How can a Camel pass through a needle?
-
nah, nerdy is knowing what windows version is coming out three editions ahead of time. The profiler thing is something I would expect to find in a serial stalker's arsenol
Good reply...
You might also find it being used by someone who has something to hide...
-
I can't say if he has something to hide or not. But it is one thing to have this profiler thing (which I think is quite strange to begin with) and something else to use it in such a manner when comunicating with people. THAT is what I find creepy. perhaps also because it was used on me and was aparently incorrect (if it is actualy a real thing and not just a guess in te head )
I will relable my opinion to call it just REALLY REALLY strange.
-
I can't say if he has something to hide or not. But it is one thing to have this profiler thing (which I think is quite strange to begin with) and something else to use it in such a manner when comunicating with people. THAT is what I find creepy. perhaps also because it was used on me and was aparently incorrect (if it is actualy a real thing and not just a guess in te head )
I will relable my opinion to call it just REALLY REALLY strange.
well, it was tried on you after a couple of comments by you but if I keep feeding Profiler with your comments I'm sure in a few weeks it will tell me who exactly are you if you are an old friend or an old foe, or a new freind, but you asked me not to use it on you again and I won't, see, I'm not a stalker
-
You are a very untrusting person. In my experience, the untrusting are the ones never to be trusted themselves. Just an honest obseration from my life.
cool, don't trust me then but I always trust honest people
however I don't know if you are a trusted person or not,
-
Well, I haven't asked anyone to trust me on anything here. Just stating my own opinion and discussing a few issues. No more, no less.
and why you stated this about me ONLY and not about a few other members in here?
i guess it sounds like you want to defriend me
sure, you are now my friend
-
the subject has not come up with anyone else. I really have not gone one on one with anyone here. you aproached e with your profiler, you were wrong. this centers around that. I honestly have not read enough outside of threads I am on, to know if anyone else is distrusting of others. Don't be so paranoid.
-
Peace be upon you,
It can't, thats the point of the parable (ba dump bump) D
-
Summary of 81.19
Innahu laqawlu rasoolin kareemin
Good, you pronounced it right, did you do it, or you just copied it then pasted it?
81.19 Certainly His Word is a Holy message.
I guess this is the proposed translation by you to 8119, thank you for that, let?s now examine your translation word for word
? ?, and you translated it as ?Certainly His Word is?, oh please AP, you can fool a non Arabic speaker, but what makes you think that you can fool an Arabic speaker like me?, well here is your first lie, the verse never related the ?Qawlu? to any entity, why the hell you added ?his? to it?, this is how it should be ? Most surely it is the Word of?
1 lie lost, 2 lies left
? ? and you translated it as ?message?, LOL bro, I guess with this one you can?t even fool the NON Arabic speakers because they know very well what ?Rasoolin? imeans, which surely means Messenger, and to translate it as ?Message? has to be considered a clear cut lie
2 lies lost, 1 lie left
? ? and you translated it as ?a Holy?, bro what non sense is this, that makes you hallucinate thinking there is sense in what you post?, the Arabic word MUST be translated as ?An honoured?
You?ve just lost your last lie bro, bad luck
Let?s recap your lies
You translated the following Arabic verse
To this
Certainly His Word is a Holy message
BUT IT SHOULD BE
?Most surely it is the Word of an honored messenger?
Your 3 clear cut lies are highlighted in red and the correct translation are highlighted in blue
As I said AP, you are allowed 3 lies only per comment, and you consumed it all in a sentence that is 6 words, wow this means 50% of what you say is nothing but lies, this is no good bro, you will look very bad like this, I?m sure you lost creditability already, I tell you what bro, try to be honest and you may gain it back, did Santa come to you this Xmas?, I'm sure Santa does not visit liars, can you please confirm?
The rest of you comment MUST be ignored bro, too many lies by you and I hate dialoguing with liars
Peace be with you
Let?s look?
Ok AP, you have served your 115 hours compulsory waiting time that started on 14 Jan 2006 at 1300, Congratualtion but now you are an ex convict in my books, the charge as you know is being a serial liar, this was concluded to my court after you got caught red handed lying three times in about 6 English words sentence , you irrefutably achieved a new record in lying and after conviction and serving time, I guess you want to clear your name and prove you are not a liar, which is fair enough and a total right for ya to notion
So I guess your follow up comment was a notice of motion for me to consider your appeal, and reverse the conviction, but here is the catch mister AP, you will only be allowed one lie in your notice of motion, if caught red handed then your notice of motion will be rejected and the conviction will be upheld true and fair
Let?s start and waste no more time, I have many cases to look at
= ?inna?
?inna? definition
One of the particles which annul the quality of the inchoative it is a corroborative particle, corroborating the predicate; governing the subject in the accusative case and the predicate in the nominative case; and may generally be rendered by verily, or certainly, or the like; exactly agreeing with the Greek ?hoti?, as used in Luke 7.16 and in many other passages in the New Testament; though it often seems to be nothing more than a sign of inception, which can hardly be rendered at all in English; unless in pronunciation, by laying stress upon the predicate, or upon the copula. It must be used when it occurs inceptively, having nothing before it upon which is syntactically dependent, with respect to the wording or meaning.
References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume one, pp. 103 - 111
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, p. 35All the above is non sense and irrelevant to an Arabic speaker, here is the lesson I promised you
Inna is a common word in Arabic and has sisters, LOL, not kiddin here, it is so popular that even songs are made on Inna and its sister
Anyway what I want to say, it is a very well known subject in the Arabic Nahaw, Arabs know well that Inna must have two elements
- Ism Inna
- Khabar Inna
And because Inna appears in 8119, we must see these two elements unless there is an exceptional circumstances according to something called Balagha, but I won?t tell what it is.
I will consider the above comment by you an ingnorance and not a lie
= ?hu?
?hu? definition
An indeclinable affixed personal or possessive pronoun of third person singular masculine; when affixed to a verb or preposition as a person pronoun, it means him or it; and when to a noun as a possessive, his or it. Singular personal or possessive pronoun. Him. Verbal suffix which expresses the accusative.
References
A Grammar of the Arabic Language, W. Wright, Third edition, volume 1, p. 100
A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, p. 152Wrong again, Hu represents Ism Inna, and is called Ddamir Ghaib, i.e. it is a representation of what suppose to be Ism Inna, from Khabar Inna we can clearly know what the Hu representation is representing as Ism Inna
Khabar Inna is simply ?Laqawlu Rasulin Karim?, which means ?The sayings of an honoured prophet? and bevcaise what the honoured prophet said was the Quran, Hu is 100% representing the Quran, therefore, the verse is like this
?Inna Al Quran Laqawlu Easoolin Karim?, where Al Quran is Ism Inna and can be represented by the Ddamir Ghaib ?Hu?, therefore the sentence will be rendred as follow, ?Certainly It is the sayings of an honoured prophet?
= ?inna? + ?hu? = ?innahu? = certainly his
Now this is a lie, because means ?as I explained before? ?Certainly it is? , but you insist on manipulating it to ?certainly his, which is a your first clear cut lie that convicted you, you are not even showing remorse
Notice of Motion of appeal rejected
Conviction Upheld
Rest of your comment must be thrown in the rubbish bin
C U
-
think about that as you wait...
hahahaha