Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Dr. Kent Hovind takes up on THREE evolutionists

Dr. Kent Hovind takes up on THREE evolutionists

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
28 Posts 8 Posters 395 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cathedral
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    No yawm in Hebrew, it's yom.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Where is your reference...?
      roll

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        Andya_Primanda
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Apple,

        Greetings Andya Primanda,
        Well?if you believe your position has any merit to it whatsoever, then I suggest that you start a dedicated thread inclusive to the ?six days? of Creation as sequenced by Genesis.

        Order of creation from Genesis 1

        Day 1. Heaven (sky? universe?) and earth; light (day) and darkness (night)

        Day 2. Firmament (clouds?)

        Day 3. Dry land & sea; land plants

        Day 4. Sun, moon, stars

        Day 5. Birds, whales, sea creatures

        Day 6. Beasts of the earth & creeping things (land creatures? mammals? reptiles?); man

        The problem with this is that it contradicts scientific discoveries about the history of the earth. Here's how the order should be

        Universe
        Stars
        Sun
        Earth
        Moon
        Dry land & sea
        Sea creatures
        Plants
        Reptiles
        Mammals
        Birds
        Man

        Your Genesis got the order mixed-up.

        From there, we can perform a detailed exegesis of the Hebrew and see just exactly who has the better understanding of the text.

        Furthermore, I would like to directly compare the Koranic six day creation sequence along side that of the Biblical one; where it can be amply demonstrated for all to see exactly how the Biblical Creation Sequence is correct, and that it totally crushes the copied Koranic one?

        Your call? wink

        Simple. You can't crush the Qur'anic six-day creation sequence because it's nonexistent. Besides, the biblical sequence is already broken under the weight of the evidence.

        Islam, on the other hand, do not have the concept of original sin and saviour. Adam and Adam's spouse has repented and has been forgiven by God. Every person is born in innocence, and everyone gets judged after they die, and during life have the same opportunity to get themselves to heaven or hell based on their actions. Intercession, by Jesus in your case, will not be accepted. This system is not influenced by the details of human creation. Whether we evolved or created by magic explosions, we still have to do good works to attain afterlife bliss.

        Islam does not, correct?but the ?holy? book of Islam does?

        Most Muslims are too steeped in the man-made traditions of their faith to spend the necessary time exegeting their book of faith?

        What? The Qur'an was glaringly obvious in saying that we don't need a saviour.

        Please bring forth any ?mankind creation ayah? from the Koran (of your choosing) and we will exegete it together?.

        Um, it was you who make the assertion in the first place. The burden of proof is yours, not mine.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Greetings Andya Primanda,

          As you can see, the Creation sequence comparison is being held in the Christian section of this forum?

          Simple. You can't crush the Qur'anic six-day creation sequence because it's nonexistent.

          If it?s non-existent, then why do the authors of the Koran proclaim a six-day creation, seven times over?.?

          Another un-backed Koranic assertion?.?

          Besides, the biblical sequence is already broken under the weight of the evidence.

          Wrong.

          The Biblical sequence fully coincides with the record of nature?

          What? The Qur'an was glaringly obvious in saying that we don't need a saviour.

          Wrong.

          You need to read Sura 86?

          Quote
          Please bring forth any ?mankind creation ayah? from the Koran (of your choosing) and we will exegete it together?.

          Um, it was you who make the assertion in the first place. The burden of proof is yours, not mine.

          Actually, you were the one who made the first assertion?.remember?.?

          Quote
          It is a bit ironic though to see Khizar being congratulated by the Christian apple-pie... I mean, evolution poses little problem for Islam (even for the traditonalists) but it does seriously challenge Xtianity.

          Take care?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Andya_Primanda
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Apple,

            As you can see, the Creation sequence comparison is being held in the Christian section of this forum?

            Okay I'll take that debate there.

            If it?s non-existent, then why do the authors of the Koran proclaim a six-day creation, seven times over?.?

