Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Classical Theism

Classical Theism

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
18 Posts 4 Posters 184 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Man_of_Faith
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Sure you know about the famous AL prefix though. Allah is just with one additional letter to form the so-called "full root". , with our without hamza (since the hamza diacritic is an invention) is just the AL prefix hooked unto the Arabic third person singular, as simple as that.

    Be well
    Qarael Amenuel

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • The_SardarT Offline
      The_SardarT Offline
      The_Sardar
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      Sure you know about the famous AL prefix though. Allah is just with one additional letter to form the so-called "full root". , with our without hamza (since the hamza diacritic is an invention) is just the AL prefix hooked unto the Arabic third person singular, as simple as that.

      Be well
      Qarael Amenuel

      Not really. Sorry

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Man_of_Faith
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Very well then, but you can easily read yourself to it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • The_SardarT Offline
          The_SardarT Offline
          The_Sardar
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Well i want to hear what the others say about this.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Offline
            J Offline
            Jafar
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            On the left diagram If we eliminate the circle line, then it is close to how the ancient israelites sees YHVH and how the vedic people sees Brahman.

            The concept then evolve into math concept of (infinity) as commonly though in any algebra classes in today's school.

            And that's the reason on the need to 'eliminate' the circle line, since the supreme is infinite, has no boundaries, limits or border in all dimensions.

            This in turn gives the reason why there's only can be one . Given only / = 1

            And there could be many cosmos as well, as described by the theory of multiverses..
            Nowadays; cosmologist tends to visualise 'everything' to be like this

            http//raszl.com/sites/default/files/multiverse2.jpeg

            Our universe with it's trillion of galaxies might be only one 'bubble' in the mist of trillion (or unlimited number) of other bubbles... each with it's own peculiar 'law of nature', space time fabric (some might have none or totally different space time fabric) and dimension.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • The_SardarT Offline
              The_SardarT Offline
              The_Sardar
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              On the left diagram If we eliminate the circle line, then it is close to how the ancient israelites sees YHVH and how the vedic people sees Brahman.

              The concept then evolve into math concept of (infinity) as commonly though in any algebra classes in today's school.

              And that's the reason on the need to 'eliminate' the circle line, since the supreme is infinite, has no boundaries, limits or border in all dimensions.

              This in turn gives the reason why there's only can be one . Given only / = 1

              And there could be many cosmos as well, as described by the theory of multiverses..
              Nowadays; cosmologist tends to visualise 'everything' to be like this

              http//raszl.com/sites/default/files/multiverse2.jpeg

              Our universe with it's trillion of galaxies might be only one 'bubble' in the mist of trillion (or unlimited number) of other bubbles... each with it's own peculiar 'law of nature', space time fabric (some might have none or totally different space time fabric) and dimension.

              Huh...interesting what wonders lies beyond of what Allah/God (SWTAY)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • The_SardarT Offline
                The_SardarT Offline
                The_Sardar
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                On the left diagram If we eliminate the circle line, then it is close to how the ancient israelites sees YHVH and how the vedic people sees Brahman.

                Isn't that Hinduism?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Z Offline
                  Z Offline
                  Zulf
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  Nice diagram

                  This is why we should not associate anything with Rabb, because it will just create images, which necessarily are incorrect.
                  The human mind is very fond of personifying everything, even God. Disaster, or at least delusion, is the consequence.
                  We even associate things with ourselves that have nothing to do with our real selves. We limit ourselves and others, and so bloodshed, supremacy and the like come as a natural consequence.

                  The way out of our human condition is to learn about our real nature, or at least approach it as much as possible. Unfortunately, religion doesn't seem to teach this anymore. To the contrary, religion is just a huge identity masturbation, which effectively takes us away from reality.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Man_of_Faith
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    On the left diagram If we eliminate the circle line, then it is close to how the ancient israelites sees YHVH and how the vedic people sees Brahman.

                    The concept then evolve into math concept of (infinity) as commonly though in any algebra classes in today's school.

                    And that's the reason on the need to 'eliminate' the circle line, since the supreme is infinite, has no boundaries, limits or border in all dimensions.

                    This in turn gives the reason why there's only can be one . Given only / = 1

                    And there could be many cosmos as well, as described by the theory of multiverses..
                    Nowadays; cosmologist tends to visualise 'everything' to be like this

                    http//raszl.com/sites/default/files/multiverse2.jpeg

                    Our universe with it's trillion of galaxies might be only one 'bubble' in the mist of trillion (or unlimited number) of other bubbles... each with it's own peculiar 'law of nature', space time fabric (some might have none or totally different space time fabric) and dimension.

                    There is no need to eliminate the inner circle, it is showing the difference between visible reality and what lies beyond. The diagram is accurate.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Man_of_Faith
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      A border is required in an illustration, but if the outer circle illustrates 100% it can still portray infinity, as it is just an illustration.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Users