Fir'aoun - Pharaoh a King with acute Narcissistic personality disorder
-
http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Tabweeb%20Part%202/001.%20Roots%20originating%20in%20Surat%20002/2.049/194.%20A%20Firoan%20Fa%20Ra%20Ain%20Noon/3.gif
Proper Noun (Diptote) - Fir'aoun - Pharaoh
a King with acute Narcissistic personality disorder
There must be something especial and unique to this King than all the kings who preceded him in history - that in the category of Proper Nouns his Name - Title finds mention in Qur?n 74 times which is second maximum number of mentioning, first being the name of his contemporary, the elevated Messenger Ms that numbers 136 times.
In this study, we will discuss the personality traits of Fir'aoun - Pharaoh. He was a king with acute Narcissistic personality disorder.
We will study the events of his reign to estimate the period of his kingship in Egypt. This will give us precise cues to near-accurately estimate the duration of his reign. It will lead us identifying and specifying him in the history which is available as Primary source in hieroglyphics of ancient Egypt.
We will however not find him ceremonially buried or mummified, as was the old funerary practice, because he was drowned along with his close aides and troops, whereby there was none to have done it. He met humiliation not to find place amongst various Pharaohs of ancient Misr Egypt - a civilization that emerged after unification of Two-Lands. What to say of getting a ceremonial burial in Egypt as a Pharaoh, none wept for him.
We may however not find mention of Ms in hieroglyphics because in the consideration of Fir'aoun - Pharaoh he was his "antagonist".
The distinct characteristic - personality disorder of Fir'aoun and his trusted Chieftains portrayed in Qur?n is self-exaltation - self-aggrandizement - Narcissistic Personality Disorder. They had all the properties of self-aggrandizers like use of technique of "divide and conquer"; aggressive ruthless behaviour; taking advantage of the people around him; arrogant, haughty behaviours; engaging in false accusations, distortion campaigns; character assassination attempts; malicious gossip; amplifying their own image, and outburst of rage; but despite his facade he himself suffered from low - diminishing esteem.
All aspects of his Narcissistic Personality Disorder are explicitly obvious in the narrative of history of Egypt during his reign, starting from his age of mature adulthood to the day of his drowning in the Gulf of Suez. His history is described in Grand Qur?n with the choice of such words and structuring of sentences that the reader can visualize as if he was witnessing the happenings.
Please read in the link since Ayahs on the subject are mentioned in images and is time consuming to bring them here.
http//haqeeqat.pk/Fir'aunPharaoh.htm
-
Pazzuz work on the subject is based on far fetched assumption and palavers.
Fir'aoun is mentioned in Qur'aan with explicit details.
I have added in the study excerpts from hieroglyphics which have the value of Primary Source which portray him exactly as his pronouncements are quoted verbatim in Qur'aan.
http//haqeeqat.pk/Fir'aunPharaoh.htm
-
How does it feel writing worthless tractates which have no historical or religious purpose outside of vanity?
Firun is not a proper noun of a particular king, it is an archetype of power and authorities. Any one who claims authority over another soul is a narcissistic personality by definition.
Also, your root definition is worthless since you use a textual example available in Lane but not the root definition itself, which is Fa-Ra-Ayn head, authority, exhalted, power.
Greek has the same word spelling as "Pha-Re-Sees", meaning "authorities", and in Aramaic
Obviously there is not a mention of Musa, since the latter is an archetype just like Firun, and not a historical personality. Musa means Messiah or Moschiachu in Hebrew, Masihu in Quran, it is a synonym for messiah, meaning enlightenenment.
Seriously... look at his arguments
Yet another cue for his identification as Ramesses II is his depiction in ancient history as a very prolific builder. The closest of men around him was Hamaan, the man who had labour force and was chief of constructing buildings.
Here we have a problem of research based on hypothesis that Ramesses II and his depiction in ancient history as a very prolific builder.
Now let us see his evidence
And so that Our Majesty may provide for them a Land to reside - does not at all even hint at the hypothesis or relation to it;
And that Our Majesty may cause, for Fir'aoun (Pharaoh) and Ha'maan and troops of both to watch some of that about which they were apprehensively cautious. - does not at all even hint at the hypothesis or relation to it;
Know it; Our Majesty had sent Ms with Our unprecedented signs and distinct authority, argument and logic, - does not at all even hint at the hypothesis or relation to it;
Towards Fir'aoun (Pharaoh) and Haa'maan and Qa'roon does not at all even hint at the hypothesis or relation to it;
Thereupon they said, "He is an illusionist hoaxer liar". - does not at all even hint at the hypothesis or relation to it.
