Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Science / History / Prophecy
  3. Science
  4. A new technology scans the brain to read people's minds

A new technology scans the brain to read people's minds

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Science
4 Posts 2 Posters 41 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    A new technology that scans the brain to read people's minds, giving details of what actions a person is thinking about, makes some critics wonder if neuroscience has gone too far

    http//www.newstarget.com/021597.html

    You can also read other Truthtelling articles about how the society controls the citizens, fools us, and other stuff in this link

    http//www.newstarget.com/index-life.html

    Your friend David

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      nadeem
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Peace Bro,

      How reliable is this information?

      Notice that not a single scientist was mention, nor a university and neither what journal the study was published in.

      The only name given, Mike Adams, with the title "consumer technologist", does not appear anywhere else on the Internet save for www.newstarget.com

      Be skeptical.

      Nadeem

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        They plagiarized it from http//www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/feb/09/neuroscience.ethicsofscience, that's why. I can't stand these two-bit "news" sites.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Sorry, not plagiarized. Bad wording. It's just this article that had very little information.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Users