Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Quran is Clear Versus Allegorical in Verse 3:7

Quran is Clear Versus Allegorical in Verse 3:7

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
117 Posts 20 Posters 4.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Timotheus
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    Peace All,

    The reason I asked about whether or not one ayat can be "tashaba" is because this particular form of the verb is one that demonstrates reciprocity.

    Given this, when aayaat are said to be mutashaabihaat, it would mean they are similar to each other, not similar to something else. This is not about allegory in my opinion. That, I think is more aptly described by the term related to mathal.

    While I have not come to a firm conclusion, my current understanding is that in 37, the references are to signs or verses similar to each other. In the case of verses, it may refer to verses like those speaking to riba which appear to have differences despite their similarity and the focus people choose to put on these differences when similar subjects are being discussed.

    Imraan

    Peace,

    this is an interesting point, and i believe it can also/rather apply to this verse. as you noted, there are quite alot of verses that repeat things in different ways, and many people do choose to see a contradiction, when it is probably only them contradicting the truth with their interpretation.

    all up, i think far to much attention is given to the verses open to interpretation, and far too little attention is paid to the clear verses which even a child can understand, the mother of the book. I am not saying we should neglect parts of the quran, but simply to bear in mind..

    that we should not seek to interpret such things, but rather seek God to interpret them for us, and not hasten it. otherwise we are more likely just to put our own desires into it

    Peace

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #90

      Peace All,

      The reason I asked about whether or not one ayat can be "tashaba" is because this particular form of the verb is one that demonstrates reciprocity.

      Given this, when aayaat are said to be mutashaabihaat, it would mean they are similar to each other, not similar to something else. This is not about allegory in my opinion. That, I think is more aptly described by the term related to mathal.

      While I have not come to a firm conclusion, my current understanding is that in 37, the references are to signs or verses similar to each other. In the case of verses, it may refer to verses like those speaking to riba which appear to have differences despite their similarity and the focus people choose to put on these differences when similar subjects are being discussed.

      Imraan

      It is not Form-III which signifies reciprocity. You are absolutely right that it is not allegory. Practical books do not contain allegorical content.

      http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Tabweeb%20Part%202/115.Mutashabeha%20Sheen%20Ba%20Haa/4.gif Indefinite; feminine; plural; nominative; -- Verbal noun and Verb .

      The fact about existing realities is that not all are visible to human naked eye. The Primal Creator and also the knowledgeable-observant-scientists convey the knowledge about realities not apparent to human eye by using the metaphors. Descriptions by metaphors enable people perceive a general idea-image of invisible fact by relating it to characteristic features of the metaphor.

      Knowledge acquired by human beings, until seventh century, was through naked eye observation. Naked eye observation of an object and reality grants conviction about its existence. Thought of invisible realities was all along there in human mind that kept him busy in developing theories to gain a perception about various phenomena.

      Unitary Verbal Passages mirroring physical realities existing in the Universe and human body through metaphors render the Book living in time and space. Knowledge about matter is verifiable in time and space. Anything said by the Book regarding physical matters could be subjected to verification in time and space about its truth to an exact detail. Falsification test of any book-statement could be the physical one. The facts mentioned in the Qur'aan about the Universe and human body are in itself the falsification test of the Book.

      Format and Organization

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Offline
        I Offline
        imrankhawaja
        wrote on last edited by
        #91

        The fact about existing realities is that not all are visible to human naked eye. The Primal Creator and also the knowledgeable-observant-scientists convey the knowledge about realities not apparent to human eye by using the metaphors. Descriptions by metaphors enable people perceive a general idea-image of invisible fact by relating it to characteristic features of the metaphor.

        peace mazhar ,

        thats very true and logical...

        i also have similar understanding.. sometimes we are unnable to tell whats going on our mind regarding the understanding of observing visibile things..

        let say a example in chapter 55 regaridng the boundries of heaven and earth if we take it literally people assume its just the earth which we are living on,, infact its not the case .. but God giving us hint actually to come out of our bascis understanding shell to explore the discoveries ...

