Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. 5:33

5:33

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
15 Posts 7 Posters 76 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    one word

    humiliation

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Offline
      P Offline
      phoenix1
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      but why cut off the limbs at all?

      peace.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W Offline
        W Offline
        warner
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Maybe for punishment I guess. Do you reckon it is some kind of sport ?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Offline
          P Offline
          phoenix1
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          The just punishment for people who make war on Allah and His Messenger and commit bloody crimes on earth, is being dispensed by the Divine Law of Requital. They are being slain, crucified, immobilized in great numbers, or are being entirely banished from the face of the earth. Such is their disgrace in this world, and an awful suffering awaits them in the Hereafter. (The use of present tense in this verse indicates that it is not a decree of Law. In (7124) the use of 'qat'a' pertains to a threat in the future tense, and then it emanates from Pharaoh, tyranny personified. Only the Divine System of life can ensure peace and security in the world (227), (2257), (3147), (4125), (2689)).

          that is QXP's translation. No mention of cutting arms and legs.
          The free-minds translation
          The recompense of those who fight God and His messenger, and seek to make corruption in the land, is that they will be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off on alternate sides or that they be banished from the land; that is a disgrace for them in this world and in the Hereafter they will have a great retribution.

          which one is correct?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            arnoldyasin
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Peace,

            I would like to quote Ahmed Ali, a great Quranic scholar and translator

            "Qata means to cut, but when used with different nouns it means different things idiomatically, for which see Raghib and Taj al-'urus, such as to stop someone from speaking when used with lisan, tongue, or cut off the road when used with sabil, or become hopeless when used with rajul, man, etc. In 1231 for instance, qatta 'na aidihunna means they wounded their hands or stopped peeling fruit, not cut off their hands. Hence here, in verse 38, it could also mean to stop their hands from stealing by adopting deterrent means, for the next verse in verse 39, speaks of repentance and forgiveness with overtones of rehabilitation, which would be lost if the hands were cut off completely or amputated. Similarly in verse 533 tuqatta'a could mean restrain them by putting fetters on one hand and on one leg."

            Which explains QXP's choice of words, which i would choose to...

            Which would give

            33 But (the) reward (of) those who embattle/fight God and His messenger, and they strive/endeavor in the earth/Planet Earth corruption/disorder , that they be killed or they be crucified , or their hands and their feet be chained/bound from opposites, or they be expelled/exiled from the land, that (is) for them shame/scandal/disgrace in the present world, and for them in the end (other life is) a great torture.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Offline
              P Offline
              phoenix1
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              thank you arnold.
              peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                nadeem
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Peace,

                Apologies for reviving an old thread, but it seems most appropriate.

                33 But (the) reward (of) those who embattle/fight God and His messenger, and they strive/endeavor in the earth/Planet Earth corruption/disorder , that they be killed or they be crucified , or their hands and their feet be chained/bound from opposites, or they be expelled/exiled from the land, that (is) for them shame/scandal/disgrace in the present world, and for them in the end (other life is) a great torture.

                For how long should they be in shackles?

                Nadeem

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  arnoldyasin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Peace Nadeem,

                  When we can see the person has stopped rebellion he can be put under an observation programme and his freedom be given back in limited form. The Islamic State must decide that, using the advice of psychologists and so on. But we must follow these guidelines

                  Hence, fight against them until there is no more oppression and all matters of faith would be let absolutely to God , and when they desist, all hostility should cease, and no use of force is allowed except against those who commit transgression? (2193),

                  ?And if you need good reason to fear treachery from people, act against them openly and fairly? (85,

                  ?And if they incline to peace, incline you to it as well, and place your trust in God And should they seek but to deceive you , God is enough for you? (861-62)

                  ?It may well be that God will bring about affection between you and those from among them whom you face as enemies, and God is all-powerful and God is much-forgiving, mercy-giving. As for such as do not fight against you on account of faith, and do not drive your forth from your homes, God does not forbid you from being kind to them and from behaving towards them with full equity, and God loves those who act equitably? (60.

                  ?A requital for an offence should be the same as it without any excessiveness, and whoever pardons and makes peace, his reward rests with God Yet, as for any who only defend themselves after having been wronged, no blame whatever attaches to them; blame attaches but to those who oppress people and behave outrageously on earth, offending against all right But withal, if one is patient and forgives ? this is the best that requires a strong will?(4239-43)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Raj-ah
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Please read the following discussion

                    what about 533? Rajah Vs Julio
                    http//www.infidelguy.com/forumarchives/modules.php?name=Boards&file=viewtopic&t=20062

                    This guy Julio has very intresting point of view regarding 533 and all of the Quran and Islam.

                    Dear Arnold I want some of your comments on his comments.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      nadeem
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Peace Bro Arnold,

                      Thanks!

                      Do you have any comments regarding this
                      http//www.astudyofquran.org/web/index.php?id=92,0,0,1,0,0

                      Nadeem

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        arnoldyasin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Peace Nadeem,

                        As always, Muhammed Asad's insight is amazing. I hadn't read his commentary on this verse yet. Thank for sharing.

                        Rajah, I haven't read the whole thread, but till now I haven't seen any real discussion, only biased throwing of dirt. I will read later further on.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          nadeem
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Peace Arnold,

                          As always, Muhammed Asad's insight is amazing. I hadn't read his commentary on this verse yet. Thank for sharing.

                          Yes, I agree. But his insights are slightly contradictory to the translation you gave. According to him, the verse isn't decreeing law. What do you think?

                          Nadeem

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • W Offline
                            W Offline
                            wildguest1956
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Already discussed here
                            http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=13931.15

                            Peace

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Users