Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. I can say no more than just a Wow!

I can say no more than just a Wow!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
26 Posts 6 Posters 288 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bkanwar2
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Most words have different meanings. A given meanings should be decided based upon the context of other words used in a given sentence. A pre-determined meaning can not be used to assign meanings to other words in a sentence.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Offline
      H Offline
      hansolo
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Your version
      9619
      By no means, you do not need to be submissive, or bowing down or even coming close to occupying yourselves in such acts.

      SAHIH INTERNATIONAL
      9619
      No! Do not obey him. But prostrate and draw near .

      Really interesting How can it be that the translations differ sooooo much ? Doesn't the arabic text say the same exact thing. Why cant just someone translate the exact words that say in the arabic.

      confused

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Offline
        B Offline
        bkanwar2
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Your version
        9619
        By no means, you do not need to be submissive, or bowing down or even coming close to occupying yourselves in such acts.

        SAHIH INTERNATIONAL
        9619
        No! Do not obey him. But prostrate and draw near .

        Really interesting How can it be that the translations differ sooooo much ? Doesn't the arabic text say the same exact thing. Why cant just someone translate the exact words that say in the arabic.

        confused

        Do you see word Allah in the verse? Why does it need to be inserted in brackets? Can it not be to give whole verse a predetermined meanings?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          imrankhawaja
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          oh my GOD.....

          ok i have a sentence in english " i am watching TELEVISION with sweet potatoes that cooked in sunflower oil"

          televison meanings... FAR view
          sweet potatoes = a kind of vegetable shape like potatoe and its sweet/honey/sugar
          sunflower oil= oil from flower at sun wordy meanings actual meanings oil get from sunflower a flower that shapes like sun...

          now see the sentence..

          i am looking at FAR VIEW with honey/sugar/ mix potatoe cooked by the oil from flower which is shaped like sun ...

          99 percent people really cant understand by veiwing far is tv... instead they will think i m looking at far place...lol nope

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Offline
            H Offline
            hansolo
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Do you see word Allah in the verse? Why does it need to be inserted in brackets? Can it not be to give whole verse a predetermined meanings?

            Yeah still... the translation you provided doesnt even remotely sound like it is the same verse actually

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              hansolo
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              (96101)
              abdan
              A slave N ? accusative masculine indefinite noun

              (96102)
              idh
              when T ? time adverb

              (96103)
              all
              he prays? V ? 3rd person masculine singular (form II) perfect verb

              How can the above text become this Watch out, worship is a slavery.

              Where did "Watch out" come from ?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Offline
                I Offline
                imrankhawaja
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Where did "Watch out" come from ?

                its comes from to b careful... watchout , everytime you do research... just kidding

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Offline
                  B Offline
                  bkanwar2
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  (96101)
                  abdan
                  A slave N ? accusative masculine indefinite noun

                  (96102)
                  idh
                  when T ? time adverb

                  (96103)
                  all
                  he prays? V ? 3rd person masculine singular (form II) perfect verb

                  How can the above text become this Watch out, worship is a slavery.

                  Where did "Watch out" come from ?

                  idh means "lo behold". When is meaning of Idh. No one uses "lo behold" in English any more. Its meaning is "Watch out", look or pay attention etc.
                  https//www.google.com/search?q=www.google.com&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoften-USIE-SearchBox&ie=&oe=#q=behold+definition

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Man_of_Faith
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    But here Rabb takes a (deeper?) meaning of "manage your affairs", making every occurence of "Rabb" referring to the person itself i.e "manage MY affairs" and not to a third party that is a "Lord" (i.e the Maker, Creator).

                    You cannot make a one syllable word containing only two letters to mean anything advanced. The word means something like Developer. For the same reason the Jews called their spiritual teachers for "Rabbi", because it means something like "he who develops", but more comprehensibly understood as "teacher".

                    More morphologically perceived, Rabb means "Foundation-Giver". The best one word translation in English I could make of that is developer hence the above explanation. An alternative would be sustainer, but the word carries a more explicit meaning of providing development. One who can provide a foundation improves the life situation for people through growth.

                    Be well
                    Amenuel

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Cerberus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      I agree with you Man Of Faith, hence why I'm confused by the translation given in the original post.

                      961

                      You gather it together in order to manage your affairs with the help of timeless knowledge that was proportioned for this purpose.

                      Rabbi'ka is "Your Rabb", which part of the translation above refers to Rabb ?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Offline
                        B Offline
                        bkanwar2
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        I agree with you Man Of Faith, hence why I'm confused by the translation given in the original post.

                        Rabbi'ka is "Your Rabb", which part of the translation above refers to Rabb ?