        for me that earth include all the landmasses(multibillion planets)

        right now we know billions of planet and billions of galaxies in our cosmic horizon i have a theory
        for God its like a cup of tea he create a expanding ball in which all this is happening like a illusion of laws bound to us at specific loacation and time... we cannot control or change it apart from limited things what we actually need.. for survival and these things also done with the willness of God like rain, plant growth.. etc and God is telling us again and again to look at these signs..

        the cosmic ball is billion x billion x billion light years and who know apart from this cosmic ball what else is there ... how many more cosmic balls like this, how many more heavens and universes ...how many more creations ...

        understanding of human being is developing by time to time ... but still we are very far from reality .. only the real entity is our lord who create all this not in vain...

        somewhere God is telling us we did not create all this heaven and earth for mere play..

        and a creation of heavens is more difficult than human being but little we understand ...

        peace
        God bless you

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #92

          and a creation of heavens is more difficult than human being but little we understand

          "Difficult" is not there. Nothing is difficult for Him the Exalted.

          Certainly, the act of Creation of the Skies and the Earth is comparatively a greater assignment - undertaking than the act of the creation of the species-Human Being.
          However, most of the people remain in the state of not accepting/realizing this fact/reality .

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Offline
            I Offline
            imrankhawaja
            wrote on last edited by
            #93

            "Difficult" is not there. Nothing is difficult for Him the Exalted.

            indeed nothing is difficult /hard for God to create,,

            this verse is for us to compare ourself with the universe ..

            7927 What! Are you the more difficult/hard/powerful to create or is the heaven that He built?

            although the word ashad of arabic u can say hard difficult or powerful but its for us to ponder about it...

            some of the translator interpret this word as difficult...

            peace but my concept was clear about it...

            peace..

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              hawk99
              wrote on last edited by
              #94

              to he who much is given, then much will be required of him'

              the more understanding we have, the greater the responsibility upon us is.

              Yes.

              everybody know its wrong, every religion, every nation..

              even a teenager in his teenage doing all these things know its wrong...

              God gave us scriptures but he also gave us a sense of right and wrong...

              using that sense does not require any scripture...

              Peace imrankhawaja we disagree, sunni, shia, and KKK, the Nazi's,
              female genital mutilators, honor killers and many others think they are right.

              Peace All,

              The reason I asked about whether or not one ayat can be "tashaba" is because this particular form of the verb is one that demonstrates reciprocity.

              Given this, when aayaat are said to be mutashaabihaat, it would mean they are similar to each other, not similar to something else. This is not about allegory in my opinion. That, I think is more aptly described by the term related to mathal.

              While I have not come to a firm conclusion, my current understanding is that in 37, the references are to signs or verses similar to each other. In the case of verses, it may refer to verses like those speaking to riba which appear to have differences despite their similarity and the focus people choose to put on these differences when similar subjects are being discussed.

              Imraan

              Interesting 1CELOSTNOWFOUND, could you give a translation of 3/7 from your perspective?

              that we should not seek to interpret such things, but rather seek God to interpret them for us,
              and not hasten it. otherwise we are more likely just to put our own desires into it

              well said

              peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Offline
                I Offline
                imrankhawaja
                wrote on last edited by
                #95

                Peace imrankhawaja we disagree, sunni, shia, and KKK, the Nazi's,
                female genital mutilators, honor killers and many others think they are right.

                detailed it plz what i understand here is honor killing and female genital mutilators...

                about honor killing people do it due to ego.. but everybody know ego is a nasty thing... satan did the same...

                about female genital mutilators i again say nobody have a right to touch/harm any human being and everybody know it...

                but its the issue of ignorance... i wonder tradition is strange thing in some areas people left a little bit drink in their cupp thinking its a good tradition ,, on other areas they drink it all never left a drink in cup becoz its their tradition to drink full otherwise host will get angry....

