Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Semitic Rhetoric and the Organisation of the QURAN

Semitic Rhetoric and the Organisation of the QURAN

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
27 Posts 3 Posters 92 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @ Mazhar => Yes i agree M. Cuypers can make some mistakes by translating but the goal is the organization.
    Don't let these kinds of erros disturbed us from the real gain of his works.

    It is big error. It can change the intended message into a different direction. This is one of the basic elements in organization or composition not to invert - change the word; and/or structure of the source text. Semitic tone and English tone have different ways.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Offline
      I Offline
      Iyyaka
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      Anoter link in English specially surah 92
      https//www.retoricabiblicaesemitica.org/Pubblicazioni/StRBS/38b_Cuypers_16.01.03.pdf

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Anoter link in English specially surah 92
        https//www.retoricabiblicaesemitica.org/Pubblicazioni/StRBS/38b_Cuypers_16.01.03.pdf

        Unnecessarily complicating things creating erroneous perception as if the Discourse is in difficult composition for an ordinary reader.

        This Chapter coheres with the preceding one and likewise is on the subject of personality development. It has Two Frames; 921-11 and 9212-21. It compares variance of efforts of people with regard to consideration and conduct about worldly wherewithal. In both the Frames the literary device Juxtaposition is used wherein the author places a person, concept, place, idea or theme parallel to another. The purpose of juxtaposing two directly or indirectly related entities close together in literature is to highlight the contrast between the two and compare them. In the First frame the people of pleasant upshot are prioritized while in the second Frame the people of worst upshot (Hell-Prison) are mentioned first.
        Both the Frames are two coherent paragraphs in linear cohesion. Every sentence is conjunct to the preceding clause by cohesive ties.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          Iyyaka
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Salam Bro,

          "Unnecessarily complicating things creating erroneous perception"
          => Of course i am in opposite of this statement.

          But i am agree that you can read the text ? different level as the "Semitic Rhetoric" method permits.

          "Semitic Rhetoric" is a SCIENTIFIC approach of how a text can be divided and organized with the main principle of SYMETRY as surah 92 demonstrate it. It has been uses with success since more 1 century with others sacred texts like the bible.
          Otherwise everybody can approach the text with his own feeling and the "random/chaos" begins. Sometimes it will fit good and sometimes not.

          A remark Not all texts can be "Tadabbour" with "Semitic Rhetoric"

          Peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Salam Bro,

            "Unnecessarily complicating things creating erroneous perception"
            => Of course i am in opposite of this statement.

            But i am agree that you can read the text ? different level as the "Semitic Rhetoric" method permits.

            "Semitic Rhetoric" is a SCIENTIFIC approach of how a text can be divided and organized with the main principle of SYMETRY as surah 92 demonstrate it. It has been uses with success since more 1 century with others sacred texts like the bible.
            Otherwise everybody can approach the text with his own feeling and the "random/chaos" begins. Sometimes it will fit good and sometimes not.

            A remark Not all texts can be "Tadabbour" with "Semitic Rhetoric"

            Peace

            Salam brother.

            The concept of Semitic rhetoric is there. But it is not used within paragraphs. He is erring and is somewhat confused about the concept itself.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              And brother forget not that Qur'an falls in the category of books that are classified as Practical books; I leave it to your reflection that does Practical Books can afford frequent use of what is Semitic rhetoric.

              It is elementary academics to firstly classify a book before talking about it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Offline
                I Offline
                Iyyaka
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                A summary of this methodology

                Rhetorical analysis makes it possible to delimit the limits and divisions of discourse as objectively as possible, as well as the organization of its different parts from each other, based on indices of composition found in the text itself. It thus makes it possible to define the exact literary context of each verse or part of a verse, and thus to understand its precise meaning. Hence is the interest of this method for the comprehension of the text.

