Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. How would you answer this question

How would you answer this question

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
25 Posts 12 Posters 494 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    nimnimak_11
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Peace

    I was reading this website and came across this
    'The Quran says that it is “clear”, but then says elsewhere (37) that only Allah understands the meaning of some verses (which begs the question of why they are there). It says that it explains "all things" (1689), but then tells Muslims to follow the example of Muhammad (3321) - without saying what that is.'

    How would you argue these points?

    Peace Sarah

    37 doesn't say that only God understands the verses

    He is the One who sent down to you the book, from which there are definite signs; they are the essence of the book; and others, which are multiple-meaning. As for those who have disease in their hearts, eager to cause confusion and eager to derive their interpretation, they will follow what is multiple-meaning from it. But none knows their meaning except God and those who are well founded in knowledge; they say, "We acknowledge it, all is from our Lord." None will remember except the people of intellect.

    3321 just tells us that in the messenger of God there is a good example. This does not mean that it is the only good possible example. I don't see an issue with citing a good example.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      Asifzaheer
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      Read ur detailed analogy n analysis..brother its amazing..thanx for sharing

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        Fadiva
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        Salam, sister

        Well, there is a huge problem with translations and especially with the brackets which directly express one personal interpretation of one singular person, the translator. Sister Sara can go herself through this great journey and discover her own interpretation, may Allah guide her, with an open, pure, empty from a priori ideas and brackets mind and without no one. I just proposed to her my understanding which is that Kitab and Quran are not the same. It is not stated if Kitab was sent in "arabic" and it is not said that Kitab is a "book" as we understand a "book", thus ayat in the kitab is not necessary a verse. Ayat can mean other things (3022).

        If you take it like this and forget that Kitab is a "book" with pages and that verses are not necessarily a limited group of words, the understanding can be quite different. And if you take it like this there is absolutely no dilemma of clear / not clear verses, allegorical or whatever, and so on.

        About the existing/former scriptures (if they are scriptures), it is never said they are the book, they just "confirm" / "affirm" what is "yadayhi" (between his hands)... In any case, each one makes his/her own interpretation and research, may Allah guide us all

        Salam sister

        I agree with what is in bold; I think that a translator should not add words, giving his understanding because it can be wrong and misleading.
        We can also note that it is sometimes chosen a word for translation instead of another (even if it can fit very well) and in other verses they chose this another word. I wonder why. I think that we can't rely on those translations, we have to check if we can.

        For the rest, I can give a clear opinion because of my lack of knowledge about it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          Fadiva
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          Peace Sarah

          37 doesn't say that only God understands the verses

          He is the One who sent down to you the book, from which there are definite signs; they are the essence of the book; and others, which are multiple-meaning. As for those who have disease in their hearts, eager to cause confusion and eager to derive their interpretation, they will follow what is multiple-meaning from it. But none knows their meaning except God and those who are well founded in knowledge; they say, "We acknowledge it, all is from our Lord." None will remember except the people of intellect.

          3321 just tells us that in the messenger of God there is a good example. This does not mean that it is the only good possible example. I don't see an issue with citing a good example.

          Salam,

          The understanding can be different. Depends on where are the dots , commas and semicolons in translation. In arabic, we don't find any dots, commas or semicolons. So how can we decide where to put them in verses like this one ?

          And an important question I asked before, how can we have all the verses translated if some are only Allah or only Allah and those who are well founded in knowledge ?

          We have diiferent translations...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            good_logic
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Peace Fadiva.
            You say ,quote
            "And an important question I asked before, how can we have all the verses translated if some are only Allah or only Allah and those who are well founded in knowledge ?

            We have diiferent translations..."

            What is your understanding?
            How can verses have different meanings ?
            In that case each to thier own translation ,hence to their own Qoran!
            And that is what we have nowdays don t you think?
            GOD bless you.
            Peace.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              Fadiva
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              Peace Fadiva.
              You say ,quote
              "And an important question I asked before, how can we have all the verses translated if some are only Allah or only Allah and those who are well founded in knowledge ?

              We have diiferent translations..."

              What is your understanding?
              How can verses have different meanings ?
              In that case each to thier own translation ,hence to their own Qoran!
              And that is what we have nowdays don t you think?
              GOD bless you.
              Peace.

              Salam good logic,

              I think if only Allah knows the meaning of the verses mutashabih, we should not (mustn't would be correct) try to translate them, be humble and believe all is from Allah.
              If only Allah + the founded in knowledge, how to recognize those people ? How can we be sure if oneself is among them ?

              I think that maybe some translations are made according to some other sources, maybe some of them are not really sincere, maybe we can find explanation in their culture...I can't be sure.

              But if only Allah knows the meanings of the mutashabih verses, we should only find the muhkham verses translated and a sincere believer should recognize them or remember that.
              Not easy to answer. I think, as I said that we should not follow the translation blindly but we have to check if we can (al quran has a lot of verses). We can't follow our desires to translate the way we want. It demands patience. I think the most sensible behaviour is to ask Allah, be patient and not follow what we are not sure about, what we have no evidence.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                jkhan
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                Peace Sarah

                37 doesn't say that only God understands the verses

                He is the One who sent down to you the book, from which there are definite signs; they are the essence of the book; and others, which are multiple-meaning. As for those who have disease in their hearts, eager to cause confusion and eager to derive their interpretation, they will follow what is multiple-meaning from it. But none knows their meaning except God and those who are well founded in knowledge; they say, "We acknowledge it, all is from our Lord." None will remember except the people of intellect.

                3321 just tells us that in the messenger of God there is a good example. This does not mean that it is the only good possible example. I don't see an issue with citing a good example.