            Another un-backed Koranic assertion?.?

            The Author of the Qur'an only said six 'days' (sittatin ayyamin). The sequence as in Genesis 1 is nonexistent. SO what are you asking for? Of course I know the Qur'an mentioned six 'days' in several passages. I also know that these proclamations do not specify the sequence, therefore I stop at that.

            Wrong.

            The Biblical sequence fully coincides with the record of nature?

            As in light before stars, earth before sun, birds before reptiles? What record of nature are you talking about?

            The Qur'an was glaringly obvious in saying that we don't need a saviour.

            You need to read Sura 86?

            http//yaqb.lrhazi.com/index.php?query=c%3D86

            <reading...>

            Okay, I did it.

            No need for a saviour there.
            And there won't be one either.

            8610 Fama lahu min quwwatin wa la nashirin
            Literal So (there is) no strength/power, and nor victorior/savior for him.

            Actually, you were the one who made the first assertion?.remember?.?

            Quote
            It is a bit ironic though to see Khizar being congratulated by the Christian apple-pie... I mean, evolution poses little problem for Islam (even for the traditonalists) but it does seriously challenge Xtianity.

            Evolution poses little trouble for Islam. Why? Because, as I said,

            Islam, on the other hand, do not have the concept of original sin and saviour. Adam and Adam's spouse has repented and has been forgiven by God. Every person is born in innocence, and everyone gets judged after they die, and during life have the same opportunity to get themselves to heaven or hell based on their actions. Intercession, by Jesus in your case, will not be accepted. This system is not influenced by the details of human creation. Whether we evolved or created by magic explosions, we still have to do good works to attain afterlife bliss.

            And the word 'khalaq' (create) in the Qur'an refers to an observable process, as stated in my favourite verse, 2920

            http//yaqb.lrhazi.com/index.php?query=29%3A20

            2920 Qul siiruu fi al-ardi fa-unzhuruu kayfa bada-a al-khalqa. Tsumma Allahu yunsyi-u an-nasy-ata al-aakhirata inna Allaha 'ala kulli shay-in qadiirun

            Literal Say "Walk/move/ride in the earth/Planet Earth, so see/wonder about how He began/initiated the creation, then God creates/originates the creation/origination the end/last, that (E) God (is) on every thing capable/able.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Greetings Andya Primanda,

              Thanks for your reply.

              The creation sequence comparison is being maintained in the Christian forum?and your questions are answered there?

              Quote
              The Qur'an was glaringly obvious in saying that we don't need a saviour.
              Quote
              You need to read Sura 86?

              http//yaqb.lrhazi.com/index.php?query=c%3D86

              <reading...>

              Okay, I did it.

              No need for a saviour there.
              And there won't be one either.

              8610 Fama lahu min quwwatin wa la nashirin
              Literal So (there is) no strength/power, and nor victorior/savior for him.

              Perhaps you need to study your classic Arabic?

              http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=28737#28737

              Have fun?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                Andya_Primanda
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Perhaps you need to study your classic Arabic?

                http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=28737#28737

                Have fun?

                The problem with your exegesis is that it refers to the New Testament. I don't believe that the New Testament is authentic. Therefore, I stick to the original translation, Tariq=Morning Star.

                Since we have gone off-topic, would you care returning to the topic of evolution, Christianity and Islam? I'll also look at the Six-Day thread.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Greetings Andya Primanda,

                  Thanks for your comments?

                  Quote
                  Perhaps you need to study your classic Arabic?

                  http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=28737#28737

                  Have fun?

                  The problem with your exegesis is that it refers to the New Testament. I don't believe that the New Testament is authentic.

                  Well?the authors of the Koran thought that it is authentic?

                  Therefore, I stick to the original translation, Tariq=Morning Star.

                  And?.?

                  Since we have gone off-topic, would you care returning to the topic of evolution, Christianity and Islam? I'll also look at the Six-Day thread.

                  Sure?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Users