Who is surah fil talking about/hadith timeline
-
sorry if its been discussed before I search but couldnt find any posts on it hmm
From hadith they tell us it was someone who was going to come destroy the kaaba in the 500's.
Personally, as Ive been reading alot about this, I have a feeling hadith have been doing something sinister. Putting us off the true timeline. of when the quran was written and when the real muhammad(or ahmad) wrote down the quran.
I wont be suprised if I found out theres a whole different story to fil then what hadiths claim. Hadith focused the story SO MUCH on arabia, mecca, peninsula, quraish yet not a single mention of any of those things in the quran? nopePerhaps bukhari had alot of foresight. Maybe he predicted 1400 years later that if they tried to make everyone think mecca was some holy land, and saudi arabia would turn this into some multibillion dollar business based on sectarian lies which they use to bomb poorer countries and make deals with baby killing countries elektro voodoo
-
i
-
I did read similar hadith when I was too into that antichrist thing. Later I realized that since it is all about humans, someone would try to imitate them to make it look like the predictions are all coming true. Currently, ISIS is doing that. Some others before them did it also. Apparently, most hadiths have no chronology. Secondly, the hadith writer Muslim admitted to putting back the preIslamic stuffs in his collection.
-
exactly reel,
basically after looking the behaviour of ISIS
i feel the verses of chapter 9 indirectly pointed towards all these people who are in the catagory to have war with..
ISIS is also one of them, if so called muslims will not finish their enemy of chapter nine
then God let other peacemakers to let them finish like UNO.. and peaceful countires who are sick from these virus of society
these are not only the enemies of peaceful public like the (victims of suicide bombers are always a random people of public like kids ,students, fruit sellers.. ) BUT ALSO they are the enemy of God because they are using the name of God without any right .
lets atleast start war with them , my power is only to write about their nature becoz i m not a militiary man.
TOGETHER towards the best system of life = peacemaking =islam..
the title is hijacked ages ago we need to sort these hijackers out ...
-
exactly reel,
basically after looking the behaviour of ISIS
i feel the verses of chapter 9 indirectly pointed towards all these people who are in the catagory to have war with..
ISIS is also one of them, if so called muslims will not finish their enemy of chapter nine
then God let other peacemakers to let them finish like UNO.. and peaceful countires who are sick from these virus of society
these are not only the enemies of peaceful public like the (victims of suicide bombers are always a random people of public like kids ,students, fruit sellers.. ) BUT ALSO they are the enemy of God because they are using the name of God without any right .
lets atleast start war with them , my power is only to write about their nature becoz i m not a militiary man.
TOGETHER towards the best system of life = peacemaking =islam..
the title is hijacked ages ago we need to sort these hijackers out ...
That's very true. But God knows when they will be removed or whether they will be removed at all. I don't think they even care about how they are misusing the title of the religion esp if their main objective is "Greater Israel". Watch this https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeTlbSZ3bQ8
-
Peace,
This post by Dr. Ayman gives insight on corruption ~100 years after revelation ?
https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=10259.msg49965#msg49965
1181 said they of O Lot ?
1182 so when came directive ours made we of upside its downside its and rained we of over it stone from baked clay layers1561 so when came family Lot the transmitters...
1573 so seized them the outcry at sunrise
1574 so made we of upside its downside its and rained we of upon them stone from baked clay1051 did not see (i.e. envision) how dealth lord your with companions the elephant
1052 did not maketh plan theirs in amiss
1053 and sends upon them bird of (i.e. flyer) in distinct or separate companies
1054 hurl them with stone from baked clay
1055 so made them like husk eatenThe faith of idol-ism/oppressive "isms" e.g. zealot nationalism, immoral-ism, fascism, racism, fundamentalism, etc.
-
No birds, melaiket came from Babyl to destroy them, they visited Ibrahim a.s., Allah's friend.
Peace -- I wrote bird of (i.e. flyer) and don't be cryptic clarify your thoughts, use verses.
No elephants either, they were "as elephants". It's a characteristic, state of mind (khal), more intense then kibr.
No, " the elephant" (noun) cannot mean "as elephants" -- again don't be cryptic and clarify.
-
All nouns are khal (state, condition...). If somebody/something has some, it can be called by that noun.
Tayr is not a bird. Check gender of verbs...
You also wrote in distinct or separate companies
You can't learn from lexicons. Use el-Qalem if you're insan...
-
All nouns are khal (state, condition...). If somebody/something has some, it can be called by that noun.
