Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Critical Examination of Islam
  3. Quranic Divinity
  4. Who was the first Muslim?

Who was the first Muslim?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Quranic Divinity
57 Posts 20 Posters 1.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    If a diary from your house informs us that

    "Recluse was the first born."

    That should imply that you are the first born human being on the planet?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      Recluse
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      If a diary from your house informs us that

      "Recluse was the first born."

      That should imply that you are the first born human being on the planet?

      I thought Islam was universal and for mankind as a whole, not only for Semitic people? Regardless, I don't believe that Islam has anything to do with belief. Monotheism has nothing to do with salvation, it doesn't make sense. Who was the first Bolivian Muslim? Who was the first Japanese Muslim, or Vietnamese Muslim? See, no matter how you rationalize, it does not change the fact that the core Islamic doctrine is irrational and ridiculous. According to the Qur'an all Japanese are going to an eternal Hellfire. Do you believe that claim of the Qur'an? Does it make sense to you?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Man_of_Faith
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Recluse,

        Unfortunately Muslims talk that away by claiming the argument is only valid for people who have had the chance to be in contact with Quran. But obviously it does not make sense as that means they still go to Hell because they are not believers.

        Indirectly it means it would be better to never have encountered Quran for any person as they will be unharmed, according to the logic, since you do not have to do the braindead ritual and other meaningless activities.

        Be well
        Amenuel

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          Novice
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          There are contradictions in the Qur'an as to who was the "first Muslim".

          Salam Recluse

          Try to understand the word Muslim without capital M and you will not find any contradiction in Quran.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Man_of_Faith
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            So Noah was not muslim you mean? Oh hell, that crazy old man was surely broken in spirit... or?

            It is lame to start at Abraham bringing islam, he was rather among those who were muslim.

            What is true is Abraham made the first assembly devoted to spreading islam, but since muslim is a state of being he surely cannot have been the first one being muslim... unless you make Noah a crazy old man as I wrote above.

            Listen to what you are thinking, please. Find soundness concerning your faith.

            Be well
            Amenuel

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Offline
              R Offline
              Recluse
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Recluse,

              Unfortunately Muslims talk that away by claiming the argument is only valid for people who have had the chance to be in contact with Quran. But obviously it does not make sense as that means they still go to Hell because they are not believers.

              Yes MoF, they claim that those who come into contact with the Qur'an must accept it. But if they themselves had been born in Vietnam, they too wouldn't accept the religion of a foreign culture either. It's very hard for most people to abandon their own established traditions. I've tried to rationalize the Islamic doctrine in my mind for many years and it still doesn't make sense to me. Frankly, it is driving me nuts.

              Indirectly it means it would be better to never have encountered Quran for any person as they will be unharmed, according to the logic, since you do not have to do the braindead ritual and other meaningless activities.

              Be well
              Amenuel

              Yes, this is precisely what I have always wondered too.

              Some people also claim that all people on earth know (in their heart) that there is one God, whether they have heard about the Qur'an or not. Does that make sense? If there are no better explanations than these, then how can we continue to believe in the divinity of the Qur'an? Because if you don't believe in this claim of the Qur'an that only Muslims go to Paradise then you are not a Muslim. I bet very few people here are Muslims )

              Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Offline
                R Offline
                Recluse
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Salam Recluse

                Try to understand the word Muslim without capital M and you will not find any contradiction in Quran.

                Salam Novice,

                Alright, let's do that; how many muslims ('m' with a small letter) are there in countries like Japan or South Korea. Are there just as many as in Saudi Arabia, Turkey or Pakistan? Why do we call Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan "Muslim countries"? Why not call Japan a Muslim country?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Someone
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Salam Novice,

                  Alright, let's do that; how many muslims ('m' with a small letter) are there in countries like Japan or South Korea. Are there just as many as in Saudi Arabia, Turkey or Pakistan? Why do we call Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan "Muslim countries"? Why not call Japan a Muslim country?