As is evident it is a number of random verses, taken from random parts of the book without being even contextually coherent. One verse is from 286, another springs from 4023 and 4024, the tactic which is consistent with the rest of his "analysis" and that is an common 'Quranist' way to interpret the Quran.
Fir'aoun enjoyed the reputation of a prolific builder because of Ha'maan
- now we have the next hypothesis.
His evidence
And Fir'aoun (Pharaoh) said, "O you the Chieftains! I have not known for you people any iela'aha godhead who is other than me.
- not only do we see a complete lack of consistency with the raised hypothesis, but we also observe random scattered verses as they somehow constitute or relate to the same story. One argument stems from verses 2623-29, and a very verse in context is a third verse unrelated contextually to two others.
Therefore, you kindle for me fire, O Haa'maan, upon clay/bricks where after render for me a lofty tower so that I may diligently obtain get information about the iela'aha the God of Ms; Though, of course, I certainly consider him one of the liars."
This verse is taken completely out of its context and by some magical means which is only understood by the author of the article and perhaps Zakir Naik, is now connected with 4036-37, as these two even relate.
Seriously, you guys should be working at the Ministry of Truth, where such sort of citation acrobatics might be valuable.
-
Also, your root definition is worthless since you use a textual example available in Lane but not the root definition itself, which is Fa-Ra-Ayn head, authority, exhalted, power.
You seem to have missed it
Classical Lexicons mentioned its Root as .
? (
That it signifies greatness, dignity, eminence and to become haughty, arrogant, proud, tyrannical, show one's strength and power; to tyrannize.
-
You seem to have missed it
Classical Lexicons mentioned its Root as .
(
That it signifies greatness, dignity, eminence and to become haughty, arrogant, proud, tyrannical, show one's strength and power; to tyrannize.
None of the definitions among the is in anyway contradicting head, authority, exhalted, power, because that's what defines power and authorities. You would bow your head to Mahomet I am quite sure about that had you a chance to meet him in person, and his name can be translated as "Praised", which is another way for "Exalted".
Secondly, 4-lettered definition is not a root. Semitic parental roots stem from 2 and 3 lettered roots. 4lettered "roots" are simply definition to particular words and do not constitute a "root definition" i.e. etymology.
Regardless, your reasoning is still defective since you read the Quran as if it somehow is a book of historical records and not the teaching of ayats .
-
Here we have a problem of research based on hypothesis that Ramesses II and his depiction in ancient history as a very prolific builder.
Why have you not mentioned this only as was mentioned by on this point
Fir'aoun enjoyed the reputation of a prolific builder because of Ha'maan
http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/028.%20Al%20Qasas/28.38a.gif
Therefore, you kindle for me fire, O Haa'maan, upon clay/bricks where after render for me a lofty tower so that I may diligently obtain get information about the iela'aha the God of Ms;
http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/040.%20Ghaffir/40.36PP.gif
And Fir'aoun (Pharaoh) said, "O Haa'maan, build for me a lofty tower so that I have the reach to means?
http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/040.%20Ghaffir/40.37.gif
The means to go into Skies whereupon I would diligently obtain information about the iela'aha the God of Ms ?
-
Why have you not mentioned this
Fir'aoun enjoyed the reputation of a prolific builder because of Ha'maan
Oh yes I did mention lofty tower in case you did not read it, use Ctrl F if you have problems with quick check.
How does this small verse out of 6400+ verses in the book somehow define Firun as a historical figure who as you say was "a very prolific builder"? Then you move unto other unrelated to the context verses and so and so on.
What a waste of time.
-
None of the definitions among the is in anyway contradicting head, authority, exhalted, power, because that's what defines power and authorities. You would bow your head to Mahomet I am quite sure about that had you a chance to meet him in person, and his name can be translated as "Praised", which is another way for "Exalted".
Secondly, 4-lettered definition is not a root. Semitic parental roots stem from 2 and 3 lettered roots. 4lettered "roots" are simply definition to particular words and do not constitute a "root definition" i.e. etymology.
Regardless, your reasoning is still defective since you read the Quran as if it somehow is a book of historical records and not the teaching of ayats .
The major chunk of the text of Qur'aan are Narratives. And narratives are mentioned to take lessons from the past. Narrative writing is distinct from other types of texts. When reading, narratives you need to be aware how they are written which will help you comprehending them.
-
Oh yes I did mention lofty tower in case you did not read it, use Ctrl F if you have problems with quick check.
How does this small verse out of 6400+ verses in the book somehow define Firun as a historical figure who as you say was "a very prolific builder"? Then you move unto other unrelated to the context verses and so and so on.
What a waste of time.
