Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Fat forbidden for the jews,was it realy?

Fat forbidden for the jews,was it realy?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
49 Posts 3 Posters 931 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Peace Simple

    Who eats sh*t? I think it's self-explanatory not to eat it...

    True but lots of things can be mentioned not good for us.

    But to me all the ayah is saying is don't try and get other people's things of value by heinous means but have integrity/ honour be fare.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Offline
      E Offline
      Elke
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Peace simple,

      you're retranslations generally make a lot of sense to me, and i don't mean linguistically as unfortunately i'm not able to verify in the arabic langage.
      Keep up the good work.

      lk

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Bro simple

        your translation is totally misleading regarding 7146

        bro the Quran is not about finding new conspets for the verses and I can see that is what you only do really

        take care

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Thanks elke,

          Peace ahmed,

          Bro simple

          your translation is totally misleading regarding 7146

          bro the Quran is not about finding new conspets for the verses and I can see that is what you only do really

          take care

          We can't win everybody - but it wasn't 7164 but 6146 and you mean concepts.

          Unfortunately I don't/ can't accept some of them so I use lanes to see an alternative meaning that is all.

          And how beautiful they come out - to me anyways.

          Your concepts make Monkeys and pigs out of men???????????? or is that wrong Br?

          God Bless.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Peace ahmed,

            Bro simple

            your translation is totally misleading regarding 7146

            bro the Quran is not about finding new conspets for the verses and I can see that is what you only do really

            take care

            We can't win everybody - but it wasn't 7164 but 6146 and you mean concepts.

            Peace bro.

            do you mean my mistake was 7146 and not 7164?, lol

            anyway, me and you know what verse we are talking about, sorry for my mistake but you too did a mistake and thought that I mmeant 7164

            Unfortunately I don't/ can't accept some of them so I use lanes to see an alternative meaning that is all.

            ok, and who is lanes exactly?

            And how beautiful they come out - to me anyways.

            Yeh yeh, it is called the feel good religion, I know exactly what you mean

            Your concepts make Monkeys and pigs out of men???????????? or is that wrong Br?

            God Bless.

            look I don't like vague comments regarding the Quran, bring the verses and discuss it with me and we will see, however if a verse is sort of a metaphor that does not mean the well established meaning verses fall under your efforts to find new meanings for it, in effect you are writing off what the prophet taught us and hence you are not following him, you are following lanes

            cheers

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Salaams Br ahmed,

              560
              Say ?Shall I inform you of worse than this as a punishment from God? Those whom God cursed and became angry at them, and He made from them apes and pigs and servants of evil. Those have a worst place and are more astray from the right path.?

              What is this , a metaphor - if so show me where it says its a metaphor - and don't say of things what Allah doesn't say of them.

              ;D

              Salaams.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Peace Simple

                I apologize if this sounds harsh, but you really can't just pick an aya that doesn't make sense to you, and instead of trying to understand it, make up things. This is really not how deen works at all. If there are issues you have with quran I would suggest you try to research thru the real meaning, because there is a big danger in attributing falsehood to God's Word.

                It's great that you take nothing for granted and use ijtihad to try to break ayaat down and get to the nitty-gritty. But when you do that, please keep in mind that you can't twist the aya to your liking.

                I'm not going to break down the entire aya for you because I'm sure you've gone over it enough times to know that the aya specifically states WA MIN AL BAQAR WA AL GHANAM.... and from the cows and sheep... HARRAMNA AALAYHOM SHOHOOMAHOMA ... we forbade for them their fat.... ELLA MA HAMALAT THOHOOROHOMA AW AL HAWAYA ... except what's stuck to the back or entrails... AW MA AKHTALAT BE AATHM THALIK... or what was mixed with the bones .

                This is a very detailed description of the body parts of an animal with the exact kind of animal this pertains to as well. There can be no "alternative" meaning, I'm sorry.

                These were dietary laws for the Jews in order to test them. Much like their test with the she-camel. Much like their test with the cow. It is to discern the faithful from the hypocrites. Today, for Muslims God ordains to eat from all the good foods He Blessed us with. Except the meat of a dead animal, blood, and swine. Thank God, it is a simple test for us and also beneficial to our bodies to stay away from such things. You ask why God did not add, don't eat sh_t. It's just self-explanatory. It's not appetizing but perhaps bacon is. So we'd need a heads up on that one. As far as I know, there is nothing wrong with eating a monkey. Not something I would do D but I never heard of anything harmful coming from it... i may be wrong dunno. Even if there are a million things wrong with it. God gave us the key already. He gave us the pattern to follow. It's up to us to use our brains now. If there is something else that turns out to be bad for you, don't eat it. You don't need every detail mentioned in order to follow God's Way. Please refer to the story of the cow starting with 267 to get my drift of how we should not act when approaching these matters.

                Peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Peace Simple

                  I apologize if this sounds harsh, but you really can't just pick an aya that doesn't make sense to you, and instead of trying to understand it, make up things. This is really not how deen works at all. If there are issues you have with quran I would suggest you try to research thru the real meaning, because there is a big danger in attributing falsehood to God's Word.

                  It's great that you take nothing for granted and use ijtihad to try to break ayaat down and get to the nitty-gritty. But when you do that, please keep in mind that you can't twist the aya to your liking.

                  I'm not going to break down the entire aya for you because I'm sure you've gone over it enough times to know that the aya specifically states WA MIN AL BAQAR WA AL GHANAM.... and from the cows and sheep... HARRAMNA AALAYHOM SHOHOOMAHOMA ... we forbade for them their fat.... ELLA MA HAMALAT THOHOOROHOMA AW AL HAWAYA ... except what's stuck to the back or entrails... AW MA AKHTALAT BE AATHM THALIK... or what was mixed with the bones .

                  This is a very detailed description of the body parts of an animal with the exact kind of animal this pertains to as well. There can be no "alternative" meaning, I'm sorry.

                  These were dietary laws for the Jews in order to test them. Much like their test with the she-camel. Much like their test with the cow. It is to discern the faithful from the hypocrites. Today, for Muslims God ordains to eat from all the good foods He Blessed us with. Except the meat of a dead animal, blood, and swine. Thank God, it is a simple test for us and also beneficial to our bodies to stay away from such things. You ask why God did not add, don't eat sh_t. It's just self-explanatory. It's not appetizing but perhaps bacon is. So we'd need a heads up on that one. As far as I know, there is nothing wrong with eating a monkey. Not something I would do but I never heard of anything harmful coming from it... i may be wrong dunno. Even if there are a million things wrong with it. God gave us the key already. He gave us the pattern to follow. It's up to us to use our brains now. If there is something else that turns out to be bad for you, don't eat it. You don't need every detail mentioned in order to follow God's Way. Please refer to the story of the cow starting with 267 to get my drift of how we should not act when approaching these matters.

                  Peace

                  Sorry souls,

                  but you need to start using your brain rather then simply follow what your given.

                  WE SHOULDN'T TRY AND UPHOLD EVERYTHING WE BELIEVE SIMPLY
                  BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN BELIEVING IT - THAT IS WHAT ALL OTHERS DO.

                  We weigh and consider as Allah wants us to.

                  Do men change to swine or apes - "NO"

                  When two people fight you make fighting illegal , and you don't say because you are fighting you can't get married or you can't eat fat...............

                  that is all but if you want to keep to your belief, then to you your way and to me my way.

                  and i don't make up things but simply investigate the meanings of words from Arabic lexicon/ dictionary which is for people to use.And would never Accept/ follow what someone says without weighing and considering for myself.

                  Gods Blessings.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Peace Simple

                    Please explain to me the alternative meaning for BAQAR and GHANAM if you are truthful.

                    Thanks

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Easy peoples. I must say that simples' method of translation is one of the better methods on the forum...(relatively speaking.) Taking the quran literally results in many contradictions and problems...The chopping of hands,whippings and sticks turning into snakes are just a few examples of what happens with literalism...Sticking to literalism is a very perilous and harmful position... see 1736...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Peace Simple

                        Please explain to me the alternative meaning for BAQAR and GHANAM if you are truthful.

                        Thanks

                        Salaams souls,

                        From lanes lex

                        Ghanima = earning or a gain obtained without trouble/ spoils of war.

                        Baqarun = Cow/ Slit/ ripped/ slit/ cut/ devide.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Peace Enquirer

                          This issue is that he's using other "meanings" for the words in the aya. So he's not taking it at all metaphorically but rather using new definitions... which ideally is fine if something doesn't make sense the way it is traditionally seen. i have no problem with searching for parrallel analogies in verses either. But this aya is literally talking about body parts of cows and sheep and what parts were permissible to eat and what parts weren't. To say that alternative definitions would equal no fighting, is something incomprehensible given the arabic words in the specific aya. I really have no problem with the idea that we should "be fair and not take things of others". It's just that this aya has nothing to do with that in the slightest- even if we look at some kind of alternaitve definition. This is why I'm asking simple to show us the evidence. How does baqar and ghanam refer to the concept he came up with?

                          There's no attack here at all, I just need some evidence so we can logically reach a rational conclusion.

                          Peace All

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Peace Simple

                            Sorry I posted I think while you were psting too...so I didn't know you already answered D

                            Thanks for the speedy reply.

                            Unfortunately, you cannot use any verb forms of these root words because in the aya, it is in the noun form. Please notice the alif lam before baqar and ghanam. In the aya it is AL-BAQAR and AL-GHANAM, making it a definite noun... so it's the cow and the sheep.

