Ture Islam Resides Somewhere Between Salafi(Shia) and Quranist(JAQ)

parvez_mushtaq

.......

He prayed twice, one time for each group.
.....

No telegraphic messages my dear bro
i want the detailed explanation
note that i explained you about two rahkaas in that verse now it is your turn to explain me that our prophet prayed twice as per that Verse 4.102

parvez_mushtaq

So you think I am one of "Should we believe as the foolish have believed?"

......

Do you think the people who are following the traditions are/were fools

imrankhawaja

but they are giving the interpretation and we should take their opinions

just as opinion not as a law , and before taking any opinion filter it through the light of quran, if it not passed that filter then that opinion is not qualified as a readable thingie. still then if u do it it will probably take u away from right path,

for example, tafseers of some critical issues, sometimes tafseer from these scholoars lead us towards shirk which is not a chance to take in anyway.. some examples of famous tafseers i wanty to show you but innfact its not what traditional tafseer claims,,

tafseer of jesus is alive, contradict with the teaching of quran itself at several occassions ,,

tafseer of david test , contradict with the teaching of quran and law of moses .

tafseer of miraj , far away from the teaching of quran, in some tafseers of sunni ,prophet himself saw Allah in mirror in shape of prophet muhammad, in some shia tafseer when Allah shakes his hands with prophet ,Allah was wearing a ring and it was written ali on it,

hold on here for a sec cant u see no image can grasp the image of Allah, no eye can see Allah, and moreover in the whole event prophet didnot meet with God at all.these tafseer are clearly contradict the mystery of Allah and how shameful their understanning is still like a kid who is thinking Allah is in person with human hands sitting behing blackcutain,

however closer understanding is he saw some amazing signs out of which one is at a place near eternal paradise.
these are just three tafseers i have to tell u a lot but these things are enough to qualified as a hell dewellers . matter of space my post is already long one..hope u ll got it

Bender

I never said so , bender

Hi,

I know, just joking )

i said i cannot be apart in the unseen aspects .for example , i thought it was ridicules to stone the satan .at the same time i cannot go against them because i had this verse banging upon my head .so i put these things to ALLAH subahnavatala

GREEN and BLUE This is I think very important.
Do you think Allah is commanding you to do ridicules things?

RED What do you mean with this?

they prayed as Ibrahim alaissalam did

Oh, who said so? And how did the people before Ibrahim pray?

and i dont bothered how they prayed because
.......
so i have to bother about my prayer

Ok fair enough, but why do you bother about your prayer? Is there something wrong with your prayer?

btw I did not ask you about their prayer, but I asked you about their sallaat.

to tell you one more thing about traditional transmission, can you tell me how do you pronounce the underlined word in the following ayah
Verse 11.41

Is it majreha or maj-reyha

I do not care about pronunciation. When I study a word in the quran I do not care how it's pronounced but how it is build and where it's place is in a verse.
I leave the pronunciation to people with a better voice than mine

Bender

Do you think the people who are following the traditions are/were fools

Hi,

As long as their traditions/rituals do not harm others there is nothing foolish about it if they find peace in it.
But if their traditions/rituals are bad/evil then for sure they are fools.

So imo stoning a object because you think it symbolizes the devil not really foolish, ok I admit it's not very smart and there are better things to do but you will not go to hell for stoning a lifeless object.
But stoning a human being because it's in your tradition or ritual or whatever, that is foolish and you can bet that hell is waiting for you.

Hizbullah

No telegraphic messages my dear bro
i want the detailed explanation
note that i explained you about two rahkaas in that verse now it is your turn to explain me that our prophet prayed twice as per that Verse 4.102

What telegraphic messages are are referring when i have already explained.

Ok, the verse shows clearly that there is ONLY ONE RAKAAH - . The Standing, Kneeling-Prostration, than getting up from prostration to kneeling position is considered one rakaah.

Q2226 - And , when We designated for Abraham the site of the House, , "Do not associate anything with ME and purify MY House for those who circumambulate and those who STAND and KNEEL-PROSTRATE.

The ones i highlighted in green, shows the procedures, in the only rakaah in our daily prayers. Thats it. Nothing more than that.

reel

Verse 6.114

, "Then is it other than Allah I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book explained in detail?" And those to whom We gave the Scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters.

The detailed book is Quran

Verse 45.6

These are the verses of Allah which We recite to you in truth. Then in what statement after Allah and His verses will they believe?

Did i ever told you that Quran is not detailed or Ahadith are detailed

If Quran is detailed why are you asking us to show you your sectarian salah from it?