Tayr is not a bird. Check gender of verbs...
You also wrote in distinct or separate companies
You can't learn from lexicons. Use el-Qalem if you're insan...
Again don't be cryptic clarify your thoughts and fill in ? so people know what it is you're talking about?
1051 did not see (i.e. envision) how dealth lord your with companions the ?
1052 did not maketh plan theirs in amiss
1053 and sends upon them a ? ?
1054 hurl them with stone from baked clay
1055 so made them like husk eatenSurah al-Fil is not about stones of baked clay. It is about another kind of punishment that happened to other people and that is about to happen again in the future.
Peace Kamzo -- same as above please clarify; use verses and explain which word/s you're translating as what?
-
Noon, don't get me wrong please, but if you're learning from lexicons it doesn't matter what I'll tell you about this or anything else. I hope, if you're insan, that you'll learn a single word from the Qur'an from our Rabb by El-Qalem, and then you'll learn more and more...
Since you asked twice, I'll tell you that ebabil is "babylonian". Lexicons will tell you that ba-ba-lam cannot be root and there's no roots with same harf as 1st and 2nd, but this is one of words, same root as word babil. If you think you can ask why there's no root of it at http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(210221).
Elif with hemze was added as negation. If you add elif-hemze to any root you'll get a new root with negative meaning. The reason for this in word ebabil is because those "tayr" are not from Babylon, but they're babylonian since that's direction where they came from (info for us). They were visiting Ibrahim a.s. prior to that.
-
Noon, don't get me wrong please
Aladin, not getting you wrong only asked simple question; ok we'll make even simpler -- please fill in the ?
1051 did not see (i.e. envision) how dealth lord your with companions the ?
-
I told you what you can do, but, as you wish...
You probably think that this is a single word from its root, but you're wrong. If you tried to think about the Qur'an you could learn. Not your fault, it's what we're doing most of our lives - making mistakes.
Word "fulaan" used in 2528 is from the same root. But, it's not all... as I already wrote somewhere on this forum if you add elif+hemze to any root you'll get a new root with negative meaning.
The other root is hemze+fa-lam and it was used only four times in ayets 677-79 in a story which I haven't found a good explanation about Ibrahim a.s. We should follow millet of Ibrahim a.s. and we know so little about him, sad.
So, whatever "feel" and "fulaan" mean, words "efele", "efelet" and "aafiloon" should have negative meaning of their root.
Meaning of fa-lam is a person who's magnifying himself to the level of comparing himself with Allah.
Meaning of hamze-fa-lam is something which others making as fa-lam (ie. magnifying to the level of comparing it with Allah).
So, "ashabul-feel" are people of Lut a.s. who thought that they're as Allah (or maybe higher, greater), and in the story of Ibrahim a.s. his people took his words as they have to "worship" objects they thought he was talking about (but he was talking about Allah).
"Fulaan" is sheytan. "Aan" at the end of that word describes his permanent state.
Btw, more important word for you should be "ebabeel", as I told you, because you can learn much more from it.
-
Word "fulaan" used in 2528 is from the same root. But, it's not all... as I already wrote somewhere on this forum if you add elif+hemze to any root you'll get a new root with negative meaning.
The other root is hemze+fa-lam and it was used only four times in ayets 677-79 in a story which I haven't found a good explanation about Ibrahim a.s. We should follow millet of Ibrahim a.s. and we know so little about him, sad.
So, whatever "feel" and "fulaan" mean, words "efele", "efelet" and "aafiloon" should have negative meaning of their root.
"to any root" really?
what's meaning and negative meaning of these ever hear of borrowed words?
375 bidinarin -- root dal nun ra
1220 dirhams -- root dal ra ha mim -
Was it used in the Qur'an?
You can make a sequence of english letters as "kjsdhfkasfaljjlalh", but that won't be a word. You can also put a few huroof but you won't get meaning with some sequencies.
I'm not talking about arabic lughat nor anything outside the Qur'an. It would be better if you can check what I said yourself and try to think about the Qur'an and its lisan only. Don't be a slave of Lane and others, unchain yourself.
-
Was it used in the Qur'an?
yes already gave you verses?
375 bidnrin
1220 dirhams
Don't be a slave of Lane and others, unchain yourself.
it was you who brought up different roots and negation theory not me.
perhaps an easier one to test your "all roots negative meaning" theory...
please provide meaning kalala (412/4176) root kf lm lm and negative?