                  Peace Recluse, all

                  I think that you will be surprised about the number of peacemakers (muslimeen) on this planet. In fact, the peacemakers are the majority, and only some few troublemakers (mojremeen) are making all the troubles going around.

                  Most of people want to live peacefully, they do not look for troubles. The problems are coming from the few troublemakers who are trying their best to abuse the others. But fortunately, many good people are facing them successfully, else things would be much worse.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Someone
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    And for the initial question, let's imagine that we are in a heated up discussion and things can get to hands. The best attitude is to step back and bring the discussion to a peaceful level by proclaiming that I am the first of the peacemakers, inviting the other parties to do the same as to proclaim that they want to make peace also. If not, then atleast the matter will be settled by force.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Someone
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      And for the initial question, let's imagine that we are in a heated up discussion and things can get to hands. The best attitude is to step back and bring the discussion to a peaceful level by proclaiming that I am the first of the peacemakers, inviting the other parties to do the same as to proclaim that they want to make peace also. If not, then atleast the matter will be settled (by force?).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Recluse
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        And for the initial question, let's imagine that we are in a heated up discussion and things can get to hands. The best attitude is to step back and bring the discussion to a peaceful level by proclaiming that I am the first of the peacemakers, inviting the other parties to do the same as to proclaim that they want to make peace also. If not, then atleast the matter will be settled by force.

                        Peace someone,

                        Are you defining muslim as a 'peacemaker', i.e. everyone who wants peace, regardless of what they believe?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          spodacus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Salam,

                          just wondering what benefits you are getting in contributing to this forum if any? Read through your history and seems that you don't find Quran to be divine anymore? Very interesting reading your posts from the past and seems that you are using arguments which you declared to be invalid.

                          For example, you came to the conclusion that Hadith should not be used to represent Quran, but now your arguments against the Quran are utilizing religious fervor defined in Hadith and not in Quran.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Man_of_Faith
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            I think Recluse is implying on things found even in a Quran interpretation detached from "hadith".

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Recluse
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Salam,

                              just wondering what benefits you are getting in contributing to this forum if any? Read through your history and seems that you don't find Quran to be divine anymore? Very interesting reading your posts from the past and seems that you are using arguments which you declared to be invalid.

                              For example, you came to the conclusion that Hadith should not be used to represent Quran, but now your arguments against the Quran are utilizing religious fervor defined in Hadith and not in Quran.

                              Salaam,

                              I'm just searching for truth, my previous beliefs and opinions were largely based on ignorance and blind faith. I had accepted a priori that the Qur'an cannot be questioned, and if there are any inconsistencies, it had to be because of my misunderstanding, but I eventually had a rude awakening.

                              Regardless if the Qur'an is divinely inspired or not, I can clearly see that this book - whether interpreted on its own, or with external sources, such as hadith, history and sunna - has many inconsistencies, illogical, irrational and immoral teachings. This may not be a problem for most people who prefer blind faith, but for me it is a huge problem. The questions asked in this thread are in my view very fundamental questions. If you have logical answers or explanations I would appreciate if you could share your knowledge with us instead of questioning people's intentions (at least that is how it came across, so I apologize if I misunderstood). My intention is to seek for truth, nothing else.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Someone
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                Peace someone,

                                Are you defining muslim as a 'peacemaker', i.e. everyone who wants peace, regardless of what they believe?

                                Peace Recluse,

                                Yes, regardless of their beliefs, people can be defined by their attitude either they are peacemakers (muslimeen ) or troublemakers (mojremeen), and this since the beginning of humanity until now - the same criteria.

                                On the other hand, being of this or that religion is irrelevant because agression is still an abuse no matter what religious cover we want to give to it. Beliefs are only thoughts, but attitudes are made of actions that can benefit or harm others, and that is what counts in the end.

                                When one is inclined to the peace, all matters can be solved easily, even if they are complicated. But if one is looking for troubles, then the simplest disagreement can turn to a destructive war. Religion is only an excuse among others.

