Discussion about Qur'an's language
-
Hey All,
I wanna know your opinion about Qur'an's language that is commonly known as "Arabic", the word "Araby" in Qur'an is not used as a name of a language it is used to indicate that the book is clear and obvious..
Also about the history of Qur'ans language they say it used to be written without dots or superscripts which is logically impossible, you can't pronounce 28 letters and only write 17 shapes, its an impossible way to communicate through mail or to write contracts or anything, and this didn't exist in any other language even before the commonly known era of prophet Muhammad, and there are modern discoveries regarding old scripts that have dots like here https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham_Quran_manuscript
So I wanna know if someone else looked into this and have any opinion regarding this matter..
Best Regards..
-
The Qurn was not composed in (what we call) "Classical Arabic" (but in an* Arabian tongue).
CA was formulated by (post-qurnic) Ajamites (like e.g., Sb/Sibawayh); cf., 16103, &c.!
Both the script and vocabulary (of the Qurn) bespeak an Aramean origin
- indefinite
https//c2.staticflickr.com/6/5109/5658834521_854d7158b9_b.jpg
http//www.iranicaonline.org/uploads/files/aramaic_tab2.jpgThe Arabian Tongue of the Qurn is not the language of ALLH (as Hadithers, the self-proclaimed "muslims," irrationally think/claim) Exalted is The Transcendent One, but the lingua franca of the folk/community of His mortal messenger at the time (in the fertile crescent/zone of ancient Arabia) Nabatean Aramaic because the "distorted Syriac" theory fails. Mind the difference between pre-qurnic "Arabic" of the Scripture, and the post-qurnic Ajamean "Arabic" of the Abbassides &co. (=CA) if you seek to correctly understand/decipher the Textus.
This is my current understanding, ALLH is (always) best acquainted.
SLM
-
Ps. The Qurn even openly names/points out (as to bring into attention) important geographical locations within this fertile zone (ie. northwest the so-called Arabian Peninsula), like e.g., Babylon (ل in modern Iraq/ancient Mesopotamia ( Midian (ن east of the Jordan River/Dead Sea; andor Aram (م and Karytyn (ن in Syria; &c. Mkh (ة, as per the Qurn, is not a city/town (let alone a so-called "holy city" of a cult called "islam" (as Mohamadans/Hadithers were, and still are been mislead/brainwashed to think/imagine).
-
so from what you say you don't believe that the current shape of Qur'an's script and letters was what used back then when Muhammad existed?
-
The Arabian Tongue of the Qurn is not the language of ALLH (as Hadithers, the self-proclaimed "muslims," irrationally think/claim) Exalted is The Transcendent One, but the lingua franca of the folk/community of His mortal messenger at the time (in the fertile crescent/zone of ancient Arabia) Nabatean Aramaic because the "distorted Syriac" theory fails. Mind the difference between pre-qurnic "Arabic" of the Scripture, and the post-qurnic Ajamean "Arabic" of the Abbassides &co. (=CA) if you seek to correctly understand/decipher the Textus.
This is my current understanding, ALLH is (always) best acquainted.
Salam my brother hicham9,
You are not only 100% correct but 1000% correct.
From my discoveries, the so called Aramaic was actually Nabatean, which was the Lingua Franca of the Levant and Persia. The languages - Middle Persia, Greco-Roman, Soghdian, Khurasanian, contains HUZWARESH, meaning, words of similarity with Nabatean. In other words, the Persian would be able to comprehend the speeches of those people in the Levant and Greco-Roman land and vice-verse.
Arabic was created by the Arabs with the help of the Persians, a combination of both ANA and ASA languages in the late 4th and early 5th Century CE. This was the era of the Arabization of the Levant by the Ummayads and later on inclusive of Persia to a certain extent by the Abbassiyah.
peace