One of the biggest mistakes that many sectarians make is trying to find the sect in Quran. You have been trying the same. Unfortunately, it does not exist within this detailed book and this should be a sign that the sectarian teachings aren't part of the Islam to be derived from it.

and it is also used in the verse 52.34

Then let them produce a statement like it, if they should be truthful.

Exactly, hence hadiths are innovations for us. We believe in Quran and we won't believe in any hadith after it. So your debate here is pretty pointless. I must add that many came and went with what you are trying to prove here. Didn't make any difference. In fact, those debates ended up being eye opener for me and that's why I left sect to be part of this Islam.

See ya.
peace

Hizbullah

If Quran is detailed why are you asking us to show you your sectarian salah from it?

One of the biggest mistakes that many sectarians make is trying to find the sect in Quran. You have been trying the same. Unfortunately, it does not exist within this detailed book and this should be a sign that the sectarian teachings aren't part of the Islam to be derived from it.
Exactly, hence hadiths are innovations for us. We believe in Quran and we won't believe in any hadith after it. So your debate here is pretty pointless. I must add that many came and went with what you are trying to prove here. Didn't make any difference. In fact, those debates ended up being eye opener for me and that's why I left sect to be part of this Islam.

See ya.
peace

So with the above detailed explanation, consclusion is TRUE ISLAM RESIDES IN THE QURAN ONLY. No if, no buts, no between this, no between that.....

Btw Parvez, if Quran is DETAILED EXPLANATION , why in 0307, you accepted that "MUTASHABAH" means allergory?

peace

parvez_mushtaq

.........
......................
Exactly, hence hadiths are innovations for us. We believe in Quran and we won't believe in any hadith after it. So your debate here is pretty pointless. I must add that many came and went with what you are trying to prove here. Didn't make any difference. In fact, those debates ended up being eye opener for me and that's why I left sect to be part of this Islam.

See ya.
peace

I cannot answer your posts if you have this attitude ,Reel
If you say all cats have five legs than you should prove it .Just saying "all cat has five legs" millions times will never make it a truth
your remarks are personal and hurting

parvez_mushtaq

Hi,

GREEN and BLUE This is I think very important.
Do you think Allah is commanding you to do ridicules things?

Exactly , Bender
but i remembered about walking between safa and marwa .how any one can become pious just walking between two hills .then when i incorporated with Verse 15.39
said, "My Lord, because You have put me in error, I will surely make attractive to them on earth, and I will mislead them all

The problem of iblees was disobedience to the Almighty .so when ALLAH subhanavatala said to walk between safa and marwa we should say Sameena Wa Ataana .similarly i cannot ask question about the rituals because this rituals got nothing to do with our prophet

RED What do you mean with this?

So i left the matter to ALLAH subhanavatal and he guided me in lot of ways in hajj

Oh, who said so? And how did the people before Ibrahim pray?
Ok fair enough, but why do you bother about your prayer? Is there something wrong with your prayer?

btw I did not ask you about their prayer, but I asked you about their sallaat.

It is obvious that we don't know how they could have performed salah
but the salah we have is 1400 years old and i prefer to follow it .If it is wrong ,It is up to ALLAH subhanvatal to guide me to the right path

I do not care about pronunciation. When I study a word in the quran I do not care how it's pronounced but how it is build and where it's place is in a verse.
I leave the pronunciation to people with a better voice than mine

There you are ,Bender
the the word is pronounced maj-reyha and not majreha
this comes in tajweed .if you happen to hear the tilawa of this verse you will notice this .No qhaari will pronounce this word as majreha but he will pronounce it as maj-reyha
this is the oral tradition transmitted down the ages by our ancestors believing that our prophet pronounced it this way
another beauty is that we don't have any hadith to prove this as well (as far as i know) just oral transmission
Yet another proof for our strong oral transmission !

reel

I cannot answer your posts if you have this attitude ,Reel
If you say all cats have five legs than you should prove it .Just saying "all cat has five legs" millions times will never make it a truth
your remarks are personal and hurting

I am sorry if it hurt you. I didn't mean it that way. Truth is that these discussions are nothing new. Use the search function to see sectarians challenging the members. You will find the same circular questions like how do you pray without hadiths. And of course, the same answers. Hence, I know very very well you won't be able to convince anyone here about your view on hadiths.

And your remark on "all cat has five legs" millions times will never make it a truth" is not pointed towards me, but Allah. Those verses are not my work. Moreover, Quran also has

And We have certainly diversified in this Qur'an for the people from every example; but man has ever been, most of anything, dispute.1854

But even logic does not agree that we need hadiths. See one example of it here

Denier of the names of Sahaba, is out of Islam???

Salam and Peace, everyone!

