Salam
-
Hadith whether it is good or bad can never be accepted as the Prophet Muhammad's saying because it is simply not his saying. The actual missing narrators from the sanads are Bukhari & Co. It is clearly their stories and not the Prophet or Companions. They are the actual narrators of these stories. Their stories, and their books. However and from the non-sectarian perspective, there are only two issues, ie. whether it is just or unjust, regardless of whether it is from the Hadiths or Hinduism Scriptures, Buddhism Scriptures, Christianity, Judaism, Atheism, Code 19, Motivational or Science Books etc. If it is just, then it is Islam, else it is not Islam. This is so since Islam is about just and balance and does not oppose justice. Therefore if they wish to fix certain labels and willing to die and go for war for that labels, ie. the difference between apple and pomme or sugar and sucre in french confused ..... then let them fix those labels since they are sectarians and religious peoples. No big deal, as long it is just and balance to humanity. Otherwise, we are also no difference to them and practising the religion of faulty generalization.
The proportion Q of the sample has attribute A.
Therefore, the proportion Q of the population has attribute A. -
Salaam all.
Please be careful with 'good' hadiths.
After I left the hadith, I began to realize that even hadiths which look good/wise/noble in fact may contain deceiving factors.
Imho, those who made hadiths are very sly.
I'm aware of this if I use the Qur'an as reference to evaluate hadiths. However, I don't know how to explain this so others can understand. It's pretty hard to explain and I'm not good at it.
Please forgive my shortcomings. This post intended to remind others to be careful also on hadiths which look good.
The safest guidance only what really come from The Creator. Glory be to Him.
Salaam.