                        Rabb also means "managing affairs". You are having problems understanding because you are thinking and are used to viewing the world from lenses of a created personalized god of religion Islam. Would suggest to research and read a write up titled as "linguistic riddle solved for those who want to learn" on this very forum.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Man_of_Faith
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          I agree with you Man Of Faith, hence why I'm confused by the translation given in the original post.

                          Rabbi'ka is "Your Rabb", which part of the translation above refers to Rabb ?

                          I cannot make any sense of the translation.

                          961

                          My word by word "Make manifest about the attribute of your Rabb the one (who) shaped.." The passage is supposed to continue from that point, it is not a complete sentence, and the continuous discourse is necessary to make a definite rendition.

                          Be well
                          Amenuel

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Offline
                            B Offline
                            bkanwar2
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            I cannot make any sense of the translation.

                            961

                            My word by word "Make manifest about the attribute of your Rabb the one (who) shaped.." The passage is supposed to continue from that point, it is not a complete sentence, and the continuous discourse is necessary to make a definite rendition.

                            Be well
                            Amenuel

                            Language has several parts. Syntax is equally important in understanding the language. While words are building block with their meanings of own. How these are arranged in sentence imparts more meanings.

                            This is a verbal sentence.

                            an imperative verb, is the verb of verbal sentence, as well itself a whole sentence. It's root is Qaf-Ra-Alif. Its primary meanings is "he gathered it together". Meanings of recite is not primary meanings and is written in Lane with two horizontal bars implying this origin of root meaning to times of the classic Arabic are very very doubtful.

                            After, verb next part of a verbal sentence is "Faail". Which can not be by rule of Syntax " a prepositional phrase". Which is what we have next in order. Hence, only qualifier for this position is . I will stop here for you to verify, what I have said, as you seem interested in understanding and not just ridiculing without bases or just on faith alone.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Cerberus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Language has several parts. Syntax is equally important in understanding the language. While words are building block with their meanings of own. How these are arranged in sentence imparts more meanings.

                              This is a verbal sentence.

                              an imperative verb, is the verb of verbal sentence, as well itself a whole sentence. It's root is Qaf-Ra-Alif. Its primary meanings is "he gathered it together". Meanings of recite is not primary meanings and is written in Lane with two horizontal bars implying this origin of root meaning to times of the classic Arabic are very very doubtful.

                              After, verb next part of a verbal sentence is "Faail". Which can not be by rule of Syntax " a prepositional phrase". Which is what we have next in order. Hence, only qualifier for this position is . I will stop here for you to verify, what I have said, as you seem interested in understanding and not just ridiculing without bases or just on faith alone.

                              That's not true.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Offline
                                B Offline
                                bkanwar2
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                That's not true.

                                What is not true? Can you be more specific please, are you saying that a prepositional phrase can be a faail?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Cerberus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  The faail "the one applying the verb" that you're looking for is IMPLICIT

                                  961

                                  You gather it together in order to manage your affairs with the help of timeless knowledge that was proportioned for this purpose.

                                  is indeed a verb in imperative tense (in arabic it's literally an "order" tense, as in "Do it!&quot

                                  To make it simple, looking at the "Do it" example, the "faail" i.e the one applying the verb"the subject" is "You", it's Implicit as you can see and not shown in the sentence. Same thing in arabic and its called Hidden.

                                  After, verb next part of a verbal sentence is "Faail". Which can not be by rule of Syntax " a prepositional phrase". Which is what we have next in order. Hence, only qualifier for this position is

                                  So you chose Rabbi'ka as the faail. nope

                                  For further explanation, while keeping it simple there is a second verb in that verse too
                                  past verb, its faail ? Implicit and refers to HE, translate it to whatever verb you found in your dictionnary, "created" would be it for me. If you check the previous word "Rabbi'ka" the previous HE is actually referring to Rabb, the link between the two is "" easily translated to "that".

                                  Gather them you get Rabbi'ka that created.

                                  Now we already know what's Rabb, the "ka" is simply "your"
                                  Finally we get Your Rabb that created.

                                  Link it to the first part of the verse, I'll go with "recite" as the first verb so it's gonna be
                                  "Recite in the name of your Rabb that created"

                                  the following website might help http//www.learnarabiconline.com/sentence-parsing.shtml

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    bkanwar2
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    I was hopping that at last there is someone who is ready and capable of rationale discussion on this forum. I would present evidence of the real meanings of just the first word letter root and its meanings. Recite is written with two horizontal bar further down. Lane gives explanation of his annotations of two horizontal bars in his preface. Two horizontal bars signify really very very broken signification as original meaning of the root.

                                    http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume7/00000030.pdf

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Man_of_Faith
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      This is discussing very much rationally, actually both Cerberus and me. We might disagree on lexical data, but we do include sensible grammar at least.