A non-muslim reads Al-Quran. And he accepts Islam.

He says that he has (Iman in Allah,---the last Prophet and all the previous Prophets and Messengers,---Al-Quran and all the previous Scriptures,---Angels,---and The Judgement Day).

He further says that he has Iman in everything that Allah has mentioned in His Exalted Quran.
He says that Allah mentioned that the Prophet had companions (Al-Baqarah-285), so he has Iman that there are companions of the Prophet.

But, since, Allah didn't mention, in His Exalted Book of Islam, the names, which are said to be the names of the companions---Aub Bakar, Umar, Usman, Ali, Fatima, Hasan, Hussain, Abu Huraira, Abdullah ibn Umar, Abdullah ibn Abbaas---so the new-muslim says he will not accept these names as the names of the companions of the Prophet.
These names are in the books of history. And Allah didn't command me to have Iman in the books of history.

The new-muslim clarifies that he is not saying the Prophet did not have companions.
The Prophet had companions,---but their names are not mentioned in Al-Quran, so he will not accept these names as the names of the companions.

=========================================================================

Respected brothers/sisters!

Please answer any one of the following questions

1)---Do you think that this new-muslim, is still a muslim?
Or---

2)---Do you think that the new-muslim, by not accepting these names as the names of the companions of the Prophet,-----is out of Islam?

If your answer is that he is out of Islam,---then in that case, your answer must be supported by a Verse from Allah's Quran.
Because when a person fulfills the basic requirements of Iman, (Iman in Allah,---the last Prophet and all the previous Prophets and Messengers,---Al-Quran and all the previous Scriptures,---Angels,---and The Judgement Day),---then Allah declares him a momin.

And if by not accepting the names of Sahaba (names are not mentioned in Al-Quran, it is in the history), he is out of Islam,-----then It is only Allah alone Who can declare him out of Islam.

No answer will be accepted if it is not supported by Allah's Verse from The Exalted Quran.

==================================================================================================

In answer to above statement, a nice and respected brother said; "Yes, the denier of the the names of the Sahaba of the last Prophet is out of Islam. Because the Sahaba of Noah are mentioned in The Quran, so go and get the names of the Sahaba of Noah."

-------I answered to the above.

To whom should we go to get the names of those Sahaba of Noah (AS)?

Go to Allah?---But, Allah did not mention their names in His Safe, Holy and Exalted Quran.
(Remember, Allah's Quran is The Only Truth in the universe. So my Allah is not giving me the names of those Sahaba in His Quran).

Now, history is left.
Should we go to the historians (humans) to know the names of the Sahaba of Noah (AS)?
History???-----which is full of fabrications, lies and corruption!!!
History has always been influenced by unjust rulers and corrupt rich classes and corrupt religious ulama karam.
History has always been written,---not to guide people to The Right Path,---but to hide the crimes of the above mentioned three unjust and cruel classes (unjust rulers and corrupt rich classes and corrupt religious ulama karam).

So, here, we are in a serious trouble, brother!---because,---
---Allah Himself has decided not to give us the names of the Sahaba of the last Prophet, Abu Bakar, Umar, Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, Hussain, Ayesha.

Talking about History!---it is full of fabrication.

So, where should we go now to save our Iman,-----Because, as you quoted, that such a person is not a momin, in spite of fulfilling the basic requirements of Iman, because he denies to have Iman in the names of the Sahaba given in the history???????

So,-----what is the solution to this trouble?

Yes, we should go to our CareTaker Allah.
Because, only Allah alone can take us out of this trouble.

So,---I ask my Allah, "O my Allah, if knowing the names of the Sahaba and the family members of the last Prophet, is compulsory for my Iman, then please give us the names of those rightly guided people. -----Indeed, You are The Hearer, All Knower!"

And brother!---Do you know what solution my Allah gave to me?

-----"That was a nation (the Messengers, their companions) which has passed away. For them is that which they earned, and for you is that which you earn. And you will not be asked of what they used to do." (Al-Baqarah-134)

Contemplate!

The brother said, "And there are many Prophets with them are their companions , you have to get all the names of them all, cause they are all blessed by Allah and saved, otherwise you will not be a Mu'min."

-------My answer to the above.

No, brother!
Allah do not Will us to know the names of those Sahaba of the Prophets. If it had been compulsory to know the names of the Sahaba of all the Prophets, Allah Himself would have given their names, and had ordered us to have Iman in them.

Rather, Allah declares clearly that you don't have any need to know those Sahabas, and you don't have to worry about them.