                in some areas if a women talk with stranger its allowed for a man to kill her,,, while in other arreas if you even caught a wife or sister on bed with stranger you bring a drink for them... rotfl

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Offline
                  H Offline
                  hawk99
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #96

                  detailed it plz what i understand here is honor killing and female genital mutilators...

                  about honor killing people do it due to ego.. but everybody know ego is a nasty thing... satan did the same...

                  about female genital mutilators i again say nobody have a right to touch/harm any human being and everybody know it...

                  but its the issue of ignorance... i wonder tradition is strange thing in some areas people left a little bit drink in their cupp thinking its a good tradition ,, on other areas they drink it all never left a drink in cup becoz its their tradition to drink full otherwise host will get angry....

                  in some areas if a women talk with stranger its allowed for a man to kill her,,, while in other arreas if you even caught a wife or sister on bed with stranger you bring a drink for them... rotfl

                  Peace imrankhawaja, you seemed to have left out culture as a factor
                  in determining right and wrong handshake

                  God bless you

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bender
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #97

                    female genital mutilators

                    peace

                    What's your opinion about male genital mutilators?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H Offline
                      H Offline
                      hawk99
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #98

                      What's your opinion about male genital mutilators?

                      Peace Bender, are you referring to circumcision?
                      are we fftopic

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Offline
                        I Offline
                        imrankhawaja
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #99

                        Peace imrankhawaja, you seemed to have left out culture as a factor
                        in determining right and wrong handshake

                        God bless you

                        lol honor killing is also cultural my brother its you who bring cultural factor...
                        handshake

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Offline
                          L Offline
                          LastDay3
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #100

                          Salaam to all Brothers/Sisters,

                          I truly love and respect each of you, learn a lot from each of you.

                          but are we not fftopic here, already for a long time?

                          Really, what was the Topic here? welcome

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • H Offline
                            H Offline
                            huruf
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #101

                            Salaam to all Brothers/Sisters,

                            I truly love and respect each of you, learn a lot from each of you.

                            but are we not fftopic here, already for a long time?

                            Really, what was the Topic here? welcome

                            May be the Topic of Cancer or the Topic of Capricorn

                            rotfl rotfl rotfl

                            Could not help it.

                            Salam

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Bender
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #102

                              yes I am offtopic, I apologize.

                              I try to stay on topic.
                              There are no allegorical verses in the book except when it is clearly stated.
                              That we can not comprehend a lot of verses/words does not mean we have to take those verses/words allegorical or force an interpretation, especially when those interpretations have nothing positive to add.
                              I think the author of the quran is a bit more intelligent, wise, knowledgeable etc than any one of us, so I think it's a good idea to first question our own intelligence, wisdom, knowledge etc instead of that of the author, except if we think we know better than the author.

                              As for you first question Reel 1689 does not close 37 out or vice versa. I understand the verses a little bit different, but even if you take kitab as book and the more traditional understanding then there is still no contradiction.
                              I have a book which explains every matter (1689) in this book I have besides clear verses also not so clear verses (37), but the book still explains every matter.
                              1689 does not refer to it's self (thus the book itself) but to "every matter", while 37 is referring to itself, thus the book.
                              I hope you understand what I mean.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Offline
                                N Offline
                                Novice
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #103

                                I think the author of the quran is a bit more intelligent, wise, knowledgeable etc than any one of us, so I think it's a good idea to first question our own intelligence, wisdom, knowledge etc instead of that of the author, except if we think we know better than the author.

                                Salaam Bender

                                No question about that and may be our present level of knowledge is not enough to explain some verses.

                                1689 does not refer to it's self (thus the book itself) but to "every matter", while 37 is referring to itself, thus the book.

                                Well said brother it makes sense.

                                May God bless you.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  Timotheus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #104

                                  Salaam Bender

                                  No question about that and may be our present level of knowledge is not enough to explain some verses.

                                  Well said brother it makes sense.

