What can be considered shirk?
-
Someone can once again tell me what those numbers represent (the upper half) and where they came from, and I can simply say he was done bringing his message (the true one) by 1990 having fought Satan, instead of saying filth left the Earth at 1990. What was his message? Was it his translation of the Quran? No. It's the original Quran in Arabic that is the true Quran, after all. His message was 1. Worship God alone, 2. Believe in the Quran alone, 3. Nothing else. And if you call that a coincidence, it then means nothing, because it's just a "coincidence". It's funny how RK haters try to use his code against him, yet their findings with it will never amount to the things RK came up with. Truly something laugh
I originally came here to say that WHAT TF is up with all these attacks, criticisms and hostility between sects? Not much of sects actually it's more like 90% sunnis verses 9% shias and 1% Quran-only muslims.
I effin hate this bs! Why would someone go to hell if they literally tried to follow the path they thought was the right one and never had evil in their heart?? They still worship ONE God, even if their ways of life are different and they disagree about what is haram and what is halal. So what if someone doesn't accept hadith? What if someone was told a hadith wasn't authentic and thus he didn't believe in it, yet it was something the prophet ACTUALLY SAID back then? They will tell you well, he was told it wasn't authentic, so it's not his fault.
Ok, so when I'm reading many articles talking about
-
How the hadith is unreliable
-
Plagiarized from the bible
-
Go against the Quran that describes itself as fully detailed
-
Puts women on the level of dogs and asses despite the Quran honoring them
-
Etc.
I'm nonetheless guilty? Notice the double-standard. It is the exact same if you think about it. A person doesn't believe a hadith because scholars agreed amongst themselves that it wasn't sahih. You will here from some saying however if the majority agree that a hadith is right, than it is right! That's stupid because consider for instance if the majority population of human beings were nonbelievers. Will we have to accept the most popular belief? Which is there's no god? No.
God doesn't trick, the devil tricks. The devil is the one that makes you follow vain desires and lusts like killing innocents (just because they're not muslims) and raping women (again, just because they're not muslims, or because they're your wives or slaves). HOW DOES SOMEONE DO THIS WITH AN EVIL-FREE, PIOUS HEART? It is impossible. This is what is meant by the devil tricks. God will not be tricking you if you thought saying "Muhammad is God's messenger" in the shahada is an obligation, because there's no evil in your heart when you do this, and God knows you are not associating partners with him! Similarly, he will not be tricking you if you thought letting your beard grow is an obligation. In fact, he doesn't ever trick, it's the Shaitan who tricks, and when the Shaitan tricks, he plants arrogance/evil inside of you. This is the most logical explanation it seems, at least to me.
-
-
Shirk in the Koran is the belief in more than one God.
There is more to it than that. It is also shirk if you call on other people in your prayers/mention their names. Eg. when you call on Muhammad in your prayers you are commiting shirk, when you recite the at-tahiyatu and sunni shahada you are commiting shirk (and also, by reciting the sunni shahada you are favoring Muhammad over other messengers).
When you prohibit other things than God has, such as dietary restrictions it is shirk, etc.
Peace