-----"That was a nation (the Messengers, their companions) which has passed away. For them is that which they earned, and for you is that which you earn. And you will not be asked of what they used to do." (Al-Baqarah-134)

So, my dear brother, I don't have to worry about the companions of the Prophet. And they don't have to worry about me. Everyone must worry about his ownself only.
For them is that which they earned. For me is that which I earn. We are not responsible for each other. Then why should I worry to know their names?

The Verses from our Allah's Exalted Quran, that you have quoted, only tells us that there were Sahaba of the Messengers, but do not command us to get those names.

Knowing those names of the Sahaba, will not benefit us in the least,-----because, no one else, but Allah Himself has stopped us to establish any relationship with those Sahaba.

-----"That was a nation (the Messengers, their companions) which has passed away. For them is that which they earned, and for you is that which you earn. And you will not be asked of what they used to do." (Al-Baqarah-134)

Yes, Allah will not ask us what did they use to do,---what did they use to say,---and what did they narrate about Islam and about the sayings of the Prophet.

Yes, nothing,----Allah guarantees us that He will not ask us about anything that those Sahaba used to do, and used to say.

According to Allah, we have no relationship with what they did, and what they said.

Dear brother, if Allah had Willed, He Himself would have given us the names of the Sahaba, the family members of the Prophet, (Abu Bakar, Umar, Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, Hussain, Ayesha)-----but, since, Allah Himself Willed, not to let us know the names of the Sahaba and the family members of the last Prophet,----then who can go against Allah's Will?

What names Allah Willed, gave in His Exalted Book.
Iblees, Korah are condemned,---to tell us not to become like them.

Zul Qurnain, Luqman are admired,---to tell us to become like them.

What Allah Willed, He did.

======================================================================================================

Now, brother!---Do we know, why Allah do not Will us to know the names of those Sahaba and the family members of The Last Prophet?

Yes, because,---"Personality-worshipping"---starts by knowing the names of those rightly-guided people.

People start talking, mentioning, remembering, adoring,-----and eventually end up worshipping those family members of the Prophet and the Sahaba by taking and following the alleged narrations, that are linked with those people.

Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, Hussain, Abu Huraira, Abdullah ibn Umar, Abdullah ibn Abbaas,---are these names not being worshipped???
Are these names not being worshipped, besides Allah???

Are the fabricated narrantions linked with these Sahaba not being taken as Deen, instead of Allah's Quran?????

Whereas, Allah declares
-----"That was a nation (the Messengers, their companions) which has passed away. For them is that which they earned, and for you is that which you earn. And you will not be asked of what they used to do." (Al-Baqarah-134)

The ummah has got no business with the names of the family members of the Prophet and the Sahaba.

Respected brothers/sisters!

Is it not true, that Allah didn't mention the names of the Sahaba in His Exalted Quran and never commanded us to have Iman in the names of the Sahaba.---Yes, it is true!

So, is it not true, that if a person says he will not have Iman in the names of the Sahaba which are not in Al-Quran, he is not a kafir???---Yes, he is not a kafir!

So, when a person have no Iman in the names Umar, Ali, Fatimah, Abu Huraira, Abdullah ibn Umar, Abdullah ibn Abbaas,----then why should he have Iman in the narrations which are, allegedly, linked with them???

If someone tells a person, "Abu Huraira said."
That person will say, "Who is Abu Huraira? I don't have Iman in him. So why should I accept whatever he says?"

Did you see, with this the whole fabric of The Science of Hadith becomes ramshackle-----so obviously!
And the whole fabric of Shia Deen crumbles down,-----even more obviously!

Every corruption in Deen starts by having Iman in the names of the family members of the Prophet, and the Sahaba of the Prophet.

Once people accept these names as the names of the family members of the Prophet, and his Sahaba,---now, they can never deny what is narrated (ahadith) using their names.

And accepting these names (Abu Bakar, Umar, Usman, Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, Hussain, Abu Huraira, Abdullah ibn Umar, Abdullah ibn Abbaas)---is not Allah's Will.-----Allah's Quran, is Allah's Will.

So, there are no ahadith in Islam.
And there is no Shia Sect in Islam.
These two are nothing but, Corruption in Deen.

And this is Allah's Will, that other than His Exalted Quran, everything is Corruption.

