Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. An interesting and enlightening paragraph from a book

An interesting and enlightening paragraph from a book

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
2 Posts 2 Posters 77 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Ronin
    wrote on last edited by Ronin
    #1

    Peace all,

    I think the following paragraph is interesting and enlightening.

    In his book, "The Experience of God", David Bentley Hart, says:

    "To speak of "God" properly . . . is to speak of the one infinite source of all that is eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, uncreated, uncaused, perfectly transcendent of all things and for that very reason absolutely immanent to all things. God so understood. . .is not a "being," at least not in the way that a tree, shoemaker, or a god is a being; he is not one more object in the inventory of things that are, or any sort of discrete object at all. Rather, all things that exist receive their being continuously from him, who is the infinite wellspring of all that is, in whom all things live and move and have their being."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      Jafar
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Once a reference to the definition of "Infinite" is mentioned then it only refer to only one, which is infinite and inclusive of anything and everything.
      There cannot be many 'infinite', as by definition; infinity is border-less while in order to be 'many' a border need to be defined, the border that provide separation between here and there, me and not me, mine and not mine.

      The conception of 'infinite' is known and labeled by many names throughout planet earth; Brahman, Tao, Great Spirit, Hyang, Heavenly Father, Infinite Creator just to name a few. The similarity can be recognized as those names are merely a reference to the 'infinite'. Yet the 'true name' actually does not exist as 'false name' also does not exist.

      "The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be named is not the eternal name."
      -- Lao Tse

      I deliberately not include the word "God" in that list, as the term is distorted in meanings.
      To some people the term "God" is a reference to something that is "finite" or "has border"; as such the term "My God", "Your God", "Their God", "Other God" become meaningful. While such term is illogical as a prefix to "infinite". As mentioned; "infinite" is "inclusive" (includes all) and not "exclusive".
      To the infinite; anyone is me, anywhere is here and anytime is now.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Users