Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Critical Examination of Islam
  3. Quranic Divinity
  4. Discrepancies in the Quran

Discrepancies in the Quran

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Quranic Divinity
96 Posts 10 Posters 3.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Raj-ah
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    Since Albion doesnot understand logic and is here Just to play the old game, therefore it is over for him.

    The Next Discrepancy is found in verse 6612 where the masculine phrase "breathed in HIM" is attributed to Mary.

    So could the life be breathed in to some one who is alive????
    off course the life was breathed into "Jesus" who was to be born and I guess he was a man!
    The life was breathed in to "Jesus" who was "him" and was in the body of "Marry" who was "her".

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #88

      You obviously don't know Arabic otherwise you wouldn't be making so many basic mistake ....

      "fanafakhna" (breathed into HIM/IT) can ONLY refer to a word that came before it. So the "Him" can ONLY refer back to Mary. Unless "fanafakhna" is translated as "breathed into IT", in which case it refers back to "farja" which is Maries private parts.

      Wamaryama ibnata AAimrana allatee ahsanat farjaha fanafakhna

      Even ALL the translators new that one roll

      Nice try, but try again...

      .......

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        Raj-ah
        wrote on last edited by
        #89

        Even ALL the translators new that one

        Fallecy de Adpopulam.

        Nice try

        Thank you!

        but try again...

        There seems no need

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #90

          There seems no need

          True there is no need because not even translators who know Arabic well could overcome the discrepancy without changing the Arabic text. The best they could do was to try the magic trick of replacing "breathed into Him/It" with "breathed into Her".

          First you tried the tricky of adding the words "their Mothers" to 43 when no such words appear in the Arabic text.

          f you deem it best for the orphans, you may marry their mothers "

          Then you ignore all Arabic Grammar rules to try and overcome the discrepancy in 6612...

          The discrepancy is still there and will remain, along with all the others..

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #91

            The Next discrepancy is in 2177 where the past tense is wrongly used for four words. The verse begins in the present tense (turn) but then changes to the past tense for the four underlined words.

            All translators have seen the problem and have changed the words to the present tense, but the error is still there no matter how much they try to cover it up

            2177 "It is not righteousness that ye turn your faces to the East and the West; but righteous is he who believed (amana ) in Allah and the Last Day and the angels and the Scripture and the prophets; and gave (waata) wealth, for love of Him, to kinsfolk and to orphans and the needy and the wayfarer and to those who ask, and to set slaves free; and observed (aqama) proper worship and paid (waata) the poor-due"

            2177 "Laysa albirra an tuwalloo wujoohakum qibala almashriqi waalmaghribi walakinna albirra man amana biAllahi waalyawmi al-akhiri waalmala-ikati waalkitabi waalnnabiyyeena waata almala AAala hubbihi thawee alqurba waalyatama waalmasakeena waibna alssabeeli waalssa-ileena wafee alrriqabi waaqama alssalata waata alzzakata"

            When it is translated the way it reads in the Arabic text, it makes no seen what soever.

            "the righteous is he who believed" ?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #92

              Do they not then meditate on the Quran? And if it were from any other than Allah, they would have found in it many a discrepancy

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #93

                Some words from an Ex-Muslim at

                http//apostatesofislam.com/

                a cursory look at the Quran reveals that this book is full of errors. Quran is replete with scientific heresies, historic blunders, mathematical mistakes, logical absurdities, grammatical errors and ethical fallacies. It is badly compiled and it contradicts itself. There is nothing intelligent in this book let alone miraculous

                Seems he noticed the many discrepancies too

                2177 "It is not righteousness that ye turn your faces to the East and the West; but righteous is he who believed (amana ) in Allah and the Last Day and the angels and the Scripture and the prophets; and gave (waata) wealth, for love of Him, to kinsfolk and to orphans and the needy and the wayfarer and to those who ask, and to set slaves free; and observed (aqama) proper worship and paid (waata) the poor-due"

                ......

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #94

                  The next discrepancy is a scientific error (one of many such errors) where the quran says that male sperm is emitted from "between the backbone and the ribs"

                  "Now let man but think from what he is created! He is created from a drop emitted-Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs"

                  This is an obvious error to say that sperm comes form in a man's chest/kidney area.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #95

                    The next discrepancy is a contradiction between 7160 and 6146.

                    In 6146 it says those with Claws/Talon are unlawful to the Children of Israel as food to Eat.

                    But in 7160 God sent down quail as Food for the Children of Israel to eat

                    Why is God giving the Children of Israel an Unlawful food to eat ?

                    7160 "We sent to them manna and quails Eat of the good things We have given you"

                    6146 "And to those who were Jews We made unlawful all of those who have claws (Thufur), and of oxen and sheep We made unlawful to them the fat of both, except such as was on their backs or the entrails or what was mixed with bones this was a punishment We gave them on account of their rebellion, and We are surely Truthful"

                    "Thufur" in respect to humans means Nail. But in respect to Animals and Birds "Thufur" means Claw or Talon

                    Source Arabic-English dictionnary "Al-kamoos Al-Asri"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #96

                      The Next Huge Discrepancy is in 4157 to 4161 where its says the jews were Prohibited Good things that were once lawful to them due to there transgession. And listed among the transgressions is the way the Jews treated Jesus and Mary.

                      Its easy to see the Problem here because the Jews received no Extra Revelations or Prohibitions after the time of Jesus. The Jewish food laws for example were given 1000 years early in the time of Moses.

                      4155 "Because of their breaking of their covenant, and their disbelieving in the revelations of Allah"

                      4156 "Because of their disbelief and of their speaking against Mary a tremendous calumny"

                      4157 "And for claiming that they killed the Messiah... "

                      4160 "Because of the wrongdoing of the Jews We forbade them good things which were (before) made lawful unto them, and because of their much hindering from Allah's way,"

                      Apparently the jEws also took Usury when forbidden as stated in 4161..

                      4161 "And of their taking usury when they were forbidden it"

                      But how could they take usury when they received NO extra commandments or Revelations after the time of Jesus.

                      .....

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Users