                This Semitic rhetoric, very different from the Greek rhetoric (linearity intro - development - conclusion and / or chronological order) which the West, but also the Arab world inherited, is based on entirely on the principle of symmetry. It can take three forms, or three "composition figures"
                1- parallelism, when corresponding elements appear in the same order (ABC / A'B'C '
                2- the chiasm, or specular composition, when the corresponding elements appear in reverse order (ABC / C'B'A '
                3- the concentric composition, when a central element is inserted between the two parts of the symmetry (ABC / X / C'B'A &#039.

                Another utility You deploy ?vidences by using the text itself so the Qur'anic "science" of "asbab al-nuzul" is not really useful

                For meditation is a good tool because you must to stop your spirit on every word and looking for principle of symmetry...But it took a long time ! With experience it comes more easy.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  A summary of this methodology

                  Rhetorical analysis makes it possible to delimit the limits and divisions of discourse as objectively as possible, as well as the organization of its different parts from each other, based on indices of composition found in the text itself. It thus makes it possible to define the exact literary context of each verse or part of a verse, and thus to understand its precise meaning. Hence is the interest of this method for the comprehension of the text.

                  This Semitic rhetoric, very different from the Greek rhetoric (linearity intro - development - conclusion and / or chronological order) which the West, but also the Arab world inherited, is based on entirely on the principle of symmetry. It can take three forms, or three "composition figures"
                  1- parallelism, when corresponding elements appear in the same order (ABC / A'B'C '
                  2- the chiasm, or specular composition, when the corresponding elements appear in reverse order (ABC / C'B'A '
                  3- the concentric composition, when a central element is inserted between the two parts of the symmetry (ABC / X / C'B'A &#039.

                  Another utility You deploy ?vidences by using the text itself so the Qur'anic "science" of "asbab al-nuzul" is not really useful

                  For meditation is a good tool because you must to stop your spirit on every word and looking for principle of symmetry...But it took a long time ! With experience it comes more easy.

                  In simple words, rhetoric is composition techniques. Has he or you found within Qur'an as to how is it composed for symmetry?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Offline
                    I Offline
                    Iyyaka
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Salam bro,

                    Sorry but what do you expect of me ? Can i have more explanations.

                    Peace

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Salam bro,

                      Sorry but what do you expect of me ? Can i have more explanations.

                      Peace

                      I am only trying to bring home to you that a great book does not leave things for the reader to decide any aspect about it. Composition, rhetoric is some thing basic about a book, how it could be missed in the most exalted book? Do reflect on the point.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Offline
                        I Offline
                        Iyyaka
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        I am only trying to bring home to you that a great book does not leave things for the reader to decide any aspect about it. Composition, rhetoric is some thing basic about a book, how it could be missed in the most exalted book? Do reflect on the point.

                        Have a look at my "general comment" in this post https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9610597.0
                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mazhar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          Have a look at my "general comment" in this post https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9610597.0
                          Peace

                          Okay, leave it, point is not getting through at the moment.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • I Offline
                            I Offline
                            Iyyaka
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            Salam everyone,

                            Today i would like to make a focus on the The role of the center (X = concentrism figure).

                            I put on this forum 2 examples with ayat 2240 and ayat 37103 where the center plays 2 kinds of roles

                            ----- 1) "Transition between 2 parts" like in -----

                            -> the first sentence is the conclusion of the first part and the second sentence is the introduction of the second part

                            A -
                            "My Master, grant me from among the upright."
                            We gave him the glad tidings of a shrewd boy.
                            B -
                            When (Arabic falamma) he was old enough to actively help his father,
                            He said "O my son, I am seeing in a dream that I am sacrificing you.
                            Take the time to think and tell me how you see this vision.
                            He said, "O my father, do what is ordained to you.
                            You will find me, God willing, one of the steadfast.
                            X -
                            when (Arabic falamma) both of them had abandonned,

                            and HE (Arabic Tallahu) heaped it to the forehead,
                            B -
                            We called him, "O Abraham!
                            You have realized the vision well.
                            This is how We reward the beneficent.
                            This was an explicit test.
                            We rewarded him with a sacrifice beyond measure
                            By perpetuated it to the after.
                            Peace over Abraham.
                            Thus We reward the beneficent.
                            HE (Arabic Innahu) was of Our believing servants.
                            A-
                            We gave him the glad tidings of Isaac,
                            a prophet among the upright.