The unique point of his reign is mentioned. For people who use intellect, it suffices to identify him in history.
-
The major chunk of the text of Qur'aan are Narratives. And narratives are mentioned to take lessons from the past. Narrative writing is distinct from other types of texts. When reading, narratives you need to be aware how they are written which will help you comprehending them.
Exactly. Who would argue with that? Now add because that's what the narratives and allegories are filled with and it becomes eternal, and not of a particular time period. When you juggle with verses in order to find a particular scientific and/or historical context, which it lacks, because the book is highly symbolical and mystical, you pretty much abrogate the point of archetypal narratives.
-
The unique point of his reign is mentioned. For people who use intellect, it suffices to identify him in history.
Seriously? Is this what you call intellect and reasoning? Because all famous rulers in history of Egypt, Rome, Mesopotamia were ALL famous for building better palaces and or "wonders" than any counterparts, ancestors or competitors. Simply saying someone was a "a very prolific builder" just because of a single verse is a non-sense, lack of insight and ignoring reasoning, whereas EVERY rulers from Summerian Kings to Genghis Khan were interested in building the best palace or a wonder so as to leave a historic and architectural heritage named after them.
And then he says
The major chunk of the text of Qur'aan are Narratives. And narratives are mentioned to take lessons from the past. Narrative writing is distinct from other types of texts. When reading, narratives you need to be aware how they are written which will help you comprehending them.
Compare your reasoning in the past two posts
-
"a very prolific builder" beacuse of a single verse ;
-
Quran is built out of narratives.
Narratives are meant to be taken as a whole and not your quranist way of juddling verses and summarizing them in a common text.
I am not your enemy, I only want to make you look more deeply into this and perhaps then you can find a better Quran.
-
-
Why not you rebut the evidence that proves him Narcissistic Personality Disorder after reading what exactly is it.
And why don't you use a bigger picture which the Quran calls you to do? There is no him in singular as it talks about the archetype and not a specific persona in history. Anyone who believes his self-rightous values and hierarchy and power allow him to control other does have Narcissistic Personality Disorder, including the Mahomet, who you probably being a lesser being would praise happen you live near him. Or would you?
-
Why not you rebut the evidence quated that the person mentioned by title Fir'aoun was a real king of Egypt who is portrayed in hieroglyphics exactly as depicted in Qur'aan?
Rebut what? The fact that someone called himself Firun like Russian kings called themselves as Tza'rz? Or English feudals called themselves Kings? Or feudal lords called themselves lords of the manor? What is there to rebut? You haven't constructed a consistent thesis, in fact you have castrated the global message of the book.
-
Exactly. Who would argue with that? Now add because that's what the narratives and allegories are filled with and it becomes eternal, and not of a particular time period. When you juggle with verses in order to find a particular scientific and/or historical context, which it lacks, because the book is highly symbolical and mystical, you pretty much abrogate the point of archetypal narratives.
A man with a little common sense and IQ would realize that Qur'aan is a non-fiction book. Nothing symbolical and mystical.
Qur?n is an explicit elucidation for the peoples at large.
This (Grand Qur?n) is a delivered-transmitted conclusive proclamation for the Mankind. The purpose is that they might get warned-admonished-awakened by it.
Qualitatively, it (Qur?n) is guarantor-conveyor of glad tidings and revivalist-Warner-awakener. .
Thereat, despite deliverance most of them after having seen it (Qur?n) have purposely abstained adhering it. Thereby, they people persistently listen not.
Don't be one of those.
It is a fact it (Qur?n) is certainly the relay of the exalted Messenger
Mind it it (Qur?n) is not relayed by a poet.
Yet little is that you people accept- acknowledge.
Another type of texts, difficult to interpret at the time of narration and writing, are statements of soothsayers - prognosticators. Qur?n is easy to interpret because it is not a discourse narrated by a soothsayer - prognosticator
And neither it (Qur?n) is an Oral and written expression of a soothsayer - prognosticator.
Yet little is that you people try self retaining and comprehending it.
Indeed it (Grand Qur?n) is certainly a conclusive verbal statement characteristically elaborate, organized, differentiating and delineating, contrasting and isolating each element rendering it crystal clear.
And it does not comprise of the comic text.
Grand Qur?n illustrates in a unique way by the choice of such words whereby it produces images and describes events as if they were happening in front of the reader. Its vivid descriptions portray image in such manner as if it were being displayed in a live recording. The reader feels watching the past and future events visually.
But certain people for reason are debarred even understanding the surface meanings of the text.