                                      A ' qaraa - B ' aseme - Rabb ' ek - al' dhi - khalaqa

                                      Be/Do/Make Manifest With Feature Rabb One Shaped

                                      You cannot make void Arabic grammar when rendering a translation.

                                      And I did once ask you to break down your renditions into tiny pieces in order to explain morphology why you reach to such conclusions that you do. You got some explaining to do.

                                      And original manuscript's Arabic does not contain any "bars" if you refer to diacritical markers. I do not recognize them. In my world a word does always mean the same no matter occurrence. This was just a way for the ancient interpreters to be able to extract multiple meanings to shape their interpretation as according to themselves. My remake of Quran's passages have removed every diacritical marker except a few which seem native such as (alef with madda) used to mark emphatic stress not altering the meaning but like I wrote give emphasis to a word and is noticed in pronunciation by stress on the letter.

                                      Be well
                                      Amenuel

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        Timotheus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        This is discussing very much rationally, actually both Cerberus and me. We might disagree on lexical data, but we do include sensible grammar at least.

                                        A ' qaraa - B ' aseme - Rabb ' ek - al' dhi - khalaqa

                                        Be/Do/Make Manifest With Feature Rabb One Shaped

                                        You cannot make void Arabic grammar when rendering a translation.

                                        And I did once ask you to break down your renditions into tiny pieces in order to explain morphology why you reach to such conclusions that you do. You got some explaining to do.

                                        And original manuscript's Arabic does not contain any "bars" if you refer to diacritical markers. I do not recognize them. In my world a word does always mean the same no matter occurrence. This was just a way for the ancient interpreters to be able to extract multiple meanings to shape their interpretation as according to themselves. My remake of Quran's passages have removed every diacritical marker except a few which seem native such as (alef with madda) used to mark emphatic stress not altering the meaning but like I wrote give emphasis to a word and is noticed in pronunciation by stress on the letter.

                                        Be well
                                        Amenuel

                                        Peace,

                                        very good interpretation, this indeed almost captures the essense of this ayah.

                                        i say almost because of course the depth is greater than any single word. 'a picture says a thousand words' and every letter is a picture, surely as Allh reminds us, even if the trees of the earth were pens and the sea ink, and the like thereof, still the Words of Allh would not be exausted. And i firmly trust that it is true even if all man and jinn gathered to produce the quran they couldnt.

                                        I have been working, largely in vain to interpret the quran (translate it) into another language (english, and maori), but i realized, you realy cant.. but then it hit me, it just needs un-translating, back into the pictures that make it up, because then it is (with Gods will) easy to understand, although I must say, Immanuel, you have a insight for getting the essense of words. 'feature' and 'manifest' realy are quite good explanations of the concepts

                                        peace, and may Allh bless you, and guide us all to a better understanding.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          Cerberus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          This is discussing very much rationally, actually both Cerberus and me. We might disagree on lexical data, but we do include sensible grammar at least.

                                          I actually agree with your lexical data, mine was very simplistic, and the way I wrote for example Rabbi'ka, the pronounciation of it is derived from my french, it would seem more reasonable for you as "Rabbe'ka". Anyways no big deal.

                                          However I disagree with you regarding the "bars" or the "Tashkeel" and the reason why you said they were implemented by interpreters.

                                          A ' qaraa - B ' aseme - Rabb ' ek - al' dhi - khalaqa

                                          Take " B ' aseme " . Now normally with no "tashkeel" it would be written "asem", the reason why it's not "asema" or "asemo" is because it has the "B" or precisely "be" before it which gives it a grammatical role and subsequently the "ending sound", a straightforward rule in the arabic grammar (or whatever you may call it).

                                          Same for Rabb ' ek, and why it is not Rabb ' ak or Rabb ' uk.

                                          In fact, Rabb itself is implementing the "bars". The bar implemented https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadda gave the transliteration the reason to write it as "R(a)b-b" and not "R(a)b" (Knowing that Rabb is merely two letters R-B, and the "bar" on top of "R" made it explicit as "R(a)b" + the Shadda on top of the "b" made it "R(a)b-b&quot

                                          Some of these "bars" (specially the ones at the end of the word) hold strong relationships with the grammatical position(or role) of the word itself, hence why "Rabb'e could be Rabb'a or Rabb'u in other conditions IN THE SENTENCE, and it could only be seen through transliteration as a consequence of the usage of the appropriate diacritical mark in the arabic language).

                                          Therefore making anyone with basic grammar able to put the bars even on a text that has no bars in a very straightforward manner, and it would automatically reflect on the pronounciation and the transliteration. Bottom line is, those diacritical markers make a lot of things easier for the reader.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users