Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Blood vs Running Blood

Blood vs Running Blood

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
8 Posts 3 Posters 137 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    No longer a Sunna-rejecter
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    6145 Say, "I do not find in what is inspired to me forbidden except that it be already dead, or running blood/blood poured forth, or the meat of pig, for it is foul; or what is corruptly dedicated to other than God." Whoever is forced without seeking disobedience or transgression, then your Lord is Forgiving, Compassionate.

    Here it says nothing for an eater/consumer is forbidden except running blood and the other items.

    2173 He has only forbidden for you what is already dead, the blood, the meat of pig, and what was dedicated to other than God. Whoever finds himself forced out of need and without disobedience or animosity, there is no sin upon him. God is Forgiving, Compassionate.

    Here it mentions blood in general.

    53 Forbidden to you is what is already dead, and the blood, the meat of pig, and what was dedicated to other than God. The strangled, killed by a blow, fallen from height, gored, eaten by wild animals except what you managed to rescue, and those slaughtered on altars... Also what you divide through gambling. This is all vile. Today the ingrates have given up from your system, so do not revere them, but revere Me. Today I have perfected your system for you, completed My blessings upon you, and I have accepted peaceful surrenderas the system for you. So, whoever is forced by severe hunger and not seeking sin, then God is Forgiving, Compassionate.

    And so on...

    So why are both terms used and what in terms of blood is prohibited in your opinion?

    I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Noon_waalqalami
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      So why are both terms used and what in terms of blood is prohibited in your opinion?

      peace, note difference with and/or which the first is read together...

      2173/53
      " and the blood and flesh the swine" (excludes any/all swine blood and flesh)

      6145
      or blood of poured of (excludes any blood poured NOT permeated in the meat)
      or flesh swine

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Offline
        E Offline
        No longer a Sunna-rejecter
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        peace, note difference with and/or which the first is read together...

        2173/53
        " and the blood and flesh the swine" (excludes any/all swine blood and flesh)

        6145
        or blood of poured of (excludes any blood poured NOT permeated in the meat)
        or flesh swine

        53 Hurrimat AAalaykumu al-maytatu wa al-damu wa lahmu al-khinzeeri wa ma...

        2173 Innama harrama AAalaykumu al-maytata wa al-dama wa lahma al-khinzeeri wa ma...

        Can you explain why it says what you said gramatically? Why isnt the blood separate from meat of swine? Would it have to say lahman wa daman khinzeerin or something similar? Why not?

        And if what you say is true, then "inna ma" cant mean "only forbidden" as some put it since then other animals' blood and blood poured forth arent included.

        6145 Qul la ajidu feema oohiyailayya muharraman AAala taAAimin yatAAamuhuilla an yakoona maytatan aw daman masfoohan aw lahma khinzeerin

        Whats the grammatic significance and difference of the underlined compared to the other verses? What does the absence of "al" do?

        I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          Noon_waalqalami
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          And if what you say is true, then "inna ma" cant mean "only forbidden" as some put it since then other animals' blood and blood poured forth arent included.

          all verses have "forbidden" (take all into consideration) which 645 pertains to "any animal" blood poured forth; cows, etc.

          perhaps read thus...

          2173 merely arrama/prohibit upon you
          the lifeless
          and the blood and flesh the swine
          and what dedicated with it to other than the god

          53 urrimat/prohibit it upon you
          the lifeless
          and the blood and flesh the swine
          and what dedicated to other than the god with it
          and the strangled
          and the struck fatally
          and the fatally fallen
          and the gored
          and what ate the wild except what butcher yours
          and what slaughter on the statue/alter
          and that seek division ye of by the arrows

          6145 say not I find in what inspires to me muarraman/impermissible of
          on an eater who eats it except that being
          lifeless
          or blood of poured of (i.e. any blood poured forth any animal)
          or flesh swine so surely it filthiness
          or disobedience of dedicate to other than the god with it

          16115 merely arrama/prohibit upon you
          the lifeless
          and the blood and flesh the swine
          and what dedicated to other than the god with it

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            No longer a Sunna-rejecter
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            all verses have "forbidden" (take all into consideration) which 645 pertains to "any animal" blood poured forth; cows, etc.

            perhaps read thus...

            2173 merely arrama/prohibit upon you
            the lifeless
            and the blood and flesh the swine
            and what dedicated with it to other than the god

            16115 merely arrama/prohibit upon you
            the lifeless
            and the blood and flesh the swine
            and what dedicated to other than the god with it

            6145 say not I find in what inspires to me muarraman/impermissible of
            on an eater who eats it except that being
            lifeless
            or blood of poured of (i.e. any blood poured forth any animal)
            or flesh swine so surely it filthiness
            or disobedience of dedicate to other than the god with it

            If "inna ma" means "merely", there is a problem with what you said between 6145 and 2173/16115 since the latter do not mention blood poured forth of other animals.