                                  May God bless you.

                                  Peace be upon you,

                                  may be? i would say without any doubt in the least, our knowledge is not enough to explain many verses, i doubt even the most knowledgable human being could encompass a fraction of the quran, it is an honourable book, and The glorious Quran. we do not even realise the depth of it. we cannot. The Glory be to God who revealed it.

                                  It is my view that the whole of human kind and jinn, gathered together could not explain or translate or interpret the whole quran. This is what is see in Gods promise that they could not 'produce something like it', as well as obviously just making up something entirely different.

                                  Peace.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    LastDay3
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #105

                                    What's your opinion about male genital mutilators?

                                    yes I am offtopic, I apologize.
                                    ..............
                                    I think the author of the quran is a bit more intelligent, wise, knowledgeable etc than any one of us,
                                    so I think it's a good idea to first question our own intelligence, wisdom, knowledge etc instead of that of the author, except if we think we know better than the author.

                                    Salaam/Peace Bender,

                                    I think your Apology should definitely be accepted, yes especially due to your Eloquent Statement in your second post above. bravo

                                    On the other hand, being an Adult who has already been circumcised --at least 40 years ago, so has nothing to lose or fear, &
                                    I can courageously stand in favor of Circumcision against you,

                                    due to the fact that TORAH is absolutely Supported in QURAN (=28/48-50 & 46/12)

                                    http//biblehub.com/esv/genesis/17.htm

                                    in another thread, in the future, inshaAL-LAH. handshake

                                    Remain in peace/salaam.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #106

                                      indeed nothing is difficult /hard for God to create,,

                                      this verse is for us to compare ourself with the universe ..

                                      7927 What! Are you the more difficult/hard/powerful to create or is the heaven that He built?

                                      although the word ashad of arabic u can say hard difficult or powerful but its for us to ponder about it...

                                      some of the translator interpret this word as difficult...

                                      peace but my concept was clear about it...

                                      peace..

                                      Simple principle of semantics Each word has certain irreducible semantic features; and conversely certain semantic features cannot be inserted into it.

                                      Akbar does not have semantic feature of "difficult" in it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        LastDay3
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #107

                                        Keeping my Promise, I should clearly relate how I understand these Verses =3/7-8 in QURAN TESTAMENT,
                                        also and especially in "Mathematical respect" here,
                                        and then totally stop writing here, but continue to read and learn
                                        from every faithful Member of this Forum, always, inshaAL-LAH.

                                        I want to keep it as short as possible and to the point.
                                        So let's start, in the Name of AL-LAH, here

                                        ==============================================================

                                        The most Fundamental and important Example I can think of right now
                                        --(which is also the most Easy/Clear/Essential to understand)-- in this regard, is

                                        Exactly these four specific Words of Basmalah (=Asm Al-lah Al-Rahman Al-Raheem)

                                        which always comes essentially as/in perfect Pairs again (51/49 = 74/26-30, 31),
                                        in the very first place, here

                                        total number of occurrences
                                        in QURAN TESTAMENT

                                        Al-Rahman < > Al-lah
                                        Lil-Rahman < > Lil-lah

                                        57 2698
                                        in total in total
                                        =19x... =19x...

                                        Al-Asm < > Al-Raheem
                                        Asm < > Raheem

                                        19 114
                                        in total in total
                                        =19x... =19x...


                                        sm < > ilah

                                        3 95
                                        in total in total

                                        As we should clearly see above
                                        based on Chapter/Verse No. (=74/2 in QURAN TESTAMENT

                                        "sm" should be exempted --on the left side above--
                                        --(beacuse there is one letter (=A) missing in the beginning;
                                        when we compare it to that most ideal/perfect Form above ("sm" X "Al-Asm"

                                        and "ilah" should be excluded --on the right side above--
                                        --(beacuse there is one letter (=I) extra in the beginning;
                                        when we compare it to that most ideal/perfect Form above ("ilah" X "Al-lah"

                                        in --(exact "opposite" sense)-- in such a perfectly parallel and absolutely Complementary manner above,
                                        they shall thus rightfully be placed under our Table above.

