to you, and what was sent down before you, and regarding the Hereafter they are certain.
                                25 These are the ones guided by their Lord, and these are the successful ones.

                                First page of quran (after fatiha) is of great importance.

                                Peace

                                The problem is

                                "- Taking as educators (RABB) in deen other than ALLAH ( as a prophet , priest, ..). That is relying on other than God and his own mind to understand quran."

                                This is purely your invention. One inevitably relies on others to understand Quran. For example learning to read . . . learning Arabic. God himself used others . . . your parents, teachers, prophets . . . etc.


                                "- mixing quran with others words not coming from allah and saying that they are as if they were from God or inspired from him"

                                If you mix anything with the Quran as if it was equal to the Quran - then it is form of Shirk. As for divine inspiration - that is much more diffcicult to judge and categorise.


                                "Really i cannot write my understanding on this because it is too complex for this thread and we have first to understand what is Quran in Deen islam (remember that abraham, moses and so on were muslims)."

                                Then why the BS before?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  pixelrow
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #70

                                  Atheists says God don't exists, Quran is bullshit.
                                  Mochrik Says Allah Akbar and Quran is Sacred but , after that, Muchrik mix words of Allah with other words. Muchrik associate others legislators in deen of Allah than Allah. Mochrik go to teachers other than the only Rabb (educator) of islam and believe their words.

                                  Peace

                                  "Muchrik associate others legislators in deen of Allah than Allah."

                                  Wrong - Islam has two legislatives - Allah and Prophet Muhammad.

                                  Although, obviously, their nature is different . . . As Allah is the supreme and absolute authority - where as the legislative powers of The Messenger of Allah are granted by Allah . . . nevertheless - majority of Muslims - since the beginning of Islam - have recognised Prophet Muhammad as a legislative authority.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    pixelrow
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #71

                                    Shirk=defaming Allah
                                    Zina=defaming humans

                                    Mochrik and Zani are same people who love lies and defaming.
                                    A truthfull don't marie liers. Liers of all types marry themselves
                                    hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail hail

                                    and after , what is your response to penality applied to defamers for murder ?
                                    Peace

                                    "Zina=defaming humans"

                                    Wrong . . . Zina has certain meaning . . . and not what you invented.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #72

                                      Wrong - Islam has two legislatives - Allah and Prophet Muhammad.

                                      No, only Allah who has autharity to create a law.Prophet Muhammad just a mesengger.

                                      "Not upon the Messenger is except notification. And Allah knows whatever you reveal and whatever you conceal."(Shahih International 599)

                                      "The messenger is only to deliver. And God knows what you reveal and what you conceal.(Free-Minds 599).

                                      Following Hadith, doesn't mean you actually follow the Prophet, since it's already fabricated.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        god1quran1
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #73

                                        Atheists are not interested in commenting about Qur'aan, Allah and the Messengers.

                                        No Mushrik says Qur'aan is sacred.

                                        Mushrik is he who adores or worships objects - deities termed as miscellaneous gods apart Allah the Exalted.

                                        Atheist adopts his own thoughts, desires etc as worshiping entity.

                                        Can you please tell me the verse # from which you have quoted the above?

                                        thanks.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mazhar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #74

                                          2543

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users