Islamophobia - Dr No: Evangelical Christian.
-
Hi,
I've enjoyed reading this board for a while but recently I?ve noticed two postersMrburns and dr.no.
Both guys are obviously anti-Islamic racists. Why are they being tolerated?
Burns spams moslems boards with articles that will make them look extreme. So that anyone visiting will think they are bigots.
They do this to other Islamic boards. Both of them as a team.
I can provide links if people are interested.
And they love quoting faithfreedom.org which is a tainted site with a author of questionable origin. faithfreedom.org is run by a guy called ali sina (Fake name). The boards when they where up where full of nazi types. People who like him include the hinduvta facists nutcases who are committed to killing and cleansing India of ALL non-Hindus. Including Moslems, Christians and secular people. etc They like attacking secular academic types and beating up christian priests with baseball bats.
Most likely he is one of them or related to some similar organisation.
The site is banned on most internet filtering software organistations use since it promotes racial haterid and promotes violence.
Theses guys are neo-fascists of one sort or another who hate all Moslems. Why do people pander to them? Kick and ban them.
Don't tolerate this islamophobes on your boards. Their not here to discuss anything. They just want to spread their hate about Islam and moslems.
The question is this board to allow it's self to be used by such people to spread this bile and hate for 1.6 billion moslems?
Lets clean house and lets get back to some good discussions.
http//www.faithfreedom.com/ali_sina_exposed.html
quote
For far too long the unstable minds behind faithfreedom.org and others have spread absolute lies about the religion of 1.4 billion people on this Earth - Islam. Let us stress we maintain high the gift of freedom of speech. Our disturbance is the fact that much of what is present on Mr Sina's and other websites are lies and gross misrepresentations of scripture, through a blending of non-contextual Quranic / Hadith verses and blatant story telling, on top of reinventing Islamic history!
Freedom of speech is one thing, falsehood in the face of historical or religious fact is another. You will find that refuting the claims of Mr Sina is enough to expose these unscrupulous individuals, seeing that the diatribe contained within his websites can be found to exist (almost word for word) on others such as secularislam.org, who happen to think so-called "Islamic nations" much of which are dictatorships run by Western-puppets, are indeed "Islamic". Based upon this wrongly perceived fact they wish Islam to be more secular.
Mr Sina presents himself to the reader as a "Muslim apostate". This approach gives him the ability to claim he knows Islam from the "inside". By exaggerating and glorifying an instance in history where a particular type of apostate was killed and by choosing to overlook the political side of the whole issue Mr Sina automatically covers himself up in many ways. Most importantly of all, this carefully vetted out approach allows Mr Sina to hide behind the safe walls of the Internet. Mr Sina has been asked to debate live over the Internet using voice chat programs but has declined for fear he may be found and hurt! We assure Mr Sina, no such thing will ever happen and we would quite happily assist him in locating a voice manipulation tool if need be.
Whilst Mr Sina quite clearly sends out an invitation to anybody wishing to refute his claims, we have collectively come to know this challenge of Mr Sina's is nothing but a terrible joke. For a year or so now, Muslims, Christians and members of other religious denominations have written to Mr Sina refuting all his claims. Some of these people although do not buy the Islamic faith have lots of respect and admiration for it. Our verdict is Mr Sina is extremely selective about the comments, refutations and replies he posts on his website or even gives attention to. Another way in which he elevates himself is by constantly asking for "Islamic scholars" to refute his articles. This pretence acts to brainwash the reader and is Mr Sina's favourite technique. The Scholar Vs The Idiot is more accustomed to Celebrity Deathmatch.
Even so, many people choose to buy the views of anti-Islamics seeing that they hold identical agendas, this is only natural. However, for the upright, truth seeking individuals (the shoe fits whomever chooses to wear it) we present the following example An Agnostic who wishes to learn about Christianity is not going to rely on a Hindu to increase his understanding of the Christian faith, rather he will find a genuine, verifiable Christian source. Likewise a man claiming to be a "free-thinker" who hides behind "freedom of speech", and whose true origin or purpose is in doubt, is no credible source at all.