17:93 and chapter 53:13 to 53:15
-
Peace Mazhar.
Brother, you are deviating! I asked who did he see? You talk about a "shift in time line"!!!
I am aware of that. Are you aware that he "saw" both times"? i.e He also saw before the shift in "time line", So who is not accepting?
Let me tell you a story of what your logic sounds like
A Scientist cut the legs of a frog. He then asked the frog to jump. When the frog did not jump,he concluded that the frog is deaf?
It seems to me that what you do with Qoran?
Anyway, GOD bless you ,brother.
Peace.Peace,
Good that you know the concept of semantic field of time. But immediately afterwards your question disappointed me that you just wrote that claim without knowing what semantic field of time means and even do not know what is tense and aspect of a verb.
The first verb about seeing is perfect, an even happened and finished. And its relation is with reference to negation of acceptance by the logical brain. The purpose of physical ascension was to show him the Messenger the biggest existential in the realm of physical world. The logical brain does not controvert things during sleep/dream. It also shows the experience was physical not dreaming.
The second verb about seeing is imperfect and in relation to question. Here it is about an ongoing routine process-happening. The wranglers are informed that why you wrangle about it while the fact is he had even seen him only once at high horizons. Does this "only once" helps not to tell you that it is about having seen Gabriel once while he was descending. Why you think that he saw the same object at two different points in time in life?
And these magnificent and metaphorically resembling swearing are to reiterate and confirm that the guiding Lord of you people is never afflicted from any delusions and hallucination.
And it is a certain fact that he had seen him Gib'raa'eil at the Demarcating Horizon .
And he Muhammad is never withholder and miser in making public the unseen realities he has seen and known. -
Peace Mazhar.
Even though your post was written in English, I am sorry to say it is like a foreign language to me!!!
Listen brother, I said Gabriel was there. You ended up agreeing with me? The rest is "gobbledegook", no offence intended.
Bless you brother.
Hallelujah!
Peace. -
Peace Mazhar.
Even though your post was written in English, I am sorry to say it is like a foreign language to me!!!
Listen brother, I said Gabriel was there. You ended up agreeing with me? The rest is "gobbledegook", no offence intended.
Bless you brother.
Hallelujah!
Peace.Peace,
Sorry brother, my fault. Your claims misled me to believe that you academically know language and semantics. I can now understand that my article might seem to you Greek. Thanks.
Friend who consider that Night Journey was not corporeal and know basics of Arabic are requested to refute the article by restricting to the words of Qur'aan.
Arabic , al-'Isr' wal-Mi'rj-The corporeal Journey far beyond the ascensions of Earthly Universe