                                        (=74/26-27-28-29-30)

                                        Therefore
                                        Each of those four specific Words of Basmalah (=Asm & Al-lah & Al-Rahman & Al-Raheem)
                                        that perfectly give multiples (=19x...) on our Table above
                                        must be those Firmly-Established Signs (=Ayatun Muhkamatun)
                                        specifically foretold in these Verses =3/7 & 13/39 in QURAN TESTAMENT,

                                        and then

                                        Each of those two specific words (=sm & ilah)
                                        that do Not give multiples (=19x...) under our Table above
                                        must be those Vaguely-Established Signs (=Ayatun Mutashabihatun)
                                        specifically foretold in these Verses =3/7 & 13/39 in QURAN TESTAMENT.

                                        So finally, let us clearly see these most Critical and important Verses (=3/7-8 & 13/38-39)
                                        in QURAN TESTAMENT above,
                                        now here again, in this Respect, thus

                                        ============
                                        7- HE is the ONE Who sent down to you the Written-Document,
                                        from which there are Firmly-Established Signs (=Ayatun Muhkamatun);
                                        =i.e. each of those four specific Words of Basmalah (=Asm & Al-lah & Al-Rahman & Al-Raheem)
                                        that perfectly give multiples (=19x...) on our Table above;

                                        they are the Essence of the Written-Document (=Ummu al-Kitab)
                                        --on our Table above,

                                        and others which are Vaguely-Established (Signs) =(Ayatun) Mutashabihatun);
                                        =i.e. each of those two specific words (=sm & ilah)
                                        that do Not give multiples (=19x...) under our Table above.

                                        As for those who have a crookedness in their hearts, they will go after that which are of
                                        Vaguely-Established-ones (=ma tashabaha minhu);
                                        seeking (to create) confusion, and seeking (to demand) its (rightful) interpretation/explanation
                                        =i.e. they will always be asking why are they exempted & excluded --on the left side & on the right side--
                                        from our Table above? What can be a rightful interpretation/explanation for it?

                                        But none know its (rightful) interpretation/explanation except AL-LAH and those who are well founded in Knowledge;
                                        (=its rightful interpretation/explanation is already clearly and unmistakably pointed out above.)

                                        (thereafter) they (=i.e. those who are well founded in Knowledge) say

                                        "We have believed in it;
                                        (for) all --(of those Firmly-Established Signs --on our Table above--
                                        and Vaguely-Established Signs --under our Table above-- are from our LORD."

                                        But none will take-heed except those who possess Intelligence. (Chapter 3, Verse 7)


                                        38- ...... It is not for a Messenger to come with any "Sign" --(whether a Firmly-Established Sign --on our Table above--
                                        or a Vaguely-Established Sign --under our Table above--
                                        as clearly emphasized in the above Verse, in the first place =3/7)-- except with the Permission of AL-LAH;
                                        (because) for each course there is a Written-Decree.

                                        39- (Because) AL-LAH neutralizes what HE wishes (as/of those Vaguely-Established Signs --under our Table above),
                                        and authorizes (as/of those Firmly-Established Signs --on our Table above),

                                        because with HIM is the Essence of the Written-Document (=Ummu al-Kitab) --on our Table above--
                                        as clearly emphasized in the very first paragraph of this Verse again =3/7 in the very first place above).

                                        (QURAN TESTAMENT 3/7 = 13/38-39)

                                        Remain in peace/salaam.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • I Offline
                                          I Offline
                                          imrankhawaja
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #108

                                          Simple principle of semantics Each word has certain irreducible semantic features; and conversely certain semantic features cannot be inserted into it.

                                          Akbar does not have semantic feature of "difficult" in it.

                                          brother peace

                                          its actually " ashaddu " which means intense/hard/difficult/stronger/superior depend on the context

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users