Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. CONCLUSION OF THE SWINE DEBATE

CONCLUSION OF THE SWINE DEBATE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
171 Posts 16 Posters 4.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #132

    Salam Ahmad Bahgat,

    and the same verse tell us that Allah allowed them to eat The fat of the ox and the sheep (Fat Only) (because these aninals also have nails and) so Allah explained to them what they can eat from a couple of animals with NAILS (OX and sheep), they could also been eaten fish because the fish do not have nails

    Khi- Im sorry to say but you got this the other way around. GOD FORBADE THE FAT of the oxen and sheep NOT THEIR MEAT so this wont be a valid argument. GOD Bless!

    I absolutely agree bro, I'm using the same rational to suit that guy rational who obviously does not understand the Quran and totally reject the Torah while he should not do that

    my logic stand bro but only against his flawed logic, I'm positive

    peace be with you man, also I have a lot of question regarding code 19 and sura 9 please let me know when you are ready

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      jonny_k
      wrote on last edited by
      #133

      Salam Ahmed Bahgat,

      peace be with you man, also I have a lot of question regarding code 19 and sura 9 please let me know when you are ready

      Khi- Please first go through all of the articles/websites i posted. Ill then take your qs next week GW. GOD Bless!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #134

        Salam Ahmed Bahgat,

        peace be with you man, also I have a lot of question regarding code 19 and sura 9 please let me know when you are ready

        Khi- Please first go through all of the articles/websites i posted. Ill then take your qs next week GW. GOD Bless!

        bro i spent all last night reading all these stuff, I'm a reading addict

        talk to you next week

        peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          jonny_k
          wrote on last edited by
          #135

          Salam Ahmed Bahgat,

          peace be with you man, also I have a lot of question regarding code 19 and sura 9 please let me know when you are ready

          Khi- Please first go through all of the articles/websites i posted. Ill then take your qs next week GW. GOD Bless!

          bro i spent all last night reading all these stuff, I'm a reading addict

          talk to you next week

          peace

          Khi- Salam. All the five lessons?! Amazing. I hope you read everything carefully and not just skimmed through the article. Ok see you next week then GW. GOD Bless!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Offline
            D Offline
            DHULQARNANE
            wrote on last edited by
            #136

            here is my final refute, now this refute was not talked about before and I believe there will be no response to it

            first of all, the verse 6146 never said animals with claws, THIS IS THE WRONG TRANSLATION FOR SURE

            the arabic word " " CAN NOT BE TRANSLATED AS CLAW, THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT WRONG TRANSLATION

            Claw means in arabic "", I"M 100% positive

            The arabic word " " SHOULD BE TRANSLATED AS "NAIL", this is what it means in arabic, YOU CAN CHECK THIS WITH ANY ARABIC SPEAKER

            now a hoof (divided or not) or a claw (long or not sharp or not) IS A BLOODY NAIL " ", and because the pig has a nail (on the form of divided hoof) IT WAS FORIBIDDENON THE JEW IN THE QURAN

            and the same verse tell us that Allah allowed them to eat The fat of the ox and the sheep (Fat Only) (because these aninals also have nails and) so Allah explained to them what they can eat from a couple of animals with NAILS (OX and sheep), they could also been eaten fish because the fish do not have nails

            you have been refuted PB, as I don't care what you read in english THIS QURAN IS AN ARABIC QURAN

            Oh, I see, so thufr means nail and all species of animals with nails, except the two mentioned--sheep and oxen, are haram, is this really your position/refutation? rotfl Well, if thufr means nail, as you claim, then, cows, goats, rams, deer, elk, seals, turtles, sheep, oxen, etc. were also haram, because they have nails...is this really your position/refutation?, because if it is, you better rethink it. rotfl

            Btw, genius, it was the FAT of the oxen and sheep which was made haram and not anything else, got it? If thufr meant nail and all animals with nails were haram to the Jews, but the sheep and oxen were the exceptions, then, Allah, would have stated that they were the exceptions in this regard. Allah, however, made no such exception and you are absolutely making this nonsense up.

            You, see, the more you talk, the more you expose your foolishness. lol

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Offline
              D Offline
              DHULQARNANE
              wrote on last edited by
              #137

              Khi- Im sorry to say but you got this the other way around. GOD FORBADE THE FAT of the oxen and sheep NOT THEIR MEAT so this wont be a valid argument. GOD Bless!

              I absolutely agree bro, I'm using the same rational to suit that guy rational who obviously does not understand the Quran and totally reject the Torah while he should not do that

              my logic stand bro but only against his flawed logic, I'm positive

              Even IDMKHIZIR, pointed out your completely misunderstanding what, in regard to the sheep and oxen was haram, so what are talking about? The Torah, is not the book of guidance to mankind and it is flawed.

