Is Reincarnation true according to Quran? Check this website for analysis
-
BTW what is illogical in killing somebody...specially in wars..
let fit your interpretation in one of the claim... when a brother killed another brother and crow show him method how to hide his body... do u remember...
What are you talking about? My logic is sound, but you are just trying to find some way of messing around. I did not say it is illogical killing in wars, but the previous post's verse does not say David killed Goliath, it says he subdued him. I have not said David did not actually kill Goliath, but the writing says he was subdued, defeated.
let say killing mean not murdering then its mean he was burring him alive... rotfl
and dnt yo see every ten miutes a murder is happening in this planet...
What the Hell are you talking about? How is it related?
530 So he found it in himself to kill his brother; so he killed him. He thus became one of the losers
your kind comments are always welcome take your time and make up a story what exactly happened with brother...
Whatever the text says in reality, the passage uses the word qatel, just like the other one about David and Goliath, and the word qatel means to subdue, master and defeat someone. When you have physically subdued someone the person either dies from your actions or is somehow immobilized, but from the word alone it is not possible to see what happened to the person unless you specify his fate.
Be well
Amenuel -
go and see arabic text the same word on both occassion is used....
its look like you want to interpret the word qatal whatever wish comes in your mind... in some cases
its convince..
in some cases its beating( moses boy event)
in some cases its defeat(david event)
in some cases its killing (story of first murder)
in some cases its mystery when moses killed a person ? -
It is illogical that you use the same word for multiple different reasons. You tend to speak about logic yet you make silly arguments. Qatel means to subdue someone and it is all it means. It does not imply whether a person dies or not from the qatel'ing but that would be needed to be written out in that case.
I said it says defeated in the story of David and it is you and your friends who translate it as kill and that is not my problem.
Moses did not kill a person but tried to defeat the opposition he had when preaching his message and he had to get out of there.
In all instances it speaks of defeating someone, and it can be violently or non-violently and the person may die or not die.
-
It is illogical that you use the same word for multiple different reasons. You tend to speak about logic yet you make silly arguments. Qatel means to subdue someone and it is all it means. It does not imply whether a person dies or not from the qatel'ing but that would be needed to be written out in that case.
I said it says defeated in the story of David and it is you and your friends who translate it as kill and that is not my problem.
Moses did not kill a person but tried to defeat the opposition he had when preaching his message and he had to get out of there.
In all instances it speaks of defeating someone, and it can be violently or non-violently and the person may die or not die.
lol bravo
why stopped , where is the logic of first murder. did he also convinced him or defaeat him? and then burried him under earth... w3as it not a qatal
-
I said it says defeated in the story of David and it is you and your friends who translate it as kill and that is not my problem.
hahahahaha , its not a problem at all trust me...
yeh but if david let him go, jalut will definately come after him after some time... as we know he was one of the wicked... where he gone after that... ?
or he just start spending a slave life under the kingdom of david... what do u think...
where is ur evidence from history he did not kill him?
i m just tired of your logics when you are unable to provide any evidence ... whatsoever...