                            I hope this clears things up

                            Peace All

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Peace soul. I understand your position,i just feel that one can explain things by metaphor,dictionaries or even by cross-referencing to real life experiences...I understand your need for evidence,thats natural...However in my experience we sometimes get defensive when we feel certain 'comfortable' understandings we have are 'threatened' by new or radical alternatives...When i first heard of people reading the quran without hadith i was unconvinced,then later when folks interpreted quran without 'literalism i was again unconvinced,now im at the stage where i dont even feel we need a book or god to be decent people.....
                              Being a free-mind can be achieved when we let go of pre-conceptions,which are based on a need to be 'comfortable',and the need to have 'infallible' knowledge...
                              I feel 'reality' is half objective and half subjective....'Life is what you make it,but not completely'...
                              ps; sorry for the metaphysical stuff at the end...
                              pps; i feel the excessive use/reliance upon grammer,linguistics and verbal forms can distort the message of many books...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                Sorry Br,

                                with repsects

                                can't convince me as i believe the language has modified , developed after the quran and if anyone says men used to change into monkeys well i wouldn't couldn't accept it thanks though,men to monkeys ...............

                                Salaams.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  Peace Enquirer

                                  I definitely agree with you that there are growing pains in letting go of blind dogma and embracing a new concept as the logical conclusion. I also agree with you that you can be a wonderful person and not believe in God or any book. Whether, you live a fullfilled life and go on to eternal bliss is another debate altogether.

                                  I think you're right that trying to gain infallible knowledge on something is impossible. We as humans are limited in our capacity to understand everything all at once. It's a journey that never ends.

                                  However, I need to tell you that I'm not trying to gain infallible knowledge or excessively rely on linguistics. I think it's crucial however to understand the words on a page if we are to discuss it at all. If it's not necessary to understand linguistics or grammar at any level, it would be very difficult to read any book or article or even a post.

                                  Peace Simple

                                  If you believe the quran was modified to make the verb into a noun, then peace be with you brother. I don't understand what you keep mentioning about men and monkeys honestly... I didn't see anything about monkeys in this verse either -\ but that's ok

                                  Peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    unknownuser
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    Easy soul. I do respect your manner of discussion and your open-ness...I also do agree with your point that some rudimentary knowledge of lingusitics is needed...
                                    What place would you give metaphor in the quran,and what are the implications for grammer rules when one takes verses metaphorically? Thanks in advance...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      Peace be upon you all,

                                      I also approach the verse about Jews being forbidden fat as metaphor also, but I dont understand it yet.

                                      The God does not expect us to blindly believe some commandment, PROOF is required for all that we do. Why would the God command only a section of mankind to not eat the fat of an animal? What about the NON jews of that time period? Was the God condoning sectarinism?

                                      I dont agree that "jews" are even being spoken of, I just am not sure of what its all about just yet.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        Peace Enquirer

                                        I believe parrallel analogies found in the quran is the miracle that makes quran so unique and could only be from Divine source.

                                        I personally noticed this specifically with stories narrated in the quran. This is just from my own limited knowledge. Perhaps it could be found everywhere. However in regards to the stories, I believe they are literal but also have a parallel spiritual message that could only be understood if we take the meanings of the words metaphorically. It's like two meanings in one. More bang for your buck if you will D

                                        In order to reach metaphorical conclusions, I think looking at root words for root meanings is beneficial. Again, I'm against this notion that the quran is a puzzle and we have to figure it out because it says something and means something else. But I do believe that the quran demands of us active thinking and active participation in reading it. We can't just passively read and the message just pops in our heads and we're done. So to a certain extent, understanding grammar and linguistics is mandatory. But we don't need to split hairs or make each verse into an unsolved mystery.
                                        That's just my opinion

                                        Peace

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          Peace Enquirer

                                          I definitely agree with you that there are growing pains in letting go of blind dogma and embracing a new concept as the logical conclusion. I also agree with you that you can be a wonderful person and not believe in God or any book. Whether, you live a fullfilled life and go on to eternal bliss is another debate altogether.

                                          I think you're right that trying to gain infallible knowledge on something is impossible. We as humans are limited in our capacity to understand everything all at once. It's a journey that never ends.

                                          However, I need to tell you that I'm not trying to gain infallible knowledge or excessively rely on linguistics. I think it's crucial however to understand the words on a page if we are to discuss it at all. If it's not necessary to understand linguistics or grammar at any level, it would be very difficult to read any book or article or even a post.

                                          Peace Simple

                                          If you believe the quran was modified to make the verb into a noun, then peace be with you brother. I don't understand what you keep mentioning about men and monkeys honestly... I didn't see anything about monkeys in this verse either -\ but that's ok

                                          Peace

                                          well if there arn't monkeys in that ayah they are all over other ayah's , like 002.065 005.060 007.166
                                          and who can say what other things there are

                                          men to pigs,
                                          oceans splitting,
                                          sticks to snakes
                                          moon splitting.
                                          ................................you probably know the rest.

                                          And Its all mistranslation.

                                          Peace

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users