A few questions about the words of the quran

marie

Any thoughts on why the basmallah was absent in Surah 9? Wasn't it spoken in behalf of God?

I think the whole quran is spoken in behalf of the God, if Basmallah is the first verse of the chapter 1, the problem is solved. One start the reading only by "Aoozu Billahi Minash Shaitanir Rajeem" without basmalah for chapter 2 until chapter 114.

I also think it is not wrong if one start the reading by the two formulas for the chapters 2-----> 114.

Allah knows best

drfazl

Bismilla Hirrahmanir Raheem is never the first verse of any sura from sura 1 through to sura 114. It is sunni handiwork

"In the Name of Allah, All Glory Be To Allah the Lord of The Worlds" it sounds odd. At least if the verse, " All Glory Be To Allah " starts with a "SAY" before it. Then In The Name Of Allah as the first sentence may have the full sense.

marie

Personnaly when I say Bismilla Hirrahmanir Raheem before reading the quran that doesn't mean I consider it as the first verse.

I say it when I start a study for ex

Ansar

Any thoughts on why the basmallah was absent in Surah 9? Wasn't it spoken in behalf of God?

You know thats an interesting religious question. The quran is the only religious source right? Or not?

Ansar

bro ansar,

Do you speak of Quran? Or about the Book? They are not the same. The Book that we have with us with the verses is the Key to Quran that which is being Preserved and well Guarded in Luvhul Mahful. Bismilla is not the part of the Book! We are yet to discuss on Quran as to what it is ? and where it is at present ? and who to "Quran" is given ?

drfazl

Well, for me its the same.

But according to you, you say the book we have with us do not contain the revealed words of the quran? In all quranic books you will see bismillah mentioned before the surah (except at-taubah). But now you say its not a revealed part from Allah.

Am i right?