In Arabic, the word for Narrative- a Real-Life Event is http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Tabweeb%20Part%202/001.%20Roots%20originating%20in%20Surat%20002/2.178/1.Qisas%20Qaaf%20Suad%20Suad%20Episode%20follow%20footprints/4.gif
It stems from Root . The basic perception infolded, in the words of Ibne Faris is that of following and tracking something, literally step by step. Lane's Lexicon portrayed this perception in these words; "to follow after one's track or footprints in pursuit; endeavour to trace or track someone".A compilation of the sequence of happenings in the past is episodehttp//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Tabweeb%20Part%202/001.%20Roots%20originating%20in%20Surat%20002/2.178/1.Qisas%20Qaaf%20Suad%20Suad%20Episode%20follow%20footprints/4.gif a part of history but distinct and of specific significance from the greater whole. Each part/segment of this compilation is unitary news, an activity; each segment is distinct static image like a mark/footprint. Each movement has, and leaves behind consecutive, one after the other images-traces. The movement/activity may apparently vanish but if we had seen or recorded the activity which is nothing but saving in memory or tape-disk the images, we can see that movement again either by recalling from memory or rewinding the tape and playing it back. Therefore http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Tabweeb%20Part%202/001.%20Roots%20originating%20in%20Surat%20002/2.178/1.Qisas%20Qaaf%20Suad%20Suad%20Episode%20follow%20footprints/4.gif denotes narrating the episode in the exact manner of its actual happening, displaying the pictures of it clip by clip, image by image the footage in present day parlance so that the activity and actual happening could be visualized by the listener and reader.
The main structural components of a narrative are the orientation, the complication and the resolution, and may include a concluding statement or comment in order to sum up the message.
-
And why don't you use a bigger picture which the Quran calls you to do? There is no him in singular as it talks about the archetype and not a specific persona in history. Anyone who believes his self-rightous values and hierarchy and power allow him to control other does have Narcissistic Personality Disorder, including the Mahomet, who you probably being a lesser being would praise happen you live near him. Or would you?
Narcissists Personality Disorder does not mean and refer every ruler. Just first study it in some psychology book.
-
Hi;
https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9609989.0
Peace
-
http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Tabweeb%20Part%202/001.%20Roots%20originating%20in%20Surat%20002/2.049/194.%20A%20Firoan%20Fa%20Ra%20Ain%20Noon/3.gif
We will study the events of his reign to estimate the period of his kingship in Egypt. This will give us precise cues to near-accurately estimate the duration of his reign. It will lead us identifying and specifying him in the history which is available as Primary source in hieroglyphics of ancient Egypt.
And which period do you think that this "Pharaoh Of Moses Time" lived?
We can then compare it to actual archeological findings...
The distinct characteristic - personality disorder of Fir'aoun and his trusted Chieftains portrayed in Qur?n is self-exaltation - self-aggrandizement - Narcissistic Personality Disorder. They had all the properties of self-aggrandizers like use of technique of "divide and conquer"; aggressive ruthless behaviour; taking advantage of the people around him; arrogant, haughty behaviours; engaging in false accusations, distortion campaigns; character assassination attempts; malicious gossip; amplifying their own image, and outburst of rage; but despite his facade he himself suffered from low - diminishing esteem.
Narcissist and Psychopathic...
Many rulers both in the past and current time are indeed Narcissistic and Psychopathic..
Infact a research shows that the highest appearance, in terms of percentage, where you can find Narcissist or Psychopathic people are among leaders in Enterprises, Government and Religious Institution.
Their appetite for self-grandiose draws them to such position.
And their psychopathy enables them to have no compassion and no remorse to achieve such position.
They can easily sacrifice their own friends, family or even their own mom in order to achieve their goal.
Performing murder, assassination, torture, persecution, lies, false accusation is easy for them, as they have no sense of guilt or conscience.Ramesses II, (12th century BC) the egyptian king, the chosen by Ra, was a good example of egyptian ruler with narcisstic and psychophatic syndrom. He has no remorse whatsoever on murdering, torturing and enslaving people which land he invaded (the canaanites). He built gigantic useless monuments to satisfy his self-grandiose and he has no shame on publishing lies (propaganda).
He claimed glorious victory over the war with The Hittites, and wrote that in a tablet for consumption by his people while in reality his army was beaten in the battlefield which forced him to sign a peace treaty.In similar manner as Mr Trump claimed victory over negotiation with North Korea.
And Mr. Kim claimed he has humiliated America and forced Trump to sign a treaty, (can only be found on news aired by North Korean TV and Radio station)Ramesses II was loved by the Egyptians, he set the standards of "What a good Pharaoh" should be.
Conquering land, providing slaves for the egyptian citizens and building gigantic monuments.