                Peace everyone...

                Read this article... And give your thoughts if possible....

                https//www.linkedin.com/pulse/curse-those-who-believe-allahs-verses-ambiguous-true-meaning-khan

                But only those who are well versed in Arabic grammar may be able to pick errors in this article...
                Hope someone point out if there is a mistake..
                Thank you and hope it benefits

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Cerberus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  Salam good logic,

                  I think if only Allah knows the meaning of the verses mutashabih, we should not (mustn't would be correct) try to translate them, be humble and believe all is from Allah.
                  If only Allah + the founded in knowledge, how to recognize those people ? How can we be sure if oneself is among them ?

                  I think that maybe some translations are made according to some other sources, maybe some of them are not really sincere, maybe we can find explanation in their culture...I can't be sure.

                  But if only Allah knows the meanings of the mutashabih verses, we should only find the muhkham verses translated and a sincere believer should recognize them or remember that.
                  Not easy to answer. I think, as I said that we should not follow the translation blindly but we have to check if we can (al quran has a lot of verses). We can't follow our desires to translate the way we want. It demands patience. I think the most sensible behaviour is to ask Allah, be patient and not follow what we are not sure about, what we have no evidence.

                  If we can't follow our desires, and we don't know how to recognize the "founded in knowledge", and we can't tell the best of translations and interpretations, how do we do it ?

                  In general, how do you tell right from wrong ? Do we have the ability to tell right from wrong or do we just stick to belief and patience as you said ?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • LaythL Offline
                    LaythL Offline
                    Layth
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Salam.

                    If I can add my 2 cents worth on this subject...

                    The Quran is both clear and unclear at the same time.

                    It is clear to those who want to learn (5417)...God is its ultimate teacher (551-2)...And it is completely locked to those who have not surrendered - their hearts are blocked from it (625)

                    As for 37, that tells us that the Quran is split into 2 sections 1. The basic Suras/Verses, 2. The Suras/Verses with deeper meanings that only those founded in knowledge would understand.

                    I would also add my opinion that the 29 initialed Suras are the "firm" suras/verses, while the rest of the Quran is what required deeper study/understanding.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      amin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      My take,

                      Some of things are signs, examples, and they need not be followed exactly without knowing the inner meaning in those, its like a moral story being told, but instead of following the moral, some only copying what the characters did without understanding or not worrying about the sign or moral, so Allah only knows why those characters did that at those circumstances, and Men in understanding knows what the moral of the story is.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        Fadiva
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        If we can't follow our desires, and we don't know how to recognize the "founded in knowledge", and we can't tell the best of translations and interpretations, how do we do it ?

                        In general, how do you tell right from wrong ? Do we have the ability to tell right from wrong or do we just stick to belief and patience as you said ?

                        Salam,

                        Note I am talking according to what I know and feel now, maybe I will have more knowledge later. I have a lot to learn.

                        They are verses which are clear to everyone I think like the ones commanding to believe that their is just one God and good deeds example feeding, giving clothes or money to the poor people.
                        We have to read with attention.
                        Being patient is not doing nothing I meant here asking Allah 's help and reading Al quran and make the effort to understand what is possible to understand (they several words repetated several times in Al quran and there is a reason). It demands time. And there are other signs. Some people might be well guided even if they can't read but understand the good from the evil. Allah guides who he wants. He knows best.

                        We can't just say what are the best translations without checking (checking the arabic words and their meaning and compare to other verses).

                        Concerning the "alike" verses, I have to be careful, I will not try to give a meaning if it's to ambiguous for me.

                        When I said " not to follow" our desires, it was about to chose to interprete a verse the way that suits us . Sincerity is very important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          Fadiva
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Salam.

                          If I can add my 2 cents worth on this subject...

                          The Quran is both clear and unclear at the same time.

                          It is clear to those who want to learn (5417)...God is its ultimate teacher (551-2)...And it is completely locked to those who have not surrendered - their hearts are blocked from it (625)

                          As for 37, that tells us that the Quran is split into 2 sections 1. The basic Suras/Verses, 2. The Suras/Verses with deeper meanings that only those founded in knowledge would understand.

                          I would also add my opinion that the 29 initialed Suras are the "firm" suras/verses, while the rest of the Quran is what required deeper study/understanding.

                          Salam Layth,

                          How can you be sure that those founded in knowledge understand them ? In arabic, there are no dots, commas and semicolons. We can have two meanings depending if we add and where we place them.
                          Is there another verse (or several)that leads you to that understanding ?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • LaythL Offline
                            LaythL Offline
                            Layth
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            Salam Fadiva,

                            The Quran was delivered orally (recited) before it was recorded. It is therefore not difficult to see how this oral transmission would have retained the correct reading - even without the vowel marks - until the vowel marks were added.

                            What difference there was in the recitations, later spilled out into the text, giving us the "7 readings" or "10 readings" (depending on your reference). The differences are cataloged and are quite small (less than 1% of the text affected), with the biggest difference being the 'verse stops' that vary greatly between the Hafs and Warsh written versions.

                            https//www.free-minds.org/which-quran

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              Fadiva
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              Salam Layth,

                              Thank you for the link to the article. I have juste read it, and it is also said that there are differences in the meaning of some words. The way that some verses are read can be understood differently...
                              7 or more readings accepted because it is said that nabi Mohammed accepted them. But normaly just one reading is correct, isn't it ? That s my understanding , al quran was revealed in pure arabic.
                              The author of this article seems to be right.

                              39.28

                              قُرْآنًا عَرَبِيًّا غَيْرَ ذِي عِوَجٍ لَّعَلَّهُمْ يَتَّقُونَ

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Users