Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Typology of quran only people

Typology of quran only people

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
22 Posts 7 Posters 91 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mquran
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    JonnyKJK- Oh then im sorry. I just saw a post today where i believe it was "mquran" addressed ur post with "lote tree". Thats how i thought you were.

    Well, Lote-Tree may be good at disguising his ip, but his crappiness comes forth all too easily. Lote-Tree is exactly the same as enquirer. Both loves the superficial 'sophistication' of modernist arguments. Both can't read beyond the first sentence and NEVER give a detailed answer and both are regularly surprised when given 'new' facts about AQ even after years of study. Enquirer studied TWENTY-FIVE years and LT for 2, yet neither one of them knew that AQ never accepted brigandage.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Navid
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Peace

      Didnt you say the quran says the earth is 'egg shaped' rather than round? From space satellites it looks pretty round to me...

      It's funny that you embarass yourself saying that, and still have the audacity to "challenge" JK. Now, it is clear why you dislike people "quoting scientists" so much.

      the fact that if god/quran/code 19 etc were so 'objective' and conclusive as you suggest,then everyone would believe in these things as much as they believe that gravity operates on planet earth...

      He said it's objective and conclusive? The fact is that within these things lies scientific and mathematical evidence. Depending on one's opinions, they will either choose to believe in it or they will choose to not believe in it. This is how it is.

      Peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Users