===================================================================

This is Allah's Will.
Read Allah's Quran, more and more, repeatedly,----to know Allah's Will.
fromhttp//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9601994.90

parvez_mushtaq

just as opinion not as a law , and before taking any opinion filter it through the light of quran, if it not passed that filter then that opinion is not qualified as a readable thingie. still then if u do it it will probably take u away from right path,

Yes they are just opinions and not laws
we should be careful in taking them and of course quran is the source to filter as a matter of fact non of the Ahadith scholars or tafisr scholars claimed that their worked to be considered as at par with Quran .
I strongly believe that these was one the ways of ALLAH subhanavatala to protect Quran
do we have only Ahadith or tafsir revolving around ,Imran .The answer is NO
There were lot of other things too .The hadiths ,then usool e ahadith, tafsir and its usool, tajweed and its usool, tilawa and its usool and Fiqh and its usool and ALLAH knows how many things were revolving around the Quran with the time .at any given point of people never left Quran .They always made it as part of their life .The real beauty is that all these evolved orally because they never carried a hard copy of these things .if Quran is miracle than all the things which revolved around it were equivalently miraculous .
Of course they all had their pros and cons but the result was obtained .....Quran is intact ...cover to cover for 1400 years !

for example, tafseers of some critical issues, sometimes tafseer from these scholoars lead us towards shirk which is not a chance to take in anyway.. some examples of famous tafseers i wanty to show you but innfact its not what traditional tafseer claims,,

tafseer of jesus is alive, contradict with the teaching of quran itself at several occassions ,,

tafseer of david test , contradict with the teaching of quran and law of moses .

tafseer of miraj , far away from the teaching of quran, in some tafseers of sunni ,prophet himself saw Allah in mirror in shape of prophet muhammad, in some shia tafseer when Allah shakes his hands with prophet ,Allah was wearing a ring and it was written ali on it,

hold on here for a sec cant u see no image can grasp the image of Allah, no eye can see Allah, and moreover in the whole event prophet didnot meet with God at all.these tafseer are clearly contradict the mystery of Allah and how shameful their understanning is still like a kid who is thinking Allah is in person with human hands sitting behing blackcutain,

however closer understanding is he saw some amazing signs out of which one is at a place near eternal paradise.
these are just three tafseers i have to tell u a lot but these things are enough to qualified as a hell dewellers . matter of space my post is already long one..hope u ll got it

All the above are the classical examples for
The instances above don't form the base of the religion .Lets see what ALLAH subhanavatala say about these things

Verse 1822
22

They will say there were three, the fourth of them being their dog; and they will say there were five, the sixth of them being their dog - guessing at the unseen; and they will say there were seven, and the eighth of them was their dog. Say, , "My Lord is most knowing of their number. None knows them except a few. So do not argue about them except with an obvious argument and do not inquire about them among from anyone."

parvez_mushtaq

Hi,

As long as their traditions/rituals do not harm others there is nothing foolish about it if they find peace in it.
But if their traditions/rituals are bad/evil then for sure they are fools.

So imo stoning a object because you think it symbolizes the devil not really foolish, ok I admit it's not very smart and there are better things to do but you will not go to hell for stoning a lifeless object.

Yes ,I agree with you Bender

But stoning a human being because it's in your tradition or ritual or whatever, that is foolish and you can bet that hell is waiting for you.

Here i want make few additions
I dont know from where they got this ruling of stoning a adulterer or adulteress
Because ALLAH subhanvatala clearly says in Ayah 415

Those who commit unlawful sexual intercourse of your women - bring against them four from among you. And if they testify, confine the guilty women to houses until death takes them or Allah ordains for them way.

This Ayah clearly proves that there will be another ruling regarding this issue

And there by the other Ayah is

Verse 242

The woman or man found guilty of sexual intercourse - lash each one of them with a hundred lashes, and do not be taken by pity for them in the religion of Allah, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a group of the believers witness their punishment.

Note the brackets to explain this ruling .
There are Ahadiths to which go against their ruling but stick to their ruling over viewing these ayahs

parvez_mushtaq

What telegraphic messages are are referring when i have already explained.

I think you have forgotten our olden days postal telegraphy
people used send only few words to make their thoughts readable to their distant relative .so your messages are few words and not clearly explained

Ok, the verse shows clearly that there is ONLY ONE RAKAAH - . The Standing, Kneeling-Prostration, than getting up from prostration to kneeling position is considered one rakaah.