                                Peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Recluse
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Peace Recluse,

                                  Yes, regardless of their beliefs, people can be defined by their attitude either they are peacemakers (muslimeen ) or troublemakers (mojremeen), and this since the beginning of humanity until now - the same criteria.

                                  On the other hand, being of this or that religion is irrelevant because agression is still an abuse no matter what religious cover we want to give to it. Beliefs are only thoughts, but attitudes are made of actions that can benefit or harm others, and that is what counts in the end.

                                  When one is inclined to the peace, all matters can be solved easily, even if they are complicated. But if one is looking for troubles, then the simplest disagreement can turn to a destructive war. Religion is only an excuse among others.

                                  Peace

                                  Peace,

                                  That belief system would be perfectly logical and acceptable, although I'm not sure if that is what the Qur'an really says.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    good_logic
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Peace Recluse.

                                    I disagree with you here,quote

                                    Regardless if the Qur'an is divinely inspired or not, I can clearly see that this book - whether interpreted on its own, or with external sources, such as hadith, history and sunna - has many inconsistencies, illogical, irrational and immoral teachings. This may not be a problem for most people who prefer blind faith, but for me it is a huge problem....

                                    May be according to your understanding/others interpretations...

                                    I also was curious to find out what Qoran says, I had some reservations, I wanted to prove to others that this book is a lot of "fairy/ancient tales and nonsense". So far I have failed miserably.
                                    Actually, after many years of studying it, I have found the opposite.
                                    I have hence, submitted to the Lord of the universe,acknowledging that GOD authored Qoran.

                                    May be we are opposites and see things differently like
                                    1624
                                    When they are asked, "What do you think of these revelations from your Lord," they say, "Tales from the past."

                                    Or
                                    1630
                                    As for those who "Ittaquau", when they are asked, "What do you think of these revelations from your Lord," they say, "Good." For those who lead a righteous life, happiness, and the abode of the Hereafter is even better. What a blissful abode for the righteous.

                                    But of course it is a matter of each finding out for themselves.
                                    GOD bless you.
                                    Peace.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • I Offline
                                      I Offline
                                      IAMOP
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      First one to surrender

                                      So in a room full of humans
                                      First one to surrender to effortless flow of caring love emanating beauty warmth fulfilment and be the truth distinguishing factual heartfelt resonance
                                      Is the first 'muslim'

                                      Minimise hell
                                      Maximise unconditional love/joy/nirvana/paradise

                                      Correct presentation of truth is free of distress (pain of iblees/satan) and allows eustress (happy growth)
                                      If distress mixed with eustress we have mixing of imbalance and balance
                                      If distress alone we have action of iblees/satan
                                      If eustress alone we have truth
                                      Distress = damage to body
                                      Eustress = repair to body & everything within

                                      That is all it is.
                                      Is there a Muslim nation? Yes, but let us see the confusion.

                                      There is no "Islam" or "Muslim" in that kind of vernacular context that is being used in that particular sense which is perceived as 'not-right', which presents a feeling of something-wrong in all witnesses, that is a pure fiction which keeps shirk with the pure, to mix truth with falsehood, by people consciously (munafiq) or unconsciously - miasm/thought-virus/dna-transcription-destructive-replicator-algorithm.

                                      Then someone can play dress up, and then we have this strange paradox "why did this Muslim commit acts of evil?" "why did this Muslim cause suffering and hurt to someone else"? When quran is very clear, someone is only being 'muslim' when they act as that which frees from hunger, oppression, slavery of all kinds, trauma, and many more things, totally the freedom from the harshness of the knowledges of evil and of good, only enlightening which is releasing from fear into comfort, happiness, universal release, liberation
                                      The true action of 'muslim' is the total release and liberation from all evil, all suffering, all hurt, true compassion for all beings, for all living things, for all that have existed in the past, present and all who will exist in the future

                                      understanding the true nature of the cessation of sorrow leads to liberation from samskaras (imprints) and vasanas (habits/thoughtforms)

