Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Community Needs
  3. Salat & Zakat
  4. A challenge to those who claim Quran states 5 salat daily

A challenge to those who claim Quran states 5 salat daily

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Salat & Zakat
100 Posts 19 Posters 4.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    GODsubmitter
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Pointing out that Salamun is a verbal noun is not very helpful and neither does it answer the objective put to you.

    Verbal noun - is an English concept and does not quite correspond to Arabic.

    Salam - is Masdar - that is Verbs originate from it . Verbal noun? Mostly in English - refer to Nouns that derive from a verb.

    The question is one of making complete Arabic sentence. An indefinite noun and a prepositional phrase do not make a good Arabic sentences. That is why you need the 'Salam' to be definite- 'al-Salam'.

    offtopic

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Offline
      T Offline
      The_Chimp
      wrote on last edited by
      #24

      fftopic

      Do you see anything else happening here? Having read his posts . . . I do not think Wakas is really up for a debate. In the mean time - might as well shoot the breeze.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #25

        The question is one of making complete Arabic sentence. An indefinite noun and a prepositional phrase do not make a good Arabic sentences. That is why you need the 'Salam' to be definite- 'al-Salam'.

        Grand Qur'aan is the source to verify correctness of use of language Arabic.

        Refer 654

        is a complete nominal sentence; prepositional phrase relates to elided predicate.

        The subject/topic of a nominal sentence can be indefinite in few situations; one is that of supplication or prayer as is the case in above sentences.

        A read about ellipses/elisions also might enlighten.
        Elipsis omission of implied word the omission of one or more words from a sentence, especially when what is omitted can be understood from the context.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #26

          Salaam

          This is about pronoun/dhamir.

          3alaykum/ and 3alayka/, both of this are true.

          -kum/ is pronoun of antum, the plural form of "you".
          -ka/ is pronoun of anta, the singular form of "you".

          Also there is no called "Al Salam" , the word is syamsiyah alphabet, and all syamsiyah words don't use definite alif-lam, but alif with following huruf.

          Example , the definite used in this word is Alif and sa' not Alif-lam.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Offline
            WakasW Offline
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #27

            Do you see anything else happening here? Having read his posts . . . I do not think Wakas is really up for a debate. In the mean time - might as well shoot the breeze.

            Careful you don't shoot yourself in the foot, in the meantime.

            This challenge has been posted on multiple Quran-islam facebook groups also, but so far, only 3 takers (I'm not even sure good logic confirmed). I was hoping for more. I will give it a little longer, if not, 3 will have to do.

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Offline
              T Offline
              Timur
              wrote on last edited by
              #28

              Also there is no called "Al Salam" , the word is syamsiyah alphabet, and all syamsiyah words don't use definite alif-lam, but alif with following huruf.

              Huh? Alif-lam is always used, but the lam is not pronounced when the first letter of the word is a "sun letter". Hence is a correct arabic word (note salam is written without alif in the reading/"quran&quot.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Offline
                T Offline
                The_Chimp
                wrote on last edited by
                #29

                Careful you don't shoot yourself in the foot, in the meantime.

                This challenge has been posted on multiple Quran-islam facebook groups also, but so far, only 3 takers (I'm not even sure good logic confirmed). I was hoping for more. I will give it a little longer, if not, 3 will have to do.

                Nothing like a Jab Jibe to get a reaction!

                There aint going to be many more . . . so either get on with it - or quit it, petal.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Offline
                  T Offline
                  The_Chimp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #30

                  Grand Qur'aan is the source to verify correctness of use of language Arabic.

                  Refer 654

                  is a complete nominal sentence; prepositional phrase relates to elided predicate.

                  The subject/topic of a nominal sentence can be indefinite in few situations; one is that of supplication or prayer as is the case in above sentences.

                  A read about ellipses/elisions also might enlighten.
                  Elipsis omission of implied word the omission of one or more words from a sentence, especially when what is omitted can be understood from the context.

                  prepositional phrase relates to elided predicate.

                  And herein lies your answer . . . and why is correct.

                  In your version Alikum relates NOT to an implied predicate but to Salamun the noun . . . hence it is not a complete sentence.


                  is a complete nominal sentence

                  No it isn't.


                  The subject/topic of a nominal sentence can be indefinite in few situations; one is that of supplication or prayer as is the case in above sentences.

                  This makes no sense at all . . . why would subject type dictate difference of grammar? The verse you give . . . is not a complete sentence.


                  The complete sentence is

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Offline
                    T Offline
                    The_Chimp
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #31

                    Grand Qur'aan is the source to verify correctness of use of language Arabic.

                    Refer 654

                    is a complete nominal sentence; prepositional phrase relates to elided predicate.

