9/11 different perspective, a video
-
that is exactly what my husband said to me too, he doesn't really want to believe it, but at the same time he kind of does, because of too many evidence ^~
there is always possibility, there was conspiracy theory behind the killing of JFK and Robert Kennedy too.
i guess we just need to check and recheck, filtering any information we got from the media and government. there has been so many lies going on, but the truth will stand out, sooner or later. -
hey Riz,
thanks for the link, it seems that people on the page who oppose it are hardcore republicans D
but anyway, after watching the video, at least i got the realization that everything is possible, what we percieve as truth can be dead wrong, and vice versa.
i think, i just don't want to be part of any mass hysteria noway -
Peace be upon you all,
I wouldnt put anything pass the rulers of the world today. Its not like millions of people havent been killed before with bombs, slavery, crack cocaine and all other things by those running the show.
I am not saying the video is true or false, just that its not a crazy notion.
-
You should read this article if you want to see reasonable explanations to the questions brought up in the video.
http//www.popularmechanics.com/blog/science/2324651.html
Z Peace be to you.
Topo, after reading the article Riz directed you to, I recommend that your read the follwoing article in response..
http//911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/
Further, here is a link directing you to a published paper(Peer Reviewed) written by a physics professor that has some tough questions for the "official conspiracists".
http//www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
Then a link to "Scholars for 911 Truth"
http//www.st911.org/
And then a response to Riz's naive thinking in believing conspiracies are impossible to believe because of the amount of people involved ( an assumption based on Zero Evidence)..anyways..
http//www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
April 30, 2001In his new expos? of the National Security Agency entitled Body of Secrets, author James Bamford highlights a set of proposals on Cuba by the Joint Chiefs of Staff codenamed OPERATION NORTHWOODS. This document, titled ?Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba? was provided by the JCS to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962, as the key component of Northwoods. Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba. These proposals - part of a secret anti-Castro program known as Operation Mongoose - included staging the assassinations of Cubans living in the United States, developing a fake ?Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington,? including ?sink a boatload of Cuban refugees (real or simulated),? faking a Cuban airforce attack on a civilian jetliner, and concocting a ?Remember the Maine? incident by blowing up a U.S. ship in Cuban waters and then blaming the incident on Cuban sabotage. Bamford himself writes that Operation Northwoods ?may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government.?
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba , March 13, 1962, TOP SECRET, 15 pp.http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Content
In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations, Cuba Project (Col. Edward Lansdale), the document lists methods (with, in some cases, outline plans) the author believed would garner public and international support for US military intervention in Cuba. These are staged attacks purporting to be of Cuban origin, with a number of them having real casualties. Central to the plan was the use of "friendly Cubans" ? Cuban exiles seeking to oust Fidel Castro.The suggestions included
Starting rumors about Cuba by using clandestine radios.
Staging mock attacks, sabotages and riots at Guantanamo Bay and blaming it on Cuban forces.
Firebombing and sinking an American ship at the Guantanamo Bay American military base - reminiscent of the USS Maine incident at Havana in 1898, which started the Spanish-American War - or destroy American aircraft and blame it on Cuban forces. (The document's first suggestion regarding the sinking of a U.S. ship is to blow up a manned ship and hence would result in U.S. Navy members being killed, with a secondary suggestion of possibly using unmanned drones and fake funerals instead.)
"Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions."
Destroying an unmanned drone masquerading as a commercial aircraft supposedly full of "college students off on a holiday". This proposal was the one supported by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Staging a "terror campaign", including the "real or simulated" sinking of Cuban refugees
"We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized."
Burning crops by dropping incendiary devices in Haiti, Dominican Republic or elsewhere.
According to James Bamford in Body of SecretsOperation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.
-
hey zeljko67,
all these things are really freaking me out.
no wonder the government backed up by cia, fbi, and nsa want to wiretap their own citizens. so they can even grip their greedy, corrupt hands even firmer and got rid of people who are against them.
but anyway, i liked that popular mechanics website, only because it has sweepstakes, i signed up and am praying i would win, hehehe. it's nothing like powerball jackpot, of course lol -
zeljko67, don't think that I support the official story. I don't really know what happened, there are holes on both sides of the story.
All I have to say is that there is no point in worrying about this. If there is a big conspiracy going down, then there is nothing we can do to stop it. That might sound weak, but its true. If I am going to be killed in 'another' govt controlled terrorist attack, then o well, there is nothing I can do to prevent it and there is nothing any of us can do to prevent it unless you're some high up official maybe.
I don't have anything against people suggesting different causes for the collapse or that it was govt controlled and I'm not saying they are crazy. I suggested that other article just to show what the other side says.
-
it's just so sad that the government would kill their own people to serve their 'broader' causes.
it seems that more and more people are aware of this conspiracy. when i watched c-span yesterday, there was one phone call that mentioned about this. i don't know how if the government did all that for good reasons or not (just like what they said about spreading freedom and democracy) but a lie is a lie, and there is no excuse for that.