              Answer the following, if you have any knowledge/faith at all wink

              WHICH BOOK IS WITHOUT DOUBT, ERROR, FLAW, CONTRADICTION, IS THE FINAL WAHY/GUIDANCE TO MANKIND

              A. AL-QURAN

              B. THE TORAH

              Which is it...mate? lol

              rotfl who are you kiddding? rotfl

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #138

                PB you are a joke if you ask me this question, but let me pretend to answer it

                the answer is A lol

                but hey, B must be also considered and believed in its uncorrupted passages as THE QURAN TOLD US, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE VERSES OR YOU WILL RUN LIKE A RAT?

                How we know it is uncorrupted?, BY COMPARING IT TO THE UNCORRUPTED AND COMPLETE QURAN

                lol lol

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Offline
                  T Offline
                  truth
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #139

                  I know what I'm doing, however, you, as evidenced by your latest screw-up, are clueless as to what you are doing rotfl

                  If we've met on other boards, well, you were just as foolish and I crushed you there as well...mate lol

                  True motives being written freely and without inhibition.

                  Keep exposing yourself.

                  The LOLs and ROTFLs are pretty lame really. Grow up.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Offline
                    D Offline
                    DHULQARNANE
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #140

                    "AhmedBahgat"]

                    the answer is A lol

                    Well, genius, if A. is the answer, then why do you continue to take the Torah over Al-Quran? Allah says in Al-Quran that...He made clawed species of animals haram to the Jews, well, pigs don't have claws, thus, Al-Quran, is refuting the tampered Torah as to exactly what species of animals Allah made to the Jews--not animals with hooves, but animals with claws. Btw, thufr cannot mean nail, because Jews eat beef/cows which, according to your "definition nd logic", have nails as do pigs. So, if pigs and cows both have nails, then the cow was also hara to the Jews...are you really gong to stand by your silly and un-Quranic position that, thufr, in ayat 6146, means nail? rotfl

                    Are you getting this yet?...mate wink

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      truth
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #141

                      ... why ... take the Torah over Al-Quran? Allah says in Al-Quran that...He made clawed species of animals haram to the Jews, well, pigs don't have claws, thus, Al-Quran, is refuting the tampered Torah as to exactly what species of animals Allah made to the Jews

                      Another gem from DULL_IQ...

                      The ancient Jews' were wrong to accept their Torah over the Quran which came thousands of years later.

                      Maybe they needed a time machine or someone like DULL... in their midst screaming "Guys, guys... ignore the Torah! You can eat pigs! Trust me they're good! They don't have claws!"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Offline
                        D Offline
                        DHULQARNANE
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #142

                        ... why ... take the Torah over Al-Quran? Allah says in Al-Quran that...He made clawed species of animals haram to the Jews, well, pigs don't have claws, thus, Al-Quran, is refuting the tampered Torah as to exactly what species of animals Allah made to the Jews

                        Another gem from DULL_IQ...

                        The ancient Jews' were wrong to accept their Torah over the Quran which came thousands of years later.

                        Maybe they needed a time machine or someone like DULL... in their midst screaming "Guys, guys... ignore the Torah! You can eat pigs! Trust me they're good! They don't have claws!"

                        My God, you don't even know what time period is being discussed shock

                        truth, give yourself a rest lol

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T Offline
                          T Offline
                          truth
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #143

                          ... why ... take the Torah over Al-Quran? Allah says in Al-Quran that...He made clawed species of animals haram to the Jews, well, pigs don't have claws, thus, Al-Quran, is refuting the tampered Torah as to exactly what species of animals Allah made to the Jews

                          "Guys, guys... ignore the Torah! You can eat pigs! Trust me they're good! They don't have claws!"

                          ... you ... know what ... is being discussed

                          Yes I do.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Offline
                            D Offline
                            DHULQARNANE
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #144

                            ... why ... take the Torah over Al-Quran? Allah says in Al-Quran that...He made clawed species of animals haram to the Jews, well, pigs don't have claws, thus, Al-Quran, is refuting the tampered Torah as to exactly what species of animals Allah made to the Jews

                            "Guys, guys... ignore the Torah! You can eat pigs! Trust me they're good! They don't have claws!"

                            ... you ... know what ... is being discussed

                            Yes I do.

                            You have some very deep seated problems.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Offline
                              D Offline
                              DHULQARNANE
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #145

                              Salam ,

                              Ahmad Bahgat and the same verse tell us that Allah allowed them to eat The fat of the ox and the sheep (Fat Only) (because these aninals also have nails and) so Allah explained to them what they can eat from a couple of animals with NAILS (OX and sheep), they could also been eaten fish because the fish do not have nails

                              IDMKHIZIRKhi- Im sorry to say but you got this the other way around. GOD FORBADE THE FAT of the oxen and sheep NOT THEIR MEAT so this wont be a valid argument. GOD Bless!

                              I'm glad you pointed this out to him, he wouldn't have believed me. With that said, do you agree with him that thufr, in ayat 6146,--means nails?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jaxal
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #146

                                = nails. This is what happens when you dont speak or understand arabic ... 'genius'

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jaxal
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #147

                                  thufr--means nails

                                  Its not pronounced with a 't' sound. Its pronounced with a 'z' sound

                                  would have taken great pleasure in cutting deep into you so that you would never forget your place again.

