theory of evolution revised lol

parvez_mushtaq

I don't think you summarize the findings correctly..

http//news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/06/morocco-early-human-fossils-anthropology-science/

It doesn't disprove darwin's theory at all..

I quote

Given the Jebel Irhoud fossils? modern faces and primitive braincases, Hublin and his team suggest that the features associated with modern humans probably didn?t evolve all at once. Instead, various traits we associate with anatomically modern humans probably appeared in a type of ?mosaic evolution? that Neanderthals also seem to have exhibited.

Modern humankind ?wasn?t a new model of an automobile that appeared in a showroom with all the bells and whistles,? says Wood. ?Different parts of modern human morphology and behavior probably came incrementally.?

Definitely.. modern humankind wasn't a new model of an automobile that suddenly dropped down from heaven either..

And looks like there are still other type of 'humanoid' living today with us as we speak.. some are big and some other are tiny like hobbit.. living undisturbed in the deep jungle and high mountain..

i may agree with it , i strongly reject to the fact that Adam alaisalam and his wife were air dropped into the earth .can any one here quote the verse to disapprove the evolution and prove that they were air dropped into the earth .i think evolution of humans fits the bill

imrankhawaja

i do beleive in evolution of human kind = chap 76
i do beleive in creation of human being = stage after stage God perfected us..

but i dnt beleive in theory of evolution by darwin= that human being was ape , or goat was fish etc..

every thing started from single cell (neither male nor female) then from that cell God create a couple (male and female)
and everything has it own intelligent design programming instead of natural selection

interestingly if the theory of darwin was correct then we find species after species with the passage of time but in reality researchers claimed species are getting decrease instead of increase..(like white tiger lol)

about this finding the discovery of the fossil is 100000 years more older than the previous fossil that beleived to be
it was news on bbc .. although link is still missing from ape to human

imrankhawaja

i may agree with it , i strongly reject to the fact that Adam alaisalam and his wife were air dropped into the earth .can any one here quote the verse to disapprove the evolution and prove that they were air dropped into the earth .i think evolution of humans fits the bill

who said they air dropped in to earth?

i think its the beleif of traditional scholars who reject the theory of evolution as well as theory of darwin both..
and moreover they beleive adam and mate was residing in heavens and then God send them down rotfl

God alone people do beleive in evolution but they are not agree with everything what darwin said thats what the discussion is about..

like he said life started from water (its true)
he said life started from single cell(its true)

but after that he found himself in missing links probably he plagarised the information from early islamic scholars but he stuck where everybody else stuck so he comes up with natural selection.. which is not the case with intelligent design..

imrankhawaja

Thanks for the notification. Did they find the salaf of this fossil prophet? Any fatwa by any atheist mufti?

awww reeel , u know what there are lot of pictures and things that belong to hairs of prophet, shoes and this kind of stuff

but the source is unknown and some time ago it was verified that pictures are fake there is no hairs or any belonging of prophet exist anywhere so probablly it was just the business for making people fool in the name of religious personalities..

and some of them still beleive in it and they still have these type of mini cards in their wallets and they kissed it beleiving it belong to beloved prophet.. handshake

reel

awww reeel , u know what there are lot of pictures and things that belong to hairs of prophet, shoes and this kind of stuff

but the source is unknown and some time ago it was verified that pictures are fake there is no hairs or any belonging of prophet exist anywhere so probablly it was just the business for making people fool in the name of religious personalities..

Oh no, I was asking about mufti Richard Dawkins like people.

and some of them still beleive in it and they still have these type of mini cards in their wallets and they kissed it beleiving it belong to beloved prophet.. handshake

That gave me nightmare of what my mom did once when we were still in the sect.

No longer a Sunna-rejecter

Thanks Science Priesthood! Funny how things are getting revised over and over again and when you question it you are "dumb" and a "science-denier" yet they keep changing the narrative.

https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkEL4yBJxm8&t=2804s

good_logic

Peace Manny.
You say,quote
God and the angels have also likely put out misleading traps to challenge the intelligence of people, for which traps many have fallen.

How is this different to "GOD is running everything"?

GOD bless you.
Peace.

hawk99

Peace,

When believers talk about Allah scientist say "we want proof" but when
they speak of evolution and aliens the hypocrites provide none! brickwall

huruf

I don't know what is th big deal about evolution or creationism or whatever.

God creates, and creates how he will. He is not bound either to create with evolution or without it.

Also, the big deal about Darwinian evolution, is that it attributes change to chance. But what is chance? it is empty of meaning. It is the name we give to our lack of knowledge. We do not know how something came to pass. We do not know how to make it pass, how to repeat the experience. But the fact that we do not know how it came to pass does not mean that there is no way tht it came to pass perfectly subject to cause an effect. We just do not know every single atom of those intervening in anything we say hapens by chance. There is no chance for God. He makes everything bilhaqq. Chance is our alibi for our lack of power and knowledge.

So whatever evolution is there, it is exactly the evolution instituted by God. Existence, on the other hand is evolution. It is never stopped, it is always evolving.

I do not care whether anybody has found a missing link or not nor is that a matter which should change any fundamental concept of ours.

Also how is "evolution" distinguished from "non evolution"?

As far as I am concerned, theseare artifical conflicts and problems that are not such problems, just past times for people who have nothing better to do than find somebody to be against. And many people in fact cling to something not out of love for that something but out of enmity towards those they can bash by "clinging" to that something. That is the enemy of my enemy is my friend. He is not his friend of course, nothing furthr from the truth, but he uses him to pundh his own enemy.

Is that what is the deal around evolution-versus whatever on either side?

Salaam

No longer a Sunna-rejecter

Peace,

When believers talk about Allah scientist say "we want proof" but when
they speak of evolution and aliens the hypocrites provide none! brickwall

That's because the media, politicians and so-called scientists are the world's biggest clergy. People don't want to be "dumb science-deniers." Meanwhile, all we get from NASA is CGI photoshop (they admit this) and the Theory of Evolution is still missing the most important proofs the missing link between supposed pre-humans and humans. Besides that, they faked a bunch of their evidence anyway - so either way it is bogus. But the sheep watching TV believe everything that comes from it as long as an "authoritative" figure speaks. It seems people that follow so-called "Quran alone Islam" forget one of their favorite verses when it comes to so-called science

1736 Do not reach conclusions about that which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight and the mind will be responsible.