Let me take that verse again .this time in Arabic
Verse 4102

Let me explain you in detail the underlined part

meaning And when you are among them and lead them in prayer Implies our porphet was the imam and that was a congregational prayer

Meaning let a group of them stand with you ...So one the group is standing with our prophet in congregational prayer

Meaning and let them carry their arms.....So another group was standing with arms ,guarding

Meaning And when they have prostrated Note that "they" it implies our prophet who is the imam is still in the salah and one rakaa was over for our prophet ....Alhamdulilah

Meaning let them be behind you and have the other group come forward which has not prayed ......The first group has finished its one rakhaa and the other group is coming forward to join prayer with our prophet. "behind our prophet" who is the imam implies our prophet is about to make his second rakhaa

Meaning and let them pray with you ......So our prophet prayed two rakaahs were as each group prayed one rakhaa each ....this is obligatory fear salah

This is called the detailed explanation....now it is your turn to tell me how our prophet prayed only one rakah twice with each group .....where are those Arabic words for praying with them twice ....it is very clear groups changes there positions behind our prophet at the end of each rakaah and our prophet whom was the imam was performing two rakaahs

PL...Pl...Pl... don't Christianize our salah

Hizbullah

I think you have forgotten our olden days postal telegraphy
people used send only few words to make their thoughts readable to their distant relative .so your messages are few words and not clearly explained Let me take that verse again .this time in Arabic

I have already explained to the best of my ability, check the quran afterall the it is a TAFSEEL . What further explanation do you need?

Verse 4102

S lets follow your detail explanation

meaning And when you are among them and lead them in prayer Implies our porphet was the imam and that was a congregational prayer

No! its does not implies to the Prophet but the Arab Messenger which this Arabic version of the quran was preached by the Prophet to him.

Meaning let a group of them stand with you ...So one the group is standing with our prophet in congregational prayer

One group standing in a Congregational prayer lead by the Arab Messenger

Meaning and let them carry their arms.....So another group was standing with arms ,guarding

No! thats not what it meant, it means the same group in the 1st Congregational prayer lead by the Messenger with their weapons besides them.

Meaning And when they have prostrated Note that "they" it implies our prophet who is the imam is still in the salah and one rakaa was over for our prophet ....Alhamdulilah

Wrong! "they" refered to the 1st group of people doing the 1st Congrational Prayer with their Messenger. After the prostration, its over for the first group.

Meaning let them be behind you and have the other group come forward which has not prayed ......The first group has finished its one rakhaa and the other group is coming forward to join prayer with our prophet. "behind our prophet" who is the imam implies our prophet is about to make his second rakhaa

Wrong, the prayers already completed for the 1st group and the second group came to carry out the prayers where the Messenger will lead them in the 2nd Congregational prayers. No mentioned of RAKAAH!

Meaning and let them pray with you ......So our prophet prayed two rakaahs were as each group prayed one rakhaa each ....this is obligatory fear salah

So the Messenger will have to conduct 2 Congregational prayers. One so called rakaah for each group. Remember this is in hostile situation. In normal situation, whoever is present will join in the congregation prayers. No need to fear!

This is called the detailed explanation....now it is your turn to tell me how our prophet prayed only one rakah twice with each group .....where are those Arabic words for praying with them twice ....it is very clear groups changes there positions behind our prophet at the end of each rakaah and our prophet whom was the imam was performing two rakaahs.

Where is the Arabic word for Rakaah? The illustration explanation in 04102 shows that the MESSENGER PRAYED ONCE WITH EACH GROUP. Each prayers consisting of 2 position - Standing and Kneeling-Prostrating. The traditional Islamic prayers is such that you

1.Stand

2.Bow show me the highlight word in the Quran. You can never find it pertaining to salat.

Sujood - from standing to prostration - this is UNQURANIC. Nowhere in the Quran gives such instruction
Qu3ud - sit in between the next sujood. This is UNQURANIC. Nowhere in the Quran gives such instruction. Beside the word is not in the Quran.
2nd sujood after Qu3ud - where in the Quran that explain explicitly that there are two sujoods in our daily prayer.

The only explicit explanation about prayers is 04102 and it shows 2 position - Standing and Kneeling-Prostrating. The Arabic is very clear. Quran 2226

There is no conjunction in between kneeling and prostrating because it is considered one position. The Traditional Islamic way of praying is nothing more but conjectures. The Quranic way of prayers base on 04102 is for both peace and hostile situation.

PL...Pl...Pl... don't Christianize our salah

The verses pertaining salat which i have shown you are all from the Quran. Nothing is from the Christian Book. so, Please, Please, Please, dont conjectures. It is not right to implement things that the Quran does not instruct.

Talking about christianity, it was founded in the 4th century CE by a Pagan Greco-Roman emperor. The Last Prophet and the Quran was in the era of the 3rd Century CE. Islam does not plagarise any christians form of worshipping. I dont blame you. The conspirators had already made sure that every Muslim is ignorant regarding history and knowledge of languages. They pull off with their deceptions, making known to the worlds as if the Prophet was an Arab born in the 6th Century in Arabia and that the Quran was written in Arabic, sent down in only one geographical area!
But off course, if you wanna believe in the traditional Islamic BS, be my guest.

peace

parvez_mushtaq

No! its does not implies to the Prophet but the Arab Messenger which this Arabic version of the quran was preached by the Prophet to him.

