Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Politics / Economics
  3. Islamic Constitution
  4. Just some ideas regarding religion in an Islamic State based on the Qur'an Alone

Just some ideas regarding religion in an Islamic State based on the Qur'an Alone

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Islamic Constitution
14 Posts 10 Posters 266 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Asfandyar
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    This one of my first posts so sorry if I am doing something wrong lol!!! &

    All children between the ages of 7 and 11 (unless their parents' object) must have lessons on the Qur'an (Alone) and its interpretation so that the progressive, ijtihadi spirit of Islam can be revived. Also, discussions must take place on topics ranging from Code 19 to the messengership to the nature of God and even to whether the Qur'an really is divinely created (and, on that line, whether there even is a God). If a pupil wishes he can take the subject further onto secondary school, sixth form, etc. However, no religious courts or clergy may exist. Instead, if any person extensively learned in the Qur'an whishes to hold any form of power he must win it like any other person running for a position in the National Council and there will be NO special offices for religious leaders, scholars, etc. This would allow the most popular interpretations to suceed entirely democratically and no clergy will be able to establish itself. However, no interpretations of Qur'anic law which would infringe upon the rights of anybody else to practice their interpretation must be allowed to succeed (the Supreme Court must vote on every religiously based law passed in the National Court and can overturn it with a 5/6ths majority). All laws, religious or non-religious, must be passed as if they were secular laws (minimal to no mention of God, Scripture, etc) so that they must not be implemented "because God says so" but for the benefit of the citizens.

    Please feel free to discuss your opinions on this.

    Peace

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      arnoldyasin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I have similair ideas presented in my Qur'anic Cosmology

      http//deenrc.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/quranic-cosmology-a-short-introduction-by-ay-mol-e-2.pdf

      This essay is a short scientific introduction into the wide topic of the Quranic cosmology. Using a scientific approach, the cosmology is laid out in 27 short steps. What is attempted to do is to present the worldview of the Quran and tried to connect it together with present scientific and philosophical opinions. Arabic words will be explained which show the rational approach the Quran has on the universe. The presentation will begin with the creation of the blueprint of the universe, its formation of its laws, the creation of the universe, the planets, life, humans, and then it will move on the formation of societies, why societies are in conflict, how we can solve these issues, what is our goal in the universe, how can we create a world society, how we can develop as species, the formation of the new universe and how mankind is placed within the new creation based on its deeds.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        Asfandyar
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        BTW I meant to write that the classes should be for children aged 11-16 not 7-11. Sorry for my mistake

        P.S. I propose a popularly elected Supreme Court, not the appointed system like they have in the US.

        Peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          Alen
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Peace,
          Respectfully.

          God AllPOwerful, The Mostb Wise, has given us brains.
          He has taught us how to use it.
          We should then presen the Quran, Torah, Bible, hadeeth to the people in such a state, in an Islamic state, Islamic Country, Quranic country, and then ask them which book makes sense.

          God guides whom He wants.
          Child is not yet been brainwashed, right, so he will choose on his own.
          In school we accept what they tell us because we haven't seen enough movie, haven't read enough material, haven't spoken to many people, just those teachers at that school, right?

          So, when they tell us that frogs lay eggs at the nearest tree, we believe it. Untill we go to the forest and discover something else frogs lay eggs in water not at the trees. The research goes on and we start using our brains.

          Glory be to God.
          If a man knows how to build a bomb and make pasta, as a child he also knows how to lie to mommy and daddy about the broken vase. The older sister did it when she was dancing. The dog did it when i chased him. Bird flew into it. Cage was open.....

          Glory be to God.
          Peace.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            Student_of_Allah
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            What if I am a resident and decide not to follow any religion at all ? Will the legal system be based on what muslims are commanded by Allah to do ?

            Peace

            ----------- Student of Allah

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              Bigmo
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              What if I am a resident and decide not to follow any religion at all ? Will the legal system be based on what muslims are commanded by Allah to do ?

              Peace

              ----------- Student of Allah

              Good point. I have noticed that many Koranist are bogged down in legalism and ritualism. Two things the Koran did not come to dictate to us but only guide us. This usually is a tell tale sign of a Jewish or Musoim background as these two religions are heavy on legalism and ritualism.

              The law of justice in the Koran of course is an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth and a nose for a nose(equal retribution) but never more. Also no bearer of burden should bear the burden of another. This is the law of justice in the Koran. So retribution should be equal to the burden imposed and by the person responsible. This is of course rejected by Judaosm which believe a Jewish eye is worth a thousand gentile eyes and the Muslims who believe an eye for an eye lash and a tooth for a jaw.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                peace SofA,

                I recommend chapter 9. It basically shows that non-believers can practice their own faith (or no faith in your hypothetical) as long as they live by the laws of the land.

                I also recommend http//www.amazon.com/Muhammad-Believers-At-Origins-Islam/dp/0674050975

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Offline
                  D Offline
                  DoubleU
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  This one of my first posts so sorry if I am doing something wrong lol!!! &

                  All children between the ages of 7 and 11 (unless their parents' object) must have lessons on the Qur'an (Alone) and its interpretation so that the progressive, ijtihadi spirit of Islam can be revived. Also, discussions must take place on topics ranging from Code 19 to the messengership to the nature of God and even to whether the Qur'an really is divinely created (and, on that line, whether there even is a God). If a pupil wishes he can take the subject further onto secondary school, sixth form, etc. However, no religious courts or clergy may exist. Instead, if any person extensively learned in the Qur'an whishes to hold any form of power he must win it like any other person running for a position in the National Council and there will be NO special offices for religious leaders, scholars, etc. This would allow the most popular interpretations to suceed entirely democratically and no clergy will be able to establish itself. However, no interpretations of Qur'anic law which would infringe upon the rights of anybody else to practice their interpretation must be allowed to succeed (the Supreme Court must vote on every religiously based law passed in the National Court and can overturn it with a 5/6ths majority). All laws, religious or non-religious, must be passed as if they were secular laws (minimal to no mention of God, Scripture, etc) so that they must not be implemented "because God says so" but for the benefit of the citizens.