                                      I.e. 10/10 life-preserving tasks to act upon
                                      9/10 tasks acted upon = 1/10 tasks of shirk
                                      10/10 tasks acted upon = muslim
                                      9/10 tasks = almost muslim

                                      first muslim is first one to 1/1, 10/10, 100/100, 1000/1000

                                      this is the Clear Light
                                      there is no discussion, there is no witness to say "this behaviour is unjust" when muslim is truly evident
                                      from the perspective of the akashic holographic record, the pure truth containing all points of view
                                      there can only be justice in accordance with the fullness of the akashic holographic record from a timeless point of view

                                      shirk = anything that evaluates to 'false' when examined with a true clear sight of unconditional love and effortless flow - as the universe itself is effortlessly flowing
                                      beware all misconceptions
                                      beware all distortions
                                      beware all opinions
                                      beware all mistakes
                                      beware all untruth
                                      only the supreme speaks truth
                                      who is the supreme?
                                      look within to the unborn, the eternal
                                      then find the true reflection in the outer, the manifest

                                      look from Allah's point of view then true nature will be seen of all

                                      Namaste (I honour the light in you which is in all beings)
                                      Salamun aleykum (Peace be upon you)
                                      I close this message in unconditional love

                                      sun

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Recluse
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        Peace Recluse.

                                        May be according to your understanding/others interpretations...

                                        Peace,

                                        Do you agree with the Qur'an that Islam is the only religion that God will accept (319), and that all non-Muslims will go to an eternal Hell?

                                        So bilions of Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai, Cambodians and other "non-Muslims" go to an eternal Hell?

                                        How do you account for this absurd threat in the Qur'an by the "Merciful God" ?

                                        Who or what is a muslim?

                                        This is the most fundamental question we should ask ourselves, the number one issue by far. Of course, I could also give you numerous verses about numerous issues that are inconsistent and incompatible.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          good_logic
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Peace Recluse.
                                          Yes I agree with Qoran.

                                          Surely, those who believe, those who are Jewish, the Christians, and the converts ( Any religion...); anyone who (1) believes in God, and (2) believes in the Last Day, and (3) leads a righteous life, will receive their recompense from their Lord. They have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve.

                                          i.e they are all "Muslims".
                                          "Islam is a spiritual state of mind and not a title of a religion that belongs to a specific group of people. ANYONE who submits and serves the one God without idolizing other entities is a "Muslim".

                                          This state of mind basically conforms with God?s one and only message He delivered to man-kind through all of His messengers since man existed; serve/worship God alone and avoid idolatry.
                                          Based on that, one can safely conclude that the message of Islam has been in existence way before the time of prophet Muhammad and way before Qoran.
                                          All God?s messengers, since the first prophet/messenger, devoted their lives service and worship to God alone and were" Muslimeen"to Him alone.
                                          Here are some verses clarifying this understanding
                                          We did not send any messenger before you except with the inspiration "There is no god except Me; you shall serve/worship Me alone."

                                          We have sent a messenger to every community, saying, "You shall serve/worship God, and avoid idolatry....."

                                          Recite for them the history of Noah. He said to his people, "O my people, if you find my position and my reminding you of God's revelations too much for you, then I put my trust in God. You should get together with your leaders, agree on a final decision among yourselves, then let me know it without delay.
                                          "If you turn away, then I have not asked you for any wage. My wage comes from God. I have been commanded to be a Muslim."

                                          Had you witnessed Jacob on his death bed; he said to his children, "What will you serve/ worship after I die?" They said, "We will serve/worship your god; the god of your fathers Abraham, Ismail, and Isaac; the one GOD. To Him we are Muslimeen."

                                          When Jesus sensed their disbelief, he said, "Who are my supporters towards God?" The disciples said, "We are God's supporters; we believe in God, and bear witness that we are Muslimeen."

                                          GOD bless you.
                                          Peace.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users