Ok let me explain you the same things in a different way

-And when (Time verb)

you are (highlighted part suffix second person male singular pronoun).Meaning our prophet and as per you there were two
among them (green suffix third person male plural pronoun ) the whole Jamaat
and you lead (green suffix second person male singular pronoun ) .our prophet
for them (green third person male plural pronoun ) the whole jamaat
the prayer

The exact meaning is "And when your among them and you lead for them (became imam) in the prayer "

can you tell me where are the words that will support you translation ....lol are you cooking your own briyani

Lets take the second part

One group standing in a Congregational prayer lead by the Arab Messenger

then let stand (Green imperfect third person female singular jussive mood verb).here taqum is a verb (meaning they stood for salah) where as in the verse you brought is a noun
a group (green female indefinite nominative noun )
of them (suffix third person male plural pronoun) .so into two groups splits here
with you (suffix second person male singular pronoun ) our prophet

So ..one of the group is standing with our prophet in salah ....Good ..you are correct

Lets take the next ....

No! thats not what it meant, it means the same group in the 1st Congregational prayer lead by the Messenger with their weapons besides them.

and let them take ( green prefix prefixed conjunction conjunction ) clearly state that it is continuation of the of the previous division
their arms.

So one group is standing with our prophet and another guarding with arms
no one bothers about what you mean or what i mean ...are you prophet to induce your own cooked up meaning in the quran ...or is quran is inherited by your ancestors you to so that you can put any meaning that you like

Next...

Wrong! "they" refered to the 1st group of people doing the 1st Congrational Prayer with their Messenger. After the prostration, its over for the first group.

Then when
they have prostrated

MEANING ....THEN WHEN THEY HAVE PROSTRATED ....first rakaa is completed
Again cooking your own briyani ....dont give your own thinking here in the translation of quran .....are is that your reading in between lines !
next ....

Wrong, the prayers already completed for the 1st group and the second group came to carry out the prayers where the Messenger will lead them in the 2nd Congregational prayers. No mentioned of RAKAAH!

then let them be ...(GREENimperfect third person male plural jussive mood verb )
from
behind you
and let come
a group -
other,
not
prayed,
and let them pray
with you

if we make out the meaning from the word to to word translation then it means "then let them be behind you and let the other group not prayed come forward and pray with you "
in other words ....after sujood , let the first group go behind and let the other group join with you for the prayer ..join in the second rakat

The verses pertaining salat which i have shown you are all from the Quran. Nothing is from the Christian Book. so, Please, Please, Please, dont conjectures. It is not right to implement things that the Quran does not instruct.

your translation or your understating of this verse is

No! its does not implies to the Prophet but the Arab Messenger which this Arabic version of the quran was preached by the Prophet to him.
One group standing in a Congregational prayer lead by the Arab Messenger
No! thats not what it meant, it means the same group in the 1st Congregational prayer lead by the Messenger with their weapons besides them.
Wrong! "they" refered to the 1st group of people doing the 1st Congrational Prayer with their Messenger. After the prostration, its over for the first group.
Wrong, the prayers already completed for the 1st group and the second group came to carry out the prayers where the Messenger will lead them in the 2nd Congregational prayers. No mentioned of RAKAAH!

is this is the translation of the verse 4.0102 or
When thou (O Messenger) art with them, and standest to lead them in prayer, Let one party of them stand up (in prayer) with thee, Taking their arms with them When they finish their prostrations, let them Take their position in the rear. And let the other party come up which hath not yet prayed - and let them pray with thee,

even christian missionary people will, laugh at your translation
so dont cook your own curry and quran is not a place for that
Really this was the very bad joke i ever read in recent time ...sorry i cannot laugh now some time later

good_logic

Peace parvez.

If the brother is cooking you a biryani followed by curry, then sit with him and enjoy the meal together like good friends.

After all ,you have been going on with this conversation for a while.

GOD bless you both brothers.
Peace.

Hizbullah

Peace parvez.

If the brother is cooking you a biryani followed by curry, then sit with him and enjoy the meal together like good friends.

After all ,you have been going on with this conversation for a while.

GOD bless you both brothers.
Peace.

And ALLAH bless you gl too

Bender

Exactly , Bender
but i remembered about walking between safa and marwa .how any one can become pious just walking between two hills .then when i incorporated with Verse 15.39
said, "My Lord, because You have put me in error, I will surely make attractive to them on earth, and I will mislead them all

The problem of iblees was disobedience to the Almighty . so when ALLAH subhanavatala said to walk between safa and marwa we should say Sameena Wa Ataana .