                  Please feel free to discuss your opinions on this.

                  Peace

                  Why advocate a state at all? A state permits the use of violence and coercion to achieve its aims.
                  It makes no difference whether the state is secular, or ran by a religious institution. Socialism is slavery. Slavery is socialism. And socialism is the state. Any form of a state is a contradiction to freedom and liberty.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Offline
                    K Offline
                    Kaiokenred
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Why advocate a state at all? A state permits the use of violence and coercion to achieve its aims.
                    It makes no difference whether the state is secular, or ran by a religious institution. Socialism is slavery. Slavery is socialism. And socialism is the state. Any form of a state is a contradiction to freedom and liberty.

                    Agree. The only acceptable law is the Natural Law, following the rules Allah mentioned in the Quran, the world would be perfect.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      JLM
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I think I like this society. Frankly modern hadither societies suck and partially because they don't allow any dissenting thought to take place. Humans were given brains for an important reason and giving clergy too much power does take away from that.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Offline
                        K Offline
                        Kaiokenred
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        I think I like this society. Frankly modern hadither societies suck and partially because they don't allow any dissenting thought to take place. Humans were given brains for an important reason and giving clergy too much power does take away from that.

                        Clergy shouldn't exist in the first place. Nor any kind of authority that's not Allah or a special man Allah choose.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          NOMAD
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Salaam to all sun

                          Wise words,Kaiokenred bravo if each one of us know his/her place in society and start to balance , we dont need 1 guy ruling 1 country, we may have congregations to improve each area/field of work, knowledge etc, but no need KINg, president, prime minister, dictator from right lef or middle center, if people real know what they are doing here they will work for comunity and for thems with pleasure and trust, with tolerance and self discipline and self struggle, not by impositions of a piramidal MAfia supremacy that conects most of countries today..
                          AMERICAN DEMOCRACY? no thank you
                          Sharia HAditers? no thank you
                          European paganism and greco style republik? no thank you
                          Living by AQ? yes WE CAN and yes i Want

                          Allah divide us into different languages but LAnd frontiers are man made. The creation of inimity and untolerance comes genarally to what is unknown to us, when you dont know something you tend to look strange to it, so as time runs, is up to us to get knowledge and make knowledge flow from 4 corners, each one of us is important tool to spread info to next generations , and in my opinion knowledge sometimes comes from where we dont expect, its on us to dig search, balance, take care of evoluting our reason and counscence toughts and acts, no need political piramidal system for us humans to live in peace..only ISlam education tolerance and free minds

                          The (you)parts is not to you directly KAiokenred, it could be me, just a statment hehehe

                          SAlaam

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Offline
                            D Offline
                            DoubleU
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            I think I like this society. Frankly modern hadither societies suck and partially because they don't allow any dissenting thought to take place. Humans were given brains for an important reason and giving clergy too much power does take away from that.

                            You like which society?
                            You blame "hadither society" or the clegy having too much power.

                            But have you ever realised, the problem was never religion, but the centralisation of religion. No actually, it was not even the centralisation of religion, but the centralisation of power. That is the STATE was and is the problem for all things.

                            By saying "you like this society" in the beginning, I assume you are advocating socialism here, as almost every society in the world today has elements of socialism rooted within them. It is the state that does not allow dissent.

                            Like you said, humans were given brains for a reason. How shameful our brains are, for even in the 21st century, we still believe that the state is a moral good.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Bigmo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              This one of my first posts so sorry if I am doing something wrong lol!!! &

                              All children between the ages of 7 and 11 (unless their parents' object) must have lessons on the Qur'an (Alone) and its interpretation so that the progressive, ijtihadi spirit of Islam can be revived. Also, discussions must take place on topics ranging from Code 19 to the messengership to the nature of God and even to whether the Qur'an really is divinely created (and, on that line, whether there even is a God). If a pupil wishes he can take the subject further onto secondary school, sixth form, etc. However, no religious courts or clergy may exist. Instead, if any person extensively learned in the Qur'an whishes to hold any form of power he must win it like any other person running for a position in the National Council and there will be NO special offices for religious leaders, scholars, etc. This would allow the most popular interpretations to suceed entirely democratically and no clergy will be able to establish itself. However, no interpretations of Qur'anic law which would infringe upon the rights of anybody else to practice their interpretation must be allowed to succeed (the Supreme Court must vote on every religiously based law passed in the National Court and can overturn it with a 5/6ths majority). All laws, religious or non-religious, must be passed as if they were secular laws (minimal to no mention of God, Scripture, etc) so that they must not be implemented "because God says so" but for the benefit of the citizens.

                              Please feel free to discuss your opinions on this.

                              Peace

                              Thats imposing things on people. You can not impose Quranic lessons. Plus a 7 years old can not understand the Quran. This sounds like Sunni talk and how 7 years old must be told to pray. A Quranic state is a free state.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Users