                                  Really?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    truth
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #148

                                    You have some very deep seated problems

                                    You probably never thought you'd see the day you were so thoroughly subdued and "crushed", that you'd be reduced to writing a single meaningless sentence such as that one.

                                    I hope you've learnt your lesson.

                                    I am compelled to post to you once more shaitan but after this, I will not go back on my word. But this if for the record. You, crush and subdue me?! and teach me a lesson? LOLx10!! You must be drunk. Anyway, there is only one reason why I'm putting you and and the other..."genius" on permanent ignore, is because I gave Layth my word that I would not revert back to the old Dhulqarnain, who would have taken great pleasure in cutting deep into you so that you would never forget your place again. Tonight, I came very close to saying things to you for which I would have certainly gotten banned for and I am not going to let that happen over you two shaitans. However, as I said, I gave Layth my word and I will keep it. This site is real learning environment and I will not want to get banned again wink.

                                    Oh, btw, shaitan, you and the other "genuis" lost the khinzeer debate, but may Allah never allow you to recognize that fact or your other superstitions. May you live long and never change your beliefs.

                                    ...there will be no more from me to you.

                                    You knew you'd fail didn't you. Everyone knew. Old habits are hard to break. It's nice that you're training yourself to be cool though. You've admitted frankly that you have a great deal of pent up anger in you and we suspected as much.

                                    While your post is very hateful towards me, know that I have no hate for you and I do not share your spiteful words. I hope that you can overcome the troubles you have made a frank admission for. Bottling them up like you say you've done is one solution but an anger management class is probably a better option in the long run.

                                    I commend you for admitting to your problem with me and the deep resentment you feel, and for accepting your status as a loser.

                                    Peace/

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      DHULQARNANE
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #149

                                      Salam PBM,

                                      Not only is ayat 6146 about specif things made haram, but the specific species of animal made haram by Allah, are only those with claws (why do you continue to ignore this fact?!), which, of course, excludes the animal pig. Is this not correct, yes or no?

                                      Khi- Show me the word "ONLY" in 6146. GOD Bless!

                                      The word "only" is self-evident. When Allah made animals with claws haram, what, do you think He made some animals with claws halal at the same time or some that He some other species of animal, in their entirety, haram? If so, then post that species. If you can't, then your question is not relevent. You still haven't answered my question

                                      Not only is ayat 6146 about specific things made haram to the Jews, but the specific species of animal made haram by Allah, are only those with claws (why do you continue to ignore this fact?!), which, of course, excludes the animal pig. Is this not correct, yes or no?

                                      Looking to your reply.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        DHULQARNANE
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #150

                                        DO PIGS HAVE CLAWS...yes or no?

                                        Maybe they have...

                                        The accessory, or dew, claws have short conical horn capsules. Those of the pig are quite well developed.
                                        http//137.222.110.150/calnet/Lfoot/page3.htm

                                        Maybe?! Well, don't you KNOW? If you are claiming that pig is haram, then you must be certain of your facts. The article you posted begins with the following

                                        Anatomy of the Ox, Sheep, Goat and Pig's Foot

                                        The article, relative the hoof being referred to as a...claw, means that, the hoof of these animals consist of two "dew claws", however, this notwithstanding, the aforementioned animals are said to have hooves not claws. Once again, if these animals truly had claws, then the sheep, goat, and ox, in their entirety, as well as the following, would have been haram to the Jews the deer, the gazelle, the roe deer, the wild goat, the ibex, the antelope and the mountain sheep. Jews both before and after Al-Quran and the Torah, ate these animals. Thus, thufr, in ayat 6146, cannot mean "dew claw"/hoof, likewise, khinzeer, cannot mean the specie of animal pig, otherwise, the goat, ox, and sheep would have had to have been haram before Al-Quran and still be haram today, if thufr means\t "dew claw"/hoof and not simply claw. Is this not correct?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jonny_k
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #151

                                          Salam PBM

                                          The word "only" is self-evident. When Allah made animals with claws haram, what, do you think He made some animals with claws halal at the same time or some that He some other species of animal, in their entirety, haram? If so, then post that species. If you can't, then your question is not relevent. You still haven't answered my question

                                          Not only is ayat 6146 about specific things made haram to the Jews, but the specific species of animal made haram by Allah, are only those with claws (why do you continue to ignore this fact?!), which, of course, excludes the animal pig. Is this not correct, yes or no?

                                          Looking to your reply.

                                          Khi- This is not a fact at all. Your completely wrong. The 'only' you conclude from 6146 is PURE CONJECTURE. Others may conclude from 6146 that those animal prohibitons are ONLY those made haram to the Jews BECAUSE OF THEIR TRANGRESSIONS while this does not obviously exclude other animals being made haram to them and those would be the universal prohibitions in 6145. In short 6146 is AN ADDITIONAL , NOT A COMPLETE, SET OF ANIMAL PROHINTIONS TO THE JEWS "DUE TO THEIR TRANSGRESSION". This last phrase makes it evident. GOD Bless!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users