Salaam Parvez,

RED We? He did not say that to me.

similarly i cannot ask question about the rituals because this rituals got nothing to do with our prophet

RED I do not understand what you mean with this.

So i left the matter to ALLAH subhanavatal and he guided me in lot of ways in hajj

You just repeated what you said. Lets suppose I am in Mecca to do the hajj. Then I decide to leave the matter to Allah. Then what? I just wait in my hotel room? A lot of people say this, I mean "I left it to Allah" but I never understood what that means. Can you explain how He guided you in hajj when you left the matter to Him.

It is obvious that we don't know how they could have performed salah
but the salah we have is 1400 years old and i prefer to follow it .If it is wrong ,It is up to ALLAH subhanvatal to guide me to the right path

GREEN Sure, there is nothing wrong imo in the 1400 old prayer.

There you are ,Bender
the the word is pronounced maj-reyha and not majreha
this comes in tajweed .if you happen to hear the tilawa of this verse you will notice this .No qhaari will pronounce this word as majreha but he will pronounce it as maj-reyha
this is the oral tradition transmitted down the ages by our ancestors believing that our prophet pronounced it this way
another beauty is that we don't have any hadith to prove this as well (as far as i know) just oral transmission
Yet another proof for our strong oral transmission !

RED Maybe they are all wrong and it should be pronounced as majreha.

Maybe your way of pray is similar to those of 1400 years back, but does it make it the only way to pray?
If I pray in my way will Allah not hear me?
Do we need a special code (=ritual) before Allah listens to us?

Hizbullah

Ok let me explain from the Quranic perspective

-And when (Time verb)

you are (highlighted part suffix second person male singular pronoun)?.Meaning the Arab messenger that was assigned to his people;
IN THEM (green suffix third person male plural pronoun ) ??the whole Jamaah
and you lead (green suffix second person male singular pronoun ) ?.the Arab Messenger AS IMAM
FOR THEM (green third person male plural pronoun ) ??the whole jamaah
the prayer
then let stand (Green imperfect third person female singular jussive mood verb)?.here taqum is a verb (meaning they stood for salah)
A GROUP (green female indefinite nominative noun )
AMONG THEM (suffix third person male plural pronoun) ?.study the verse, it says A GROUP AMONG THEM, meaning a group among the Jamaah;
with you (suffix second person male singular pronoun ) ?the Arab Messenger
and LET THEM take ( green prefix prefixed conjunction conjunction ) ?
their arms.
Then when
they have prostrated
then LET THEM be ...(GREENimperfect third person male plural jussive mood verb )
from
behind you

WHERE IS THE WORD "guarding with arms"??? YOU ARE NOT ALLAH, AUTHOR OF THIS QURAN, So dont try to be smart fabricating your own cooked up meaning in the Quran ...or is the Quran given to you directly FROM ALLAH ALMIGHTY that you can put any meaning that you like!

Next...

MEANING ....THEN WHEN THEY HAVE PROSTRATED ....SHOWS COMPLETION OF SALAH FROM THE QURANIC PERSPECTIVE;

If you wanna cook briyani, make sure put in the proper briyani spices, dont put in THOSAI OR APPUM SPICE, IT WILL TASTE AWFUL! ....IF YOU HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE DONT TRY TO EXPLAIN THE QURAN, LEAVE IT TO THE EXPERT!

SO THE 1ST GROUP AMONG THEM COMPLETED THEIR PRAYERS with THE MESSENGER

ANOTHER GROUP FROM THE JAMAAH. NOTE THIS PART OF VERSE 102, USE THE WORD "ANOTHER".....

next ....

and let come
A GROUP -
ANOTHER,
not
prayed,
and let them pray
with you
and let them take
their precautions
and their arms.

SO THE 2ND GROUP WAS ALSO REMINDED TO TAKE ARMS AS NECESSARY PRECAUTION.

if we make out the meaning from the word to to word translation then it means "let the other group not prayed come forward and pray with you and let them take precaution and their arm"
in other words ....after sujood , let the first group go behind and let the other group join the Messenger for the prayer ..join in the second congregation prayers. So the correct tralations is -

When thou (O Messenger) art with them, and standest to lead them in prayer, Let A PARTY OF THEM stand up (in prayer) with thee, Taking their arms with them When they finish their prostrations, let them Take their position in the rear. And let THE OTHER PARTY come up which hath not yet prayed - and let them pray with thee,and let them take their precautions and their arms.

I never take Quranic verses as a joke, unlike you, sectarian, will take Quranic verses as joke because to you Quran is nothing, the word of dead men are more valuable than the words of ALLAH.

My last post so peace