                    The subject/topic of a nominal sentence can be indefinite in few situations; one is that of supplication or prayer as is the case in above sentences.

                    A read about ellipses/elisions also might enlighten.
                    Elipsis omission of implied word the omission of one or more words from a sentence, especially when what is omitted can be understood from the context.

                    A read about ellipses/elisions also might enlighten.
                    Elipsis omission of implied word the omission of one or more words from a sentence, especially when what is omitted can be understood from the context.

                    I think you are mentioning this just for effect - and do not know what you are talking about.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      The_Chimp
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #32

                      Salaam

                      This is about pronoun/dhamir.

                      3alaykum/ and 3alayka/, both of this are true.

                      -kum/ is pronoun of antum, the plural form of "you".
                      -ka/ is pronoun of anta, the singular form of "you".

                      Also there is no called "Al Salam" , the word is syamsiyah alphabet, and all syamsiyah words don't use definite alif-lam, but alif with following huruf.

                      Example , the definite used in this word is Alif and sa' not Alif-lam.

                      Dearie, rest easy . . . I don't think even you would understand what you wrote.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #33

                        True, lemmings wish not to listen.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T Offline
                          T Offline
                          The_Chimp
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #34

                          True, lemmings wish not to listen.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #35

                            http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/025.%20Al%20Furqan/25.63a.gif

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T Offline
                              T Offline
                              Timur
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #36

                              Peace Mazhar,

                              thank you, I know about the dagger-alif. But those dagger-alifs do not occur in early scriptures. Hence the correct spelling of salam is simply without alif. The dagger Alif is speculation about the correct pronounciation, in any case it is not part of the original word.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #37

                                Huh? Alif-lam is always used, but the lam is not pronounced when the first letter of the word is a "sun letter". Hence is a correct arabic word (note salam is written without alif in the reading/"quran&quot.

                                So that's why there is no called "Al salam", because it's little bit strange if we pronounce it in Arabic language.
                                People mostly said "Assalamu alayka" not "Al salamu alayka"

                                Peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  GODsubmitter
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #38

                                  Shall we get some more insights about the title of this thread "A challenge to those who claim Qur'an states 5 salat daily" please?

                                  Thanx

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    Timur
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #39

                                    Peace Earthdom.

                                    So that's why there is no called "Al salam", because it's little bit strange if we pronounce it in Arabic language.
                                    People mostly said "Assalamu alayka" not "Al salamu alayka"

                                    That is correct. Spelling is Al-Salam, pronounciation As-Salam.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #40

                                      Peace Mazhar,

                                      thank you, I know about the dagger-alif. But those dagger-alifs do not occur in early scriptures. Hence the correct spelling of salam is simply without alif. The dagger Alif is speculation about the correct pronounciation, in any case it is not part of the original word.

                                      Salamun alaika;

                                      http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.%20Tabweeb/0004.%20Kitab%20Kaaf%20Ta%20Ba/59.gif (1)1338(2)1504=2

                                      http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.%20Tabweeb/0004.%20Kitab%20Kaaf%20Ta%20Ba/6.gif (1)289(2)515(3)868(4)2362(5)2729(6)4103(7)4612(6837(9)8309(10)8320=10

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        Timur
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #41

                                        http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.%20Tabweeb/0004.%20Kitab%20Kaaf%20Ta%20Ba/59.gif (1)1338(2)1504=2

                                        http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.%20Tabweeb/0004.%20Kitab%20Kaaf%20Ta%20Ba/6.gif (1)289(2)515(3)868(4)2362(5)2729(6)4103(7)4612(6837(9)8309(10)8320=10

                                        Salamun alayka,

                                        although we were talking about salam...

                                        kitab is actually written without any alif in all occurences according to early manuscripts. Please check here

                                        1338 (only examples)

                                        • http//www.corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/13/vers/38?handschrift=13
                                        • http//www.corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/13/vers/38?handschrift=382 (2nd pge)
                                        • http//www.corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/13/vers/38?handschrift=226
                                        • http//www.corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/13/vers/38?handschrift=56

                                        -1504 (only examples)

                                        • http//www.corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/15/vers/4?handschrift=13
                                        • http//www.corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/15/vers/4?handschrift=382
                                        • http//www.corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/15/vers/4?handschrift=32
                                        • http//www.corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index?sure=15&vers=4&handschrift=56&anzeigen=Anzeigen

                                        I think this will do

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #42

                                          There is no gains for dispute about existence of alif,because the languages will get changes/updates one century to another.

                                          Please check Al Mushaf Al Imam in https//archive.org/details/Al-mushaf-Al-Imam
                                          This Mushaf was collected by Khalifah Ustman and notice the alif-lam is exist in the word Kitab.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users