                            => And this group (B - X - B&#039 begins with the condition in phycial/psychological maturity (Arabic sa'ya) to be a potential "believing (part 1) servant (part 2)"
                            and this group (B - X - B&#039 ends with the diploma of being a "believing (part 1) servant (part 2)"
                            and inside the begin and the end of this group God explains you How to become a "believing (part 1) servant (part 2)"

                            More details => https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9610608.0

                            ----- 2) "the center introduces a new idea " like in -----

                            -> Even if you "remove" the center (x) the speech remains fluid and coherent.

                            (A) God will certainly defend those who have faith.
                            (B) God, indeed, does not like the traitor (1) filled with ingratitude. (2) (a)
                            Permission is granted to those who are fought because they suffered injustice. (b)
                            (C&#146 God, indeed, is able to make them victorious.

                            (D) - To those who have been expelled from their homes, (a)
                            Outside all right, (x)
                            Only because they said, "God is our Master."(a&#146

                            (X) - If God did not repel some people by others,

                            (D&#146 - hermitages (or places of retreat) would be demolished,(a)
                            as well as places of trade (or markets / trade), (x)
                            and the bonds of solidarity (support) (x)
                            and the places of obedient listening (or submission) - where the name of God is abundantly mentioned.(a&#146

                            (C&#146 - God, indeed, gives victory to those who support him because God certainly holds Strength and power.
                            (B&#146 - To those who, if We establish them in the land exploitation, establish the Salat (1&#146
                            and give the Zak?t (2&#146, (a)
                            And Order the adequate and forbid the blameworthy. (b)
                            (A&#146 - To God returns the final decision.

                            More details => https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9610597.0

                            ----- Conclusion -----

                            In conclusion, Center of concentrism figures can play others roles like Question etc...If God consents we can experiment it through other examples

                            Peace be upon u

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              when (Arabic falamma) both of them had abandonned,

                              What they had abandoned?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • I Offline
                                I Offline
                                Iyyaka
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                What they had abandoned?

                                Sorry for my poor English. it means "accept / consent / acquiese / subjected to Something (here consent the mission promoted by god)"

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #24

                                  http// When (Arabic falamma) he was old enough to actively help his father,

                                  For "when" Arabic is only Lamma; not Falamma. What to do with FA.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    Iyyaka
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    http// When (Arabic falamma) he was old enough to actively help his father,

                                    For "when" Arabic is only Lamma; not Falamma. What to do with FA.

                                    Yes you're right thanks to correct my translation = Then when...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      "My Master, grant me from among the upright."

                                      It is a meaningless sentence.

                                      Master means a man in charge of an organization or group.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • I Offline
                                        I Offline
                                        Iyyaka
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #27

                                        It is a meaningless sentence.

                                        Master means a man in charge of an organization or group.

                                        It is not the subject of this post but i quote the definition from Muhammad ASAD that i found good
                                        "
                                        The Arabic expression rabb - rendered by me as "Sustainer" - embraces a wide complex of meanings not easily expressed by a single term in another language. It comprises the ideas of having a just claim to the possession of anything and, consequently,
                                        authority over it, as well as of rearing, sustaining and fostering anything from its Inception to its final completion. Thus, the head of a family is called rabb ad-dar ("master of the house&quot because he has authority over it and is responsible for its maintenance; similarly, his wife
                                        is called rabbat ad-dar ("mistress of the house&quot.
                                        "
                                        => For me Master in English is the word which is closest to the Arabic meaning. (Cf. 2 qualities of Rabb in surah 55.)

                                        A bonus by means of letters meaning Ra-Ba-Ba

                                        • RA = Repetition
                                        • Ba = House, block with an idea of protection
                                          => Repetition of protection, to care and take care, responsible of evolution of something, physical as spiritualy (From the root R-B-B you have also the idea of educator, education, farming..)

                                        So finally another good translation could be "Responsible of evolution"...

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Users