Suggestion for Layth and Mods : Moderated Debates
-
And by the way, Mr. mquran, since you are promulgating the debate issue, I'll bet that the first ones to deviate and debar prospective and deligent discussions will be you and Ahmed along with a few encroachments that barge in from time to time.
-
LOL
You're a classic Danish, and sure lucky that I like you
-
Not true. Idolfree has shown clear biased with members who do not agree with his own views. Search and find out the truth. Savage Carrot would be fair and unbiased Moderator.
But you may be biased in suggesting SC D
So we can take this route to ad infinitum -)
-
If both agree on SC, sure why not. Same goes for idolfree1, TheNabi and Wakas... I think their views are balanced and fair, but as LT said, I might be biased in saying that also. I just thought of idolfree in this particular case because, I know mq doesn't mind, and if I'm not mistaken, enquirer was just complementing him as well.
......Ask idol-free for ideas on 'behaviour modifications' and peaceful behaviour........That brother knows what hes talking about... bravo
Peace.
-
Peace,
While Jaxal was a "playful puppy", in contrast, Dhulqarnain (aka Priest_Bokmei) always displayed a keen interest in Quranic injunctions with diligence and contemplation, UNLESS PROVOKED. Though my views on Quran has recently changed, I would love to have my good 'ol friend back, perhaps he can better discuss the issues penned by me, rather than mquran and Ahmed having thoughtless, disturbing and defamed views.
Dhulqarnain's apologetic response and willinging to come back was crystal clear
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=4993.0http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=4520.0
-
Peace all,
By the way, my all-out vote for moderating goes to "enquirer", a fine resilient and methodical candidate.
-
Peace Danish,,
Peace,
While Jaxal was a "playful puppy", in contrast, Dhulqarnain (aka Priest_Bokmei) always displayed a keen interest in Quranic injunctions with diligence and contemplation, UNLESS PROVOKED. Though my views on Quran has recently changed, I would love to have my good 'ol friend back, perhaps he can better discuss the issues penned by me, rather than mquran and Ahmed having thoughtless, disturbing and defamed views.
Dhulqarnain's apologetic response and willinging to come back was crystal clear
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=4993.0http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=4520.0
Are you sure you wanted to post this post under this thread? I thought that your post belongs more to the other one
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=5762.0I was looking forward to your comment regarding the banning. But have you not thought that maybe DQ has changed his views too!? In any case, I would like to know where he has arrived in his understanding.
-
Are you sure you wanted to post this post under this thread? I thought that your post belongs more to the other one
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=5762.0Certainly TAJ, you are right. My bad, I should have posted on the 'banning' thread. Perhaps the moderators can swing it there.
I was looking forward to your comment regarding the banning. But have you not thought that maybe DQ has changed his views too!? In any case, I would like to know where he has arrived in his understanding.
I honestly do not have the faintest idea of what DQ's current views are, since his last post on this forum. I do not know him personally and neither spoken to him, except for a few pm's back then.
-
Not true. Idolfree has shown clear biased with members who do not agree with his own views. Search and find out the truth. Savage Carrot would be fair and unbiased Moderator.
Exactly bro
and I'm one of those members
cheers
-
Not true. Idolfree has shown clear biased with members who do not agree with his own views. Search and find out the truth. Savage Carrot would be fair and unbiased Moderator.
Exactly bro
and I'm one of those members
cheers
He challenged me many times by coming after me because he did not like what I said. I avioded that because did not want any debate with no logic and sense. I am on for the debate. Thanks to you and the brother I will miss on this forum TG.
-
Elenathanks to mquran for your answer about the justifications.
and
those expressions related to the last episode of the digestion + the ' you no integrity and decency.. etc ' stuff is what the mods had to delete and send some lines to the user reminding the rules of etiquette needed online and offline.Either one respects those in power or one leaves. This is the ethos of al-quraan.
-
EnquirerPeace all. By the way,i dont really want anyone banned....Just a bit more civil behaviour would be nice.....Especially from guys advocating 'quranic' justice......Ask idol-free for ideas on 'behaviour modifications' and peaceful behaviour........That brother knows what hes talking about..
Funnily, according to this individual it IS civil behaviour to disparage the religion of others and refuse a direct debate. What a funny world we live in.
-
Danish And by the way, Mr. mquran, since you are promulgating the debate issue, I'll bet that the first ones to deviate and debar prospective and deligent discussions will be you and Ahmed along with a few encroachments that barge in from time to time.
The challenge is issued. Read it.