            53 urrimat/prohibit it upon you
            the lifeless
            and the blood and flesh the swine
            and what dedicated to other than the god with it
            and the strangled
            and the struck fatally
            and the fatally fallen
            and the gored
            and what ate the wild except what butcher yours
            and what slaughter on the statue/alter
            and that seek division ye of by the arrows

            No issue here since there is no "merely" or "only."

            I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              6145 Say, "I do not find in what is inspired to me forbidden except that it be already dead, or running blood/blood poured forth, or the meat of pig, for it is foul; or what is corruptly dedicated to other than God." Whoever is forced without seeking disobedience or transgression, then your Lord is Forgiving, Compassionate.

              Here it says nothing for an eater/consumer is forbidden except running blood and the other items.

              2173 He has only forbidden for you what is already dead, the blood, the meat of pig, and what was dedicated to other than God. Whoever finds himself forced out of need and without disobedience or animosity, there is no sin upon him. God is Forgiving, Compassionate.

              Please just notice the difference in the structures and flow of information in both ayahs.

              You the Messenger pronounce "I do not find; in the contents of that which has verbally been communicated to me (Grand Qur'aan), any food prohibited and forbidden upon a feeder which he usually takes as feed;

              Except the prohibition that it feed were a naturally dead mammal;

              Or the food comprised flowing liquid blood;

              Or the food contains bacon - meat of pig; reason being that it certainly suffers messiness, filthiness;

              Or the meat of that mammal slaughtered in the name/pronouncing someone other than Allah the Exalted; it is an act of denouncing allegiance and transgressing the bounds."

              The aforementioned prohibition is relaxed for desperate reason of quiver/shudder because of extreme hunger subject to further condition that one will not be held guilty of sin for eating any of the forbidden things provided he had no urge and liking for that; and he does not transgress the limit of relieving the state of quiver/shudder from hunger.

              This is because the Sustainer Lord of you is indeed Oft-forgiving/overlooking; the Fountain of Mercy.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Offline
                E Offline
                No longer a Sunna-rejecter
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Please just notice the difference in the structures and flow of information in both ayahs.

                You the Messenger pronounce "I do not find; in the contents of that which has verbally been communicated to me (Grand Qur'aan), any food prohibited and forbidden upon a feeder which he usually takes as feed;

                Except the prohibition that it feed were a naturally dead mammal;

                Or the food comprised flowing liquid blood;

                Or the food contains bacon - meat of pig; reason being that it certainly suffers messiness, filthiness;

                Or the meat of that mammal slaughtered in the name/pronouncing someone other than Allah the Exalted; it is an act of denouncing allegiance and transgressing the bounds."

                The aforementioned prohibition is relaxed for desperate reason of quiver/shudder because of extreme hunger subject to further condition that one will not be held guilty of sin for eating any of the forbidden things provided he had no urge and liking for that; and he does not transgress the limit of relieving the state of quiver/shudder from hunger.

                This is because the Sustainer Lord of you is indeed Oft-forgiving/overlooking; the Fountain of Mercy.

                Peace,

                I understand 6145. However why is only blood mentioned in the other verses and what does "inna ma harrama alaykumu" mean? I see an issue with "only forbidden you"

                I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Peace,

                  I understand 6145. However why is only blood mentioned in the other verses and what does "inna ma harrama alaykumu" mean? I see an issue with "only forbidden you"

                  In 6145 it is about the feed lying on your table that one usually eats. It can include a glass filled with liquid blood. The blood that is present within the flesh lying roasted on our table does contain blood but it is not visibly the part of the food lying on table. The point stands clarified what is meant by including blood in the prohibited list.

                  http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.%20Tabweeb/0000.%20Haroof%20particles/02.%20C%20Inna%20plus%20ma%20Innama/1.gif

                  This is a particle of limitation or restriction . It stands at the beginning of proposition and the word or portion which is effected by it is placed at the end for the sake of emphasis.
                  This comes after the . It is a particle and it stops these from carrying out their typical grammatical influence. In the case of especially, even the meaning is altered from ?indeed? to that of restriction.

                  He the Exalted has forbidden upon you people specifically the dead corpse-mammal who has died a natural death, and the blood, and the meat of swine - pig flesh?
                  And that mammal which has been slaughtered pronouncing the name of someone other than Allah the Exalted
                  However, for desperate reason of quiver-shudder , one will not be held guilty of sin for eating any of the forbidden things provided he had no urge and liking for it, and further, that he transgresses not the limit of relieving the state of quiver/shudder from hunger.
                  It is a fact that Allah the Exalted is repeatedly Forgiving-Overlooking, the fountain of Mercy.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Users