Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Sura ArRheman

Sura ArRheman

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
39 Posts 5 Posters 116 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Thanks Dear Mazhar for the link. I will take an indepth look. But at a causual look it appears to me this guy has no idea what he is talking about. There is no known literature or published books (besides this on-line PDF form) available where authors indicate that Musdar or verbal nouns are not derived from three letter verb roots. Furthermore, all lexicons are arranged as three letter verb roots.

    So how do you know this guy is talking from authentic resources?

    Regards

    Lexicons are not morphology books.
    You mix up things. Root does not mean "verb roots". Verbs are the subject of morphology. Root is sort of a semantic frame.
    Take little time reading the book. Then google you might get more books on Arabic morphology.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      bkanwar2
      wrote on last edited by
      #31

      Lexicons are not morphology books.
      You mix up things. Root does not mean "verb roots". Verbs are the subject of morphology. Root is sort of a semantic frame.
      Take little time reading the book. Then google you might get more books on Arabic morphology.

      Thanks Mazhar, I took a look at your obscure and unique claiming PDF book from an unknown guy without any know references for his claim. Please take look at this Morphology book which agrees with what I know about the subject and you disagree based upon the reference you provided.

      http//special.worldofislam.info/Arabic/pdf/Treasures_of_Arabic_Morphology.pdf

      Regards

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #32

        Both the books I have thoroughly studied, they say the same thing. Verbs are made from verbal noun.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          bkanwar2
          wrote on last edited by
          #33

          Both the books I have thoroughly studied, they say the same thing. Verbs are made from verbal noun.

          Dear Mazhar, just re-read pages 18 and 19 in this book. Ones does not need more in order to find that, the claim "Verbs are made from Verbal noun" , itself is an Oxymoron.

          Regards,

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #34

            Dear Mazhar, just re-read pages 18 and 19 in this book. Ones does not need more in order to find that, the claim "Verbs are made from Verbal noun" , itself is an Oxymoron.

            Regards,

            Dear, your problem is that you let not enter your brains the statement of others. You take it inside polluting it with your preconceived understanding. These pages told you about three types of nouns. Again read about "Masdar"-verbal noun.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              bkanwar2
              wrote on last edited by
              #35

              You take it inside polluting it with your preconceived understanding.

              Dear Mazhar, What is preconceived notion/understanding? It is an opinion formed beforehand without adequate evidence.

              My preconceived notion was that Allah means "One and only deity for worship"

              Based upon understanding and evidence of the language. I understand Allah now to mean "One who is not at all a deity for worship".

              http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9599853.msg237622#msg237622

              This understanding is on this very site as well on the net for almost 5 years now. All believers of Allah, as "one and only deity for worship" need to do is to just prove one step based upon correct reference as wrong. In order, to prove all of it, to be wrong. However, they are unable to do, due being stuck on their preconceived notions.

              Regards,

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #36

                We were talking about verbal noun-Masdar.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Offline
                  B Offline
                  bkanwar2
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #37

                  We were talking about verbal noun-Masdar.

                  Dear, we were but instead of giving concrete examples of how a verbal noun can exists without having a verb first and also be called as a verbal noun. Which by its name suggest that which word should be deriven from which word. You as usual started to bring pre-concieved notions.

                  Care refuting the linguistic break down of Allah? Come on it has been on this site for 5 years now. You know all the language.

                  Regards,

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #38

                    You insisted that verbal nouns are made from verbs.

                    I said verbs are made from verbal noun.

                    You called it obscure and unique claim and refuted a book.

                    You referred a book claiming it is authentic which supports your opinion.

                    I said read that book again, it also says verbal nouns are made from verbs.

                    Now you go back to so called morphology analysis by you about Allah.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      mmkhan
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #39

                      Peace mmKhan,

                      This is reported to be the oldest Qur'an...

                      http//idb.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/diglit/MaVI165

                      The investigated Qur?an manuscript with the signature MA VI 165
                      http//www.commdiginews.com/world-news/middle-east/worlds-oldest-quran-discovered-and-may-be-linked-to-imam-ali-30011/

                      WASHINGTON, November 19, 2014 ? Researchers from the Project Coranica at the University Library in T?bingen, Germany have discovered a copy of the Quran that may be the oldest in the world, dating to within 20-40 years of the death of Islam?s Prophet Muhammad. The copy of the Quran, dubbed Ma VI 165 by scientists, appears in the famous ?Kufic script?, popularized by Imam Ali ibn Abu Talib who moved the center of the Islamic government to Kufa in the after being elected as ?Caliph? in 656 AD. The manuscript ?with a 95.4% statistical probability can be dated to the period between Ad 649 -675,? according to Medieval Histories Magazine.

                      Peace brother,

                      We are able to read this because we already have a copy of alQuraan to relate to. A person who don't know what alQuraan is and he never saw this book cannot read or understand. And my Lord cannot send such book specially as a guidance?

                      As I said earlier those who made up hadith to keep future people away from alQuraan, the same people played tricks with alQuraan and made some copies without diacritics. So that future generations will have a doubt in the Book of Allah. And this is what is happening now, unfortunately.

                      Finding that copy of alQuraan may confirm its carbon dating but you should understand why Allah send such book? And I strongly believe that no one on earth is so perfect to add diacritics so precisely and perfectly into the Book. Allah book for guidance means it should be same for all older generations and future generations.

                      May Allah increase our knowledge and guide us on His path pr
                      mmKhan

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Users